Apache :: 2.4.4 Forward Proxy - Response Slow When Tested From Browser
Jan 22, 2014
I have Configured Apache2.4.4 for forward Proxy and tested from my browser the response is very slow and even not coming complete Response for some requests.
I also Tested the same for Apache2.2 Forward Proxy it is very fast and good.
May I know what is the Problem in Apache 2.4
Is there any Issues in proxy modules (mod_proxy,mod_proxy_connect.so,mod_proxy_http.so) in Apache2.4
This is the same configuration i used for Apache2.2 and Apache2.4
Behind a pfsense box we have a computer who act as a forward proxy with apache. At the end we have the family computer.This is the problem: i can't hide the forward proxy on internet, the forward proxy is reported "detected".
I've been trying to get ahold of Awknet (www.awknet.com) Sales sector for about a week now and still no response :-( Does anyone have similar experience? Or maybe Awknet just didn't get my email? :<
I have Qmail installed on my Centos box. There seems to be some problem with connection because when I run DNSreport from dnsstuff.com on it it shows me that it cannot connect to mailserver.
I tried telnet from local and this is what happened...
telnet mail.mydomain.com 25 Trying XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX... Connected to mail.mydomain.com (XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX). Escape character is '^]'.
then nothing happens for a while (about 30s) and then I receive this greetings message:
220 [mydomain.com] ESMTP NO UCE/SPAM on this server ESMTP
How can I speed up this process? Are there any lookups possible or what?
I have a dedicated server that I am renting that appears to randomly respond very slowly for some reason (pings are between 90-4000ms with about 75% packet loss).
This has been happening lately (about once a week for the past 4 weeks) and I thought I had originally found the cause of the problem but it appears I haven't.
Originally, when this problem was happening we were getting an abnormally high about of traffic but a reboot always fixed the issue. I've checked every where I can think of but I cannot find anything out of the ordinary.
ight now we're averaging less than 2Mbps in traffic, the CPU load is less than 0.75, the memory usage is at 55% with no swap being used, Apache connections are normal, no active SSH, FTP, or mail connections, I've restarted all services which had no impact, I've checked the access and error logs but can't see anything out of the ordinary.
I have a ticket open with the data center but I'm trying to figure this out on my own to fix whatever is causing this so I can move my data over to a new server we just got setup over the weekend in a local data center.
Limestone's support is extremely slow. I just got a server with them to host VPSes, so I was inquiring about additional IPs in case I needed them.
Their first two responses were within 4-5 hours, which is bearable. However, yesterday, I actually needed to order more IPs and posted a new reply. I have yet to receive a reply after over 12 hours and my client has been left waiting to receive the additional IPs he ordered.
I haven't been with Limestone long, and I haven't had much other experience with their support, but I was unsure what else to do other than post this here and hopefully get a resolution.
I know their servers are unmanaged and pretty cheap, but I think they should still take the time to answer tickets in a decent amount of time.
Has anyone had similar experiences with Limestone?
I recently made a shift to FDC for one of my servers that I use for downloadable content.
I went for a $199 server with a 100mbps shared bandwidth port. Now, the only problem I seem to be having with it is that downloads appear to be, I would say recognized, very slowly by the server before they start, however, once the download starts I get a full speed. This usually happens during peak times.
I'm using about 10/15mbps on the server according to my cPanel statistics. I just wanted to ask here prior to contacting FDC on this, whether this slow server response time has something to do with the bandwidth port, or perhaps the server's RAM, CPU, etc? Given I'm using quite minimal bandwidth on the port, should I consider having them fix this or upgrade the server instead?
And if I had to upgrade, would I need to upgrade the port or the RAM, or both for this?
This is in regard to ongoing stress I've had over this server from DN...
Keep in mind this is a NEW server order; my first with this company.
I was assigned IPs that appear to be on multiple spam block lists. The "biggest" problems are mail being dumped to bulk by yahoo and dumped to bulk or completely black holed by hotmail. It was also blocked by comcast, mail.ru, and anyone who uses SORBS (those are the only ones I KNOW about so far). This helps reinforce the suspicion that bulk mail was being delivered from the IPs at some point.
