Final Results - HostWay
Apr 10, 2008
This is a follow-up to my original thread [url] regarding my client's experiences with HostWay.
I simply can't believe all of this, and I went through it.
The low points of the whole thing work out like this: In order to set up an SSL for my client's site, we needed a dedicated IP. If you do a traceroute on my client's URL, it resolves to someone else all together. Int he mean time, I tried to purchase an SSL through HostWay, and when they didn't respond in a week and a half, I e-mailed cancelling the order, and purchased a (thankfully) inexpensive SSL from GoDaddy. I got an e-mail back within hours from HW saying, literally, "We never processed your SSL order, so there's nothing to cancel. Let us know if there's anythig else we can do."
As I mentioned before, e-mail support seems to be handled off-shore, and it takes over a week for most answers. Phone support gets you, I found out, a service in Florida.
While the people I dealt with on the phone were always professional and polite, they literally could do almost nothing. I was told several times, "I have to e-mail someone in Chicago - no, I don't know who it is, all I have is an e-mail address."
Back to the SSL - seems HostWay already installed one on my client's site at some point - and it had nothing to do with my client. You could visit a secure version of the site, and it would tell you not to enter, as the cert didn't match the site.
My client and I both were on the phone with the Florida 800 number for hours at a time.
Average wait time to speak to someone was 30 minutes or so. I'm not carping about that part - but they were feeding us false information which was supposedly fed them from "Chicago." Specifically, I told them on the phone and via e-mail that the IP didn't resolve correctly, and that the old cert needed to be removed before a new one could go on (and only their SSL team can install certs, supposedly).
They told my client that the GoDaddy cert was causing them problems, and that it needed to be cancelled before they could install one of their GeoTrust certs. I nuked it - even though I knew better - and of course nothing was done. They lied to my client for several days, saying the new cert was installed (even though I knew it wasn't, and I told my client so, and showed them HW's tech was passing on false information).
This situation went on for almost two weeks. Finally, Monday night, my client got a supervisor based in British Columbia, Canada, who promised that he would walk "the tech admin" through fixing the problems that night. But that was only after my client threatened to pull his account.
Well, the IP is still screwed up, but they replaced the cert that night with one for which they charged my client an arm and a leg. The CC processing company is happy, so we let it ride, and they're now processing payments over the web.
If this is confusing, it's because I condensed many long days and nights into a few short paragraphs. Let's just say that HW didn't have their thinking caps on tight, because they committed to their preposterous stories to e-mails which we all received.
Later this year, at a conference to be held in Canada, a committee of nuclear power station operators will be discussing whether or not they should keep HW as the host of their site. Gee, I wonder what the consensus will be.
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 29, 2008
i would like to know if there's someone has a bad experience with this host.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 23, 2008
I have used this forum a lot recently and just wanted to give back.
I had my site hosted with gate.com for about 2 years which had been "OK". I wanted shared windows hosting with a real SQL Server account included and there weren't many options. Gate.com was only $10 at the time for a shared windows site with 100MB MS SQL included. Down time has been nowhere near 99.99%. Several times a year the the site was down for days at a time. I was nearing my 100MB SQL limit and noticed that SQL was no longer included with their new plans, so I started doing some research on this site.
Right after that they migrated to new servers. Based on some domain names, setup screens... that I've seen recently, I believe that they were bought out by hostway.com. Since then, everything has been horrible.
They moved my SQL database to a new server, but kept the old one with the old name visible on the web. Since you can't have 2 computers with the same name and they didn't tell me about the change, the new server had to keep the old name but I couldn't access it with that name. They never told me about this change and never gave me access to the new server. After calling, one tech support guy actually gave me a CNAME as the server name. Like I could access the server using a name ending in hostway. <- yes, not .com, just a dot at the end.
The aliases that were pointed to my domain were redirected to some investment club. One tech guy tried to fix it by deleting the alias from my account and then re-adding it.
The script he used to do this automatically charged my credit card for $10 for each alias and only worked for one of them. He said it was up to me to contact billing to fix this. Three weeks later, the alias that worked was broken again - pointing back to the investment club.
Gate.com also had phone support (originally a plus), but hold times during this transition period could take an hour. Filling out a ticket took 3 weeks for a reply.
I had already decided I wanted to try out a VPS because I had a couple more sites I wanted setup and I didn't want to get nickled and dimed for each one. Again, I wanted Windows Hosting with SQL Server included. Based on some reviews I read here I decided to go with KickAssVps.com. Their Plesk license includes 10 domains for free (I need 6), they have a free SQL Server 2005 1GB coupon (still available on this site until October 1st), and RAM was great at 960MB which I now realize is a lot more than I need.
Have only had the site for a 9 days but so far I am happy. Registered the account late on a Saturday and it was setup by 11PM that night. Questions have been answered in a couple of hours. The KickAssVPS.com site doesn't have the greatest support, but you aren't using any custom tools from them. Help for Plesk, Virtuozzo, DNS setup, IIS... can all be found online and so far I haven't had much of a problem.
I get about 8500 page-views a day and RAM is still under 300MB. Having SQL off server instead of using SQL Enterprise Express is great. Users of the site have commented that the site and chat both respond noticeably faster now. Remote Desktop is also very fast.
Uploading about 1GB of images took a very long time, but not sure if that was on my end or the server.
Sorry for the long rant. Just needed to release some aggression against my old provider.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 25, 2008
I used to recommend Hostway.com to other companies, as they host our eCommerce site as a shared hosting site and their uptime and customer service were very good.
But, NEVER AGAIN. Today, they have been down ALL DAY since around 10:30 am (they would not give me the exact time) and so has our business site! I called twice and the wait time the first time for a tech support person was over 1 hour! IN-FRIGGING-CREDIBLE! The 2nd call a few hours later was at least a 45 minute wait.
The answer I got was that they had a hard drive crash and my site is unlucky enough to live on that drive. Understandable, but their explanation that it takes ALL DAY to restore a hard drive from tape is incredible (or havent they heard of RAID systems??). In any case, our site came back up for a few minutes and is back down again. Downtime since 10:30 or so is approaching 6 hours now!
