I am running Apache2.2, PHP5.I have been running with virtual hosts on a Windows 7 environment fine for a couple of years successfully, but have just had to move to a Windows 8 environment.It looks like Apache and PHP have installed and are working fine, but my Virtual hosts are now not being recognised. From what I can tell, it is the Windows 8 hosts file that is having a problem, as it looks as though it is now just setup to Block websites.
If I make the host file just have the one line127.0.0.1 localhost entry, then the very first Virtual Host from my apache config file will come up, but the rest are not found.If I put the usual 127.0.0.1 mywebsite.name aliasname is appears as though my website works momentarily and then is blocked..
Ok so I just installed apache 2.2 on windows server 2008.
I would like to set it up so if I go to 22.214.171.124(Server IP) I get index1.html. If I go to example.com which points to 126.96.36.199 I get index2.html. If I go to example3.com which points to 188.8.131.52 I get index3.html.
So kind of like, if the domain folder is not found on my server, give the page index1.html.
In the long run I want to run a bunch of sites with different domains, testing right now though.
I just have a question about an Apache 2.0 error. I am running a web host and I am using VHCS for my web hosting control panel which creates virtual hosts in Apache's config files. Whenever I have a certain number of virtual hosts (200 or more roughly) Apache will start giving me problems with no messages about what went wrong. Some examples of what Apache does is that it will crash when I run "apache2ctl restart" or it just won't run when I start it sometimes. It really annoys me since I'm wondering if it's an Apache memory issue. Any ideas on what to do or how to solve this dilemma?
i bought some webspace and i have uploaded mywebsite.I need to configure my domain atomuss.com to have virtual hosts.How is that done?.I have tried contacting my webmaster and it seems he is making himself unavailable everytime i speak want a word with him. Anybody..
I have a little trouble with my Apache configurations. I have two computers with Ubuntu and Apache 2.2 - let's call them Home (192.168.1.2) and Server (192.168.1.3) connected with a router. I am working on Home, connecting to Server via ssh and mounting the web root directory of Server to Home via sshfs -> Server's /var/www becomes Home's /home/username/www. The problem is I can't really setup my Apache virtual hosts. I have a project in Server's /var/www/project, respectively Home's /home/username/www/project, and I want to create a virtual host on Home that lets me view the remote contents.
This is what I am adding to Home's /etc/hosts: 192.168.1.3 project
This is what I am adding to Home's /etc/apache2/sites-available/project:
I am messing with Apache at home and have managed to create virtual hosts with no problems, my next step was to produce a self signed SSL cert. which again has worked but it's redirecting my non-SSL virtual host to the host I have set-up for SSL for example:
- www.mysite1.com set-up with SSL and works as designed both http and https - www.mysite2.com I don't want using SSL is working fine through http but if you try https it will then redirect to www.mysite1.com
I have been tearing my hair out over this, I have a small problem, I am trying to set up multiple virtual hosts using ssl on port 443. I have followed instructions and set up IP based hosts with my single network card having two different IP's. but the problem is that the second IP is not recieving any requests from the router as it is using the certificate from the first host and diverting to the result of the first sites authentication process.
any one know how I can do this, the first router forwards all requests to the second more secure router which then forwards to the server which is working fine. I need to get this to work and don't know how. both routers support NAT and ther servers first IP address has been assigned a NAT IP.
I can't include the conf file as the board won't let me until I have posted 5 times....but if you need it I can email it or something
the virtual hosts on port 80 are name based....does this matter?
I am trying to configure Apache 2.2 on Linux Mint 17 ( derived from Ubuntu 14 LTS).
I am wanting to create a variety of localhost sites all for development. One of those is built on Laravel 4. I have followed every tutorial I can find yet, for some reason which I do not understand ALL my sites route back to the Laravel root document when called from the browser. Just don't get it.
Here is my hosts file:
127.0.0.1 localhost 127.0.1.1 vince-XPS-8300 127.0.0.1 auburntree 127.0.0.1 example
I just installed a new server and I would like to transfer all virtual-hosts on new Apache installation.
I updated all IP addresses in each .config file and simply uploaded the edited conf files into new /etc/apache2/sites-available folder. I rebooted Apache, but through Webmin I can not see them on Existing virtual hosts list. Why? Do I need to manually re-add all the 30 sites?
I have a task of converting a current Win Server based apache server from multiple IP based virtual hosts to a full name based virtual hosting.I'm famiilar with the steps but I was wondering if there are any gotchas in Windows that I should be aware of. It seems that now matter what I change in the new config it doesn't work or work as expected.
I am just getting started with my first Linux VPS account and am having a problem that I hope someone can help me with. I am setting up multiple client accounts that will each have access to Tomcat Manager on their own domain so that war files can be deployed to the home directory of the respective account. I was able to get Tomcat Manager going for each domain, but when I try to upload a war file, I get a permission denied error. However, I don't get this error for the main VPS account.
What is the best way to resolve this? Is there a way to link a client account user to an instance of Tomcat Manager? Or do I have to assign the home directory of the account to a group that is common to the tomcat user (assuming that is what Manager is running under)? Or is there another option that is entirely better?
Just looking for some guidance before I hack up my new account too bad.
As far as I can tell, SSL is working perfectly on my server. Though I am wondering why I am getting errors logged? By the looks of it, I've been getting them every day since I opened my server.
