Server For 8 Million Emails
May 25, 2008
I started a friendship network few months ago and now have 8 million people.
Now I send a weekly newsletter and periodic updates to all and my weekly newsletter reaches the last person after a month. The fastes server I have is a quad core and it sends 300,000 in a day.
It takes 15 days for my three servers to send mails to all. And another 5 to 6 days to clear the queue of bounces and all the mess you know. So I am in real trouble. Most memebrs of the network are form India, Indonesia etc so don't make enuf to buy several hgh end servers.
Is there a solution to send them all in a few hours? I would really love that! Also if you can suggest a better software to handle bounces and reporting, I am using OEM Pro which is full of bugs (I think).
View 12 Replies
Sep 22, 2007
to send 3.6 million emails over a week period of time. it is for a client that wants to send an email about their new account policies. these users are clients from different domains. how can this be done.
They have an exchange server onsite. should they use that server or do you recommend going through a service? if so whom do you recommend that is good?
Do you recommend going with a dedciated server for email? what server specs?
the email will not have an attachment just a few lines and a link to their own site.
with whatever solution you recommend? please give me price ranges?
Dell and such enterprise companies send emails all the time with that many emails and more to external clients... how do they do it.
I just do not want to get black listed and want to make sure all or most of they clients get it.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2009
If I used the PHP mediawiki script and I had10,000 wiki articles, and 2 million users were browsing my site which is hosted on two Dedicated servers that are P4 Quad Core 2.6GHZ 4GB RAM 100Mbit dedicated port with a load balancer, would my servers handle this amount of simultaneous users and how fast would each wiki article take to load when all these 2million users are online if each article was 300KB?
And what is the maximum number of users online at the same do you think these 2 servers could handle?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2008
Which shared host you have come across, can handle 1 Million page views per month?
Assuming -
Impression happens across the clock in same pattern.
Maximum pages (60%) are static html, rest php+mysql+drupal
All pageviews consume max of 20 GB
Cost under $20/month
Close to 100% uptime (As we all know 100% is not possible)
I know these name only (not sure they agree all above mentioned conditions or not) -
medialayer
steadfast
unitedhosting
pair - I read some -ve reviews for pair, that they suspend the account without notice
View 16 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2009
I can send/receive email from within the server.
I can send email out.
But no emails can get in.
What is the problem?
I already disabled spamassassin, all firewalls, even ACL, but emails are still not getting to the server.
Exim log gives this error: ...
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 3, 2009
I run a free webhosting company, and I would like to email all of my users (they accepted this by signing up with my services) a monthly newsletter. I do not wish to use the WHM Email All Users function, but rather use a third party tool.
Is there a way to export ALL of the email accounts of my users
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2009
I have 2 cPanel servers with normal decent setups, and until today, HOTMAIL/LIVE is not accepting my e-mails.
There is no problem with GMAIL & YAHOO, btw.
When I mentioned not accepting my e-mails means it will always appear inside the Junk box instead of Inbox (for every domains in both servers)
I've tried to contact Microsoft support many times but they keep repeating the same thing. I've tried everything including make sure that my IP reputation is clean, and having domain keys.
I need some advise from you guys out there that has this issue before and start from sketch, what do I need to do to identify what Microsoft servers actually want from me?
Here's their 'robotic' respond.
1) Make sure that you have SPF/SIDF records in place. You
can go to [url]
for more information on this.
2) Clean up your lists. Remove those who do not want to
receive the emails. Make the unsubscribe process more visible. Hotmail
also has a sender complaint feedback loop program called the Junk Email
Reporting Program (JMRP). Enrollment in this free program will benefit
you as a sender as it will keep your email lists updated and populated
with interested Windows Live Hotmail Customers. This program will help
you to remove those Windows Live Hotmail Customers who do not want to
receive emails from your company. If you are interested in joining this
program, please visit
[url
_options_form_byemail&ct=eformts
3) Ensure that there is not anything technically wrong with
your MTA. Are your DNS records updated, are you transmitting data upon
making the SMTP connection, and is the problem isolated to any specific
machines? Do your SMTP logs show any failures?
4) Segment your mailing infrastructure by IP. Marketing
email, transactional corporate email, "forward to a friend" email and
signup emails should be sent from different IP's. This will help to
identify what types of messages are being flagged by Hotmail customers.
5) Strengthen the sign up process. Confirm that you are
using a double-opt-in sign up process. This will not help in removing
existing Hotmail customers from your email lists, but it will confirm
the authenticity of those who sign-up for your email campaigns and
newsletters.
