I have 2.4.x version installed on RHEL and I need to install same version on Solaris 10. How can I find out what packages/modules were compiled for RHEL so that I can download same for Solaris and compile them.
We are facing an issue i.e "Can't verify server identity",When we hit the platform 'teampark.sogeti.com' from android mobile application.Whenever we hit teampark.sogeti.com from Mobile Application ( IBM connections android App), our initial request will hit our Reverse Proxy and Validates the user certificate and forward it to the next level.We are using Apache 2.2.9 as our Reverse Proxy.
everthing generally seems fines but I have a strange thing going on with an images folder that a php script puts users images in (so my users can upload files). this folder was previously 777 and now phpexec has been installed the images are not showing up. I get a "You don't have permission to access" message on the image files. I tried chmod'ing the images folder to 766 and 755 and the same thing happens. This has nothing to do with the php script as I can't even access the image files by typing in the URL in a browser.
I am really not familiar with MPM prefork. Should apache use MPM prefork or is there a better alternative? If yes, what would that be and how to use that alternative?
I have a RHEL 5 server, that host one site with a common PHP 5.x -MySQL 5.x app, it also uses .htaccess to rewrite rules. I'm trying to optimize apache to the max, and though about removing some unneccesary modules. The actual modules loaded are:
I'm trying to install the Win32 dist from apachelounge 2.4.9 and I'm having difficulties getting the modules loaded. Several modules have different names or aren't there at all. mod_imap.so
I have complied Apache from the source with so enabled and compiled PHP with Apache apxs. What if I do, if I want to add/Load another modules as a dynamic modules without recompiling apache. Suppose if I want to enable rewrite or any other module.I am pasting the command which I used to compile apahce.
Apache == ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-module=so make make install
PHP == ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/php --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs make make install
Both are running fine on my server,how to enable mod rewrite module as shared module fro example ??Â
what modules I should use in my httpd.conf file. Here's the modules that I currently have enabled / disabled. The site is running specifically off PHP. There is no need for CGI, ASP, or any other languages (to my knowledge). The negotiation module is enabled,. It does not need to be to my knowledge.
However, when I disabled it Apache would not restart. Could someone give some details as to which directives need to be disabled for negotiation to be disabled. Also, does anyone know if negotiation is essential. It is not to my knowledge. Suggestions and comments are much appreciated. Thank you in advance for your hard work and experience being as it's not costing me anything. I will do my best to return the favor.
I can't get SELinux to let httpd load the IonCube module for PHP. I've given the CentOS 5 forum a try (here: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/...15403&forum=42), talked with WHMCS's support (the app I'm using that needs it), and even opened a ticket with IonCube. Unfortunately nobody seems to know how to tell SELinux to let httpd "exec" modules.
I'm running CentOS 5, and the error I'm getting in /var/log/messages is:
I can disable SELinux and it works fine (setenforce 0), but that's not the solution I'm looking for. Can someone please tell me how to do this the *right* way?
We have been using Apache 2.2.x with reverse proxy modules for our clients to access their OWA servers for over a year. I want to get us to Apache 2.4.x so I setup a test box with latest 2.4 on it. I fixed the config file issues since 2.4 has changes in it. OWA proxy is working on my test server with Apache 2.4. But with 2.4 I do have an issue I cannot figure out. Note that this does NOT occur with Apache 2.2. I get the following errors when using ActiveSync through reverse proxy:
[Thu Oct 17 12:19:11.670665 2013] [proxy_http:error] [pid 748:tid 8440] (OS 10060)A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond. : [client x.x.x.x:20311] AH01102: error reading status line from remote server mail.nameredacted.net:443 [Thu Oct 17 12:19:11.670665 2013] [proxy:error] [pid 748:tid 8440] [client x.x.x.x:20311] AH00898: Error reading from remote server returned by /Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync
So somehow with Apache 2.4 there is some sort of timeout that was not there with 2.2.
I purchased two SSL certificates from HostGator a few months ago for each of my sites. I realized that when I go to my website and click the "lock icon" at the bottom right of the screen, my personal identity is revealed. In Internet Explorer, I click the "Details" Tab then go down to Subject field. It has my Street, City, State, and Zip Code. Of course, I don't want my personal mailing address listed there and I never authorize Hostgator to put this information on my SSL Certificate.
I've speaken to a few HostGator customer service reps and they all say different things. I spent 40 minutes on the phone with an incompetent employee who ended up opening a support ticket with improper grammar and incorrect things I told him on the phone. I've gotten really frustrated. One said they cannot remove that information on my SSL certificate. Then another said they can reissue the SSL certificates without revealing my mailing address for $25. I never even wanted them to put this information on there in the first place and now they want to charge me. Now another one says that what is displayed on your WHOIS information on your domain will be displayed on the SSL certificate. And since my registration is private through godaddy, that I would have to make it public whois then change it back to private so Comodo can verify my identity. I'm lost in translation here with everything they are saying at HostGator. My question is, what do I tell Hostgator? What are my rights? Why are they charging me for a simple task? It's to the point where I want to somehow get some kind of information about my SSL certificate so I can call Comodo directly to resolve this issue rather than going through their reseller, HostGator.
