Is There Any Public Listed Web Hosting Companies
May 19, 2009I would like to know there is any.
View 14 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Hosting A Public Email Service
May 10, 2007Currently we are running a very successful site for extreme sports. We have just spent 6 months on development of our new site which we will launch in a fortnight. This will free up some of my time to look at other areas and avenues to attract members.
Personally I would love to run a hotmail style service on our website, and believe this would help with the growth of our online community.
Just interested in advice from others on areas to be aware and alert when running a service like this?
I am also trying to make the decision between SocketMail or Atmail. If anyone has opinions on these, or an alternative solution i'm all for that advice too.
Basically at this point I am wanting to get as much advice together as possible, then look to making an informed decision to go ahead or not.
Currently we operate off a dedicated server and i realise this may have to become two servers in the near future with such a service. It is fully managed by myself, and a 3rd party individual I hire to maintain the server on a monthly basis.
How To Access Hosting From A Public Place
Aug 8, 2007I often need to access my sites from public places, which are behind firewalls, don't have access to hard disk and any Windows tool (just plain internet access).
Problem: firewall, closed ports: 8082 (cPanel), 2078 (SSL; I don't know, if I'll need this), 2077 and maybe others.
Which hosting features I need? to be able to
1. access cpanel, when port 8082 is closed (I was using cpanelproxy.net until now with success).
2. for uploading files from other websites directly to my website (without prior downloading on a PC hard disc) - I've herad SSH should work, but what exact SSH I need - any experience someone? Any other solution? I was trying WEb Disc feature in cPanel11 but it needs port 2078 or 2077 open...
What To Look For In Hosting Companies
Aug 17, 2008I own a IT/Computer related blog site & community right now. I have plans to contact the top 25-50 hosting companies posing as a potential new client. I plan ask questions similar to the following and publish it on my blog. (This project will be geared towards shared hosting only, on low to mid sized budgets.
1.) What are the exact specs of the shared servers you are using? Smp, Uni processors? What are the manufactures of this hardware?
2.) How many clients are added to a server before it's considered 'Full'? If your company doesn't use this method, then what is the average I/O, CPU, & Memory usage on a full server in the opinion of your company for shared hosting?
3.) What is your mass email policy? Emails per hour?
4.) Where is the physical location of your companies shared servers in regards to country, city, and state?
5.) Are you a Reseller? If so, with whom do you resell for?
6.) Physical location of Technical Support?
7.) What is the average wait time for a Technical Support ticket submission during server peek hours for your company?
8.) Do you currently have a link of client testimonials that includes URL's to the
clients website?
Do you think publishing this information to be public for each host would be illegal, imoral, or disrespectful in anyway? If not, does anyone have any other suggestions as far as questions that are usually not disclosed on hosts website in regards to shared hosting?
Old Hosting Companies
May 20, 2007I still have some NT 4s and Windows 2000 servers out there. My main issues are these are very very old clients who will not want to move, either their programmers had long disappeared or they just had an attachment to their old servers.
Now what should I do with these? Or rather what do you guys facing similar issues deal with this? Migrate these old contented clients and risk breaking something or just leave it as it is?
New Hosting Companies Vs. Established Once
Oct 12, 2009I would like to discuss over new companies which have just put there steps towards hosting business.
I know many of the people here and everywhere believe that only established companies with a nice price tag of almost around $5 per month for smallest web hosting plan can give you best support and uptime. No doubt they can give you nice uptime but what about the support... leaving some companies all other big and established once do not offer you what you should actually get.
Companies with a huge customer base receives a large number of hosting support requests from there customers daily which they can not fulfill on time. Thus resulting in delay and some times inconvenience to the customer.
Where as on other hand new companies or mid level companies that just arrived or been in industry for a few couple of months is much better then them.
A solid reason to support this is if they want to be in this industry they will surely provide all the best of support and uptime and industry leading softwares and products to there client for the very low price as compared to other big ones.
Now the point to be noted is the people only don't believe new companies just because they are new... I don't understand the reason why people have a mentality of treating OLD IS GOLD....
