My first ever post on WHT and I am happy its a positive one. These are a few words I have to say in favor of people at LimestoneNetworks.
I ordered a Intel Core2Quad Q6600 dedicated server with them with upgrading most of the resources to the topmost at about 6 AM CST this Friday. They recently included a Fraud Check in their TOS which I was not aware of but only became notified once I had signed up. It involved uploading the CC images and a Govt ID.
Btw: their new control panel Rockware actually Rocks !
I uploaded the docs promptly and since chat was offline I called them up and got connected with a Support rep. He told me that a Sales rep will check on it at 8 AM CST. At 8 AM, one of the sales rep promptly acknowledged the ticket for verification and it had the comments of a 24-hour turnaround, which scared me a little.
Wonder ! Wonder ! Since all my stuff was verifiable and without any issues... I got reply within 20 mins stating my server was being sent for provisioning.
Another wonder ! another 20 mins and my server was showing the server in my Rockware CP as being built. I was pressing F5 like crazy and everytime I saw something new in my CP regarding my server. Which is like the most rapid updates I have seen ever !
Overall, even after the verification delay, I got my server in 4 hours !
Subsequently I had to open some tickets to them for issues that were from my side and 100% (yes 100%) of the time, someone responded within 5 mins.
Hoping to post a similar (if not more) positive review after couple of months.
I am very happy go give everyone a review of limestonenetworks.com
Here is My story!
I was in a bunch and needed a VPS server because My other one went down unexpectedly, so i needed a new server in under 5 hours. I looked all over, and came upon one very special company, Limestonenetworks.com. I placed the order, and selected to have HyperVM/OpenVZ installed. The server was setup in 3 Hours! This was the fastest setup time for a dedicated server I have ever seen. When I submit a support ticket, I have a response within 30 mins. This is truly one of the best datacenters ever! Their staff is very helpful! To be honest, I am so pleased with them, I just now ordered a second server from them! Yes, You do pay a bit more, but you definatly get what you pay for, and ill tell you what, this extra 2 cents is worth it all the way!
I would recommend Limestonenetworks.com to ANYONE!
I have been with them for 3+ months now and the service has been amazing. I am pleased with the superb fast and knowledgeable customer support.
Going more into details...
I have submitted couple support tickets and all were answered on a timely manner, with proper guidance. Also their live-chat is very good, the rep. is knowledgeable and can provide technical support. The staff seems quite nice, and I am loving their new rockware panel, makes it easy for anyone to configure dns, pay invoice, check invoice, submit tickets, etc, etc. do anything you need to do regarding your server.
The overall service has been amazing, my site is quite server intensive and it loads very fast, my visitors are happy, and barely any downtime -- definitely a thumbs up from me
Where/How do I submit my domain to verify the review like I have seen in couple other threads?
Want to share my expirience after 2 weeks on limestone netwroks and psm.
For starters - i'm very happy with the service (~230$/m)
I started out with a webmin controled server without management and after 2 days of try and fail and new threads in wht i finally switched to cpanel with psm service, switch was really fast and limestone has a deal which gets you 5 bucks off psm's monthly fee.
limestone accually reinstalled my server and added cpanel and then contacted psm to get my software initialied (i even got my software configs set as my old server so i'll have a stable move).
software initiation took about 2 days with psm but that's due to special software requirment needed for my site to transfer.
responce times from psm and limestone are lightning fast and besides an overcharge of 39 bucks due to new software bug on limestone(got 40$ back yay), I can barely say something bad about this new system of running my dedi server with both limestone taking care of hardware and psm for all software issues - both do really well and fast on answering any kind of ticket.
ill give one example for this on the ticket i submited yesterday to psm, all my sent php mail() came out as spam on gmail.com, after contacting psm i got answered in less than 1 hour that my reverse dns aren't set correctly - then i got them setup with limestone and it took about 90 minutes to close this whole issue.
being moved from shared hosting to dedi servers I must say to all the new movers out there like I was that the combinitation of limestone + psm is great, you'll get fast and quallity support on all ends.
i've left out other info like uptime because this has been mentioned before and when combining the included psm monitoring with the great limestonenetworks uptime, downtime is a word i really forgot about.
