# Untrusted Network interface(s); all traffic on defined interface will be# subject to all firewall rules. This should be your internet exposed# interfaces. Only one interface is accepted for each value.IFACE_IN="venet0"IFACE_OUT="venet0"
==================================
when i finish it and restart my apf its shows me like this ???
PHP Code:
[root@box ~]# apf -sapf(3107): {glob} activating firewallapf(3149): {glob} determined (IFACE_IN) venet0 has address 127.0.0.1apf(3149): {glob} determined (IFACE_OUT) venet0 has address 127.0.0.1apf(3149): {glob} loading preroute.rulesiptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295apf(3149): {resnet} downloading http://r-fx.ca/downloads/reserved.networksapf(3149): {resnet} download of http://r-fx.ca/downloads/reserved.networks failedapf(3149): {glob} loading reserved.networksapf(3149): {glob} SET_REFRESH is set to 10 minutesapf(3149): {glob} loading bt.rulesapf(3149): {dshield} downloading http://feeds.dshield.org/top10-2.txtapf(3149): {dshield} download of http://feeds.dshield.org/top10-2.txt failedapf(3149): {sdrop} downloading http://www.spamhaus.org/drop/drop.lassoapf(3149): {sdrop} parsing drop.lasso into /etc/apf/sdrop_hosts.rulesapf(3149): {sdrop} loading sdrop_hosts.rulesapf(3149): {glob} loading common drop portsapf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from tcp port 135:139apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from udp port 135:139apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from tcp port 111apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from udp port 111apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from tcp port 513apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from udp port 513apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from tcp port 520apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from udp port 520apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from tcp port 445apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from udp port 445apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from tcp port 1433apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from udp port 1433apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from tcp port 1434apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from udp port 1434apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from tcp port 1234apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from udp port 1234apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from tcp port 1524apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from udp port 1524apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from tcp port 3127apf(3149): {blk_ports} deny all to/from udp port 3127apf(3149): {pkt_sanity} set active PKT_SANITYapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny inbound tcp-flag pairs ALL NONEapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny inbound tcp-flag pairs SYN,FIN SYN,FINapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny inbound tcp-flag pairs SYN,RST SYN,RSTapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny inbound tcp-flag pairs FIN,RST FIN,RSTapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny inbound tcp-flag pairs ACK,FIN FINapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny inbound tcp-flag pairs ACK,URG URGapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny inbound tcp-flag pairs ACK,PSH PSHapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny inbound tcp-flag pairs ALL FIN,URG,PSHapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny inbound tcp-flag pairs ALL SYN,RST,ACK,FIN,URGapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny inbound tcp-flag pairs ALL ALLapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny inbound tcp-flag pairs ALL FINapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny outbound tcp-flag pairs ALL NONEapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny outbound tcp-flag pairs SYN,FIN SYN,FINapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny outbound tcp-flag pairs SYN,RST SYN,RSTapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny outbound tcp-flag pairs FIN,RST FIN,RSTapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny outbound tcp-flag pairs ACK,FIN FINapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny outbound tcp-flag pairs ACK,PSH PSHapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny outbound tcp-flag pairs ACK,URG URGapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny all fragmented udpapf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny inbound tcp port 0apf(3149): {pkt_sanity} deny outbound tcp port 0apf(3149): {blk_p2p} set active BLK_P2Papf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from tcp port 1214apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from udp port 1214apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from tcp port 2323apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from udp port 2323apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from tcp port 4660:4678apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from udp port 4660:4678apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from tcp port 6257apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from udp port 6257apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from tcp port 6699apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from udp port 6699apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from tcp port 6346apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from udp port 6346apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from tcp port 6347apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from udp port 6347apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from tcp port 6881:6889apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from udp port 6881:6889apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from tcp port 6346apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from udp port 6346apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from tcp port 7778apf(3149): {blk_p2p} deny all to/from udp port 7778apf(3149): {glob} loading log.rulesapf(3149): {glob} virtual net subsystem disabled.apf(3149): {glob} loading main.rulesapf(3149): {glob} opening inbound tcp port 20 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound tcp port 21 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound tcp port 22 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound tcp port 25 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound tcp port 53 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound tcp port 80 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound tcp port 110 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound tcp port 143 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound tcp port 443 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound tcp port 465 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound tcp port 993 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound tcp port 995 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound tcp port 8443 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound udp port 37 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound udp port 53 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound udp port 873 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound tcp port 20 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound tcp port 21 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound tcp port 22 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound tcp port 25 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound tcp port 53 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound tcp port 37 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound tcp port 43 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound tcp port 80 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound tcp port 113 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound tcp port 443 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound tcp port 465 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound tcp port 873 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound tcp port 5224 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound udp port 53 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound udp port 873 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound icmp type 3 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound icmp type 5 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound icmp type 11 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound icmp type 0 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound icmp type 30 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening inbound icmp type 8 on 0/0apf(3149): {glob} opening outbound icmp all on 0/0iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295apf(3149): {glob} resolv dns discovery for 207.218.192.38iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295iptables: Unknown error 4294967295apf(3149): {glob} loading postroute.rules
I'm just looking for some background information or a place where I can learn more about this.