So, I will no longer recommend HOSTWAY to anyone for any reason. The incredible wait times on the phone line are ridiculous and we have lost $$$ today due to this outage and associated loses from adwords, too.
Finally, it seems that Hostway's other problem is that they are trying to offer too many other kinds of services besides just hosting (which they used to be good at), and now they suck at their core basic service. That's my two cents.
Any recommendations for a replacement hosting service that is reliable and well known?
I think I pay about $50/3 months for Hostway.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Aug 11, 2008
Sharktech is hit and miss. They are not professional or courteous at all. Everything is done THEIR way or the highway. You either love them or you hate them. It's just the way it is.
Anyone who is truly business-minded and has a grasp on how the real world works will not like them. Dealing with them will NOT be like dealing with a "real" company like the cable company or phone company, even IF you're paying Sharktech MORE per month than you pay for your utility bill.
If you're just looking for the cheapest option for your side-business that you don't really care about too much, and you can tolerate the occasional email from Sharktech that makes you go "WHOA!", then use them.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 12, 2008
When I first started hosting with Spunky everything went smooth as silk (as you can see by this thread: [url] and it was almost like a dream host, unfortunately it didn’t take long before the bubble burst with my site being down due to some DNS issue on their side which resulted in my site being down around 4 times… Mike offered to make it up to me by giving me a free month.
After a couple of other minor issues things were finally starting to look good when suddenly my site was offline again, I contacted support and they told me that they had changed the name servers and had sent emails out regarding this around 3 weeks back.. I never got these emails (but I did get billing emails), none the less I changed my name servers to the new ones… and that’s when I got a shock, after my domain again resolved… its showed me copy of my site that was nearly a month or so old! All my content was gone! Apparently they had also sent other emails (which I didn’t get) saying that once they shift name servers all the old sites would be deleted! In the beginning when I started hosting with Mike I asked him if Spunky did daily backups and was old yes, so I never kept a backup… and so I lost my whole site… weeks of work including writing multipage articles, test scripts, modifications etc.. all gone, like they never existed… except for some found on google’s cache.
Worst of all, all the links that I had from other sites to specific articles are now dead and even if I rebuild the site those links are still going to be dead because I don’t know all of the old links.
Now, reading this post you might say: “ Ah! He’s just bitter” and you would be damn right, I am bitter, angry, frustrated and a whole lot of other things as this could have been prevented from their side if they used a simple system that I thought of in 2 minutes..
Just like the link that you have to click on when you join a newsletter or a forum they could have sent out these notifications with a link having the customers number attached to it to show that the client had gotten the email.. if the link was clicked… they client got the email, if not, a simple cron job to check and resend emails that were not received would do the trick, if that too didn’t work… then maybe contact from tech/customer service *BEFORE* deleting someone’s website/s?
Spunky says they are very sorry and regret what has happened, but sorry and regret does not get back the weeks of work that went into a site, does it?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2008
[WARNING: This may be a long review, reader discretion is advised.]
If some of you have followed my other reviews on HostingZoom(HZ) posted on here, you might be wondering why are the # of months are not correct... it's actually do to my poor math skills haha.. but here it is, calculated correctly(I hope).
I've been an HZ customer for 36 months now. That must say quite a lot about HZ in itself and the fact that I come back here periodically to tell others about my experience at HZ. A little backgrounder for starters.
I've been with HZ since April 2005. I came to this very forum to read up on reviews and get recommendations. I narrowed down my search to HZ and Site5. At the time, 2 very formiddible hosts in the industry. Both touting blazing fast response time to tickets, superior-high quality support, excellent servers managed by the best. After getting feedback and contacting both hosts I made my decision to go with HZ. Their sales staff was particularly helpful and friendly. Quite prominentely I remember getting blazing fast replies from Kiet Duong(CEO of HZ) with detailed explanations to the questions I had as a n00b in the hosting industry(I feel quite dumb looking back at the questions I've asked). It was this personal helpfulness that I experienced that gave me the extra push to go with HZ added with the fact that they had live chat technical support.
Fast forward a year and a half. I totally patted myself on the back telling myself what a great choice I've made. It was this time I've seen the "Site5 Fiasco" unfold here on WHT. To such amazement I didn't understand how such a highly touted host could run into so many problems and just be bombarded with a barge of negativity. It was also at this point where the overselling went mad with Site5. I was just glad I wasn't any part of it.
I was happy over here at HZ. Stable server with little to no problems. The support I received through tickets were always blazing fast and amazingly helpful and personal.
Such notable technicians as Alex and Vlad who are still with HZ today made my stay at HZ a perfect one. Any problems I had were always delt with in the most professional manner. The server was very stable and I had little to no reason to complain about anything since all my websites were working beautifully. The times where I've used live chat was pleasantely helpful. No trouble getting a hold of a technician and having a personal 1-on-1 support session to get a quick problem resolved.
On a few occassions as well, I had special urgent requests and they were fulfilled greatfully. One was to get a new VPS plan purchased at their sister company ModVPS and get it setup during the weekend, which they don't normally do. Kiet took it upon himself to get my VPS up and running over the weekend. Absolutely wonderful gesture.
A second request was to have my site moved back to the original server I was on, when I moved to their 'failover service' simply because my experience with the 'failover service' was quite bluntly put, horrible. Kiet again took it upon himself to personally make sure my sites made it over safely. He worked over the wee hours of the night and had a technician, Alex I believe, follow up with me the next morning. Again, a very wonderful gesture on Kiet's part. This is what made me really tout HZ so much simply because of this service I received that was above and beyond what I felt I should have gotten.
Fast forward yet again in time. Now I start to experience minor hiccups here and there. 500 internal server error reports from my users. No biggie in my mind but then also at this time I seemed to have observed a pattern happening on the forums. The problems of other customers have began to become very vocal. Day after day, all I observe in the forum is posts about problems problems problems and support not being helpful. For me personally, support quality and response time definately took a hit.
Not a big one, it was still good by my standards, just not as good as it was before. I don't take much out of this, simply take it as growing pains.
Fast forward a little more to now. Nothing has changed. Customers are more and more vocal about problems. Some network outages occur with more frequency and in my honest opinion, were handled horribly. Horrible customer communication and notification about the status of the major event.