6) If you have any feedback loops setup with other ISPs,
you should look for trends to try to determine possible causes - a new
data source? New advertisement? Maybe folks signing up do not recognize
the mail?
7) Clearly mark your emails so that Hotmail customers are
able to identify quickly and easily that they requested emails from your
service.
8) Do some analysis on the data regarding complaints - look
at Hotmail customers who have never clicked, opened, responded or
bounced in any way. These poor performers could contain many bad
addresses.
9) Evaluate the frequency of your mailings. Are you making
your mailings less relevant and welcome by sending too many emails?
10) Enroll in the Sender Score program. This is the only white
list that Hotmail uses. It is owned and operated by Return Path. You can
find information about this program at
[url
11) Please visit [url]
to verify that your IP is not being listed
on any third party block lists.
12) We also recommend that you take advantage of the following
email delivery consulting companies who participate in the Messaging
Anti-Abuse Working Group [url]
), and the Authentication and Online Trust
Alliance [url]
View 7 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2007
I have one of our servers that is bouncing all sent emails to hotmail, MSN and some others. The emails often come back saying they are bounced as SPAM.
There were SPAM issues on this particular server at one point, but have since been corrected one we tightened it up.
Now, how can I fix this? Can I change the servers hostname? Are they rejecting by hostname, or by IP?
And do I need to just contact each provider and try to get off their blacklist?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 21, 2009
Recently I have encountered a problem with Gmail accounts ; I can not send Any messages to gmail from our server by ip address 64.85.165.82 at all.
Kindly refer me the best cure to fix the problem and I declare that any needed item will be available to present.
Some of the messages appearing are listed below.
Our server ip's :
64.85.165.82
64.85.165.83
Message 1MGpDu-0005sl-3a is not frozen
LOG: MAIN
cwd=/usr/local/cpanel/whostmgr/docroot 4 args: /usr/sbin/exim -v -M 1MGpDu-0005sl-3a
delivering 1MGpDu-0005sl-3a
Connecting to gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [72.14.247.114]:25 ... failed: Connection timed out (timeout=5m) ....
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2008
Its with exim .
my server send alot of fake emails
31017 titus 18 0 11188 1956 624 D 2 0.0 0:03.98 exim
31132 titus 18 0 11180 1812 504 D 2 0.0 0:00.08 exim
30964 titus 18 0 11180 1812 504 D 1 0.0 0:05.78 exim
30971 titus 18 0 11180 1948 624 D 1 0.0 0:05.58 exim
30981 titus 18 0 11184 1812 504 D 1 0.0 0:05.41 exim
31049 titus 18 0 11192 1812 504 D 1 0.0 0:02.16 exim
30946 titus 18 0 11188 1952 628 D 1 0.0 0:05.96 exim
30951 titus 18 0 11176 1804 504 D 1 0.0 0:05.83 exim
30976 titus 18 0 11180 1952 624 D 1 0.0 0:05.40 exim
31027 titus 18 0 11212 1816 504 D 1 0.0 0:03.76 exim
31044 titus 18 0 11188 1812 504 R 1 0.0 0:02.13 exim
31064 titus 18 0 11180 1808 504 D 1 0.0 0:00.50 exim
31096 titus 18 0 11196 1824 504 R 1 0.0 0:00.45 exim
31102 titus 18 0 11188 1824 504 D 1 0.0 0:00.42 exim
30942 titus 18 0 11184 1952 624 D 1 0.0 0:06.05 exim
31036 titus 18 0 11188 1964 624 D 1 0.0 0:02.22 exim
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 5, 2008
I have a virtual dedicated server hosted with "Domains Priced Right" I have several domains hosted on the server with emails for each. I used to be able to view my emails in Outlook however recently I've been getting the error (0x80042108) 'Outlook cannot connect to incoming (POP3) email server'
I've switched to thunderbird and still have the same problem. "Could not connect to the server mail.blahblah.com; the connection was refused."
I have about 10 domains and I can't see the emails for any of them.
I know the emails are there I can see them when I use webmail. I know thunderbird works because it can get email from gmail and my ISP. It just won't connect to the server and download them.
Things worked in the past so I'm perplexed. I'm running Windows Vista and maybe a new update has caused a problem. It may be a firewall issue but I've had a look at that. Also I did do a clean up of some old drivers. I think it might be a dodgey email file.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 11, 2007
I have purchased a server for layeredtech a few months back, and I just reliased that no one is receiving emails of their subscription in the forums, no contact forms are working on website, simply the server is not seding out the emails..
how can I fix it OR where to check whats wrong why its not sending emails?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2014
I have 2 Plesk server and I want move everything from old server to new server. I can move my site downloading via ftp but how can I move my email message to new server? when I creating backup with backup manager I think everything is backed up but when I trying to restore that backup on new server I am getting invalid signature error and email message was not moved (only account created)
Is their any way to moved email message automatically? I checked on /var/lib/psa/dump and I see their many backup files created like apache file, conf, info, logs, vhost ?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2007
Since Jan 07, one of our servers has been sending thousands of emails to ne.jp hosts.