Here's the problem:
The web site runs on a dedicated Apache server. There's 2 SSL certificates installed, one for e-commerce for https://www.mysite.com and one to help with the administrative interface for https://admin.mysite.com. I run a custom php application that forces the web page from http://www.mysite.com to https://www.mysite.com when going to an e-commerce page.
Generally everything runs Ok but a few times this year there has been a problem where the php application points to https://www.mysite.com/ecom.php but instead it gets https://admin.mysite.com/ecom.php and gets a page not found.
In discussing this with my web hosting company they claim they haven't changed anything but they do manage to fix the problem and get the web site working correctly again.
I generally figure that the web hosting company has done some type of maintenance on the web server and messed-up the dns entries or something for the SSL part of the web site but this is really outside my area of experience. I'm trying to understand what went wrong and where the entries are that determine when going to SSL which SSL certificate/URL is used.
My server with APF (firewall script) with BFD logs over 1215 events today of some hack user or bot trying to login to my server from various of IP trying many kind of usernames...
Is it possible to customize BFD to automatically ban the IP directly if the username they try to login with it was wrong 2 times?
For example the username is qwerty The hack is trying with many usernames john, root, master, boot, etc...
A friend of mine has a server that the provider claims is a Core2Duo, but looking at /proc/cpuinfo, the cpu is shown as:
Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 000 @ 1.86GHz
What would cause this? I'm not saying the host is lying, I've just never seen this before and I haven't found anyone else with this problem on google. The processor is supposed to be a e6300, so the 1.86GHz speed is right. Also, this has happened on 2 different linux distros.
I've been told by a few people that something's wrong with my nameservers. But I'm not sure what it is that's wrong.
the site => www.visualpoetry.ca
the DNSs: ns1.visualpoetry.ca / ns2.visualpoetry.ca
a zone check says:
Quote:
---- warning ---- w: Nameservers are all part of the same AS
* Adv: ZoneCheck
To avoid loosing all connectivity with the autoritative DNS in case of a routing problem inside your Autonomous System, it is advised to host the DNS on different AS.
* All the nameservers are part of the same Autonomous System (AS number 30058), try to have some of them hosted on another AS.
* generic
w: Host doesn't reply to ICMP requests (firewall?)
I have bought a dedicated server with FDC servers and installed a script. Initially everything was working fine but now the site is not accessible. Everything is alright with the script installed but looks like there is some issue with the DNS settings. When I ping the IP address (it's dedicated ip address) it gives me an error. When I Ping the domain name, it just closes the window after few mins. Can someone experienced with WHM help me to fix the DNS settings? Of course, I am ready to pay for your help (though i might not have a very higher budget)
I have a mysql-only server and the server is constantly > 30 in server load. I'm ousted as to what is wrong with mysql and what can be done to optimize it. Using mysql report to generate the following:
Quote:
MySQL 4.1.22-standard uptime 0 0:22:30 Thu Feb 22 07:14:45 2007
__ Key _________________________________________________________________ Buffer used 30.93M of 256.00M %Used: 12.08 Current 60.41M %Usage: 23.60 Write ratio 0.891 Read ratio 0.001
add In httpd.conf to virtual őîńňó for instance: LayoutHeader "<H1>Test</H1>"
the text appears, but not there where it is necessary:
<H1>TEST</H1> ........ <head> <title>title</title> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset==utf-8"/> </head> <body> the text of the site.....
That is required? It is Necessary ÷ňîá was removed so:
I've noticed in a few unrelated traceroutes from my dedicated server the error message shown below. Is this likely to be an issue with my provider or just a general backbone issue? It seems to show up after 4 or 5 hops on routers belonging to a number of different backbone providers.
More importantly does it indicate that there is packet loss/corruption on the line?