[url]
Customers are more and more vocal about the horrible support service as well. Canned liked responses, unhelpful support, very slow responses and the increasing difficulty to get on live chat.
This is the point that began to worry me. My server was still more or less fine so I haven't had an excuse to use tech support so I could not put these claims to truth.
Customers also begin to now point out the increasing problem of load ont he servers.
This past month. I too have begun to feel the effects of this. Load has been an issue daily. My sites are inaccessible during the morning hours as the load hovers around 15+. Either that or my sites are just so incredibly slow that it doesn't even matter that they eventually load because more than likely the visitor would have left. ALL my sites have been taken a hit due to this inaccessiblilty. I loose some traffic becuase this vital part of the day, none of my sites are close to being function due to the speed.
I have contacted support and have gotten nothing that has been remotely useful. Also mentioning that the respones time has turned to hours for my tickets(6-9 hours if memory serves me correct, instead of 5-35 minutes like before). I've also had little luck connecting to a tech on live chat on the first attempt. The responses I've gotten from support seem more like excuses than anything. Alex did take it upon himself to reopen my ticket to check up on me(which I really appreciate) but it still doesn't change the fact that the problems have still been occuring. It has come to a point where I no longer think it's beneficial to stay any longer with HZ. So I may call it quits with them after 36 months unfortunately.
Nonetheless, I am greatful for the times where HZ has been helpful and had taken it upon itself to provide me with service above and beyond what I expect. But like the saying, all good things come to an end.
Hope you found this review intriguing and sorry for the lengthyness of it. I hope it's a great read!
View 14 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2007
I have been doing my homework on windows ASP.NET shared hosting providers and have narrowed down my choice to discountASP & CrystalTech. I am now struggling with making the final decision and would appreciate any thoughts/input/comments/experience that you might have.
My requirements are:
- ASP.NET 2.0
- SQL Server 2005
- SSL Certificate
- Daily backups
- Ability to backup SQL database in real-time
- 20GB Bandwidth
- 100MB Disk Space
- 300MB SQL Disk Space
Site Description: Publish educational material. Users can navigate the site and see articles for free or login and see premium content with subscription. Currently getting 7500 views a day, 1500 visits and 25,000 hits.
Specific items of note:
- discountASP runs apps in isolated application pool, CrystalTech does not
- CrystalTech has phone support, discountASP does not
- CrystalTech is $16.95/month, discountASP is $30/month
- neither provide guaranteed uptime (compared to aspwebhosting.com which does for example - any others that guarantee uptime??)
Will a shared plan with one of these providers be adequate for my needs? If not, any other recommendations?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2009
Is there a way to page results from ls through FTP similar to the way you can in your shell by using ls | less (or ls -l | more)? When I try ls | less through FTP, even on a linux server, it wants to output to a local file?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2007
##################################################################
--------------------- Selinux Audit Begin ------------------------
Number of audit daemon stops: 4
**Unmatched Entries**
Error sending failure mode request (Connection refused)
Unable to set audit pid, exiting
Cannot daemonize (Success)
Error sending failure mode request (Connection refused)
Error sending failure mode request (Connection refused)
Unable to set audit pid, exiting
Cannot daemonize (Success)
Error sending failure mode request (Connection refused)
---------------------- Selinux Audit End -------------------------
--------------------- Cron Begin ------------------------
Commands Run:
User *system*:
personal crontab reloaded: 2 Time(s)
User agadirnet:
personal crontab listed: 1 Time(s)
User dafatir:
personal crontab listed: 1 Time(s)
User drweb:
/opt/drweb/update.pl: 37 Time(s)
User kari:
personal crontab listed: 1 Time(s)
User karicom:
personal crontab listed: 1 Time(s)
User kastala:
personal crontab listed: 1 Time(s)
User mailman:
/usr/lib/mailman/cron/checkdbs: 1 Time(s)
/usr/lib/mailman/cron/disabled: 1 Time(s)
/usr/lib/mailman/cron/gate_news: 223 Time(s)
/usr/lib/mailman/cron/nightly_gzip: 1 Time(s)
User root:
/opt/php51/bin/php5
/usr/local/sitebuilder/utils/clear_trial_sites.php > /dev/null 2>&1: 19
Time(s)
/opt/php51/bin/php5 /usr/local/sitebuilder/utils/sip1.php >
/dev/null 2>&1: 1 Time(s)
/opt/php51/bin/php5 /usr/local/sitebuilder/utils/sip2.php >
/dev/null 2>&1: 1 Time(s)
/opt/php51/bin/php5 /usr/local/sitebuilder/utils/update_key.php >
/dev/null 2>&1: 1 Time(s)
/usr/local/psa/admin/sbin/backupmng >/dev/null 2>&1: 74 Time(s)
/usr/local/psa/libexec/modules/watchdog/cp/clean-events: 1
Time(s)
/usr/local/psa/libexec/modules/watchdog/cp/clean-sysstats: 1
Time(s)
/usr/local/psa/libexec/modules/watchdog/cp/pack-sysstats day: 1
Time(s)
/usr/local/rtm/bin/rtm 40 >/dev/null 2>/dev/null: 1116 Time(s)
/usr/local/sbin/bfd -q: 112 Time(s)
/usr/sbin/ntpdate -b -s 213.186.33.99: 1 Time(s)
run-parts /etc/cron.daily: 1 Time(s)
run-parts /etc/cron.hourly: 18 Time(s)
CRON Restarted 2 Time(s)
---------------------- Cron End -------------------------
--------------------- httpd Begin ------------------------
0.07 MB transferred in 211 responses (1xx 0, 2xx 26, 3xx 173, 4xx 12,
5xx 0)
148 Images (0.00 MB),
62 Content pages (0.07 MB),
1 Other (0.00 MB)
Requests with error response codes
400 Bad Request
/vb/Juice/images/editor/bold.gif: 1 Time(s)
/w00tw00t.at.ISC.SANS.DFind: 1 Time(s)
404 Not Found
/admin/phpmyadmin/main.php: 1 Time(s)
[url]
