With Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 (RHEL 4), are updated packages made available, or are only security patches backported? Specifically I'm interested in vsftpd. Version 2.0.1 is included in the RHEL installation on a server I'm working on, but there is a bug fix in v2.0.4 that I'd like to get access to.
Is there an easy way for me to browse / search what packages are available for RHEL 4, preferably via website?
I am using CPanel. I just made customized features list and want to update all accounts of my reseller with that feature list. But problem is if I update package, this will update account space/bw, I am some account edit direct for space and bw etc. but thats account have same package name.
Is there any option available that update features list without changing current space + BW.
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package cadaver.i386 0:0.22.5-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package mtr.i386 2:0.72-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package rsync.i386 0:3.0.2-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package nmap.i386 2:4.20-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package lftp.i386 0:3.7.1-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package syslinux.i386 0:3.63-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package dkms.noarch 0:2.0.19-2.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package subversion.i386 0:1.4.6-0.1.el5.rf set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: perl(Crypt:asswdMD5) for package: syslinux --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Crypt:asswdMD5) is needed by package syslinux
Which one would you consider using the most? Currently I use vsftpd and while it's fast and light, it's a real pain in the butt to add new users I've found (adding shell users except it doesn't always work). I was reading up on how to add users on pure ftp and they had something called virtual users which looked really nice...
3. I setup vsftpd with chroot to each virtual host.
This works very nice as long as each client has only one ftp account. But if a client(website1) wants to have multiple ftp accounts( ex. john, john100, john200), they would mess up the file ownership when they upload and change files. Since suPHP executes PHP scripts with the permissions of their owners (suPHP_UserGroup John group1, suPHP would complain their setid is mismatched because the John100 is not the suPHP_USERGROUP owner(John). I have tried Virtual Hosting with Vsftpd and Mysql, that didn't work because all the virutal users would be acting as one user (guest_username=virtualftp) when they upload and change files. I am wondering if there is ways to allow multiple ftp accounts for each Virutal host working together with suPHP. Or It is possible for ftp user to change ownership once they log in.
I have been pulling my hair out all day trying to fix this issue, which should be simple in theory.
Basically in summary, vsftpd is running on the server, I can't connect to FTP from my own computer.
I have tried many things, but right now the way it stands is my vsftpd.conf file has listen=YES. I did a netstat -pan, with a return of: tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:21 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 29984/vsftpd
I can telnet/FTP into port 21 locally, so vsftpd is indeed running properly, but I cannot connect from the outside at all. I have also commented out everything in /etc/hosts.allow.
At this point, I am out of ideas. And to top it all off, I'm on a tight deadline. Usually works out there way doesn't it?
working with Ubuntu (and unix/linux) in general. I have, however, managed to install vsftpd and configure it in what I believe is a correct manner.
However, upon attempting to upload a file, I get a "could not create file" error which seems to imply that I don't have permission. The account that I'm logged in under is an administrator account.
I been using plesk, and cpanel so this is the first time I have Webmin for my CentOS.
After some googling and reading, i able to install apache, mysqld and vsftpd (for some reason, my host (hivelocity) didnt install these. So this is my setup.
a.com: in godaddy, i add nameserver host as ns1.a.com and ns2.a.com and change the dns to point to that
b.com: in godday, point dns to ns1.a.com and ns2.a.com BIND DNS Server
========================
I create two master zone for a.com and b.com a.com
Code:
$ttl 38400 a.com. IN SOA server.a.com. abc.yahoo.com. ( 1226206691 10800 3600 604800 38400 ) a.com. IN A 1.2.3.4 server.a.com. IN A 1.2.3.4 a.com. IN NS server.a.com. mail.a.com. IN A 1.2.3.4 ftp.a.com. IN CNAME a.com. www.a.com. IN CNAME a.com. a.com. IN MX 10 mail.a.com. b.com Code: $ttl 38400 b.com. IN SOA server.a.com. abc.yahoo.com. ( 1226206691 10800 3600 604800 38400 ) b.com. IN A 1.2.3.4 server.a.com. IN A 1.2.3.4 b.com. IN NS server.a.com. mail.b.com. IN A 1.2.3.4 ftp.b.com. IN CNAME b.com. www.b.com. IN CNAME b.com. b.com. IN MX 10 mail.b.com.
APACHE
========================
I created 2 virtual servers for a.com and b.com /home/sites/a.com/html /home/sites/b.com/html
I create an index.php in a.com/html with content: "a.com YEAH"
I create an index.php in b.com/html with content: "b.com YEAH"
After wait for dns to propogated,
when i try to go to a.com, content "a.com YEAH" shows up.
But when goto b.com, content "a.com YEAH" shows up? Why?
Also, when goto ns1.a.com, content "a.com YEAH" is there.
I also has problem with vsftpd but let fix that later.
I have a RHEL 4 plain server, and im using vsftpd server, i can not find an option to specify the max size for uploading files... does anybody know something about this?
Going to order a new server fairly soon, and I'm facing the tough question if I should go with 64-bit or stay with the "classic" 32 bits. My operating system of choice is Red Hat Enterprise 4.
From the research I've done, RHEL 4 (64 bits) should come with dual libraries that would allow running 32 bit and 64 bit applications under the same 64 bit operating system. Sounds great, and if it comes with an overall performance boost I am all for it.