Code: # traceroute www.cisco.com traceroute to www.cisco.com (198.133.219.25), 30 hops max, 46 byte packets 1 XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX (XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX) 0.354 ms 0.294 ms 0.289 ms 2 66.154.95.219 (66.154.95.219) 0.486 ms 0.362 ms * 3 216.89.82.73 (216.89.82.73) 1.353 ms 1.047 ms 0.815 ms 4 dcr1-so-4-3-0.Atlanta.savvis.net (208.172.75.109) 2.617 ms 3.605 ms * 5 cw-gw.attga.ip.att.net (192.205.32.117) 2.892 ms 1.138 ms 1.178 ms Icmp checksum is wrong 6 tbr2.attga.ip.att.net (12.122.81.154) 55.510 msIcmp checksum is wrong 55.077 msIcmp checksum is wrong 55.550 ms Icmp checksum is wrong 7 tbr1.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.122.2.89) 54.579 msIcmp checksum is wrong 55.069 msIcmp checksum is wrong 54.964 ms Icmp checksum is wrong 8 tbr1.la2ca.ip.att.net (12.122.10.50) 55.622 msIcmp checksum is wrong 55.462 msIcmp checksum is wrong 56.408 ms 9 gar1.sj2ca.ip.att.net (12.122.2.249) 53.999 ms 54.947 ms 53.960 ms 10 12.118.124.10 (12.118.124.10) 54.596 ms 54.329 ms 54.727 ms 11 sjce-dmzbb-gw1.cisco.com (128.107.239.53) 58.822 ms 68.721 ms 79.009 ms
While server (as whole) is [presumeabily] fully managed by hosting company in their own interest - then what could really go wrong with unmanaged Windows VPS.
I am not sure if this is the right forum, i am just so frustrated with hotmail. Unfortunetly most of my clients use hotmail. After 2-3 communications in the same day, Hotmail decides i am a spammer and blocks mails from my domain. Thats were the fun starts and frustation begins. My host do not support sender id, anyone have same issues?
If some body pays by paypal for some services we need to verify that it is not a fraud so he has to fill up a form and send a government issued ID. but please see this chat conversation. the customer is reluctant to do so see the chat
====== Guest: photo id? Guest: i am verified paypal. Guest: why all this. Guest: sorry, i can't send you something like that. Guest: no one ask me something like that I have 25 servers Guest: in europe, usa, asia ===============
I have a dedicated WHM server (qumbia.org) with several CPanel accounts, among them:
- qumibiao (qumbia.org). - qumbiaca (qumbia.ca).
Both of these accounts were set to the same ip (70.86.221.122).
15 days ago, I changed qumbiaca to the ip 70.86.221.123
Since, some requests (about 1% of the total according to my logs) for qumbia.ca are still serving up what's in /home/qumbiao/public_html
I know next to nothing about this, but perhaps some ISPs have cached the 70.86.221.122 IP and are directing requests there? Still, why wouldn't WHM, upon receiving such a request, resolve it to the right address, it being on the same server?
My Time to live record is set to 24 hours on my DNS, and the expire header set to 41 days.
Might it be a good idea to set up a new DNS (NS3.QUMBIA.ORG) on my WHM and give that DNS to qumbia.ca? Would this force the ISPs to reset their cache? Or does the problem lie elsewhere? Should I just wait out the 41-day expire period and hope for the best?
I completely amazed on how this Company has managed to engineer their TOS & AUP in such a way that they can in essence discriminate, destroy your hardware and steal your money in the process...
The developed some type of a bias against me, and then the true colors came out. It all started with a simple argument over a Cpanel License on a VDS that I had rented from them. I decide to send my own server instead to save a few dollars and I overnight the box.
-- For support to tell me that the brand new Corsair 750Watt PS is dead. We had sealed the server with stickers to ensure that no one would open it and tamper with the hardware inside. That's the first thing they did, was to remove the stickers and pretend that they PS was dead and that they had to Trouble Shoot.
-- I get the power supply back and it was in perfect working condition, obviously after they had made a few dollars on handling the shipping.
-- I asked them my options and they then try to make me buy a PS from them. Until I ship another one in. They let that ride 2 days until I send a ticket for a reboot. Right away, ohh that PS apparently died right there and then. 4 minutes after I open the ticket asking for a reboot.
> Then I notice some type of QoS going on specifically on my IP. As I know a few others that have servers there and we verified the routes back to our local provider. My upload was about 50kbps. I inquire to get the usual "routes" cannot be controlled. As well I would see when downloading something from my box; the speeds would startup at max out and throttle all the way down to around 50kbps and maintain. From different local points as well.