I Contacted support at 9PM on the 13th and was referred to abuse. Only after complaining again on the 17th, was I told they requested removal from ONE of the blacklists and they would "look into" the others. I replied saying I wanted new IPs or I would request a refund and that I did not feel the service I recently purchased was actually delivered.
Now here is the part that is giving me the feeling this will not end well for me; I no longer see the abuse department ticket when I log into their ticket system.
What If I ordered the server to use as a mail server? Am I out of line for finding a new server unable to deliver mail to the hotmail/yahoo inbox unacceptable?
Telling my customers to wait and maybe someday their mail will be delivered to the major free mail services is not the kind of reputation I want to have. Its feels like I was sold a problem someone else created and am expected to wait an unspecified amount of time to see if it can be resolved. I do not feel its fair to be left hanging while waiting for white listing attempts on IPs I did not soil in the first place.
I have built a database driven site with PHP & MySQL. Pages download quicker on some connections than other (obviously), however this is not due to connection speed. The web host server seems to respond very slowly to my boss's network (which is on a proxy server). Could it be that this problem is related to the web host? i.e. could it be that the web host is unequipped to deal quickly with this type of network?
On my home connection (2Mbps), pages often download instantly, however occaisionally I have to wait 10-20 seconds to receive the page from the host.
Finally, could you recommend an excellent web host to use with our site? My boss wants to offer a professional service where server response is quick. We are based in the UK.
We are seeing intermittent slow responses from SMTP on a RHEL6 server running Qmail on Plesk 11.5. The response is being measured from a remote Zabbix server.
The response time seems to be slow (>10s) for a period of 2-3 minutes and then returns to normal (<1s). All other services continue to be ok during the period of slowness.
The server_args line in /etc/xinetd.d/smtp_psa already contains "-Rt0" and all the DNS servers in /etc/resolv.conf are resolving properly.
From looking at the maillog file the server was receiving about 35 SMTP connections a minute at the time of the slowdown. We have the server configured to use 2 x RBL's.
I wonder if we are hitting a limit on the maximum amount of SMTP connections. The file /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming does not exist so, according to the Qmail manual, there shouldn't be a limit on the number of incoming SMTP connections.
i signed up for vps from vps.me and i got ssh credential i logged in ssh using token2shell but when i put my server ip "10.223.1.157" in google chorome but then it says unable to find even i am not able to access ftp through filezilla also
I am working with an Apple Lion Server. I want to give users the possibility to gain access to certain share points with the webbrowser via the WebDAV protocol. The OS allows to define sharepoints with the GUI. In this GUI you can adjust, that the users are allowed to access the sharepoints via WebDAV but it is not possible to access the folders via a browser. You just get an error from the webserver after a login:
You don't have permission to access /webdav/ on this server.
So I have looked for the relevant configuration file "httpd_webdavsharing.conf" (apache v2.2)
Code:
# # Apache Config for WebDAV Sharing # Activated and deactivated by com.apple.webapp.webdavsharing webapp #
RegisterResource "WebDAV Sharing: %c %s" /webdav main webdav RewriteEngine On RewriteMap webdavmap prg:/usr/libexec/webdavsharing/webdavsharing_mapper
[Code] .....
Is there a way to modify the code in such a way that it allows the favoured access?
Just wondering if anyone here has tested windows VPSes with the latest PV drivers and xen 3.2.1?
So far it looks pretty solid and the CPU doesn't go crazy like the older versions.
What do you guys think?
Also what do windows vpses hosters here use? I was looking at testing out XenSource for work and recommending it. But if the typical Xen VPS can handle windows then it won't be necessary although I like alot of the features that xensource has. Anyone else here use some other products in the hosting business?
i have made my all pages with .html extension and hence my SEO is based on accordingly. Now i made some changes to htaccess that causes to not inclusion of header and footer pages (both are made with .php extension ). so i decided to change the extension of pages (.html to .php) and it wokrs. due to SEO and large number of pages i want all my pages .php (made later). to get converted automatically with .html in browser. so is it possible using .htaccess rewrite.
