I was having issues with what I would like to think as power.
Now, I was wondering if there are any SQL database benchmarks, or something else I can run on the system for a given period of time, that will let me see if I'm still having those power issues.
I am planning to change my shared server web host. As part of my evaluation, I want to test the speed of web hosts I'm considering switching to. I've looked but could not find any reliable data for speed. So, I want to create my own data.
Based on some specific requirements, I have chosen the following finalists: ANhosting/Midphase, Hostgator, IXWebhosting, and Websitesource. If you have a website that uses one of these hosts,
I think a good way of doing a fair, accurate speed comparison is for 2 or 3 customers of each web host to place a 20MB file on their website. I will then download the file from each customer site during a high-traffic time of day. I will then report the results here.
This forum doesn't allow urls for the file to download, I think, but I hope it is allowed to put the URL for the download into an attachment, enclosed...
I anticipate that other webhosts that are reading this will want to participate. I welcome this, so here are some key features I need: php/linux, add at least 3 dedicated IPs to one account (could be extra fee), at least 20 addon domains on one acct., catchall/default email, shared ssl.
I am having some serious speed issues with my 1Gbit server at FDC. After opening a ticket, they've simply dismissed it as a server configuration problem. However I am convinced it isn't because certain ISP's (usually universities) get good speeds, usually 700kb/sec but the vast majority of my users get between 20-50 kb/sec and it's causing a lot of complaints.
Furthermore I have other servers with FDC which are 100mbit which perform better than my 1 Gbit one. There are no server bottlenecks (CPU/RAM/HDD), since I've closely monitored them (PRTG) and they aren't even heavily utilised. So the problem is with the network at some point.
Speed Test : [url]
where abouts you are downloading from, your ISP and net connection. Wget's from servers are also welcome as are traceroutes.
My server DC technician change the cable to another switch in another rack. all in sudden, my server went 'offline'.
the weird thing is, I can ping the server IP
When I plug my KVM, I can ping google.com from my server
But when I lynx google.com, it keep saying HTTP requests sent; waiting for response._
When I open my putty and SSH, it keep waiting.
When I try to ssh from another server, it keep waiting $ ssh school@xxx.xxx.xxx.xx [nothing happen] $ ping xxx.xxx.xxx.xx PING xxx.xxx.xxx.xx (xxx.xxx.xxx.xx) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from xxx.xxx.xxx.xx: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=1.10 ms 64 bytes from xxx.xxx.xxx.xx: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=0.864 ms 64 bytes from xxx.xxx.xxx.xx: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=0.854 ms
- I can ping my server from MS DOS - I can ping my server from Iptools.com - I can ping my server from another server
But.. - I cannot ssh into my server - I cannot ssh into my server from another server
Inside my server.. - I can ping google.com, yahoo.com, other servers - But I cannot lynx and open all websites
When I restart network, it shows [refer attachment] captured from my KVM
I just moved from PowerVPS to EuroVPS, being located in Europe myself, and was of course hoping for much better ping times. Also EuroVPS advertise themselves with a 30ms ping to most of Europe.
Anyway after my VPS was installed I compared the pings:EuroVPS (85.17.48.162) average ping: 335ms PowerVPS (69.65.106.19) average ping: 129ms
335ms is of course ridiculously high, and after writing them a support ticket they told me it's probably a latency problem with my ISP
Can you please post the ping you get for 85.17.48.162 (preferably people located in Europe)?
I have configured Nagios on my network 10+ Servers (Linux+Windows) now when i check through http://localhost/nagios everything is ok but only ping command is giving following message :-
Unknown bin/ping -n -U -w 10 -c 5 x.x.x.x CRITICAL - Could not interpret output from ping command
and mail me "server down " message
So what is the issue ?
I am able to run this command through command line
./check_ping -H {server} -w 100.0,20% -c 500,50% -p 5 PING OK - Packet loss = 0%
./check_ping -H x.x.x.x -w 300.0,80% -c 500.0,100% -p 5 PING OK - Packet loss = 0%
I'm running my own OpenVZ server with a few VPS's running on it and have a small network issue.
I can't ping any VE from the HN. All the other networking is working ok (strangely I can ping the HN from the VE) apart from this. It's a simple setup with one network card connected to the internet.