> Anyhow I decide not to complain and to pay. Thus I get 2x Internap dedicated bandwidth @ $225.00 a month + $99.00. 1x Internap per Eth interface. That is after I had already paid them $269.00 for the initial VDS as well which I never got a refund for, that was just wasted money now.
> I got to enjoy that for about 8 days. Until I asked for a reboot before I messed up accidently a ifconfig command. That's when it went again, from ohhh the box is rebooted. Took about 4 hours, three techs telling me it was beeing rebooted. Never could I connect again. Then I ask them if I they have perhaps KVM over IP so I Can take care of the problem and save them time. All of a sudden the story evolves to a dead motherboard. When I question the tech, he tells me that he swapped all parts and tested them and that the motherboard was dead. That was as well a brand new WS motherboard. Running at around 34 degrees celcius temp for the 8 days very stable without any issues.
> Of course I complained some, looked for the owner to have a discussion. Stumble on Better Business Bureau US and find that others complained there. Mentioned that in the ticket and they terminated my service; keeping of course the rest of my money; Because that too is in their AUP/TOS no refunds
Thus if I get it right, they can randomly choose people that they believe they can easily take. Or simply dislike. It's simple, break their hardware. They will have no choice to ship it back; to then fill their place with another customer because they are low on space. But still bill the first one for the rest remainder of the month, why? Because they can, it's in their well engineered TOS/AUP. So I got to use it from the 26th of last month to today but still will pay until the 26th of this month.
They are allowed to do all of the above, why because they are big now Right!
I seem to have a strange problem (I am hoping that if I fix this, it will fix another problem I am having).
For some reason (I most probably did by accident) when I run the command lsof -i tcp:80. The information that comes up says that my IP address xx.xxx.xxx.172 is being used to listen to port 80. Yet the IP address that was asignned to me is xx.xxx.xxx.171. I am wondering how I would go about removing wrong IP address so that the right one is listening to the correct port.
i have an e-mail account that in cpanel shows it has 60 of 90 mb of used space... it had some big emails in the trash folder but i deleted em... in fact i deleted everything from the account (sent, trash, drafts, etc) and it keeps showing 60 of 90 mb of used space ive checked if it was spambox... nothing, spamassasin... nothing i even loged on the server and checked the space of mailbox's folder... but it showed only 500 kb... so i assume its a cpanel issue... how can i fix it?
I represent a small software development company out of Bellevue, WA. For the longest time we had our server (3U rack) based in Sunny Southern California. We were paying $150/m for 3mbit connection with six IPs. We use the server for work as well as hosting a gaming community. We'd host half-life 2 servers for friends and family for the longest time.
We began to go over our monthly bandwidth allocation limits late last year and had to shell out for the overage charges. Not a big deal. However, a good friend of one of my associates said he could get us free hosting up here in Seattle if we moved our machine.
I was skeptical, but he said he knew someone who was an employee at one of the major datacenters here in Seattle and that she could get us in as long as we hosted her website. We moved our box in November of 2006. It is now March 6, 2007, and we just received word that we've been had. I guess the employee at said datacenter broke some rules and as a result lost privilages to host her own private machine.
So, while she was busy leading us along, we were basically frozen as a small start-up company as our servers were offline and our ability to function without this machine online was greatly hindered.
So, today I was turned onto this website as a place to find answers to questions about hosting. Well, here's my question.
Does anyone know of anywhere in the Pacific Northwest and/or Northern California that provides affordable hosting and quality service? We're looking for rack space for our 3U server and a 3mbit connection. Ideally we'd like more bandwidth than this as 3mbit wasn't enough at our old location... however, considering the amount of loss we've taken during this disaster, we'll settle for anything. We also only need 1 IP, but more wouldn't be a bad thing.
The key word here is affordable. We are starving college kids and hosting is expensive.
We're quite desperate, so any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Again, we're looking for cheap/affordable hosting sollutions in the Pacific Northwest that meets the above requirements.
I have problem with free space on one partition. After deleting files on about 10GB "df" still shows about 100% used but when I count files by "du" then it show correct value. Where's the problem and how fix it ?
root@alfa [~]# du -sh /usr 9.1G /usr
root@alfa [~]# df -h /usr Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb3 20G 19G 0 100% /usr
In my web site I have several index pages in different languages in the following format
[URL] ....
Two days ago I noticed increased, many times. Google bot activity on my site and when I checked my log file I found that all pages crawled were wrong web addresses: to the above index were added existing files from my site like
/folder1/folder2/file.html
So, the strings looked like
[URL] ....
And surprisingly all they returned code "200".