Here's a few: [30/Jun/2008 04:30:46 04877] [warn] Init: (host.mywebsite.com:443) You configured HTTP(80) on the standard HTTPS(443) po$ [30/Jun/2008 04:30:46 04877] [warn] Init: SSL server IP/port conflict: mywebsite.com:443 (/usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.c$ [30/Jun/2008 04:30:46 04877] [warn] Init: You should not use name-based virtual hosts in conjunction with SSL!! [30/Jun/2008 04:54:05 04877] [warn] Init: (host.mywebsite.com:443) RSA server certificate is a CA certificate (BasicCons$ [30/Jun/2008 04:54:05 04877] [warn] Init: (mywebsite.com:443) RSA server certificate CommonName (CN) `www.mywebsite.c$ [30/Jun/2008 04:54:05 04877] [warn] Init: (host.mywebsite.com:443) You configured HTTP(80) on the standard HTTPS(443) po$ [30/Jun/2008 04:54:05 04877] [warn] Init: SSL server IP/port conflict: mywebsite.com:443 (/usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.c$ [30/Jun/2008 04:54:05 04877] [warn] Init: You should not use name-based virtual hosts in conjunction with SSL!
Why so many sleeping processes from server 2, and none or almost none from server 1 ? Is it normal that every query from server 2 is open on a different port ? Should they be grouped by virtual host, or is there one different port for each script running concurrently?
What could be a reason for server 2 having problems to open connections on server 1, and how to solve it?
Right now I'm about to deport more users from server 1 to new virtual hosts on server 2, hoping it will lower the load on the first machine and overall accelerate the response times. I just thought I'd post here first because this all seems very weird to me and i thought someone with an external look might tell me what I'm doing wrong. And also if network would be the problem maybe that's not the clever thing to do to make more users remote.
I have set up IP-Based Virtual Hosts, as I have been requested to set it up for SSL.
I have successfully set up all redirects and routes using the IFCONFIG and ROUTE.
My query is this, I have noticed that each HTTP request actually has to come in through the Virtual IP address (which is assigned to each site) from outside. Else it just displays the default host. Does this mean I have to have a separate phone line and router for each web-site I wish to host?
I was in the market for a new dedicated server after a couple of years with my previous provider. The previous provider did nothing wrong but they were no longer competitive when it came to CPU and memory.
I moved first to geekrack. And I left them after a week and a half as they never were able to get my rDNS records setup.
I found Universal Hosts on this forum and gave them a shot. I had asked for an operating system that they didn't offer normally (Debian 64 bit) and they said that they could do it. However, when my server was setup it was 32 bit Debian instead. They apologized and had Debian 64 bit setup less than 24 hours later.
When I asked them to get rDNS records setup it took a few hours but they were setup correctly and they worked.
Universal Hosts is also a BurstNet reseller but compared to my other attempt at using a BurstNet reseller they are fantastic. While the initial config was incorrect they worked quickly to fix it and were very professional about it.
So after two weeks - so far so good. Keep up the good work UniHosts!
I current have a VPS hosted with a host who rent racks from Gyron.net at Telstra Londong Hosting Center Datacenter (Docklands) and im very satisfied with the network but im looking to change hosts, so im looking to find hosting companies that also rent racks/network from Gyron.net.
So does anyone knows hosting companies that rent space/racks/network from Gyron.net?
Are there any web hosts that allow spaces in file names?
I am building a web site using Adobe GoLive. It contains many photo galleries using Adobe Photoshop CS3 (Adobe Media Gallery). When I upload a test site to my domain hosted by Yahoo using SmartFTP, it is rejected because the file names of my photos contain spaces. See <hayesphotos.biz> When I look at other photographers' sites, many use real world file names with spaces. I have inquired at two other large web hosts and they tell me that spaces will appear on their sites as "%20". My test site looks fine when previewed on my web browser with spaces. Their answer is to use underscores. Am I asking too much for a web host that allows file names in english?
Recently I stumbled along a host on here with a good rep and that uses direct admin.
Because they were very nice on the live support I signed up to see what direct admin was like.
Its very diferent from cpanel. Some parts seem to be harder to use like the phpmyadmin requires the username and password to the database you created not the control panel username and password like cpanel. Although I guess that could be a good security feature just in case some one gets into the control panel they can not get into the phpmyadmin, then again if they are smart and were able to get into the control panel they could get into ftp and look what the username and password is on the config file for the script you are using.
The bandwidth meter seems to be better in direct admin although I think its acting up for me as its putting yesterdays bandwidth on todays. I was told by the host that it updates every 2 hours and at first it did but now its gone to every day. Oh and unlike cpanel this bandwidth meter includes bandwith used by the control panel.
Niether one from what I can tell counts sftp though at least for the hosts I have right now.
I'm writing a .Net app using SQL server, and so I'm looking for a Windows server hosting. Do they provide things like Remote Desktop and what not? Because on some of my tables, I have to be able to login and give permissions to users and things of that sort.
after upgrading from 11.5. to 12.0.18 all web Hosts which are using asp or aspx files are not working anymore.
We get following error: HTTP-Fehler 404.17 - Not Found ModulStaticFileModule BenachrichtigungExecuteRequestHandler HandlerStaticFile Fehlercode0x80070032 Angeforderte URLhttp://www.ratg.at:80/index.asp Physikalischer PfadC:Inetpubvhosts atg.athttpdocsindex.asp AnmeldemethodeAnonym Angemeldeter BenutzerAnonym
If we try to repair the Installation with the reconfigurator "Plesk virtual Hosts Security" the program is crashing.
We use Apache as part of a 'consumer' software which as been working fine with Apache 2.0.64 (running as a 'regular' user). We want to transition to version 2.4, but it seems to be working a little bit differently than the 2.0 version.
In httpd.conf, we have "ErrorLog logs/error.log". With version 2.0, the error.log file is created in the "...AppDataLocalVirtualStore..." path (since user cannot write to 'Program Files (x86)' were it is installed), but with version 2.4.10 we only get an "Access is denied. AH00015: Unable to open logs" error.Is this a known difference between 2.0 and 2.4.