When I deploy my application into tomcat, and bind httpd with AJP, httpd do not response occasionally, it will halt 2-3 minutes. The quickly way is restart httpd
My site will wait for 30s almost everytime before loading any of the page itself.Specs of my install:
- DigitalOcean Droplet (VPS) with Ubuntu Server 12.10: 512 Ram and 20GB SSD (not even coming close to needing more RAM, still have 240MB free according to top) - Wordpress 3.6.1 - 5 plugins: W3 Total Cache, Wordpress SEO by yoast, WP Better Security, WP Smush.it, and Redirection (problem occured before adding the last 2, I can't remember about the others) - No traffic to speak of. I get maybe 10 uniques/day. - Apache 2.2.22 - MySQL 5.5.32
I've optimized my site itself the best I can, minifying and combine js and css files, using the WP Smush. It plugin to compress images, serving jQuery from a CDN, but none of that worked the 30 second wait (though it did shave about 10 seconds off the load time after the wait for response).
I was using cloudflare and had to fiddle with the nameservers of my domain, but cloudflare didn't work at all and I switched the nameservers back to normal pointing DNS directly at my site to eliminate the obvious causes. I'm comfortable with Linux and the command line. This is the link to my site: [URL] ....
I have also enabled SSL in the apache http server using mod_ssl. The load balancing works fine, but in all the response headers these connection attributes are added "Connection: keep-alive keep-alive: timeout=5"
Is there a way to remove these headers? I do not want these headers to be added in the response. I have also tried mod_header to unset these headers, but no use. HTTP/1.1 protocol is being used, so eventhough the connection is not present in the header, the connection would should be considered as persistent. Why is apache sending these attributes explicitly in each response. I just want to get rid of these attribute...
I am using the latest version of Apache on an Windows XP machine
When my web service is down for maintenance, since Apache is will still be up and running, I would like for Apache to serve an xml file as a response for the appropriate request. I have three operations available, makePayment, calculateFee, and voidPayment.
Is it possible to have Apache determine what type of request is made for example if I have an xml error page for each operation; how will Apache know which xml file to serve based on the operation request from the client
To make it more clear: What is the best practice for modifying apache to know what request is being made in order to serve the appropriate xml file?
I'm using the isapi rewrite module for iis 6 which uses the exact same syntax as mod_rewrite in apache. I'm not very well versed in apache and need getting this to work asap. Basically I have a directory in our website: URL....
I need to forward this to an IP address, for example to this address:100.12.33.45/folder.While keeping the original URL (www.xyz.edu/folder). I'm unsure of the apache syntax for this.
I want to setup a failover approach in which if after a particular timeout say 10secs the load shifts to some other website like Refer.com | The world. The timeout should be in Proxy Pass and if timeout occurs it shifts to Refer.com | The world
Im using AJAX on my site and i need to access a seperate server instance on a different port. AJAX wont allow me to do that so i want to use Apache as a proxy but only for one page.
Loading a page with ~150 files (most images and js files) i keep runing into "locked requests" that are not comeing back and block the whole page from finishing loading. The files differ every time.
I see this warnings in my error.log (looks like they are connected to the behauviour above).
Code:
[Tue Nov 19 20:38:10.890013 2013] [cache_disk:warn] [pid 216692:tid 15924] (OS 5)Access is denied. : [client x.x.x.x:58963] AH00699: rename tempfile to file failed: C:/temp/cache/aptmpcBQArf -> C:/temp/cache/H8Cta/9ha4U/Uhhhs/OlQfU/1Q.data,
I m trying to setup a reverse proxy with several site that will redirect the request into several internal server.I wanted to do that with several VirtualHost (like shown below). Unfortunatly whatever I type on my browser testsupport.xxxx.com or support2.xxxx.com I m redirected at the first of the config file (in the exemple http://10.253.12.41/.Is it the ServerName key that will redirect to the right proxypass ?