Just wanted to take a minute and report that I am still extremely pleased with my LSN dedicated box. I have a 3ghz amd dual core with 4gig ram and 2x250gb hdd. No problems at all and staff is very helpful and knowledgeable. I don't want to go through the laundry list of things they have done for me and to my server (they are in other threads) but just wanted to say that they continue to impress.
I joined Limestonenetworks back in 2008 when it was a small company. At the time they offered the best price on the server I was looking for, so I took the plunge. The first 2 months were great, I enjoyed the stable network, and responses from the support team were fairly quick (1-2 hours response time). From there on it was all downhill, my servers were constantly down, and the support team took longer to answer my tickets. I didn't think this was a big problem, so I stayed with Limestonenetworks even though it was having problems with their network. Near December an incident occurred that really pushed me over the edge. My servers had been down for hours, so I opened a support ticket, and one of the agents replied and told me that the downtime was due to an upgrade in their network.
Again, I came to conclude that it could be far worst, so I stayed, one of the reasons was that I didn't want to switch my game servers over. It's important to keep in mind when you are running game servers, IPs play an important part because that's where you get your traffic. Near January the network upgrade at Limestonenetworks was still taking place which caused my bandwidth meter to stop working. This really scared me because I didn't want to get charged for overages due to the fact that my servers were receiving DDOS attacks, and I wouldn't know when to close the ports.
This incident actually turned out to be positive for me because even though I went over my bandwidth quota they didn't charge me for overages. I was very happy because this was like a late Christmas present, so now I was even more happy to give my money to Limestonenetworks. Now you might ask the question, how is this going downhill? Even though they didn't charge me for the overages, I still lost many clients who were angry at the fact that their game server were down.
In the end this network upgrade actually cost me 3 clients who were paying ~$60 per month. I let this slide because at this point I already had two servers with Limestonenetworks and I really didn't want to switch over due to the fact I would lose my IPs. The next month, February, was no different, I had more issues with Limestonenetworks. Starting of this month I was getting large DDOS attacks, which kept pushing my bandwidth over the quota, and I ended up paying close to $200 dollars just for bandwidth overages.
At this point they started to nickel and dime me for every single penny they could get of me. I don't know if they were having financial problems, or if it was due to another reason. Again in March I went over the quota, but at this time they told me that I had to pay per gigabyte which would result in a $500+ charge in bandwidth, and after talking with multiple agents, I was finally able to reach an agreement. They had changed a policy all of the sudden due to the fact that they knew I was a good customer and would keep paying for the overages.
The problem I had here was that I didn't mind upgrading to plan after I knew how much bandwidth was going to be used, since they don't offer any sort of DDOS protection, and game servers result in large DDOS attacks occasionally. I understand that Limestonenetworks was not at fault, but by making me pay per gigabyte was a bit harsh, since I had never been late on a payment, and had multiple servers. Try to remember that I stayed with this company even though I lost multiple clients because of their network outages, but they didn't care about this, all the care about is nickling and diming customers.
From that point on I have been living on the edge because I don't want to pay for an upgrade before hand due to the fact I don't know how much bandwidth my server will be using. Even if I upgrade to a different package it does not offer an insurance due to the fact that if I receieve a large DDOS than I orignally predicted, I would still end up paying per gigabyte.
This company has turned from having potential to just making their customers run away. Now the other problems I had with Limestonenetwork is the support they offer, which has been declining since I joined. The associates are very rude and don't really care about the customer's experience. I didn't include every problem I had with Limestonenetwork because it would make it a very long read.
Network - 10/10 Downtime - 5/10 Customer Service - 2/10 Overall Experience - 4/10 Would I recommend this company? NO, I urge everyone to stay away, unless they like to deal with problems on a daily basis.
Also from reading other topics on this forum, I personally believe that Limestonenetwork is overselling and their network can not handle the load.
I am working on a fresh Windows 2003 server with PHP5.2.1 and MySQL 5.0.27.
I am trying to load the curl, ldap, and mssql extensions for a project I am working on here for a client. (I use linux only for the most part)
I have set: extension_dir = "C:PHPext"
However I get the following on only these 3 of the several I am trying to load.
