I wanna know if upload media to server for streaming will slow your site down?
Reason is that I have a few audio books on my server for my members to listen to, and I have a feeling that my site is using more and more resources and its getting slower and slower each day.
I'm the owner of pwn-tube.com and am looking for a dedicated server. It needs to have at least a 250gb hard drive, preferably two in raid. The processor needs to be good enough to convert the files while still keeping a site up and going. For RAM I'm guessing 2-4GB. But most importantly it needs to have unmetered bandwidth, and a 100mbps port, with room to upgrade.
I am expecting to host a sequel to a video exclusively, and the first video had 100,000 views. I'm also going to partner up with a game publisher with 16 million gamers.
Any one know why media streaming server dont working?
I installed the media streaming server, 1 month ago and it was working well. However, from Thursday to now it dont working. I have checked and the wmv files only run 3seconds is broke.
please tell me what the reasaon make my server doesnt working?
OS: Windows 2003 enterprise R2
Streaming Protocaol : MMS
I know this type of question pops up every once in awhile here, but we are currently using MediaMax. Upon comparison, MediaMax (formerly Streamload) was the best affordable solution we could find. Lately however, it's been very buggy, and supports takes forever (actually never) responds. Can't seem to find a support phone number for them either.
So I was wondering what other alternatives anyone here is aware of? We have 500+GB worth of AV materials.
I need to build a video server that supports remote inbound live streams (multiple sources) and multiple outbound streams. I'm interested in hearing feedback or suggestions on Real Media Server, Microsoft Media Server, or other alternatives. Please share your thoughts on any of these. I would prefer Linux hosting and would prefer Windows Media formats. I would love to hear what some of you have had successes with.
View 4 Replies View RelatedUvault.com does flash streaming media, features unlimited connections, and redundant servers.
Has been around for a while and is a Macromedia Alliance Partner but I can’t find any feedback on them anywhere.
Anyone have any information?
I have a VPS server running on Windows 2003, and would like to stream live videos to about 50-80 people. I was wondering is there a way to have a FLASH based stream embed into my website, without paying for a software like Flash Media Server?
View 12 Replies View RelatedI'm planning to buy a share hosting support media streaming, encoding and decode the video file like youtube, likeclub.com. or others
View 3 Replies View RelatedIm working at time with ffserver ... i test ffmpeg with flash streaming and it works perfectly but i want to do anoter step.
Im trying to do a streaming of a file to watch that movie in Windows Media Player. The problem is that i have a lot of errors of "buffer underflow" when i stream the video.
I Post My Config:
Port 8090
BindAddress 0.0.0.0
MaxClients 1000
MaxBandwidth 10000
NoDaemon
<Feed feed1.ffm>
File /tmp/feed1.ffm
FileMaxSize 5M
</Feed>
<Stream test.flv>
Feed feed1.ffm
Format flv
VideoCodec flv
VideoFrameRate 15
VideoBufferSize 80000
VideoBitRate 200
VideoQMin 1
VideoQMax 5
VideoSize 352x288
PreRoll 10
</Stream>
<Stream test.asf>
Feed feed1.ffm
Format asf
VideoFrameRate 2
VideoSize 848x480
VideoBitRate 256
VideoBufferSize 40
VideoGopSize 30
AudioBitRate 96
StartSendOnKey
</Stream>
As you can see i listen in all the ip source so i can acess to the file but ... dont work ...
Many of messages of the error:
[flv @ 0xb7df29a8]rc buffer underflow
[flv @ 0xb7df29a8]rc buffer underflow
[flv @ 0xb7df29a8]rc buffer underflow
[flv @ 0xb7df29a8]rc buffer underflow
[flv @ 0xb7df29a8]rc buffer underflow
[flv @ 0xb7df29a8]rc buffer underflow
[flv @ 0xb7df29a8]rc buffer underflow
Line that i use:
ffmpeg -i /descargas/anime/Soul_Eater/RnF_Soul_Eater_42.avi http://127.0.0.1:8090/feed1.ffm
....
My OS is debian eth.
I have a media orient web site with a lot of videos (.WMV files), most of them are from PC based racing games, a few other games, plus videos of radio control models, racing cars, etc. Currently, there is about 9GB of media on my web site and traffic is about 20GB to 200GB / month (activity increase when I add videos from a newly released game). Note this is a hobby web site (not a business site, no ads, or ad related links).
My current web host provider, ipower, recently switched to a much small number of servers with many more users per server, and now they throttle download rate to about 350 kilo-bytes / second. Before the change, download rates ran over 2 mega bytes / second.
If curious as to the content, my web site is here: ...
I have a video streaming which is consuming around 3000gb of bandwidth presently its on citrex shared hosting i was thinking to move site to a dedicated box i have almost no knowledge of server setup are there some host who can help me setup these requirements and move site to dedicated box?
please note :- site is adult video sharing site ...