But I've also heard that that's only the theory - in reality, I could end up banging my head against the screen for uncounted hours because compatibility still isn't as good as it's supposed to be. I don't plan to run Plesk or Cpanel, but I still don't want to get into hot water with other applications I've been using on my current 32-bit server.
All in all it's intimidated me quite a bit, so I'd probably go with 32 bits this time around, just to be on the safe side. Then again, I'm still having an eye on the possible performance boost, so dunno. Does anyone have an idea what's the latest on this? 64 bit already safe for the non-experimental-minded, or bleeding edge and stay away from?
Anyone out there have experience with SuSE over RedHat? RHEL is obviously the generalized Enterprise version used across most commercial hosting companies, but I'm interested in hearing about some SuSE experiences people have had.
It looks like SoftLayer offers SuSE and a couple VPS hosting companies do the same. I'm wondering how many large-scale sites are run on this operating system.
I have a problem with time at one RHEL 4 server, it is a plain box, and from time to time the time (hours) seems to be auto modified, no one is touching the box and then from once it got modified to a few hours less than what we specified, to change time and date we always use:
Code: date --set "2007-10-24 13:35" hwclock --set --date="2007-10-24 13:35"
The only thing that I noted is that ntpd daemon was running, while in the rest of our plain box it is not running, maybe this is the reason the system is auto chaning the time?
Is there a Windows GUI software for remote Admining servers that run on Red Hat Linux?
FYI: Currently I use Putty for remotely managing our servers.
So if you can recommend a GUI like Windows desktop software for remotely Admining servers running Red Hat Enterprise, I would very much appreciate that.
FYI: we have like 10 dedicated severs, so a desktop GUI that would allow one to monitor/manage multiple servers would be best. But if the GUI that you think is best can only remotely connect/manage one server at a time, requiring disconnecting to connect to the other server to Admin it, that is fine.
Also, I would love to hear what you think is the best book, best tutorial and reference guide for remotely Admining servers running RHEL? I am not looking for one of those books that are 1000 pages, but something that is a few 100 pages and can be read in 1 month assuming a few hours per day of reading.
For the past two weeks, our Hypertown RedHat RHEL 5.2 server has been going down everyday because of a wierd Kernel Panic problem.
Attached you can see what was displayed on the console at the time of the panic. This is what SoftLayer tech. support team was able to obtain from the console.
I seen where a lot of server management companies are charging big bucks for this, so this might save you some time and money. First
Code: nano -w /etc/yum.repos.d/dag.repo Insert
Code: [dag] name=Dag RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise Linux baseurl=http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el$releasever/en/$basearch/dag gpgcheck=1 enabled=1 Then yum update and search for ffmpeg and install all ffmpeg packages including devel. Seems there is some lib problems along the way so in /etc/ld.so.conf add /usr/local/lib then ldconfig -v To install the php extension follow the simple directions on [url] Then you should be all set!
Tried and tested on 2 different centos server, works fine.
I have 2.4.x version installed on RHEL and I need to install same version on Solaris 10. How can I find out what packages/modules were compiled for RHEL so that I can download same for Solaris and compile them.
As cPanel is an integral part of server hosting and has the ability of compiling Apache 1.3.x with PHP4 (cgi) and PHP5 (dso) on your server OS.
Does anyone know or have baselines/benchmarks for which performs better generally for hosting: 32bit or 64bit RedHat 5 when cPanel 11 has compiled for the Apache and php mentioned above on either of these OS editions? (assume latest versions of apache/php4/5)
I was wondering if 32bit performed better or 64bit on a quad core Xeon. Don't forget PHP is compiled for prefork and not multi-threading for Apache 1.3.41 (which are considered legacy 32bit forked apps compiled against 64bit OS).
Or rephrased, could i be hampering performance by running it on a 64bit OS on a Xeon (X3210) or improving performance? I'd assume 64bit would offer better all round processing power, or is this a misconception.
I recently decided to get a server on RedHat Enterprise 5 X86_64 (64bit), when i wondered if 32bit version would have provided better performance and been the better options for compatibility.
I just got a Dell 1600SC dual xeon 2.8 from the Planet with a Dell DRAC3 remote access card. In my RHEL3 system this hardware combination works great, but in the new RedHat Enterprise Linux 5 system the DRAC accepts no keyboard input after RHEL5 loads, thus making it impossible to login to the OS through the drac remote console redirect. Tech support suggested it was because the RedHat Enterprise 5 and CentOS5 kernel does not load the PS/2 keyboard driver which is required for the Drac3 to accept keyboard input. (a drac4 works, but that's not an option for this server I would guess.)
At tech support's suggestion, I added atkbd.set=2 to the /boot/grub/grub.conf file rebooting had no change - still text input to enter the bios, but no text input to login to the OS. I also added serial --unit=0 --speed=9600 -word=8 --parity=no --stop=1 terminal --timeout=2 serial console which I saw in /etc/grub.conf (which is not linked to /boot/grub/grub.conf but instead a separate file) but still no luck - no keyboard input accepted through the drac3 remote console to login to the os through the drac console redirect.
Has anyone solved this hardware/software combination? Or is RHEL5 simply not going to be backwards compatible with the Dell DRAC3 hardware?
Any ideas, suggestions, or solutions would be greatly appreciated as I've been working on getting a solution for this for a week now and no closer at this point.
I would really like to have the DRAC as a backup connection with my server incase any firewall or software update issue ever prevents me from connecting via ssh. I hate to have roll back to an older OS though to get it. I'm stuck.