It's gotten to a point where I want to just call up Comodo and buy SSL through them directly so that it would not reveal my personal mailing address on my SSL certificate. To hell with Hostgator, unless you guys can provide some good things to tell them on the phone.
i have seen many posts here regarding godshost.com hosting company, as i have noticed that the owner of that company is hosting 80% of the identity theft networks for illegal credit cards trading.. i have reported this issue to admin@godshost.com and support@godshost.com / abuse@godshost.com a weeks ago without receving 1 reply from them about it,
all of the ircds server that keeping the illegal network up is from godshost.com 86.106.137.* - 89.40.71.*, Even this company used to supply alot of other illegal networks of ircds as i believe the reason behinde that is to force the network owners to pay more or even the double of the server cost so this how it make more profit!
i'v sent to sharktech.net - rackvibe.com / an emails since a week about an illegal hosting on thier ircd services, but can i know why the identity theft irc servers is still running?
i have sent to both abuse emails to: abuse@rackvibe.com abuse@sharktech.net,
from a differnt email addresses with a hope to see a responce, but they never did.
i wounder how the both companies feel when people credit cards and thier bank accounts are being sold and traded under thier service.
i'v sent to sharktech.net - rackvibe.com / an emails since a week about an illegal hosting on thier ircd services, but can i know why the identity theft irc servers is still running?
i have sent to both abuse emails to: abuse@rackvibe.com abuse@sharktech.net,
from a differnt email addresses with a hope to see a responce, but they never did.
i wounder how the both companies feel when people credit cards and thier bank accounts are being sold and traded under thier service.
Programs compiled with the Intel C++ compiler run 20-30% (up to 450% in some rare cases) faster than their GCC counterparts.
I have successfully compiled MySQL 5, PHP 5, eAccelerator and nginx with ICC 10.1.015. I was wondering, if anyone has compiled the linux kernel with icc? There are some linux vendors who supply icc compiled kernels, and there are some docs on intels site about compiling the kernel with icc... so it's doable.
But I want to know if anyone has done it on a VPS? What was your experience? Did the system run faster than before? Or did you face some weird situations?
It is possible to make code execution on the server with applications such as FastCGI or Zend Optimizer, but the code isn't compiled for good, it's more of a bytecode that is created on the fly, correct?
I'd like to know if it's possible to compile code (PHP, Python, Ruby, etc...) so that when you request a page, the compiled code is executed the same way as compiled C++ code with cgi-bin.
I'm asking because it would be quite efficient in case of high-traffic web sites instead of running intermediary code (bytecode).
Is it possible? What do you think is the more efficient, less resource-intensive and fastest way to execute dynamic-content pages?
I have experimented a strange behaviour on plesk linux 12.0.18 Update #33
Basically: 1. I have recompiled Apache with more file descriptors 2. Several days later watchdog did not work properly. Support requested me to remove and install wd 3. I ran the autoinstaller. All my compiled version where replaced.
Watchdog is ok now, but I have to recompile Apache.
I have been searching on forum and kb but could not find any reoccurance.
Question : Is there a way to avoid this ?
Compilation performed based on article [URL]
after having executed /usr/local/psa/admin/bin/autoinstaller --debug
[root@ns7 scripts]# rpm -qa --last | grep "Sat 21 Feb 2015" psa-watchdog-12.0.18-cos6.build1200140707.14.x86_64 Sat 21 Feb 2015 01:12:58 PM CET php-tidy-5.3.3-40.el6_6.x86_64 Sat 21 Feb 2015 01:10:07 PM CET
Going to order a new server fairly soon, and I'm facing the tough question if I should go with 64-bit or stay with the "classic" 32 bits. My operating system of choice is Red Hat Enterprise 4.
From the research I've done, RHEL 4 (64 bits) should come with dual libraries that would allow running 32 bit and 64 bit applications under the same 64 bit operating system. Sounds great, and if it comes with an overall performance boost I am all for it.
But I've also heard that that's only the theory - in reality, I could end up banging my head against the screen for uncounted hours because compatibility still isn't as good as it's supposed to be. I don't plan to run Plesk or Cpanel, but I still don't want to get into hot water with other applications I've been using on my current 32-bit server.
All in all it's intimidated me quite a bit, so I'd probably go with 32 bits this time around, just to be on the safe side. Then again, I'm still having an eye on the possible performance boost, so dunno. Does anyone have an idea what's the latest on this? 64 bit already safe for the non-experimental-minded, or bleeding edge and stay away from?
Anyone out there have experience with SuSE over RedHat? RHEL is obviously the generalized Enterprise version used across most commercial hosting companies, but I'm interested in hearing about some SuSE experiences people have had.
It looks like SoftLayer offers SuSE and a couple VPS hosting companies do the same. I'm wondering how many large-scale sites are run on this operating system.