My question is: is there any way to rewrite such requests to the first ".html" found in the string.
Whenever an incoming mail is tagged as [SPAM] by SpamAssassin in my mail queue I see it is being redirected from spamassassin@mydomain-site.com to spam@mydomain-site.org
Sence mydomain-site.org is no longer active the [SPAM] mail just sits there in the queue and does not get delivered anywhere..
I am new to this stuff so I have no idea where I should look to change the option.
I am not even sure if it is suppose to this, I just want all SPAM to go to spamassassin@mydomain-site.com
I don't have cpanel or any real server management, so i am not sure where to look and what to edit so the mail stops going to the .org domain.
I have noticed a weird thing lately with two VPS accounts. Virtuozzo's system usage meter on the Resources page creeps up to 100% over the course of 24 hours or so and stays there, but stays green and I don't get any QoS alerts. The servers both seem to be running fine, and I haven't had any crashes. One VPS is running a few Wordpress blogs.
The other is running some Joomla sites.
Both are running Virtuozzo on CentOS 4.7 i686 with WHM 11.24.2 and cPanel 11.24.4-R32486.
In the past, when the system usage meter in Virtuozzo got anywhere near 100%, it turned yellow or red, I had sites go down, and all kinds of QoS alerts for privmpages were thrown. It turned out back then that I had a bad PHP script eating tons of memory with too many MySQL queries. That doesn't appear to be the case here, since I'm not having any apparent problems with either server. It seems like a "non-problem" but it has me concerned because I'm used to using that system usage meter in Virtuozzo to keep an eye on the health of the VPS..
When I look at memory used in WHM (WHM->Server Status->Server Status) it shows only 31% used, which is what I used to see in Virtuozzo.
When I run free, I get:
root@server [~]# free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 524288 133804 390484 0 0 0 -/+ buffers/cache: 133804 390484 Swap: 0 0 0 When I run Free, I get: root@server [~]# Free Memory limit...: 8388604 MB (burstable: 8388604 MB) Current usage..: 120 MB (0%) (requested: 264 MB) Free memory....: 8388484 MB (100%)
Initially, I suspected it was another problem with MySQL, and restarting MySQL does drop the system usage meter down to ~31% in Virtuozzo for a while--without changing the actual memory used on the System Processes page--but the memory usage for MySQL with Virtuozzo pegged is only 6.23% in WHM.
Here's the really weird thing: If I look at Virtuozzo->System Processes it shows only 0.4% (I think they mean 40%) of total memory used, half of which is mysqld and the rest is spamd.
With no sign of problems, it looks like Virtuozzo is incorrectly reporting memory usage in the system usage meter, but correctly in the system processes list.
The web host's response was:
We use SLM for managing VPSes. This enforces your per VPS limits and doesn't let your VPS use more then it should be. It sounds like you guys may have some memory hogs in your applications.
Have you guys considered cutting down some of the unneeded plugins and stuff?
That doesn't make any sense to me given the disparity between the memory usage meter and the amount of memory usage reported in System Processes and with free/Free as well as the lack of QoS alerts, but maybe SLM prevents any alerts? I don't want to let a memory hog run free on my system if one exists.
I am just trying out MySQL on the external Apache server. I must have written down the wrong password. My commands to enter mysql with a password results in denied access.
What file do I undo in order to create a new password? I don't know the exact steps I'm supposed to take. I don't think this is a MySQL issue, but a server issue, right?
I used to create databases and tables on my regular computer and left off the password altogether while I was practicing. Now I'm taking steps to do it on the actual server, and have run across this problem.
I was getting 13-16k visitors per day on one site, with maxclient set at 1000. I changed it to 500 on a recent server I got and now the website is barely breaking 10k visitors. It was getting 13k-16k per day average for the past month.
If I set it too low does it actually block out people?
mysql MySQL Support enabled Active Persistent Links 0 Active Links 0 Client API version 4.1.21 MYSQL_MODULE_TYPE external MYSQL_SOCKET /var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock MYSQL_INCLUDE -I/usr/include/mysql MYSQL_LIBS -L/usr/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient
mysqli MysqlI Support enabled Client API library version 4.1.21 Client API header version 4.1.20 MYSQLI_SOCKET /var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock
I have a dedicated Linux box hosting all of my sites.
I've offloaded my email support to google's small business hosting which I am loving.
One problem I continue to have is when I send email via a php form or internally through webmail - the email stays on the server thinking that I am still hosting the email myself. The email should instead be sending externally.
Since my Google mail is working perfectly for everyone else in getting me my emails - I'm guessing that all of my DNS is correct.