Code: [27-Mar-2007 16:14:42] PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'C:PHPextphp_curl.dll' - The specified module could not be found. in Unknown on line 0 [27-Mar-2007 16:14:42] PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'C:PHPextphp_ldap.dll' - The specified module could not be found. in Unknown on line 0 [27-Mar-2007 16:14:43] PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'C:PHPextphp_mssql.dll' - The specified module could not be found. in Unknown on line 0 My PHP.ini file is as follows:
Code: [PHP]
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; About php.ini ; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; This file controls many aspects of PHP's behavior. In order for PHP to ; read it, it must be named 'php.ini'. PHP looks for it in the current ; working directory, in the path designated by the environment variable ; PHPRC, and in the path that was defined in compile time (in that order). ; Under Windows, the compile-time path is the Windows directory. The ; path in which the php.ini file is looked for can be overridden using ; the -c argument in command line mode. ; ; The syntax of the file is extremely simple. Whitespace and Lines ; beginning with a semicolon are silently ignored (as you probably guessed). ; Section headers (e.g. [Foo]) are also silently ignored, even though ; they might mean something in the future. ; ; Directives are specified using the following syntax: ; directive = value ; Directive names are *case sensitive* - foo=bar is different from FOO=bar. ; ; The value can be a string, a number, a PHP constant (e.g. E_ALL or M_PI), one ; of the INI constants (On, Off, True, False, Yes, No and None) or an expression ; (e.g. E_ALL & ~E_NOTICE), or a quoted string ("foo"). ; ; Expressions in the INI file are limited to bitwise operators and parentheses: ; | bitwise OR ; & bitwise AND ; ~ bitwise NOT ; ! boolean NOT ; ; Boolean flags can be turned on using the values 1, On, True or Yes. ; They can be turned off using the values 0, Off, False or No. ; ; An empty string can be denoted by simply not writing anything after the equal ; sign, or by using the None keyword: ; ; foo = ; sets foo to an empty string ; foo = none ; sets foo to an empty string ; foo = "none" ; sets foo to the string 'none' ; ; If you use constants in your value, and these constants belong to a ; dynamically loaded extension (either a PHP extension or a Zend extension), ; you may only use these constants *after* the line that loads the extension. ; ; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; About this file ; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; This is the recommended, PHP 5-style version of the php.ini-dist file. It ; sets some non standard settings, that make PHP more efficient, more secure, ; and encourage cleaner coding. ; ; The price is that with these settings, PHP may be incompatible with some ; applications, and sometimes, more difficult to develop with. Using this ; file is warmly recommended for production sites. As all of the changes from ; the standard settings are thoroughly documented, you can go over each one, ; and decide whether you want to use it or not. ; ; For general information about the php.ini file, please consult the php.ini-dist ; file, included in your PHP distribution. ; ; This file is different from the php.ini-dist file in the fact that it features ; different values for several directives, in order to improve performance, while ; possibly breaking compatibility with the standard out-of-the-box behavior of ; PHP. Please make sure you read what's different, and modify your scripts ; accordingly, if you decide to use this file instead. ; ; - register_long_arrays = Off [Performance] ; Disables registration of the older (and deprecated) long predefined array ; variables ($HTTP_*_VARS). Instead, use the superglobals that were ; introduced in PHP 4.1.0 ; - display_errors = Off [Security] ; With this directive set to off, errors that occur during the execution of ; scripts will no longer be displayed as a part of the script output, and thus, ; will no longer be exposed to remote users. With some errors, the error message ; content may expose information about your script, web server, or database ; server that may be exploitable for hacking. Production sites should have this ; directive set to off. ; - log_errors = On [Security] ; This directive complements the above one. Any errors that occur during the ; execution of your script will be logged (typically, to your server's error log, ; but can be configured in several ways). Along with setting display_errors to off, ; this setup gives you the ability to fully understand what may have gone wrong, ; without exposing any sensitive information to remote users. ; - output_buffering = 4096 [Performance] ; Set a 4KB output buffer. Enabling output buffering typically results in less ; writes, and sometimes less packets sent on the wire, which can often lead to ; better performance. The gain this directive actually yields greatly depends ; on which Web server you're working with, and what kind of scripts you're using. ; - register_argc_argv = Off [Performance] ; Disables registration of the somewhat redundant $argv and $argc global ; variables. ; - magic_quotes_gpc = Off [Performance] ; Input data is no longer escaped with slashes so that it can be sent into ; SQL databases without further manipulation. Instead, you should use the ; function addslashes() on each input element you wish to send to a database. ; - variables_order = "GPCS" [Performance] ; The environment variables are not hashed into the $_ENV. To access ; environment variables, you can use getenv() instead. ; - error_reporting = E_ALL [Code Cleanliness, Security(?)] ; By default, PHP suppresses errors of type E_NOTICE. These error messages ; are emitted for non-critical errors, but that could be a symptom of a bigger ; problem. Most notably, this will cause error messages about the use ; of uninitialized variables to be displayed. ; - allow_call_time_pass_reference = Off [Code cleanliness] ; It's not possible to decide to force a variable to be passed by reference ; when calling a function. The PHP 4 style to do this is by making the ; function require the relevant argument by reference.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; Language Options ; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
; Enable the PHP scripting language engine under Apache. engine = On
I am working on a fresh Windows 2003 server with PHP5.2.1 and MySQL 5.0.27.