I am wondering Site like Megavideo How much Bandwidth they use Every Month ?
Let's say you want Open site like Megavideo OK , What is your plan for this site ?
What is the least amount to start with site like this ?
What kind of servers you will choose ?
What is your plan for Bandwidth ?
What Provider you will choose ?
I have a friend who has a film production company and he wants to run a site where video clips will be streamed and made available for download.
A developer suggested that we go in either for a VPS or a large shared hosting account, but have the video files stored on Amazon S3 and streamed/downloaded from there. According to the developer, this way, we could make the best use of available resources as Amazon S3 is cheap for storage and we don't need to spend on a dedicated server just for serving the video.
I'm hosting wmv,wma,mp3 files, streaming of video can be done with Windows hosting, but my website script is with php.
Do you suggest Windows Server 2008 hosting or redhat linux hosting?
My site is very slow. But I can not find the reason.
Here is the top
Code:
top - 22:04:07 up 22:09, 1 user, load average: 0.44, 0.43, 0.34
Tasks: 402 total, 1 running, 401 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 4.3%us, 0.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 94.8%id, 0.1%wa, 0.1%hi, 0.1%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 2074804k total, 2007836k used, 66968k free, 72720k buffers
Swap: 4192956k total, 96k used, 4192860k free, 641728k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
17133 apache 20 0 27752 9.9m 3392 S 4 0.5 0:02.25 httpd
6306 apache 20 0 27772 9.9m 3452 S 4 0.5 0:08.04 httpd
2261 mysql 20 0 251m 88m 4752 S 3 4.3 48:25.58 mysqld
17081 apache 20 0 27700 9.9m 3496 S 2 0.5 0:02.81 httpd
17105 apache 20 0 27112 9504 3428 S 2 0.5 0:02.62 httpd
11844 apache 20 0 27756 9.9m 3444 S 0 0.5 0:06.21 httpd
13676 apache 20 0 27700 9.9m 3440 S 0 0.5 0:04.74 httpd
13718 apache 20 0 27424 9856 3448 S 0 0.5 0:04.83 httpd
16690 apache 20 0 26628 8980 3408 S 0 0.4 0:01.88 httpd
When run
[root@nd10749 ~]# netstat -an |grep 80 |wc -l
2788
It was able to handle over 5000 connection without problem.
When checked the log, can not find anything suspicous.
my site is terribly slow, especially if there are several users accessing it at once.
Is there a way to to find out what exactly is slow, so I know what to tackle?
Since there is no caching at the moment, I think that is a good point to start.
The reason that there is no caching, is because Internet Explorer kept showing stale content, whatever I tried. How do you make sure that IE doesn't cache the dynamic pages?
This also means that images are not cached and pages with several images, seem to load a lot slower, sometimes not even showing all images the first time the page is loaded.
Does anybody know what I can do to improve on this?
I had an VPS in SLHost and experiencing fall downs and slow server... now I moved and I check that the VPS is fast and great, but my sites are loading too slow...
I mean the connect time is too long; the time between connect and sending first byte goes from 5 to 12 seconds! My provider can't find what's wrong and I'm a little lost in this
I have a website www.officegofor.ca. The site takes a very long time to load. I don't think it's because of the server's connection speed. What would be the best way to diagnose the problem? What could the problem be? I noticed that it get's slower and slower with time and when I restart apache it's faster (but still not fast enough).
View 1 Replies View RelatedHopefully this will be a quick and fairly simple question. I already have my site hosted with another provider and very, very happy with the service.
However, i want to add video support to my site. However the current provider i use doesnt have the functionality i need (FFMPeg, etc).
So what i am looking for is a reliable host who will store, convert/encode my files and then stream them for a decent prices. As it will be a new feature to my site im not looking at spending a fortune to start with (i know, how many times have you heard that?) but will be happy to upgrade capacity as and when.
Im not interested in fancy cPanels or bogged down features for "Web Hosting" which i will never use. I just need a host that can store, encode and stream my media (i will handle the scripting side. Ideally they would be located within Europe, but thats not 100% nessesary.
moderate single webhosting for audio/video hosting...
may be 1-3gb which moderate cost..
so what should be cost..ideal and which is relaible one...
whats about the free service like youtube...
or paid but not for music ..like rapidshare...
I rented a server from VD a month ago and hosted some of my websites. But I'm constantly noticing that my websites are loading very slow. How can I check if other users are experiencing the same problem, or if the problem lies with my Internet connection?
View 4 Replies View Relatedour VPS hosting company did an upgrade the other day and now something is wrong with our home page, it takes about 30sec to load. They keep saying its a php problem, but the scripting is fine, the engine is fine and the only thing that changed is that they did an upgrade.
They don't seem to be able to grasp the problem, and it is making my boss go nuts. A web guy a know said it definately had to be something at their end, and everyone else is at a loss.