---------------------- httpd End -------------------------
--------------------- Kernel Begin ------------------------
2 Time(s): PrefPort:A RlmtMode:Check Link State
2 Time(s): Virtual Wire compatibility mode.
2 Time(s): autonegotiation: yes
2 Time(s): duplex mode: full
2 Time(s): flowctrl: none
2 Time(s): ide0: BM-DMA at 0xfc00-0xfc07, BIOS settings: hda:pio,
hdb:pio
2 Time(s): ide1: BM-DMA at 0xfc08-0xfc0f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio,
hdd:pio
2 Time(s): irq moderation: disabled
2 Time(s): rx-checksum: disabled
2 Time(s): scatter-gather: disabled
2 Time(s): speed: 100
2 Time(s): tx-checksum: disabled
1 Time(s): pIII_sse : 4821.000 MB/sec
1 Time(s): pIII_sse : 4822.000 MB/sec
2 Time(s): IO window: e000-efff
2 Time(s): MEM window: fbf00000-fbffffff
2 Time(s): PREFETCH window: 20000000-200fffff
2 Time(s): Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI
revision: 05
2 Time(s): Vendor: ATA Model: Hitachi HDS72168 Rev: P21O
2 Time(s): BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009fc00 (usable)
2 Time(s): BIOS-e820: 000000000009fc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
2 Time(s): BIOS-e820: 00000000000e6000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
2 Time(s): BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000001f7b0000 (usable)
2 Time(s): BIOS-e820: 000000001f7b0000 - 000000001f7c0000 (ACPI data)
2 Time(s): BIOS-e820: 000000001f7c0000 - 000000001f7f0000 (ACPI NVS)
2 Time(s): BIOS-e820: 000000001f7f0000 - 000000001f800000 (reserved)
2 Time(s): BIOS-e820: 00000000ffb80000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
2 Time(s): sda: sda1 sda2 sda3
2 Time(s): ..TIMER: vector=0x31 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=0 pin2=0
2 Time(s): 0MB HIGHMEM available.
2 Time(s): 3ware 9000 Storage Controller device driver for Linux
v2.26.02.007.
2 Time(s): 3ware Storage Controller device driver for Linux
v1.26.02.001.
2 Time(s): 503MB LOWMEM available.
2 Time(s): ATA: abnormal status 0x7F on port 0xD407
2 Time(s): Adding 522104k swap on /dev/sda3. Priority:-1 extents:1
across:522104k
2 Time(s): Allocating PCI resources starting at 20000000 (gap:
1f800000:e0380000)
2 Time(s): BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
2 Time(s): Brought up 1 CPUs
2 Time(s): Built 1 zonelists. Total pages: 128944
2 Time(s): CPU0: Intel P4/Xeon Extended MCE MSRs (24) available
2 Time(s): CPU0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz stepping 09
2 Time(s): CPU: L2 cache: 1024K
2 Time(s): CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
2 Time(s): CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 16K
1 Time(s): Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 5989.49
BogoMIPS (lpj=11978986)
1 Time(s): Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 5989.50
BogoMIPS (lpj=11979013)
2 Time(s): Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
2 Time(s): Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in
supervisor mode... Ok.
2 Time(s): Compat vDSO mapped to ffffe000.
2 Time(s): Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
2 Time(s): Copyright (c) 1999-2005 LSI Logic Corporation
2 Time(s): Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation.
2 Time(s): DMI 2.3 present.
2 Time(s): Dentry cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144
bytes)
1 Time(s): Detected 2992.767 MHz processor.
1 Time(s): Detected 2992.772 MHz processor.
2 Time(s): Dquot-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order 0, 4096 bytes)
2 Time(s): ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
2 Time(s): EXT3 FS on sda1, internal journal
2 Time(s): EXT3 FS on sda2, internal journal
2 Time(s): EXT3-fs: INFO: recovery required on readonly filesystem.
4 Time(s): EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
2 Time(s): EXT3-fs: recovery complete.
1 Time(s): EXT3-fs: sda1: 4 orphan inodes deleted
1 Time(s): EXT3-fs: sda1: orphan cleanup on readonly fs
2 Time(s): EXT3-fs: write access will be enabled during recovery.
2 Time(s): Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs
2 Time(s): Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
2 Time(s): Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
2 Time(s): ExtINT not setup in hardware but reported by MP table
2 Time(s): Freeing SMP alternatives: 20k freed
2 Time(s): Freeing unused kernel memory: 220k freed
2 Time(s): Fusion MPT SAS Host driver 3.04.01
2 Time(s): Fusion MPT SPI Host driver 3.04.01
2 Time(s): Fusion MPT base driver 3.04.01
2 Time(s): Fusion MPT misc device (ioctl) driver 3.04.01
2 Time(s): I/O APIC #2 Version 32 at 0xFEC00000.
2 Time(s): ICH5: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:00:1f.1
2 Time(s): ICH5: chipset revision 2
2 Time(s): ICH5: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
2 Time(s): IP route cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2, 16384
bytes)
2 Time(s): IPv4 over IPv4 tunneling driver
2 Time(s): Initializing CPU#0
2 Time(s): Initializing Cryptographic API
2 Time(s): Inode-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072
bytes)
2 Time(s): Intel MultiProcessor Specification v1.4
2 Time(s): Intel machine check architecture supported.
2 Time(s): Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
2 Time(s): Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 7.1.9-k4-NAPI
2 Time(s): Kernel command line: auto BOOT_IMAGE=linux ro root=801 nousb
2 Time(s): Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones
2 Time(s): Linux version 2.6.18.1-xxxx-grs-ipv4-32
(root@kernel-32.ovh.net) (version gcc 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)) #2 SMP
Fri Nov 3 23:04:19 CET 2006
2 Time(s): Memory: 506412k/515776k available (2860k kernel code, 8896k
reserved, 1080k data, 220k init, 0k highmem)
