Anyone out there have experience with SuSE over RedHat? RHEL is obviously the generalized Enterprise version used across most commercial hosting companies, but I'm interested in hearing about some SuSE experiences people have had.
It looks like SoftLayer offers SuSE and a couple VPS hosting companies do the same. I'm wondering how many large-scale sites are run on this operating system.
I am having trouble finding any providers that provide Opensuse on their configs. So far, the only one seems to be 1&1 and I certainly do not want to be going near them anytime soon.
Does anyone know of a reputable company that can provide Opensuse based servers?
I have been trying to compare Red Hat to SUSE Linux, and can't really come to a definitive solution. I can't seem to find anyone that uses SUSE (Well, hardly anyway), but I found out that they have over double to market share that Red Hat has so somebody is definitely using them. I also noticed that SUSE is cheaper too.
Based on your experiences, what are some of the pros / cons both ways? Who offers better product training (I wan't to get certified directly)? Who has better product support? Is AppArmor better than SELinux?
By the way, I am only looking for commercial linux distributions. Specifically companies that offer product training.
I have a server which runs suse linux on it. Postfix is already installed on it.
But, the problem is i am not able to send mail using root. I mean using mail -v command.
I could see the following in mail logs. I know 2 files main.cf and master.cf are there.
Not, sure what to change and how.
Nov 21 21:17:56 CSIDB3 postfix/smtp[14577]: connect to mx3.domain.com [x.x.x.x]: Connection timed out (port 25)
Nov 21 21:17:56 CSIDB3 postfix/smtp[14577]: 61715223EE: to=<sabarish@domain.com>, relay=none, delay=30, status=deferred (connect to mx3.domain.com[x.x.x.x]: Connection timed out)
The same thing happens will Gmail also. I think outgoing mail is not working at all.
Nov 21 20:27:41 CSIDB3 postfix/smtp[13907]: connect to gsmtp183.google.com[64.233.183.27]: Connection timed out (port 25)
Nov 21 20:27:41 CSIDB3 postfix/smtp[13907]: 5A177223E1: to=<sabarish@gmail.com>, relay=none, delay=189739, status=deferred (connect to gsmtp183.google.com[64.233.183.27]: Connection timed out)
I'm working with a local startup and we are looking into potential backup solutions. We have roughly 9 servers all running some variation of susE linux (some straight susE and some X Server which runs off susE).
We are needing a backup solution that will allow us to securely get data off the servers on a regular interval. We are unable to move the data off site as we are running on a single T1 line with moderate utilization, certainly not enough BW to go off site.
OS is OpenSuse 13.1.Yast shows the installed version of Apache2 as 2.4.6-6.23.1..I created my own CA, and used that to create a server certificate. The CA crtificate (in PEM format), and the server key and certificate have been placed in the appropriate directories in /etc/apache2 (the key in ssl.key and the certificates in ssl.crt).
When I check the status, after restarting apache, I see an error claiming that socache_shmcb_module is not installed and that it is ignored. This is, of course wrong, as I included that module in /etc/sysconfig/apache2, and the appropriate LoadModule statement in the Loadmodule.conf file (with the proper full path - /usr/lib64/apache2). This error is the only error I see on the server.
Will you use RHEL 4 or 5? Is there any great differences between them?
I want to use the newer version, but helix server [url] requires RHEL 4 to run, so I am just thinking whether I should use RHEL 4 or 5.
When will RHEL 5 final be released? (And Centos 5 as well)
Wasn't it supposed to be released in December?
Going to order a new server fairly soon, and I'm facing the tough question if I should go with 64-bit or stay with the "classic" 32 bits. My operating system of choice is Red Hat Enterprise 4.
From the research I've done, RHEL 4 (64 bits) should come with dual libraries that would allow running 32 bit and 64 bit applications under the same 64 bit operating system. Sounds great, and if it comes with an overall performance boost I am all for it.
But I've also heard that that's only the theory - in reality, I could end up banging my head against the screen for uncounted hours because compatibility still isn't as good as it's supposed to be. I don't plan to run Plesk or Cpanel, but I still don't want to get into hot water with other applications I've been using on my current 32-bit server.
All in all it's intimidated me quite a bit, so I'd probably go with 32 bits this time around, just to be on the safe side. Then again, I'm still having an eye on the possible performance boost, so dunno. Does anyone have an idea what's the latest on this? 64 bit already safe for the non-experimental-minded, or bleeding edge and stay away from?
direction of any companies who offer dedicated servers with SuSe -
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhich type of suse you recommend Professional or Enterprise Edition?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow to setup nameservers in SUSE Linux when my server is behind router?
