Downtime, Switch Shared Hosts Or Wait It Out
Sep 2, 2008
I'm with one of the big shared hosts. Support is patchy at best, which isn't a problem until you require help at which point it's agonising as you have to wait an age to get an unsatisfactory response.
At the moment the server I'm on is suffering from consistent outages (it's been up and down over the last few days). Support has been hard to get hold of at times (right now my site is completely unacceptable for me and there's no-one tending the live support chat - which is the only chance of getting a prompt response).
My question is should I be actively looking to improve my situation (it's amazingly frustrating to spend the best part of a day doing small updates, which because of instability, take hours instead of minutes) or should I just wait until it blows over (to be fair server issues tend to be fairly infrequent, but they do flair up every so often). I can't really afford to pay that much more than I am (say $20-$50 a month max) so am I stuck with shared hosting or is there anyway to pay a little more (my current package costs around $10 a month) to get better support and stability?
After a initial look around would something like MediaTemples GS or the low end MediaTemples dedicated virtual service be suitable? The pages do have moderate database use (a few forums and galleries) and use around 50GB a month bandwidth (which would climb slowly in future months)?
View 14 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Mar 16, 2009
How long should I expect my website to be down when I switch from shared to dedicated ip?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2009
If your happy with your current hosting provider why change? Maybe you have found a better deal, but is it really worth it to switch to save a few bucks if your happy, I would say no.
What if you have noticed major changes in loading time?
What if there has been downtime?
What if they dont offer the support you need when you need it.
If a hosts changes prices on you?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2007
I currently use Micfo, and was quite satisfied with their services and fast response times until recently. They seem to be undergoing a lot of changes, but performance seems to be going downhill. Last month I had continuous down-time of about 10hrs. They said this was because of a failure at the data-center.
Email and cPanel has been down for the last 8 hrs because of a server upgrade. (I don't know why they decided to do it on a weekday). They said it will take a minimum of 8 hrs for things to be back to normal again. It's only on the second attempt to contact support that I found this downtime was because of a server upgrade. The first support person I contacted said he has to go and reboot the server and things will be ok.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Oct 6, 2009
Why don't all shared web hosts use litepspeed?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2008
Is it possible to get a rough description of the benefits of a VPS host over a shared host?
1) Support. Should support with a VPS host be better than my current shared provider? They offer live chat and a ticketing system. Tickets can take hours to get a response, live chat minutes but often there are no support operaters to answer the question.
2) Uptime. Will uptime be improved upon? My current host tends to range from 97%-99% in a month. Importantly will it suffer from soft outages where parts of the account are down (such as MySQL or http)?
3) Traffic. What levels of traffic will base VPS packages handle? Will a few semi active forums (say max 20 users on 3 forums) be manageable alongside several PHP/MySQL galleries and several hundred normal PHP pages?
4) Load. Does the load usage of other customers on the same server effect your account in the same way it does in a shared environment? Can one user bog down the entire server for everyone else?
5) Management. How much control is given to a user in managed VPS environment. Can you restart OS yourself (and do things like edit the firewall blocks)? Do you have to keep the OS (Linux in my case) and things like Apache and PHP up to date yourself or is that done for you.
6) Usage Policies. Are the usage policies in place in a VPS environment (limiting the amount of CPU process and memory you can use). If yes are they higher than in a shared environment.
Is it possible to get a little more on a few of the hosts I've looked at (if possible I'd like to be below the $50 a month mark).
JaguarPC ($20 / $40)
WiredTree ($50)
LiquidHost ($60)
Is it a case of picking any of these and getting a similar support and hosting service?
WiredTree seems to offer a decent compromise of price against value. Given that my site is still pretty small at the moment, would the smallest JaguarPC package be a better fit (so I'm not spending money for specs I'm not using).
Unfortunately disk space is a fairly big factor as the site uses quite a few image and small video files (I'm using something like 2GB at the moment but this would increase fairly rapidly over time). Does that mean a shared host is better suited for my needs?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jan 20, 2008
This thread [url] is a perfect example of how some shared web hosts act to sell. This one might not be posted from someone who plays for the web host but it illustrates a shameless promotional model.
