Any Software , Utility , Package To Test HDD On Linux Server
Aug 15, 2008
I have used e2fsck on linux server hard disk (CentOS 5.0) and the result :
=================================
Warning! /dev/sda2 is mounted.
Warning: skipping journal recovery because doing a read-only filesystem check.
/dev/sda2 contains a file system with errors, check forced.
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Deleted inode 19137773 has zero dtime. Fix? no
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
Block bitmap differences: -(16332803--16332804) -(16332823--16332826) +(16345421--16345424) +16347209
Fix? no
Free blocks count wrong for group #498 (25950, counted=25949).
Fix? no
Free blocks count wrong (37023218, counted=37023216).
Fix? no
Inode bitmap differences: -19137773
Fix? no
Free inodes count wrong (19162546, counted=19162545).
Fix? no
/dev/sda2: ********** WARNING: Filesystem still has errors **********
I don't know the exact meaning of the displayed result , does it mean bad sectors? How much the e2fsck is reliable? Is there any better Linux utility to check bad sectors on Western Digital HDD?
Although running >> /usr/local/psa/bin/dns --info dev.sname.c002.aname.domain.com >> shows the 'ecz1' TXT record exists for "dev.sname.c002.aname.domain.com" : ... ecz1.dev.sname.c002.aname.domain.com. TXT ecz1
[Code] ....
The issue can be caused by extra spaces in the TXT record:
Code: [root@a10-52-143-28 ~]# /usr/local/psa/bin/dns --add dev.sname.c002.aname.domain.com -txt 'ecz1 ' -domain ecz1 SUCCESS: Creation of DNS record in Domain 'dev.sname.c002.aname.domain.com' complete. [root@a10-52-143-28 ~]# /usr/local/psa/bin/dns --del dev.sname.c002.aname.domain.com -txt 'ecz1' -domain ecz1 Unable to del record in DNS server: unable to find DNS record
In the following example I have 3 such TXT records with 3, 5, 7 extra spaces and remove record with 3 spaces:
Code: [root@a10-52-143-28 ~]# mysql -u admin -p`cat /etc/psa/.psa.shadow` psa -e "select host, val, (length(val) - length(rtrim(val))) as extraspaces from dns_recs where host='ecz1.dev.sname.c002.aname.domain.com.' and val like 'ecz1%'" +---------------------------------------+-------------+-------------+ | host | val | extraspaces | +---------------------------------------+-------------+-------------+ | ecz1.dev.sname.c002.aname.domain.com. | ecz1 | 5 | | ecz1.dev.sname.c002.aname.domain.com. | ecz1 | 3 |
I'm using Earthlink to host a website, but I think this question is valid for any host.
If you have a hosting account that's on a windows server/MS Windows based and want to switch to a Linux/Unix server account, how would you do this without any downtime?
I assume when they switch the account, all DNS related entries have to be updated so you won't be able to reach the website for a day or so.
Trying to access any APS installed in Plesk i obtain this error: Internal error: Package with UID 'fb00f4ad-620a-4052-96b7-398bd99d9d6d' not found.The error panel.log:
[19-Dec-2014 13:17:19 Europe/Berlin] Exception: Package with UID 'fb00f4ad-620a-4052-96b7-398bd99d9d6d' not found. file: /usr/share/aps_php/aps_php.php line: 12519
[code]....
This post change the error, but i think that is not the correct way: [URL] ..... Any way to reinstall/regenerate APS database and anything related with it?
I define expiration date for my package in my domain and after that date my domain still active. I think this problem related to statistic. When I run this command manullay i'v got the error.
Anyone have a good download test in chicago other then FDC's?
I was told i was upgraded to a 1GBPS port for free by my host(from a 10mbit) which is sort of weird, i want to confirm. at this time FDC's 100MB file takes me about 3 seconds to download and downloads at 44.7M/s.
the file is too small for me to try and pull 1gbit, by that speed i have a 500mbit line odviosely but i want to test against something outside of FDC.