I am trying to load the curl, ldap, and mssql extensions for a project I am working on here for a client. (I use linux only for the most part)
I have set: extension_dir = "C:PHPext"
However I get the following on only these 3 of the several I am trying to load.
Code: [28-Mar-2007 13:41:40] PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'C:PHPextphp_curl.dll' - The specified module could not be found. in Unknown on line 0 [28-Mar-2007 13:41:40] PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'C:PHPextphp_ldap.dll' - The specified module could not be found. in Unknown on line 0 [28-Mar-2007 13:41:40] PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'C:PHPextphp_mssql.dll' - The specified module could not be found. in Unknown on line 0 I have restarted IIS several times and have also placed the three above extensions in the c:windowssystem32 folder.
My php.ini file is:
Code: [php]
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; About php.ini ; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; This file controls many aspects of PHP's behavior. In order for PHP to ; read it, it must be named 'php.ini'. PHP looks for it in the current ; working directory, in the path designated by the environment variable ; PHPRC, and in the path that was defined in compile time (in that order). ; Under Windows, the compile-time path is the Windows directory. The ; path in which the php.ini file is looked for can be overridden using ; the -c argument in command line mode. ; ; The syntax of the file is extremely simple. Whitespace and Lines ; beginning with a semicolon are silently ignored (as you probably guessed). ; Section headers (e.g. [Foo]) are also silently ignored, even though ; they might mean something in the future. ; ; Directives are specified using the following syntax: ; directive = value ; Directive names are *case sensitive* - foo=bar is different from FOO=bar. ; ; The value can be a string, a number, a PHP constant (e.g. E_ALL or M_PI), one ; of the INI constants (On, Off, True, False, Yes, No and None) or an expression ; (e.g. E_ALL & ~E_NOTICE), or a quoted string ("foo"). ; ; Expressions in the INI file are limited to bitwise operators and parentheses: ; | bitwise OR ; & bitwise AND ; ~ bitwise NOT ; ! boolean NOT ; ; Boolean flags can be turned on using the values 1, On, True or Yes. ; They can be turned off using the values 0, Off, False or No. ; ; An empty string can be denoted by simply not writing anything after the equal ; sign, or by using the None keyword: ; ; foo = ; sets foo to an empty string ; foo = none ; sets foo to an empty string ; foo = "none" ; sets foo to the string 'none' ; ; If you use constants in your value, and these constants belong to a ; dynamically loaded extension (either a PHP extension or a Zend extension), ; you may only use these constants *after* the line that loads the extension. ; ; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; About this file ; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; This is the recommended, PHP 5-style version of the php.ini-dist file. It ; sets some non standard settings, that make PHP more efficient, more secure, ; and encourage cleaner coding. ; ; The price is that with these settings, PHP may be incompatible with some ; applications, and sometimes, more difficult to develop with. Using this ; file is warmly recommended for production sites. As all of the changes from ; the standard settings are thoroughly documented, you can go over each one, ; and decide whether you want to use it or not. ; ; For general information about the php.ini file, please consult the php.ini-dist ; file, included in your PHP distribution. ; ; This file is different from the php.ini-dist file in the fact that it features ; different values for several directives, in order to improve performance, while ; possibly breaking compatibility with the standard out-of-the-box behavior of ; PHP. Please make sure you read what's different, and modify your scripts ; accordingly, if you decide to use this file instead. ; ; - register_long_arrays = Off [Performance] ; Disables registration of the older (and deprecated) long predefined array ; variables ($HTTP_*_VARS). Instead, use the superglobals that were ; introduced in PHP 4.1.0 ; - display_errors = Off [Security] ; With this directive set to off, errors that occur during the execution of ; scripts will no longer be displayed as a part of the script output, and thus, ; will no longer be exposed to remote users. With some errors, the error message ; content may expose