2 Time(s): Mount-cache hash table entries: 512
2 Time(s): NET: Registered protocol family 1
2 Time(s): NET: Registered protocol family 16
2 Time(s): NET: Registered protocol family 17
2 Time(s): NET: Registered protocol family 2
2 Time(s): Netfilter messages via NETLINK v0.30.
2 Time(s): OEM ID: ASUSTeK Product ID: APIC at: 0xFEE00000
2 Time(s): PCI quirk: region 0480-04bf claimed by ICH4 GPIO
2 Time(s): PCI quirk: region 0800-087f claimed by ICH4 ACPI/GPIO/TCO
2 Time(s): PCI->APIC IRQ transform: 0000:00:02.0[A] -> IRQ 16
2 Time(s): PCI->APIC IRQ transform: 0000:00:1f.1[A] -> IRQ 18
2 Time(s): PCI->APIC IRQ transform: 0000:00:1f.2[A] -> IRQ 18
2 Time(s): PCI->APIC IRQ transform: 0000:01:0d.0[A] -> IRQ 23
2 Time(s): PCI: Bridge: 0000:00:1e.0
2 Time(s): PCI: Enabling device 0000:00:1f.1 (0005 -> 0007)
2 Time(s): PCI: Ignore bogus resource 6 [0:0] of 0000:00:02.0
2 Time(s): PCI: Ignoring BAR0-3 of IDE controller 0000:00:1f.1
2 Time(s): PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xf0031, last bus=1
2 Time(s): PCI: Probing PCI hardware
2 Time(s): PCI: Transparent bridge - 0000:00:1e.0
2 Time(s): PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX/ICH [8086/24d0] at 0000:00:1f.0
2 Time(s): PCI: Using configuration type 1
2 Time(s): PID hash table entries: 2048 (order: 11, 8192 bytes)
2 Time(s): Processor #0 15:4 APIC version 20
2 Time(s): Processors: 1
2 Time(s): Real Time Clock Driver v1.12ac
4 Time(s): SCSI device sda: 160836480 512-byte hdwr sectors (82348 MB)
4 Time(s): SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
2 Time(s): SCSI subsystem initialized
2 Time(s): SGI XFS with large block numbers, no debug enabled
2 Time(s): SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
2 Time(s): Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 4 ports, IRQ
sharing disabled
2 Time(s): Setting up standard PCI resources
2 Time(s): Software Watchdog Timer: 0.07 initialized. soft_noboot=0
soft_margin=60 sec (nowayout= 0)
2 Time(s): TCP bic registered
2 Time(s): TCP bind hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
2 Time(s): TCP established hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072
bytes)
2 Time(s): TCP reno registered
2 Time(s): TCP: Hash tables configured (established 16384 bind 8192)
2 Time(s): Time: tsc clocksource has been installed.
1 Time(s): Total of 1 processors activated (5989.49 BogoMIPS).
1 Time(s): Total of 1 processors activated (5989.50 BogoMIPS).
2 Time(s): Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
2 Time(s): Using IPI Shortcut mode
2 Time(s): VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.1
2 Time(s): VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly.
2 Time(s): ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xD400 ctl 0xD002 bmdma 0xC000
irq 18
2 Time(s): ata2.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 160836480 sectors: LBA48 NCQ
(depth 0/32)