I have Parallels Plesk 12.0.18 with CentOS 6.5 (Final)
WAF is On, with Atomic Basic ModSecurity rule set.
I was wondering if my sites were protected and I went to the Atomic wiki.
When I run a test from a non-whitelisted system following these instructions (STEP 10) [URL].... I always receive 404 error with all of my sites.
I also tested with:
[URL]...
Results: The sites load normally. (the call not even appears in the logs)
I've unistalled and reinstalled mod_security several times with the same results.
Is there any "official" way to check if WAF is protecting Plesk 12?
I asked same question in Atomic forum and they said:
you'd need to ask parallels about this, we made the ruleset available to them, but they implemented it using their own design. They might not be using 403 error codes like we do.
My server is a debian 7 64 bits with plesk 12 last update.
A customer installed drupal 7.4 from plesk panel successful. However from Drupal/Configuration admin panel can not enable "Clean url". Clean test url failed too:
"The clean URL test failed"
.htaccess was ok .
I tried set domain vhost.con with (https://www.drupal.org/getting-started/clean-urls#enabling-7):
I wrote a script to test the integrity of my DNS and run it from time to time on my server...
I just ran it today and it discovered I suddenly have 5 domains with SOA-records that doesn't point to itself. They point to the secondary nameserver.
They are records that exist for years and were for sure correct before (I know this because of that script).
If I do a "restore defaults" it isn't corrected and if I switch to slave and then back to master it doesn't change either...
The file /var/named/run-root/var/obfuscated.com is updated, but the slave-DNS stays in that file...
The only way I'm able to correct it is by deleting the NS-record with the slave DNS and adding it again.
I assume there's some mechanism that scans the NS-records and then decides to make that one the SOA. This has always worked fine... also on this server.
If you are deploying PHP and MySQL along with a site/application, how do you do it? Do you work with the individual components, or do you lean towards ready-made packages?
I use WAMP to develop my applications, and I find it a very simple yet powerful tool for deploying Apache, MySQL and PHP to Windows platforms. I've been looking at the Zend Server today too, which strikes me as very interesting, especially the full version.
ordering a dedicated server package, what else is there to expect as far as running or pointing your domain name to the servers IP? what else is needed to.. lets say get supercoolryan.com up and running.
Would the hosting company provide this setup for me or do i have to do it myself?
i might order windows server 2003 and install apache.
I'm planning on launching a php-based web application within a month or two and am weighing different hosting options. I was almost certain with my plan to use two dedicated servers (one for web, one for db) but I can't help reading about all of these new grid/cloud/utility hosting solutions that promise instant scalability and deployment - which sounds like a blessing. I know there is a lot of garbage and marketing hype so I felt I should ask what the real deal is. Are these services reliable, worth using, really that easy to use, powerful, etc? I was looking at gogrid's demo videos and to instantly launch a few web servers, a db server, load balancer, etc, in 15 minutes for 30% of the cost - I can't ignore it.
if it's possible to disable the ability to send email for accounts using a certain package in cPanel? I tried searching, I didn't find anything really relevant. Would it be possible to maybe create a rule, or script to add a rule to each account using a package to just block that username or account from sending email?
We are a small development team mostly coding in php/mysql as an unpaid hobby. Anyways yesterday our test server had hardware problems and to get a decent new one would be $300. Well this seems a lot to ask for someone that does get any compensation for it. So we are looking for some cheap way of providing a test server. We need at least a way that provides svn, apache w/ php and mysql. We tried to use the webserver, but the head dev didnt like the idea. Any suggestions?
Let's say you ordered new server,do you make active same moment(install httpd server and all other components)or you running test before like memory and hardware test? If yes,which programs you would recommend to test fully hardware?
I have LAMP -server running and I was wondering how to test it's performance. So is there any good tools for that? I'm interest how many http queries my server could handle etc.