information about your script, web server, or database ; server that may be exploitable for hacking. Production sites should have this ; directive set to off. ; - log_errors = On [Security] ; This directive complements the above one. Any errors that occur during the ; execution of your script will be logged (typically, to your server's error log, ; but can be configured in several ways). Along with setting display_errors to off, ; this setup gives you the ability to fully understand what may have gone wrong, ; without exposing any sensitive information to remote users. ; - output_buffering = 4096 [Performance] ; Set a 4KB output buffer. Enabling output buffering typically results in less ; writes, and sometimes less packets sent on the wire, which can often lead to ; better performance. The gain this directive actually yields greatly depends ; on which Web server you're working with, and what kind of scripts you're using. ; - register_argc_argv = Off [Performance] ; Disables registration of the somewhat redundant $argv and $argc global ; variables. ; - magic_quotes_gpc = Off [Performance] ; Input data is no longer escaped with slashes so that it can be sent into ; SQL databases without further manipulation. Instead, you should use the ; function addslashes() on each input element you wish to send to a database. ; - variables_order = "GPCS" [Performance] ; The environment variables are not hashed into the $_ENV. To access ; environment variables, you can use getenv() instead. ; - error_reporting = E_ALL [Code Cleanliness, Security(?)] ; By default, PHP suppresses errors of type E_NOTICE. These error messages ; are emitted for non-critical errors, but that could be a symptom of a bigger ; problem. Most notably, this will cause error messages about the use ; of uninitialized variables to be displayed. ; - allow_call_time_pass_reference = Off [Code cleanliness] ; It's not possible to decide to force a variable to be passed by reference ; when calling a function. The PHP 4 style to do this is by making the ; function require the relevant argument by reference.
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; ; Language Options ; ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
; Enable the PHP scripting language engine under Apache. engine = On
; Enable compatibility mode with Zend Engine 1 (PHP 4.x) zend.ze1_compatibility_mode = Off
; Allow the <? tag. Otherwise, only <?php and <script> tags are recognized. ; NOTE: Using short tags should be avoided when developing applications or ; libraries that are meant for redistribution, or deployment on PHP ; servers which are not under your control, because short tags may not ; be supported on the target server. For portable, redistributable code, ; be sure not to use short tags. short_open_tag = On
; Allow ASP-style <% %> tags. asp_tags = Off
; The number of significant digits displayed in floating point numbers. precision = 14
; Enforce year 2000 compliance (will cause problems with non-compliant browsers) y2k_compliance = On
I've run a pure-ftpd-server privetley and haven't bothered to chroot the enviroment since I only used it myself when I needed files remotley. Now on request of my school and work buddies I've started hosting a website which they are to manage and through my ftp-server add / remove the site's different files.
I know how to start it with chrooted enviroment but everytime I reboot it, which I usually don't need to anyway, it starts unchrooted so I manually have to kill the ftp-daemon and start it with my customised parameters.
Is there a way to change the init.d/pure-ftpd-conf or something to start with my customised options? i.e with the chroot-option turned on.
I am very interested in getting in the web hosting business and have been investigating a lot in the internet. My question is what would be the recommended hardware to start, taking in consideration the costs.
I have 2.4.3 (Win-64) installed and running. When it starts up, I get a command prompt window that has messages in it, but the window closes so quickly, I can't read the messages. They don't appear in the log. I have tried to manually start the server, but when I do, the messages do not appear!
How can I get that window to stay open or where can I see those messages?
My Review / Experiances of Limestonenetworks My Advise Avoid like the plauge 01-07-09 01:14 PM I placed an order for a server 01-08-2009 Server is ready Orginal Config DotnetPanel Windows Web 2008
I had problems from the start IIS Not starting correctly Dotnetpanel issues including adding websites.