You just need to hire 10 dudes to give them a blog or small web site and "some orders" to post threads about your business. They get paid per result (paid per sale made) Nothing wrong if those guys go to promote in "advertising and requests" sections. But they come to flood sections where we're comming to meet each other, to talk and share some knowledge and information.
Forums like SitePoint were the first quality social networks. They came out many years before anyone knew what Web 2.0 was? Let's not allow good communities to be conquered by adv posts.
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2009
Not sure if there was similar thread earlier. But just want to find out hosts which offer shared hosting and have their own DCs. The ones I know are:
Pair
FutrueQuest
LiquidWeb
HE
View 14 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2008
This is my first time with shared hosting and I went with hostgator because they are well known. Well, my site is getting decent traffic but well within my disk space and data transfer allotment, and I get this email saying my site has been suspended and my site is inaccessible.
Dear customer,
Due to an excessive amount of Apache requests on our gatorXXX server we have been forced to suspend the directory /home/username/public_html/sitename at this time as all other users on the server are experiencing issues due to this :
...http requests list...
Please let us know when you're ready to investigate and address this issue so we can work with you further. Thanks.
Sincerely,
Ford Merrill
Systems Administrator Supervisor
HostGator.com LLC
Is this what most shared hosts do? Just suspend your account once your site starts getting traffic?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2008
why so few shared hosting companies enable a php op-caching system on their system (xcache, apc, eaccelerator).
Is there some specific technical reason in place?
Usually I run my own servers, but it happens from time to time that you need a quality shared hosting in order to reccomend it to a friend, for a personal blog, a small website, maybe your own personal blog that you're not keen to host on your dedicated servers already used for big projects ...
Now, as everyone using php applications knows, software like xcache or eaccelerator gives a nice speed bost to page generation. I run xcache on all my servers and vps (mainly running vbullettin and wordpress) and never encountered any issue.
Installing one of those (eg. xcache) is a 5minutes procedure, and even for kiddie-hosting companies that won't know how to build php, the ability to compile eaccelerator is in the cpanel easy php build software, so you don't even need to know how to rebuild php to enable eaccelerator in cpanel.
Despite all these facts is quite impossible to find a decent webhoster with xcache or apc/eacc enabled ...
The only one claiming to have eaccelerator is medialayer : "# Zend Optimizer, IonCube, and eAccelerator" this is a quote from their website.
How come nobody else undertakes this step?
What I have been noticing is most premium shared-hosting provider I encountered run their server with a lot of free memory .. so why not impress the customer with blazing fast page generation times (wordpress footer displaying "page generated in 0.071 seconds" impresses also the non-technical savy customers) enabling such a simple feature ?
There should be something I am missing, for sure.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Oct 7, 2008
Im a webdesigner so when looking for hosting i try to find one that is simple to manage, hardware powerful, lots of ready to install scripts and a beautiful webmail like Atmail or Zimbra.
So im looking for a powerful / quality high end "shared" hosting package.
Until now i have looked at:
- Mediatemple
(as @mail, exelent support but slow in Europe)
- Mosso
(is always good to be powered by rackspace but i think that the cloud hosting concept is still unsstable. Any experience?
- SimpleHelix (realy fast magento demo store, lots of scripts, @Mail and seems to have a fast network to europe)
So any advices on premium shared hosting?
An in Europe, any company similar to mediatemple or simplehelix?