I'd need to setup two nameservers so I could register domains.
NAT IP is the ip shown at whatismyip.com? or is it ip my router gives out eg 192.168.4.103?
I will be dropping my shared-hosting plan and ordering a small VPS as soon as I can decide on which operating sytem to use. It seems that most companies offer the following choices: Suse, Debian, Fedora and CentOS.
I freely admit that I am a full-fledged n00b when it comes to linux and will be learning as I go, the problem is I just don't know where to start because I'm not familiar with any of them. I have at least heard of Suse, Debian and Fedora before, but didn't even know this CentOS existed until yesterday... and yet, it seems to be one of the more popular choices.
So I was wondering if some of you seasoned VPS veterans here could recommend an OS, tell me what the differences are, or otherwise share any experience you might have with any of them.
how can I install a VNC *(graphical remote control) on RHEL 5.0?
would someone give me a detail instruction and links?
I olled online and tried to use yum and up2date and they said the package could not be found
I did rpm-q gd and gd is installed but i need it for php-gd.
I looked on the web and i do not see a version for RHEL.
I've got SUSE 10 loaded and installed at home.
My ISP service is highspeed from Comcast (speed right now not an issue), I would like to setup a domain name on the box to play around with - nothing serious yet.
I have several domain names purchased (Wildwest & Enom) and would like to use one of those on this box, or even more domains at a later day.
Does anyone knows how on Linux (SuSE) remove files ending with (lets say) *.1.0.1
when I try rm *.a.1
it outputs - to many arguments if rm test.* - everything is fine.
My server is not sending mail for about a week, and i dont know what is the problem and how to fix this.
also, in PLesk, it still states that Mail is on and active.
Could anybody point me the direction how to fix that?
i am having a server runnung RHEL 4
I just installed RHEL on our in house web server. This server is going to host our secure public server.
I was wondering if installing a control panel (cPanel) would be a good idea? I would like something automated to setup php, mysql, apache etc.
How can I restart a SUSE server multiple times?
how to use Cron to restart the server every 5 minutes and then log the number of times this was done and output it to a file?
I am trying to transfer a domain from the server for Plesk 11.5 to 12 system is SUSE 13.1. After restoring the manager from within Backup getting errors:
Warning:
python is not supported. It will be disabled for the following objects: xxxx.xx
Warning: domain "xxxx.xx"
Failed deployment of mail user bbbbb@xxxx.xx
Warning:
Execution of /usr/local/psa/admin/plib/api-cli/mail.php --create bbbbb@xxxx.xx -passwd '' -passwd_type sym -mailbox true -mbox_quota -1 -aliases add:bbbbb -forwarding false -ignore-nonexistent-options failed with return code 1.
[code]....
With Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 (RHEL 4), are updated packages made available, or are only security patches backported? Specifically I'm interested in vsftpd. Version 2.0.1 is included in the RHEL installation on a server I'm working on, but there is a bug fix in v2.0.4 that I'd like to get access to.
Is there an easy way for me to browse / search what packages are available for RHEL 4, preferably via website?
My data center happen to install RHEL 4 without a swap partition
Is there anyway to fix it without an OS reload?
Linux OS:
[root@server2 log]# uname -a
Linux 2.6.9-55.0.9.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Sep 25 02:17:24 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[root@server2 log]#
Kernel Version(uname -r)
[root@server2 log]# uname -r
2.6.9-55.0.9.ELsmp
[root@server2 log]#
Hardware Information
Clovertown with quad core , dual thing.
4 gb ram.
Control Panel(if any)
Cpanel
[root@server2 sbin]# df -l
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda5 75505212 37384684 34285012 53% /
/dev/sda1 101086 17347 78520 19% /boot
none 2074560 0 2074560 0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda3 25197252 80800 23836476 1% /tmp
/dev/sda2 40313996 7249168 31016944 19% /var
/tmp 25197252 80800 23836476 1% /var/tmp
[root@server2 sbin]#
[root@server2 sbin]# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 146.8 GB, 146815733760 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 17849 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 14 5112 40957717+ 83 Linux
/dev/sda3 5113 8299 25599577+ 83 Linux
/dev/sda4 8300 17849 76710375 5 Extended
/dev/sda5 8300 17849 76710343+ 83 Linux
[root@server2 sbin]#
I have a problem with time at one RHEL 4 server, it is a plain box, and from time to time the time (hours) seems to be auto modified, no one is touching the box and then from once it got modified to a few hours less than what we specified, to change time and date we always use:
Code:
date --set "2007-10-24 13:35"
hwclock --set --date="2007-10-24 13:35"
The only thing that I noted is that ntpd daemon was running, while in the rest of our plain box it is not running, maybe this is the reason the system is auto chaning the time?