So I fixed what I could and then employed someone to do the work. Afterlooking around I found someone who looked proffessional and told me he could do the work.
He got back to me after a few hours and said their were problems with the server OS and DotnetPanel install.
It would take longer to fix but he would try After A day or so, he sent me and email stating he was unable to get it to work correctly and said the entire OS needed to be reinstalled. So I contacted LSN and told them about the problems I was having and decided to ditch the Windows 2008 Web server for a more roboust soloution.
I went for the classic Centos and Hypervm soloution.
LSN happy loaded my server with a fresh OS and I proceed to employ my normal guy to install and configure the server AV went on firewall went on Lex went on Hypervm went on IP Address Binded to network adapters.
But all the VPS we setup only had the "local lan adapter IP" making them inaccessiable from the outside world.
After somemore looking at the matter I resorted to contact LSN and get them to remove /change the interfaces.
This gave the VPS the external IPS but were still not connectable from the outside world. so far I spent 65$ on the orinal comapny who looked at setting up the web 2008 server additioanl 45$ on a diffrent tech to confirm the fault and been billed for a second money at singlehop.
so I contacted "customer support" and all I wanted was a refund, even if it was parcial. I just wanted a refund. I lost out on to much money and to many hours sitting infront of the computer typing up support contacts.
Please read the transcript below I strongly advise you not to use LSN they are not a helpful company
You are now chatting with ryan ryan: Hello, thank you for visiting Limestone Networks! How may I assist you today? ibby@: Hello Ryan, I want to make a complaint. ryan: Oh no! What appears to be the issue? ....
after reading the complete thread about Limestone's TOS and weighing their latest server offering, I took the plunge and just spent $160 on a monthly server.
My email from them is dated today at 6:44 pm.
Let's see how long it takes to get this server in my hands. Nothing special in the order, an extra hd for backup, that is it.
I'm a newbie here but not a newbie to unmanaged servers. If this one goes off without a hitch, I'll move a few sites from a box I currently have a ManageMyBox (no problems with them, at all, just looking for a datacenter closer to home and this seemed like a good deal).
I've got a few servers around many companies, yet never tried them(LSN). To me they are a bit fishy, by how cheap their servers are. Any experience with them(Good/Bad), please share it.
I just want to preface this by saying I was on here reading up about hosting companies, their reviews and limestone networks after a phone call with Ryan A over there, was definitely going to be my provider.
However, I ordered my server about a week ago, and have some massive issues.
First and most concerning : Support.
There has been about 4 tickets from me, with no response for about 9+ hours, one ticket (when they incorrectly installed DotNetPanel, and I couldn't start hosting domains yet even) they didn't get back to me for almost 2 days. It looked like all hope was lost.
I guess (speaking with Kris there) they're working on tightening up the provisioning time, etc. With that said, they DID in fact fix my DotNetPanel installation, and all looked well.
Lastnight I figured I'd check my bandwidth, for kicks. I've been remote desktop connecting to my machine fairly frequently, maybe for about 10 minute sessions a piece, nothing major. I have nothing running on my box, I ran a couple of tests to check out pings, server loads so I figured I'd plop a quick and simple game server up there to test it. I checked my "bandwidth report" and this is what I found out:
[url]
Mind you, I have no mail server at all, nothing. in the span of 5 days I've used almost my entire quota, without running almost ANY serverside applications.
Currently my dedicated server remains shut down until this issue can be resolved. I entered yet another ticket lastnight, had one reply this morning, and it appears I'm back into the lost ticket desert.
Remember, just my experience. My point of view so far may change however, but at this rate it's been pretty horrible. 5 days on setting up a dedicated and have it all ready to go, I had to re-pay my old provider for another month due to Limestonenetwork's ability to not install DotNetPanel correctly, I'm pretty displeased at the moment.
My company ordered server on 23/10/2009 from LimeStone, and they asked for verification hence i given them all the ID that they need. After that, they told me they couldn't accept AMEX and have to pay through PayPal, i have paid since and NOW again they asked for ID again.
Why i have to verify for second time since i have posted all my ID and utility bill for first time? I don't think i need to give so much verification since PayPal has already verified my account as i owned PayPal Verified Business Account, this kind of "repeating" or double verification never happen when i order from ThePlanet/EV1 where i am looking to migrate to Limestone Networks.