My machine is pretty good. Here are the specs:
Intel Xeon-Woodcrest 5148-DualCore
3 gigs of ram
250GB Western Digital WD Cavia
I run a forum with a modest amount of traffic along with a content management system handling the other sections of the website. I'm pretty sure the forum isn't the problem though.
The server load for this machine is almost never above a 1. Right now as I type this the load is at 0.17, but it's unbearably slow! Taking up to 16 seconds to load a single page.
What could be causing this? I'm a server n00b. Is there a setting I should be doing to one of my servers configuration files to make it run faster?
My website gets 30-40,000 visitors a day and these problems always occur during peak hours. It would be easier to deal with this though if not for the fact that the server load is always so low. How is it possible for the site to get so slow while the server load is always so low?
we recently launched a site that has a you-tubeish clone to it, none the less the media progressive download bottlenecks the the rest of the sites functions beyond video...
I've been looking into solutions with moving the files elsewhere.
I was looking at Lime Light Networks but they were $1/gig, granted i'm sure their service is great but we're currently moving 3tb and have been going up around 500gb every month. So we really can't afford that.
I just stumbled on Amazon S3 and that looks real attractive, has anybody used their services or know of a site that does that I could test it out.
And the last stupid question, I'm trying to figure out how it works, they make it sound like all you have to do is put a CNAME in your zone, but I need the video clips to be put there as they're uploaded...
I have most of my sites on the very reliable clook.co.uk but I only only get around a Gig of bandwidth per month per site.
I'm thinking of getting an unlimited hosting package so I could upload client's music files, large images, video clips etc.. Nothing is illegal or adult. Then I could host my sites as normal at Clook and then point to all the very large files being hosted at the new place.
I think I'd get about 10Gig of traffic max a month. And as it'll just be an extended online harddrive I've no real need for databases, email, php, cPanel etc...
I've seen some unlimited offers at hostpapa.co.uk for 4.99 a month with a free domain. Is there a catch? What do you recommend?
They really have an ideal plan for me with their grid service. But I wanted any recent customer views on them, before I make my mind up about going with them for hosting.
Also if you don't think Media Temple is good can you provide someone who is?
I have been reading this forum all night now. And I'm just clueless still as to who would be good enough to go with. I don't want to make a wrong decision. I would prefer something with 10Gb or over not fussed on the cpanel or bandwidth as long as they have good support and are efficient. Also my budget is around the $20-$25 bracket.
I moved from shared host to VPS a few days back. Since the move, the site becomes slow during particular time of the day. It appeared to be an issue of cron run by their another client and after promising that they would move that client to another node (I have spent more than 25 days to follow up on this till now) they backed off from their words but informed me about an alternative. Now, they say that the cron of that client was executing many scripts and they have spaced those scripts.
I am looking for a long-term host and was wondering:
1. VPS provides a minimum guaranteed stuff so what is the use of that guarantee if one client can make the server crawl (imagine 5 minutes or more to open a site).
2. Can a host be trusted who does not honour words.
i need a webhosting for upload mp3 and video clip without copyright ..
and just need :
15gb hdd
150gb bw
I have a little project for a website that contains some of Downloadable files
and Media Files!
In my calculation..., I may use about 50 GB storage
and if the number of visiors is as what im expected i'll need 1 TB bandwith or some less!
==
let's talk about the hosting part here
i know that there are some companies that over more than 300 gb storage and more that 3 TB of traffic!
but i don't think they are going to work with my project so... i searched for a vps to start my project ..., and im thinking in dedicated server in the future..,so let's not talk about the future right now!
I want to talk about the ability of vps for downloads hosting!
the vps I've found is this one:
Disk Space : 60,000 MB (60 GB)
Number of Domains : Unlimited Domains
CPU Limit : Equal Share
Guranteed Memory : 512 MB
Burstable Memory : 2048 MB
Monthly Bandwidth : 2,000 GB
Included Control Panel : cPanel / WHM
I will be starting a website featuring my own videos. They will be all flash based. Now I will be having 1 main website, which will be very fast and with its own forums as well. I'll probably go with reliablesite.
Anyhow, what I want to do. Is host flv files on hosts such as dreamhosts, host monster, site5, webhostasp, eleven2, hostgator. As they have > 5TB hosting (yes I know they oversell, but even if I get 75% - its good).
So, if I have lost you, let me explain in more detail.
The page in the reliable host will have links (to 5 files, which the locations are randomised in order with each refresh)..
I have built a database driven site with PHP & MySQL. Pages download quicker on some connections than other (obviously), however this is not due to connection speed. The web host server seems to respond very slowly to my boss's network (which is on a proxy server). Could it be that this problem is related to the web host? i.e. could it be that the web host is unequipped to deal quickly with this type of network?
On my home connection (2Mbps), pages often download instantly, however occaisionally I have to wait 10-20 seconds to receive the page from the host.
Finally, could you recommend an excellent web host to use with our site? My boss wants to offer a professional service where server response is quick. We are based in the UK.