My server DC technician change the cable to another switch in another rack. all in sudden, my server went 'offline'.
the weird thing is, I can ping the server IP
When I plug my KVM, I can ping google.com from my server
But when I lynx google.com, it keep saying HTTP requests sent; waiting for response._
When I open my putty and SSH, it keep waiting.
When I try to ssh from another server, it keep waiting $ ssh firstname.lastname@example.org [nothing happen] $ ping xxx.xxx.xxx.xx PING xxx.xxx.xxx.xx (xxx.xxx.xxx.xx) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from xxx.xxx.xxx.xx: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=1.10 ms 64 bytes from xxx.xxx.xxx.xx: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=0.864 ms 64 bytes from xxx.xxx.xxx.xx: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=0.854 ms
- I can ping my server from MS DOS - I can ping my server from Iptools.com - I can ping my server from another server
But.. - I cannot ssh into my server - I cannot ssh into my server from another server
Inside my server.. - I can ping google.com, yahoo.com, other servers - But I cannot lynx and open all websites
When I restart network, it shows [refer attachment] captured from my KVM
Pinging lunarpages.com [220.127.116.11] with 32 bytes of data: Average = 191ms Pinging hostmonster.com [18.104.22.168] with 32 bytes of data: Average = 191ms Pinging godaddy.com [22.214.171.124] with 32 bytes of data: Average = 175ms Pinging rackspace.com [126.96.36.199] with 32 bytes of data: Average = 150ms Pinging siteground.com [188.8.131.52] with 32 bytes of data: Average = 148ms Pinging hostgator.com [184.108.40.206] with 32 bytes of data: Average = 147ms Pinging ipowerweb.com [220.127.116.11] with 32 bytes of data: Average = 113ms The pages load really fast @ ipowerweb
i run yum update and result is : -bash-3.1# yum update Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories
Could not retrieve mirrorlist http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?releas...86&repo=extras error was [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (-3, 'Temporary failure in name resolution')> Error: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: extras
i use of middle config : /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 TYPE=Ethernet DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static BROADCAST=192.168.0.255 IPADDR=192.168.0.13 IPV6ADDR= IPV6PREFIX= NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.168.0.0 ONBOOT=yes /etc/sysconfig/network NETWORKING=yes HOSTNAME=myhost.l3i.ca GATEWAY=192.168.0.1 /etc/resolv.conf (DNS resolver) nameserver 18.104.22.168
My sites are up when I go to http and there is no slowdown but my monitors (panopta and pingdom) say that there is an outage in ping (only in ping, http is up). I tried pinging the server and there are packet loss up to 100% but the site is still up. I also used other online pinging tools (all-nettools.com, dnsstuff.com, etc.) and host unreachable.
I tried contacting the provider but they say there are no network problem at this time. So I found this other site that's also hosted on the same provider and I can access their site but fails on ping.
I have 2 CPanel servers. I wanted to transfer multiple accounts via WHM but it gives me error that I cannot SSH into the other server.
I tried to ping the 2nd server from 1st server and it gives me: root@s [~]# ping xxx.xxx.xxx.7 PING xxx.xxx.xxx.7 (xxx.xxx.xxx.7) 56(84) bytes of data. ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted cping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
I added both server IP into allowed list inside my APF firewall on each server as well.
I rebooted both server earlier before, but it is still not solving my problem.
I installed net query tool from this site http://virtech.org/tools/
They say in order for ping and trace to work, you must chmod those executables on the server itself to 755. Is this safe or a security risk? The odd thing is, ping and trace works fine from dnsstuff.com or any other network tool site.
I am hosting some sites with innohosting and it seems they are loading slow. This could be because of my internet so im not sure.
My ping is below. What is considered good?
64 bytes from 22.214.171.124: icmp_seq=0 ttl=39 time=87.104 ms 64 bytes from 126.96.36.199: icmp_seq=1 ttl=39 time=89.647 ms 64 bytes from 188.8.131.52: icmp_seq=2 ttl=39 time=110.035 ms 64 bytes from 184.108.40.206: icmp_seq=3 ttl=39 time=130.241 ms 64 bytes from 220.127.116.11: icmp_seq=4 ttl=39 time=139.109 ms 64 bytes from 18.104.22.168: icmp_seq=5 ttl=39 time=163.304 ms 64 bytes from 22.214.171.124: icmp_seq=6 ttl=39 time=96.559 ms 64 bytes from 126.96.36.199: icmp_seq=7 ttl=39 time=96.478 ms 64 bytes from 188.8.131.52: icmp_seq=8 ttl=39 time=103.415 ms 64 bytes from 184.108.40.206: icmp_seq=10 ttl=39 time=111.042 ms 64 bytes from 220.127.116.11: icmp_seq=11 ttl=39 time=118.234 ms 64 bytes from 18.104.22.168: icmp_seq=12 ttl=39 time=94.255 ms 64 bytes from 22.214.171.124: icmp_seq=13 ttl=39 time=86.390 ms 64 bytes from 126.96.36.199: icmp_seq=14 ttl=39 time=95.784 ms 64 bytes from 188.8.131.52: icmp_seq=15 ttl=39 time=89.193 ms
I have a lot of sites with big graphics that need to load fast.
When I talked with my friends who are into computer stuff, they'd say that it is important that the provider that I am about to host my site with, has good ping response so that my site will load faster.
Basically I registered with a new host. They sent me the details with obviously includes the IP address. I tested the IP address on just-ping.com and it came back with all of them having between 80% to 100% packet loss. Surely this is not normal is it? I havent moved my domain yet but it doesnt look good does it? Should I cancel?
I was on this site a while ago and someone shared a link to a site that would ping a given IP from multiple locations around the globe and give the output. Does anyone know of a site that would do this?
for a server to run a lightweight game server. It will require about 15-20KB/sec bandwidth. Fairly low ram requirements, and very little disk requirements.
My issue is, i need it to have VERY VERY low ping rates. Users will be connecting from Europe and US. Where can i go for something that would fill these needs? I've tried Amazon EC2, but its flaky sometimes..