2 Time(s): ata2.00: ata2: dev 0 multi count 16
2 Time(s): ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
2 Time(s): ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xC800 ctl 0xC402 bmdma 0xC008
irq 18
2 Time(s): ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 -- P1 -- ]
2 Time(s): device-mapper: ioctl: 4.7.0-ioctl (2006-06-24) initialised:
dm-devel@redhat.com
2 Time(s): drivers/rtc/hctosys.c: unable to open rtc device (rtc0)
2 Time(s): e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2005 Intel Corporation
2 Time(s): e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.5.10-k2-NAPI
2 Time(s): eth0: Yukon Gigabit Ethernet 10/100/1000Base-T Adapter
2 Time(s): eth0: network connection up using port A
2 Time(s): floppy0: no floppy controllers found
2 Time(s): found SMP MP-table at 000ff780
2 Time(s): ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override
with idebus=xx
2 Time(s): io scheduler anticipatory registered (default)
2 Time(s): io scheduler cfq registered
2 Time(s): io scheduler deadline registered
2 Time(s): io scheduler noop registered
2 Time(s): ip_conntrack version 2.4 (4029 buckets, 32232 max) - 224
bytes per conntrack
2 Time(s): ip_tables: (C) 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team
4 Time(s): kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
2 Time(s): klogd 1.4.1, log source = /proc/kmsg started.
2 Time(s): loop: loaded (max 8 devices)
4 Time(s): md: ... autorun DONE.
4 Time(s): md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
4 Time(s): md: autorun ...
2 Time(s): md: bitmap version 4.39
2 Time(s): md: linear personality registered for level -1
2 Time(s): md: md driver 0.90.3 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27
2 Time(s): md: multipath personality registered for level -4
2 Time(s): md: raid0 personality registered for level 0
2 Time(s): md: raid1 personality registered for level 1
2 Time(s): md: raid4 personality registered for level 4
2 Time(s): md: raid5 personality registered for level 5
2 Time(s): md: raid6 personality registered for level 6
2 Time(s): megasas: 00.00.03.01 Sun May 14 22:49:52 PDT 2006
2 Time(s): mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
2 Time(s): migration_cost=0
2 Time(s): monitor/mwait feature present.
2 Time(s): mptctl: /dev/mptctl @ (major,minor=10,220)
2 Time(s): mptctl: Registered with Fusion MPT base driver
2 Time(s): raid5: automatically using best checksumming function:
pIII_sse
1 Time(s): raid5: using function: pIII_sse (4821.000 MB/sec)
1 Time(s): raid5: using function: pIII_sse (4822.000 MB/sec)
1 Time(s): raid6: int32x1 862 MB/s
1 Time(s): raid6: int32x1 863 MB/s
2 Time(s): raid6: int32x2 795 MB/s
2 Time(s): raid6: int32x4 708 MB/s
1 Time(s): raid6: int32x8 543 MB/s
1 Time(s): raid6: int32x8 544 MB/s
1 Time(s): raid6: mmxx1 1831 MB/s
1 Time(s): raid6: mmxx1 1840 MB/s
2 Time(s): raid6: mmxx2 2122 MB/s
2 Time(s): raid6: sse1x1 1057 MB/s
1 Time(s): raid6: sse1x2 1208 MB/s
1 Time(s): raid6: sse1x2 1210 MB/s
1 Time(s): raid6: sse2x1 2099 MB/s
1 Time(s): raid6: sse2x1 2101 MB/s
1 Time(s): raid6: sse2x2 2252 MB/s
1 Time(s): raid6: sse2x2 2254 MB/s
1 Time(s): raid6: using algorithm sse2x2 (2252 MB/s)
1 Time(s): raid6: using algorithm sse2x2 (2254 MB/s)
2 Time(s): scsi0 : ata_piix
2 Time(s): scsi1 : ata_piix
2 Time(s): sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda
4 Time(s): sda: Write Protect is off
2 Time(s): serial8250: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
2 Time(s): serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
2 Time(s): serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
2 Time(s): tun: (C) 1999-2004 Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
2 Time(s): tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6
2 Time(s): using mwait in idle threads.
---------------------- Kernel End -------------------------
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jul 30, 2008
VPS vs. Dedicated - New Benchmark Results ....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 13, 2007
We're looking to bring in a T3 for our small startup hosting company and when we do traces from multiple location it always runs through a cox.net IP and it concerns me because I dont want our customers to believe they're being hosted on some kids cablemodem. What do you folks suggest, the IP is 64.19.96.5 to their outer router. Should it be a concern that we route through everyone through a cox.net IP?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 22, 2007
Quote:
MySQL Version 4.1.22-standard i686
Uptime = 0 days 0 hrs 4 min 15 sec
Avg. qps = 17
Total Questions = 4479
Threads Connected = 1
Warning: Server has not been running for at least 48hrs.
It may not be safe to use these recommendations
To find out more information on how each of these
runtime variables effects performance visit:
[url]
SLOW QUERIES
Current long_query_time = 10 sec.
You have 1 out of 4491 that take longer than 10 sec. to complete
The slow query log is NOT enabled.
Your long_query_time may be too high, I typically set this under 5 sec.
WORKER THREADS
Current thread_cache_size = 128
Current threads_cached = 6
Current threads_per_sec = 0
Historic threads_per_sec = 0
Your thread_cache_size is fine
MAX CONNECTIONS
Current max_connections = 2000
Current threads_connected = 1
Historic max_used_connections = 7
The number of used connections is 0% of the configured maximum.
You are using less than 10% of your configured max_connections.
Lowering max_connections could help to avoid an over-allocation of memory
See "MEMORY USAGE" section to make sure you are not over-allocating
MEMORY USAGE
Max Memory Ever Allocated : 96 M
Configured Max Per-thread Buffers : 10 G
Configured Max Global Buffers : 58 M
Configured Max Memory Limit : 10 G
Total System Memory : 3.95 G
Max memory limit exceeds 85% of total system memory
KEY BUFFER
Current MyISAM index space = 78 M
Current key_buffer_size = 16 M
Key cache miss rate is 1 : 735
Key buffer fill ratio = 8.00 %
Your key_buffer_size seems to be too high.
Perhaps you can use these resources elsewhere
QUERY CACHE
Query cache is enabled
Current query_cache_size = 32 M
Current query_cache_used = 4 M
Current query_cach_limit = 1 M
Current Query cache fill ratio = 14.83 %
Your query_cache_size seems to be too high.
Perhaps you can use these resources elsewhere
MySQL won't cache query results that are larger than query_cache_limit in size
SORT OPERATIONS
Current sort_buffer_size = 2 M
Current record/read_rnd_buffer_size = 256 K
Sort buffer seems to be fine
JOINS
Current join_buffer_size = 1.00 M
You have had 0 queries where a join could not use an index properly
Your joins seem to be using indexes properly
OPEN FILES LIMIT
Current open_files_limit = 10000 files
The open_files_limit should typically be set to at least 2x-3x
that of table_cache if you have heavy MyISAM usage.
Your open_files_limit value seems to be fine
TABLE CACHE
Current table_cache value = 1024 tables
You have a total of 721 tables
You have 93 open tables.
The table_cache value seems to be fine
TEMP TABLES
Current max_heap_table_size = 16 M
Current tmp_table_size = 32 M
Of 212 temp tables, 0% were created on disk
Effective in-memory tmp_table_size is limited to max_heap_table_size.
Created disk tmp tables ratio seems fine
TABLE SCANS
Current read_buffer_size = 1 M
Current table scan ratio = 17754 : 1
You have a high ratio of sequential access requests to SELECTs
You may benefit from raising read_buffer_size and/or improving your use of indexes.
TABLE LOCKING
Current Lock Wait ratio = 1 : 76
You may benefit from selective use of InnoDB.
If you have long running SELECT's against MyISAM tables and perform
frequent updates consider setting 'low_priority_updates=1'
how to make the changes in red? My server works good for awhile, but then gets REALLY REALLY slow.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2007
I run the top command when memory usage seems to be running high on my server. I look at it and blink and have no real idea whether things are "okay" or not.
I apologize for the extreme basicness of this question. At the same I would love to have some kind of personal benchmark of "okayness" for this server so I can look at top results when things are dreadfully wrong and recognize it.
Based on these results would you say the server is holding up under traffic?
-----------------------------------
17:35:58 up 4 days, 2:26, 1 user, load average: 0.66, 0.57, 0.56
85 processes: 80 sleeping, 2 running, 3 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait idle
total 5.4% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 93.3%
cpu00 6.2% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 92.2%
cpu01 4.8% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 94.2%
Mem: 4147916k av, 3420324k used, 727592k free, 0k shrd, 265360k buff
3128396k active, 91908k inactive
Swap: 2096440k av, 0k used, 2096440k free 2845408k cached
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND
7359 mysql 15 0 94352 16M 3448 S 2.1 0.4 0:08 0 mysqld
9099 nobody 19 0 20256 14M 2096 R 1.3 0.3 0:00 0 httpd
1 root 15 0 1592 496 436 S 0.0 0.0 0:00 0 init
2 root RT 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0 migration/0
3 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 0 ksoftirqd/0
4 root RT 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 1 migration/1
5 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 1 ksoftirqd/1
6 root 10 -5 0 0 0 SW< 0.0 0.0 0:00 0 events/0
7 root 10 -5 0 0 0 SW< 0.0 0.0 0:00 1 events/1
8 root 10 -5 0 0 0 SW< 0.0 0.0 0:00 1 khelper
9 root 13 -5 0 0 0 SW< 0.0 0.0 0:00 1 kthread
13 root 18 -5 0 0 0 SW< 0.0 0.0 0:00 0 kblockd/0
14 root 11 -5 0 0 0 SW< 0.0 0.0 0:00 1 kblockd/1
---------------
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2007
We run our company website on a VPS.