Is there a Windows GUI software for remote Admining servers that run on Red Hat Linux?
FYI: Currently I use Putty for remotely managing our servers.
So if you can recommend a GUI like Windows desktop software for remotely Admining servers running Red Hat Enterprise, I would very much appreciate that.
FYI: we have like 10 dedicated severs, so a desktop GUI that would allow one to monitor/manage multiple servers would be best. But if the GUI that you think is best can only remotely connect/manage one server at a time, requiring disconnecting to connect to the other server to Admin it, that is fine.
Also, I would love to hear what you think is the best book, best tutorial and reference guide for remotely Admining servers running RHEL? I am not looking for one of those books that are 1000 pages, but something that is a few 100 pages and can be read in 1 month assuming a few hours per day of reading.
For the past two weeks, our Hypertown RedHat RHEL 5.2 server has been going down everyday because of a wierd Kernel Panic problem.
Attached you can see what was displayed on the console at the time of the panic. This is what SoftLayer tech. support team was able to obtain from the console.
We are not using Samba or NFS-based applications.
Here is the server's info:
[kaware3@rannatweb ~]$ uname -a
Linux rannatweb.com 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5PAE #1 SMP Fri Jun 20 02:51:01 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[kaware3@rannatweb ~]$ free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 16632176 3244660 13387516 0 234480 1934632
-/+ buffers/cache: 1075548 15556628
Swap: 2096472 0 2096472
[kaware3@rannatweb ~]$ more /etc/fstab
LABEL=/1 / ext3 defaults 1 1
LABEL=/var1 /var ext3 defaults 1 2
LABEL=/boot1 /boot ext3 defaults 1 2
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
proc /proc proc defaults 0 0
LABEL=SWAP-sda3 swap swap pri=0,defaults 0 0
/dev/sdb1 /disk1 ext3 defaults 0 0
/dev/sdc1 /disk2 ext3 defaults 0 0
/dev/sdd1 /disk3 ext3 defaults 0 0
[kaware3@rannatweb ~]$ iostat
Linux 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5PAE (rannatweb.com) 07/13/2008
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
3.78 0.00 4.41 9.02 0.00 82.79
Device: tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn
sda 90.93 1784.24 1401.45 2073549 1628690
sdb 156.49 1567.09 179.30 1821188 208368
sdc 47.39 443.82 565.21 515787 656864
sdd 0.06 0.88 0.01 1019 8
I seen where a lot of server management companies are charging big bucks for this, so this might save you some time and money.
First
Code:
nano -w /etc/yum.repos.d/dag.repo
Insert
Code:
[dag]
name=Dag RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise Linux
baseurl=http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el$releasever/en/$basearch/dag
gpgcheck=1
enabled=1
Then yum update and search for ffmpeg and install all ffmpeg packages including devel.
Seems there is some lib problems along the way so in /etc/ld.so.conf
add
/usr/local/lib
then
ldconfig -v
To install the php extension follow the simple directions on [url]
Then you should be all set!
Tried and tested on 2 different centos server, works fine.
I have 2.4.x version installed on RHEL and I need to install same version on Solaris 10. How can I find out what packages/modules were compiled for RHEL so that I can download same for Solaris and compile them.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe noticed that for now only Plesk 12 supports RHEL / CentOS 7. Is support for EL 7 planned for Plesk 11.5?
View 13 Replies View RelatedGazzin.com offers so many OSs on their VPS deals - CentOS, Debian, Fedora Core 3, Fedora Core 4, Gentoo, Opensuse, Suse, Unbuntu. Which one would you advise me to start from?
View 4 Replies View RelatedAs cPanel is an integral part of server hosting and has the ability of compiling Apache 1.3.x with PHP4 (cgi) and PHP5 (dso) on your server OS.
Does anyone know or have baselines/benchmarks for which performs better generally for hosting: 32bit or 64bit RedHat 5 when cPanel 11 has compiled for the Apache and php mentioned above on either of these OS editions? (assume latest versions of apache/php4/5)
I was wondering if 32bit performed better or 64bit on a quad core Xeon. Don't forget PHP is compiled for prefork and not multi-threading for Apache 1.3.41 (which are considered legacy 32bit forked apps compiled against 64bit OS).
Or rephrased, could i be hampering performance by running it on a 64bit OS on a Xeon (X3210) or improving performance? I'd assume 64bit would offer better all round processing power, or is this a misconception.
I recently decided to get a server on RedHat Enterprise 5 X86_64 (64bit), when i wondered if 32bit version would have provided better performance and been the better options for compatibility.