OpenVZ the latest stable version running on CentOS 5.2
I'm pretty sure it's not a firewall problem but is something to do with arp or routing and one of the settings in sysctl.conf
Pinging lunarpages.com [74.50.4.210] with 32 bytes of data: Average = 191ms Pinging hostmonster.com [74.220.195.150] with 32 bytes of data: Average = 191ms Pinging godaddy.com [97.74.104.201] with 32 bytes of data: Average = 175ms Pinging rackspace.com [72.32.191.88] with 32 bytes of data: Average = 150ms Pinging siteground.com [209.85.102.36] with 32 bytes of data: Average = 148ms Pinging hostgator.com [74.54.219.185] with 32 bytes of data: Average = 147ms Pinging ipowerweb.com [66.96.130.200] with 32 bytes of data: Average = 113ms The pages load really fast @ ipowerweb
i run yum update and result is : -bash-3.1# yum update Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories
Could not retrieve mirrorlist http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?releas...86&repo=extras error was [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (-3, 'Temporary failure in name resolution')> Error: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: extras
i use of middle config : /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 TYPE=Ethernet DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static BROADCAST=192.168.0.255 IPADDR=192.168.0.13 IPV6ADDR= IPV6PREFIX= NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.168.0.0 ONBOOT=yes /etc/sysconfig/network NETWORKING=yes HOSTNAME=myhost.l3i.ca GATEWAY=192.168.0.1 /etc/resolv.conf (DNS resolver) nameserver 4.2.2.1
My sites are up when I go to http and there is no slowdown but my monitors (panopta and pingdom) say that there is an outage in ping (only in ping, http is up). I tried pinging the server and there are packet loss up to 100% but the site is still up. I also used other online pinging tools (all-nettools.com, dnsstuff.com, etc.) and host unreachable.
I tried contacting the provider but they say there are no network problem at this time. So I found this other site that's also hosted on the same provider and I can access their site but fails on ping.
i think 216.245.208.x and 216.245.215.x DOWN, but limestonenetworks tell me :"problems well outside of our network, and I would highly suggest contacting your ISP for support on this matter" ....
I have 2 CPanel servers. I wanted to transfer multiple accounts via WHM but it gives me error that I cannot SSH into the other server.
I tried to ping the 2nd server from 1st server and it gives me: root@s [~]# ping xxx.xxx.xxx.7 PING xxx.xxx.xxx.7 (xxx.xxx.xxx.7) 56(84) bytes of data. ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted ping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted cping: sendmsg: Operation not permitted
I added both server IP into allowed list inside my APF firewall on each server as well.
I rebooted both server earlier before, but it is still not solving my problem.
Can I have some of you ping 24fans.net and let me know what your results are? Also where you're located would be good.
My ISP is being crappy and my dsl line is basically down ever few minutes. They're supposed to fix it tomorrow.
My current results are:
Reply from 70.84.145.91: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=51 Reply from 70.84.145.91: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=51 Reply from 70.84.145.91: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=51 Reply from 70.84.145.91: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=51
This doesn't really have anything to do with my dsl being crappy, but rather I'm just curious as to what kind of responses people are getting around the world.
So I'm wondering what if anything I can do to get a better ping from my 1and1 server.
It's located in Wayne, PA and my ping floats around 70ms and I'm in South Lake Tahoe, CA. I only ask because there are servers with Peer1 hosted in New York, NY that give me a ping around 20ms.
A website,which i can't access,but i used the ping and tracert instruct. the result tell me the IP and route is right.later,a use a Proxy site to access that site,it can. who knows the reason?
I installed net query tool from this site http://virtech.org/tools/
They say in order for ping and trace to work, you must chmod those executables on the server itself to 755. Is this safe or a security risk? The odd thing is, ping and trace works fine from dnsstuff.com or any other network tool site.
I have two servers both in a same vlan. Both may access Internet and be acceessed from Internet I setup db server and web server internal IP each as follows:
I used ifconfig to check both status, both of them are up. both of them may ping google, but when I try to ping their each other through internal IP, nothing returns.
I used command tracert to follow, found all packages were sent to Internet rather than an internal IP.
My host tells me to do it by making NAT, I have no idea on it. Anyone may help me out on how to do with NAT?
I am hosting some sites with innohosting and it seems they are loading slow. This could be because of my internet so im not sure.
My ping is below. What is considered good?
64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=0 ttl=39 time=87.104 ms 64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=1 ttl=39 time=89.647 ms 64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=2 ttl=39 time=110.035 ms 64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=3 ttl=39 time=130.241 ms 64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=4 ttl=39 time=139.109 ms 64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=5 ttl=39 time=163.304 ms 64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=6 ttl=39 time=96.559 ms 64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=7 ttl=39 time=96.478 ms 64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=8 ttl=39 time=103.415 ms 64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=10 ttl=39 time=111.042 ms 64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=11 ttl=39 time=118.234 ms 64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=12 ttl=39 time=94.255 ms 64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=13 ttl=39 time=86.390 ms 64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=14 ttl=39 time=95.784 ms 64 bytes from 67.220.209.81: icmp_seq=15 ttl=39 time=89.193 ms
I have a lot of sites with big graphics that need to load fast.
When I talked with my friends who are into computer stuff, they'd say that it is important that the provider that I am about to host my site with, has good ping response so that my site will load faster.
Basically I registered with a new host. They sent me the details with obviously includes the IP address. I tested the IP address on just-ping.com and it came back with all of them having between 80% to 100% packet loss. Surely this is not normal is it? I havent moved my domain yet but it doesnt look good does it? Should I cancel?