Now we do notice, that quite frequently, the connection times out or the server responds slowly. A friend of mine said the VPS could be the issue of this.
I ran a ping test today for several hours, sending one ping with 16 bytes with a timeout set to 3 seconds.
From 18000 pings sent (5 hours), 120 failed. Which comes to one failure in 150 pings, or one failure every 2.5 minutes.
Is this still an acceptable failure rate or do I have reason to contact our VPS provider? According to our own usage statictics, we are not using much of the server's capacities.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 4, 2008
How can I get rootkit hunter to email me the results?
I tried
MAILTO=me@mydomain
0 0 * * * /root/rkhunter-1.3.2/files/rkhunter --cronjob
and
MAILTO=me@mydomain 0 0 * * * /root/rkhunter-1.3.2/files/rkhunter --cronjob
But it is not sending the email, nothing even show up in my exim_mainlog.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2007
Is there any way to avoid getting false name lookups when trying to resolv inexistent domains ? apart from using another nameserver.
I'm sorry if it was posted earlier, tried searching but it didn't help as it gave me large results.
Code:
[root@removed ~]# ping hjkdji284kajgafhj87da778dfsd.com
PING hjkdji284kajgafhj87da778dfsd..com.insertdchere.com (xx.xxx.xxx.xx) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from www.insertdchere.com (xx.xxx.xxx.xx): icmp_seq=0 ttl=61 time=1.00 ms
64 bytes from www.insertdchere.com (xx.xxx.xxx.xx): icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=0.952 ms
64 bytes from www.insertdchere.com (xx.xxx.xxx.xx): icmp_seq=2 ttl=61 time=1.34 ms
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2007
I just read Peer 1 financials -they got big this year!
Does anyone know how many actual customers they have? The financials say $74.36 Million... with 9,000 customers... humm... they must have more than that? Just curious.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2008
I'm new to server administration/security/troubleshooting, so I have included a lot of info here hoping it will help.
This started because a Linux VPS with CentOS and Exim crashed after only 3000 emails were sent (of 30000) total
I ran a netstat and several times I get three separate ips with the only difference being the last two digits and the port number:
86.104.230.29:59009
86.104.117.45:18065
89.37.137.157:41593
As far as I can tell they are from Romania, and there are several connections.
I have posted a lot of information below, if someone can take a look and give some ideas, it would be very much appreciated.
netstat:
Code:
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.98:34060 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.82:59022 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.219:52276 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.163:25383 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.154:20794 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.235:39094 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.127:61711 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.127:5748 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.37:63424 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.228:54121 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.226:39605 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.91:6446 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.10:54841 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.100:22842 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.118:32674 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.80:16559 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.64:47817 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.136:21718 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.246:37288 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.28:62119 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.190:4468 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.8:25247 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.100:35503 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.199:20896 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.237:saft SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.199:47952 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.118:60561 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.181:10844 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.125:50584 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.253:17855 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.10:25740 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.109:29528 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.62:47349 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.55:4614 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.226:22001 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.163:11790 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.44:8911 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.46:telnets SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.190:27377 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.181:34031 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.19:41722 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.100:57151 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.145:61402 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.53:52461 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.26:42463 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.217:35530 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.35:63414 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.154:56638 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.26:43972 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.172:6922 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.17:3683 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.210:2397 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.46:18754 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.244:4032 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.235:8602 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.82:39495 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.19:28848 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.163:47624 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.8:2683 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.39.71.55:43300 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.37:1664 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.118:36892 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.17:7317 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.109:56229 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.217:45257 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 89.37.137.73:15278 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.230.64:14076 SYN_RECV
tcp 0 0 mydomain.com:http 86.104.117.116:14567 SYN_RECV
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2009
Hope there is a DNS expert about that can make sense of what I observe and give an unbiased opinion.
We are currenlty evaluating hosted DNS providers. Anycast DNS seems like a great feature to have and we want fail over too. Narrowed down a list of possible suppliers: DNS Made Easy, Netriplex and Dynect.
After reading up on some blogs 1 & 2 mainly, we setup a Pingdom test to evaluate our three candidates.
For DME I used their own site URL for testing, Netriplex and Dynect gave us dedicated test accounts.
The average response times roughly follow the prices, DME is slowest, Netriplex next and Dynect is the winner. I have detailed logs in anyone is interested (in CSV).
Now for the unexpected results. All 3 providers give very long response times a few times a day - sometimes as long as 5 or 10 seconds. Now and again we see a timeout - i.e. a response of over 15 seconds.
We cross checked by running a testing our current non-anycast Rackspace DNS - similar outliers are present too.
Pingdom tech support think these outliers could be due to peering issues on the internet.
I would expect anycast DNS to be much more robust and to give decent response times even if there are localised networking issues.
So our outliers are either down to the way Pingdom does the testing, or just a 'feature' of the way DNS works.
Anyone with any bright ideas on how to explain this?
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2015
I've been fiddling with Plesk to get HTTPS to work for [URL] .... Unfortunately I haven't had any successes at forcing HTTPS, all result in a 'to many redirects' message.
The certificate is already activated and can be verified trough; [URL] ....
Code:
proxy_error_log:2015/05/16 16:35:00 [crit] 21266#0: *2336 SSL_do_handshake() failed (SSL: error:140A1175:SSL routines:SSL_BYTES_TO_CIPHER_LIST:inappropriate fallback) while SSL handshaking, client: 64.41.200.106, server: 151.80.117.38:443
proxy_error_log:2015/05/16 16:36:37 [crit] 21266#0: *2616 SSL_do_handshake() failed (SSL: error:14094085:SSL
[Code] .....