Budjet: up to 100 $
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2007
My VPS had some high %wa this two days,when i refresh(F5) WHM %wa will go to 18-20% and us sy just 1 or 2
Is it my vps provider have a very bad oversell?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2007
I/O Wait is increasing on my server, please advise what to do: some times it is within 30 % and sometime it is up to 90%
top - 04:40:44 up 5:30, 2 users, load average: 4.57, 2.64, 3.24
Tasks: 171 total, 2 running, 169 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 18.3% us, 4.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 0.0% id, 77.0% wa, 0.3% hi, 0.0% si
Mem: 1027556k total, 1021944k used, 5612k free, 85460k buffers
Swap: 2040244k total, 2068k used, 2038176k free, 147752k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
16754 apache 15 0 96140 58m 5948 S 8.3 5.8 0:04.95 httpd
19760 psaadm 15 0 36936 3628 1548 S 4.7 0.4 0:00.14 httpsd
5417 apache 15 0 103m 67m 5984 S 2.0 6.7 0:13.00 httpd
2738 mysql 15 0 394m 79m 4660 S 0.7 7.9 1:25.08 mysqld
28294 apache 15 0 104m 68m 6076 S 0.7 6.9 0:25.33 httpd
39 root 16 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:06.16 kswapd0
2857 root 16 0 4788 752 628 S 0.3 0.1 0:03.09 couriertcpd
3022 qmails 15 0 2304 484 372 S 0.3 0.0 0:09.28 qmail-send
32688 apache 15 0 96112 58m 6000 S 0.3 5.8 0:10.76 httpd
5632 popuser 15 0 35588 29m 2344 D 0.3 2.9 0:30.44 spamd
9850 apache 16 0 100m 65m 5996 S 0.3 6.5 0:09.85 httpd
12418 apache 16 0 99796 62m 6296 S 0.3 6.2 0:08.56 httpd
19578 qmaild 15 0 4008 840 692 S 0.3 0.1 0:00.01 qmail-smtpd
1 root 16 0 1652 552 472 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.70 init
2 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.29 ksoftirqd/0
3 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/0
4 root 11 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper
5 root 15 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid
19 root 5 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/0
37 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush
38 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.07 pdflush
40 root 11 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0
20 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd
186 root 25 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod
295 root 15 0 0 0 0 D 0.0 0.0 0:06.68 kjournald
1373 root 6 -10 1904 456 380 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 udevd
1606 root 6 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kauditd
1648 root 6 -10 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmirrord
1672 root 19 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kjournald
1673 root 19 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kjournald
2360 root 15 0 2160 552 456 S 0.0 0.1 0:07.27 syslogd
2364 root 16 0 2620 384 316 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 klogd
2391 rpc 15 0 1952 548 452 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 portmap
2410 rpcuser 18 0 2400 724 620 S 0.0 0.1 0:00.00 rpc.statd
2436 root 16 0 4628 340 172 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpc.idmapd
2507 root 17 0 3060 508 300 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 smartd
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2007
I have Apache2 installed on my dedicated server. I would like to install a mod / configure my Apache Server in order to limit simultaneous connections / IP.
The thing that I want is that for example if I want a maximum of 2 simultaneous connections / IP, when that IP reaches the LIMIT, I would like to delay its next request, and NOT display him a 503 error like most mods DO.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 11, 2008
For the past couple of days, I've noticed that there is alot of apache processes running in the "D" state and that my IO wait is up to %80. I straced one of the processes and the result is its locking on a php session:
$ strace -p 3230
06:57:12 open("/var/lib/php/session/sess_86ecf346c6f7adba93cb1077f6b95d43", O_RDWR|O_CREAT,
0600) = 44
06:57:12 flock(44, LOCK_EX
And this is the output of lsof
[root@xeon ~]# lsof | grep session
mysqld 3212 mysql 178u REG 8,33 275456 26099994 /hd/mysql/sitebuilder3/session.MYI
mysqld 3212 mysql 183u REG 8,33 354592 26099937 /hd/mysql/sitebuilder3/session.MYD
bash 6426 root cwd DIR 8,21 1060864 25133096 /var/lib/php/session
httpd 6698 apache 44uW REG 8,21 115 9814967 /var/lib/php/session/sess_e0f1bb824667860260f9e5bd53da54e9
httpd 6704 apache 44u REG 8,21 138 25135115 /var/lib/php/session/sess_325b2701fcb8fb2d8371d1dd72660e8b