Eg from logs:
Code:
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FY9ME016602: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:02, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYB7d016734: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FY9A4016629: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:02, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FY9la016616: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:02, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYCkO016807: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:36:58, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYB7B016730: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYCO0016757: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:36:59, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYDjq016819: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:36:58, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYBhL016751: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYDPw016811: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:36:58, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
We're absolutely unable to track or find out who is sending it or how to stop this.
So I'm wondering if it is possible to prevent sendmail from sending to:
lsean.ezweb.ne.jp, OR
docomo.ne.jp, OR
softbank.ne.jp
/var/mail/vhostswww logs are not showing helpful info at all. Eg:
Code:
--l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian--
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: hanako.@docomo.ne.jp
Subject:
To: a_j.n-y_bluespider-tattoo@softbank.ne.jp
Message-Id: <200709041410.l84EA0Fh007971@debian>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l84EA0Fh007971;
Received: (from vhostswww@localhost)
for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id l84EA0jk007973
Received: from debian (localhost [127.0.0.1])
Return-Path:
Content-Type: text/rfc822-headers
--l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:16 +0200
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Invalid recipient:
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx.softbank.ne.jp
Status: 5.1.1
Action: failed
Final-Recipient: RFC822; a_j.n-y_bluespider-tattoo@softbank.ne.jp
Arrival-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
Reporting-MTA: dns; debian
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
--l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian
<<< 503 No recipients specified
550 5.1.1 ... User unknown
<<< 550 Invalid recipient:
>>> DATA
... while talking to mx.softbank.ne.jp.:
----- Transcript of session follows -----
(reason: 550 Invalid recipient: )
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
from localhost [127.0.0.1]
The original message was received at Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
--l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian
This is a MIME-encapsulated message
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
boundary="l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian"
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:
Message-Id: <200709041642.l84GRnX5029819@debian>
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:17 +0200
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:17 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) id l84GRnX5029819;
Received: from localhost (localhost)
Return-Path:
From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Sep 4 18:42:17 2007
--l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian--
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: hanako.@docomo.ne.jp
Subject:
To: a_j.n-y_bluespider-tattoo@softbank.ne.jp
Message-Id: <200709041411.l84EB8CS011861@debian>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:08 +0200
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:08 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l84EB8CS011861;
Received: (from vhostswww@localhost)
for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:09 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id l84EB8f6011862
Received: from debian (localhost [127.0.0.1])
Return-Path:
Content-Type: text/rfc822-headers
--l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:15 +0200
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Invalid recipient:
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx.softbank.ne.jp
Status: 5.1.1
Action: failed
Final-Recipient: RFC822; a_j.n-y_bluespider-tattoo@softbank.ne.jp
Arrival-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:09 +0200
Reporting-MTA: dns; debian
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
--l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian
<<< 503 No recipients specified
550 5.1.1 ... User unknown
<<< 550 Invalid recipient:
>>> DATA
... while talking to mx.softbank.ne.jp.:
----- Transcript of session follows -----
(reason: 550 Invalid recipient: )
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
from localhost [127.0.0.1]
The original message was received at Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:09 +0200
--l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian
This is a MIME-encapsulated message
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
boundary="l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian"
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:
Message-Id: <200709041642.l84GRnX4029819@debian>
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:15 +0200
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:15 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) id l84GRnX4029819;
Received: from localhost (localhost)
Return-Path:
From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Sep 4 18:42:15 2007
--l84GRnX3029819.1188924134/debian--
How would I solve this problem as it's making our server load skyhigh 24/7.
Additional info about system:
> Debian Linux, latest kernel
> Sendmail (we've tried postfix, exim, with same results)
> Non cPanel system.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2007
Our company has recently invested in a Microsoft Small Business Server, we are moving all our email accounts to exchange server.
Our company runs a high profile website in Japan and we have a few email accounts that are downloaded by multiple staff, rather than have all staff download the same emails is it possible to have all emails forwarded to a public inbox where emails processed can be marked and ignored by other staff?
We do not want to forward the emails to user's personal inboxes, this seems to be the common solution for this type of email.
This might sound like a basic questions but we have trolled the internet for best practices in trying to set up this solution on exchange server but have not come across an answer.
View 4 Replies
View Related