This is very unpleasant experience and I don't want to wait for more than a week to get a server.
over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1161 ms 797 ms 839 ms <hidden> 2 673 ms 876 ms 821 ms <hidden> 3 574 ms 839 ms 881 ms 10.137.4.81 4 743 ms 863 ms 857 ms 10.137.4.42 5 661 ms 899 ms 779 ms <hidden> 6 570 ms 875 ms 840 ms <hidden> 7 774 ms 462 ms 784 ms <hidden> 8 544 ms 401 ms 359 ms <hidden> 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 831 ms 562 ms 539 ms so-3-1.hsa1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.78.205.157 ] 11 578 ms 557 ms 562 ms vlan52.csw2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.68.102.62] 12 469 ms 460 ms 457 ms ae-72-72.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.69.137.2 1] 13 683 ms 682 ms 576 ms ae-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.132.78] 14 609 ms 581 ms 580 ms ae-63-63.csw1.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.136.154] 15 567 ms 599 ms 557 ms ae-13-69.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.19.5] 16 592 ms 599 ms 618 ms LIMESTONE-N.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.71.120.66 ] 17 573 ms 558 ms 580 ms 1-203-63-74.reverse.lstn.net [74.63.203.1] 18 676 ms 581 ms 580 ms 6-203-63-74.reverse.lstn.net [74.63.203.6] 19 510 ms 577 ms 580 ms 74-201-63-74.reverse.lstn.net [74.63.201.74] 20 663 ms 580 ms 581 ms vertualhost.com [69.162.111.77] Trace complete. AND: Tracing route to yourservers.info [69.162.111.66] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1414 ms 761 ms 664 ms <hidden> 2 1038 ms 1036 ms 680 ms 10.19.18.233 3 374 ms 1421 ms 376 ms 10.137.4.81 4 437 ms 1278 ms 1019 ms 10.137.4.42 5 1162 ms 783 ms 797 ms 10.145.176.130 6 525 ms 359 ms 377 ms 10.145.176.133 7 371 ms 378 ms 378 ms <hidden> 8 646 ms 420 ms 359 ms <hidden> 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 * * 4187 ms so-3-1.hsa1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [ ] 11 1618 ms 1499 ms 2183 ms vlan51.csw1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [ 12 658 ms 1522 ms 996 ms ae-62-62.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net 7] 13 2261 ms 1458 ms 3320 ms ae-3.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.1 14 1655 ms 2463 ms 1435 ms ae-63-63.csw1.Dallas1.Level3.net [4. 15 1762 ms 1817 ms 2062 ms ae-13-69.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4. 16 1718 ms 1340 ms 2638 ms LIMESTONE-N.car3.Dallas1.Level3.net ] 17 2300 ms 455 ms 1739 ms 1-203-63-74.reverse.lstn.net [74.63. 18 1421 ms 420 ms 1978 ms 6-203-63-74.reverse.lstn.net [74.63. 19 461 ms 437 ms 599 ms 74-201-63-74.reverse.lstn.net [74.63 20 541 ms 576 ms 581 ms hostingwitch.com [69.162.111.66]
how can they sell UNLIMITED ALPHA MASTER RESELLER to others?
Is that true that they are your customer?
All I know is, You do not sell unlimited space at limestonenetworks.com.
Are those sites cheaters or are the illegal? I did not find a specific or complete postal address or person name on those sites.
I am troubleshooting a problem where the php5 package was replaced and caused lots of psa/plesk packages to be removed. This system details are;
# cat core.version 11.5.30 Ubuntu 12.04 115140407.17 # lsb_release -a Description: Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS Codename: precise # uname -a Linux my.host.name 3.2.0-45-generic #70-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 29 20:12:06 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
The plesk panel is up, the websites are running, and the email services are running, but there are many errors like so;
==> error.log <== PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php5/20090626/json.so' - /usr/lib/php5/20090626/json.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0
I also get the following error when inspecting the json module:
root@vps:/etc/php5/mods-available# php -i|grep -i json PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php5/20090626/json.so' - /usr/lib/php5/20090626/json.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/20-json.ini,
[Code] ....
What I need to install to get that json.so file back?