httpd 6718 apache 44u REG 8,21 138 9814423 /var/lib/php/session/sess_a28662f28c3fe91926c7c96267fe324f
httpd 6723 apache 44u REG 8,21 115 9814794 /var/lib/php/session/sess_79249a69f0a929318c3a8d25b1102ff4
httpd 6765 apache 44u REG 8,21 14 9815234 /var/lib/php/session/sess_0983ce89bad9d37eccec89fe83985945
httpd 6773 apache 44u REG 8,21 141 9815254 /var/lib/php/session/sess_298731e4cb90e58f223bc1b1b2da8cef
httpd 6782 apache 44uW REG 8,21 175 9814514 /var/lib/php/session/sess_608cf6bb40ba33a7505f3857e32c3854
httpd 6786 apache 44u REG 8,21 139 9814480 /var/lib/php/session/sess_10913da266608052ffd08e5fa39356c7
httpd 6787 apache 44uW REG 8,21 138 9814292 /var/lib/php/session/sess_3e0fac0590d02b4f111ce4bee9a8bfe1
httpd 6790 apache 44u REG 8,21 14 9815287 /var/lib/php/session/sess_cdfeac2790c55a62744a66caef886857
httpd 6794 apache 44u REG 8,21 138 9814423 /var/lib/php/session/sess_a28662f28c3fe91926c7c96267fe324f
httpd 6798 apache 44uW REG 8,21 93 9814971 /var/lib/php/session/sess_fa0f81edfd26e8653bc94bc9f9af6f6d
httpd 6801 apache 44u REG 8,21 138 9814423 /var/lib/php/session/sess_a28662f28c3fe91926c7c96267fe324f
httpd 6802 apache 44uW REG 8,21 138 9814423 /var/lib/php/session/sess_a28662f28c3fe91926c7c96267fe324f
httpd 6811 apache 44uW REG 8,21 115 9814802 /var/lib/php/session/sess_396f6670549934766bd8268f0b5628fc
httpd 6822 apache 44u REG 8,21 153 9815061 /var/lib/php/session/sess_0d1fcc65d1964fc3d354e4b94f3638eb
httpd 6833 apache 44uW REG 8,21 153 9815173 /var/lib/php/session/sess_05ed9e41766579f10cfdaa2f7e737a1a
httpd 6846 apache 44u REG 8,21 236 9815142 /var/lib/php/session/sess_23b5cad8471778391bf9748d0f4f1230
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2009
I've ordered server from LeaseWeb two weeks ago and still wait for the server setup. Its looks to slow for me - we are used to wait only a few hours for servers setup in datacanters in the US.
I'm afraid that such slow response will be also in response and level of the support. Do you think I should cancel this service and look for other provider in Europe? If yes please suggest such provider.
I've paid in advance by paypal for 3 month(~ 500 EURO). Do you think I will be able to cancel that payment?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2009
Any one facing any issue when Running CPanel on the VPS.
I always seem to be getting these errors only for Cpanel VPS only.
kernel: TCP: time wait bucket table overflow
kernel: TCP: too many of orphaned sockets (90 in CT****)
Even Cpanel Install by SSH or VePortal gives the same error.
View 12 Replies
View Related
May 20, 2014
PRODUCT, VERSION, OPERATING SYSTEM, ARCHITECTURE
Parallels Plesk Panel 11.5.30 MU #44 CentOS 6.5 (Final) 64bit
2 of our our servers are suddenly experiencing high Wait I/O Times, and high Load Averages during the backup process. During this period the Plesk grinds to a halt, sometimes crashing out completely (although SSh is still possible. We have been in talks with our server suppliers (assuming this would be node related) however they have done a lot of testing etc. and categorically state the node is fine , with no other users affecting it.
STEPS TO REPRODUCE : We backup the server using the scheduled backup service and Wait I/O immediately goes up.
ACTUAL RESULT: Plesk downtime / Website downtime
EXPECTED RESULT: No downtime, successful back up
Some other info :
All other processes (MYSQL, apache, Nginx etc) are all running between 1 - 10%
Partition "/usr" utilization 4.2% used (1.81 GB of 43.3 GB) (?)
Partition "/var" utilization 50.6% used (61.8 GB of 122 GB) (?)
We are struggling to identify what has changed on the server that would cause this sudden change.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 18, 2009
a sales told me i can buy two switch and do series connection,
then if one fail,another will continue to work,
it will take high HA,
but i still can not understand how to do it and work,
could you know what it is?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2008
I was in the market for a new dedicated server after a couple of years with my previous provider. The previous provider did nothing wrong but they were no longer competitive when it came to CPU and memory.
I moved first to geekrack. And I left them after a week and a half as they never were able to get my rDNS records setup.
I found Universal Hosts on this forum and gave them a shot. I had asked for an operating system that they didn't offer normally (Debian 64 bit) and they said that they could do it. However, when my server was setup it was 32 bit Debian instead. They apologized and had Debian 64 bit setup less than 24 hours later.