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2014
I have the follow errors at (one) of my plesk panel:
at Applications:
Search results could not be loaded at the moment. Retry Click to expand...
View 8 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2007
All my sites on both my hosting accounts are infected with an iframe.
At the end of the index.html files the malicious code just appeared...suddenly 3 weeks ago.
The host blamed Joomla so I took the appropriate steps:
Upgraded my Joomla to the latest version, changed the whole account username and password, changed the configuration and template to unwriteable.
It stopped the injection for a few days but then it came back.
I would also like to add that 2 other sites on my account, one simple index.html file and an old website I have that is totally HTML with nothing to do with Joomla also got infected.
The iframe also infected a Drupal install I did as a test.
So according to these fact is this a Hosting Company not taking responsibility or can a Joomla site infected spread to other normal HTML sites and different CMS's on the server?
This situation is ruinning me and I strongly suspect it's a Hosting problem and not Joomla.
Any expert opinions from true professionals would be appreciated because if I can prove that it's not a Joomla issue I might take legal action against the hosting company since this has cost me dozens of hours of work and several hundred dollars of lost revenue.
I am attaching the iframe exploit. It installs itself on every index file...in every folder - components, mambots, ect..additionally it attaches itself on any and every kind of addon that has an index.html file.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2014
After last night's attempt to upgrade one of our old plesk servers (10.0.1), on RHEL 5.5, we are left with unfunctional control panel.
Following the KB [URL] ...., we see:
1) no /usr/local/psa/version file exists currently.
2) mysql -uadmin -p`cat /etc/psa/.psa.shadow` -D psa -e 'select * from upgrade_history order by upgrade_date desc limit 1'
+---------------------+--------------------------------+------------+
| upgrade_date | version_info | db_version |
+---------------------+--------------------------------+------------+
| 2010-12-01 10:52:30 | 10.0.1 RedHat el5 109101029.17 | 01090 |
+---------------------+--------------------------------+------------+
as you see the plesk was OLD. No line for the last night's upgrade, though in here.
3) but: rpm -q psa
psa-12.0.18-rhel5.build1200140606.15
So, the installation procedure finished partially, installing net packages, but not really updating all info.
Comparison of the MySQL scheme for DB psa with another server with the new installation shows that some minimal differences in some tables and a couple of missing tables. So, it looks like it _almost_ succeeded.
Comparison of the RPMs installed on the two servers, shows some differences in installed packages and versions. For example, there are 2 versions of psa-backup-manager and 2 versions of psa-migration-manager on the "malfunctioning" machine.
Further runs of the autoinstaller does not work, since it seems to think that everything is fully installed/updated. How to proceed from this point. Control panel does not work...
We've looked through the installation log files and Wonder if there is some log file that we are missing - where shold we look for messages in case of a failed installation?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2015
To automate some tasks for some projects I'm working on, I need to be able to automatically create or delete ftp-users.
Creating and listing ftp-accounts is working great, but when it comes to deleting them I run into an internal server error. Before my script gets the response it's waiting for, the script crashes.
- When live watching the Apache error-log with 'tail -f', the terminal-session is exited with 'Killed (core dumped)'
- Apache error-log shows:
Code:
(104)Connection reset by peer: mod_fcgid: error reading data from FastCGI server, referer: http://example.com/ftp.php?action=delete
Premature end of script headers: ftp.php, referer: http://example.com/ftp.php?action=delete
- Webbrowser shows default '500 Internal Server Error'
I have checked and changed time-out settings, but it didn't work. Error occurs a few seconds after executing, while the timeouts are set to 60 to 90 seconds.
Packet send to Plesk:
Code:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<packet version="1.6.6.0">
<ftp-user>
[Code].....
View 15 Replies
View Related
Jul 30, 2014
a Backup from Plesk 11.0.9 last MU installed to Plesk 12.0.18 last MU installed brings a lot of:
Database:
<message code="FailedDatabaseUserDeployment" severity="warning" id="160ffa07-4a78-400b-88f9-8a4292b78c30">
<description>Failed deployment of database user phpbb of database usr_web2_3</description>
<message code="ExecCmd::ExFailed" severity="warning" id="f5e9a089-a046-4937-8fe0-bbaee9e61b7b">
[Code]....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2009
I've been very happy with Virpus since I joined. There was 1 issue that has plagued me since the beginning and that was that I was not receiving e-mails on my ISP e-mail, my main e-mail. Not to big of an issue except that I didn't get any news updates or know when my tickets were replied to, or even when I was past due on my bill. 3 tickets later and their solution was for me to use another e-mail address, which was kind of a pain for me since each of my e-mail addresses has a specific reason which only specific e-mail get sent there for organizational reasons.
First off I have to say the VPS I was using was top notch. It easily outperformed my LiquidWeb VPSs and quickly became my primary VPS instead of my backup like was intended. I took advantage of one of their specials a while back which was a 512MB RAM cPanel VPS for $19.50/month which is a steal since the cPanel license alone is $15/month!
So now to why this is probably my final review of this company. Communication is lacking greatly. It was good at first, but now it's non-existant.
Over the weekend all my sites went down and I had no idea why... because I never got the e-mail saying they were moving data centers (if it weren't for a small thread on WHT I would never have known). I also did not receive any updates on extending their ETA so yet again I had nothing to tell my clients. The only good thing was that I run a free hosting company (Host2x.com for reference) and I offer no uptime guarantee since it's a non-paid service.
Ok, so the sites are back online and everything is working nicely... well I recently hit the 70% mark on my disk space usage so time to start looking for an upgrade. I created a ticket on April 23rd asking if they would allow me to upgrade my plan to their biggest VPS plan and to my surprise I never got a reply. I would think that a billing ticket asking to upgrade to a plan that costs more without the transfer of the discount I'm receiving would be a welcome ticket for them to reply to, but I was incorrect in thinking this. So I ended up purchasing a dedicated server last night because I cannot wait to see if they will assist me with upgrading my account or not.
View 13 Replies
View Related