When I asked them to get rDNS records setup it took a few hours but they were setup correctly and they worked.
Universal Hosts is also a BurstNet reseller but compared to my other attempt at using a BurstNet reseller they are fantastic. While the initial config was incorrect they worked quickly to fix it and were very professional about it.
So after two weeks - so far so good. Keep up the good work UniHosts!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 11, 2013
I am running Apache2.2, PHP5.I have been running with virtual hosts on a Windows 7 environment fine for a couple of years successfully, but have just had to move to a Windows 8 environment.It looks like Apache and PHP have installed and are working fine, but my Virtual hosts are now not being recognised. From what I can tell, it is the Windows 8 hosts file that is having a problem, as it looks as though it is now just setup to Block websites.
If I make the host file just have the one line127.0.0.1 localhost entry, then the very first Virtual Host from my apache config file will come up, but the rest are not found.If I put the usual 127.0.0.1 mywebsite.name aliasname is appears as though my website works momentarily and then is blocked..
View 7 Replies
View Related
Aug 16, 2008
Recently I stumbled along a host on here with a good rep and that uses direct admin.
Because they were very nice on the live support I signed up to see what direct admin was like.
Its very diferent from cpanel. Some parts seem to be harder to use like the phpmyadmin requires the username and password to the database you created not the control panel username and password like cpanel. Although I guess that could be a good security feature just in case some one gets into the control panel they can not get into the phpmyadmin, then again if they are smart and were able to get into the control panel they could get into ftp and look what the username and password is on the config file for the script you are using.
The bandwidth meter seems to be better in direct admin although I think its acting up for me as its putting yesterdays bandwidth on todays. I was told by the host that it updates every 2 hours and at first it did but now its gone to every day. Oh and unlike cpanel this bandwidth meter includes bandwith used by the control panel.
Niether one from what I can tell counts sftp though at least for the hosts I have right now.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2008
In your opinion how much downtime is too much downtime?
1, 2, 5 hours over the course of a month? 99.8%, 98%, 95% total uptime too little?
I mean I can understand technical difficulties and I am willing to be patient with my host especially when the service (when it is up) is good but where exactly do you draw the line, start asking questions, or canceling that contract and demanding your refund?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 17, 2007
i have 150 domains my server I wish it to migrate to a new server I can do restore domains, mail and users and data, stats to new server. I need minimum downtime so I need your's advice step by step which service need to restore first so my user get minimum downtime.
WIndows 2003 Enterprise
Helm3.2.15.
IIS6.
Smatermail4.
smarterstats.
MSDNS.
MSFTP.
MySQL5.x.
SQL server2005.
.
.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2009
Moved to them recently from Wiredtree as my clients were asking for a uk-based server. I am a small time host, mainly to friends and family.
I've had more downtime in a week with VPS Ville than I ever had with Wiredtree.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 4, 2009
i've recently been experiencing a lot of apache downtime on my eUKhost VPS. anyone else having this problem? it's driving me crazy and i'm thinking about moving.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 24, 2009
Recently our provider has been having unplanned long outages (along with a complete server move that took several hours). This has turned out uptime statistic from exemplary to mediocre (100% to <99%).
As we are a hosting company and normally have an extremely good amount of uptime, when is it time to give up on the provider? I am extremely concerned this will become regular and our uptime will simply continue to go down the drain, however, they have been good and have been the main attribution to our 100% uptime (along with our great technicians and hardware).
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 10, 2008
It's not even been a month that I started subscribe a windows 2003 VPS hosting with them and now their website is gone and I am unable to access my VPS server
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2008
I am the webmaster for a high level court system. We run mainly .php and MySQL like most do. We are in the process of doing a transfer to 1 and 1. I want to be able to test everything (database wise) before I do the transfer. I thought the best way to do so would be to purchase another DNS name and server and transfer everything there first to test and then when that is fully operational have a redirect to there and do the DNS name transfer from the old site to 1 and 1, and when the DNS name is on 1 and 1 take the redirect off . I don’t want any downtime at all.
This might not be the most cost effective but for downtime I thought it would be the best way, especially when I can have a live test before the transfer.
View 14 Replies
View Related