When new companies just to establish them selves in this market are offering tons of services for a much lesser price to what other big ones do then why do people think they are going to fall down... They too have there business plans setup or else they won't advertise it different forums and waste there precious time in which they could have done many other jobs....
I know this is a never ending topic but you surely need to broaden your thinking and start thinking about this second phase of hosting industry...
With my article I surely can't mentality of too many people but surely can start a step ahead of others to let people think on this....
Hope I can scratch some great minds with my writting and they can comment some great ideas and pros and cons...
2 Hosting Companies: One In California And One In NYC
Dec 31, 20072 Hosting Companies: One in California and One in NYC..
If they have exactly the same plan ( Same servers ) at the same price and I lived In NYC would it be better ( Faster ) for my site/forum to choose the NYC host?
What I need to know is it beter to pick a host who i live closer to?
Phone Support For Hosting Companies?
Jun 1, 2008Is there any companies that offer live support online or over the phone for hosting problems.
In other words
Can i hire a company that helps customers out with their problems online or over the phone?
Is SpamTitan For Hosting Companies The Right Solution
May 18, 2009We are a hosting company with about 10000 customer domains. We are looking for a good spamfilter gateway and found Spamtitan.
Do you think SpamTitan would work well with so many customer domains? How many servers do you recommend for this amount?
I realized that in the admin area a lot is done with domain dropdown elements to choose the domainname. This is for sure not the best solution with this amount of domains.
Our plan is, that customers don't have access to ST but only get the quarantine report mail. Will there be a resource problem in creating this report once a day for about 50000 mail addresses?
Are there any other hosting companies which are using ST?
What Will Happen If I Used 4 NameServers For 2 Or More Web Hosting Companies
Feb 10, 2009I found that adbrite are using 10 name servers .
asia3.akam.net
aus1.akam.net
eur1.akam.net
eur2.akam.net
ns1-105.akam.net
ns1-232.akam.net
ns2.adbrite.com
ns4.adbrite.com
usc2.akam.net
usw6.akam.net
could any one has for example 3 hosting accounts each one in
a ddifferent hosting company , could it be possible to put all Name Servers
of 3 different hosting sites under one domain name ?
Hosting Companies Offering Different DC Location
Jan 28, 2008How many companies have you come across that offer different dc location? Does it make their offer more attractive for their potential clients?
Marblehost.com offer you to choose between GB and USA location? Or am I misreading their post as it seems unbelievable...
[url]
Any Recommendation On Good Hosting Companies
Apr 7, 2008Are there any recommendation on good hosting companies which can provide good support, excellent uptime, >50GB space, >1GB mySQL/MSSQL database space and supports ASP.NET 2.0 and AJAX with a resonable price?
View 8 Replies View RelatedOutsource Support For Web Hosting Companies
May 21, 2008The Web hosting industry embraced the benefits of outsourcing to maximize the profits.
Web hosting being a competitive business, it is imperative that any and every benefit that comes on the way is picked and used to its maximum. There are many companies which provide support for hosting companies.
Outsourcing support saves the Web hosting company a lot of money and time. Web hosting companies can focus on selling hosting plans while the outsourced support for the Web host can provide quality support to the customers and manage servers 24/7. The Web hosting company does not need to hire many experts who will check the overall quality of delivery to their existing customers and technical experts for managing/monitoring the server. Top outsourcing companies that provide support for Web hosts have an internal QA team that takes care of the quality.
In Web hosting industry it is critical that the servers are up and running all the time. It is expensive to have technical support staff on a 24/7 basis, add to it the cost of buying the software to help you manage and monitor the servers. Most of the companies that provide outsourced support for hosting companies have a complete setup needed for 24 X 7 support to customers like having 24/7 phone support, managing and monitoring servers and helpdesk support system. These things in mere infrastructure will increase costs of a web host, add to this the time needed to manage this setup and people. Hence outsourcing your hosting support is a smarter way.
Any Pointers On Switching Hosting Companies For Resellers
Aug 20, 2009I have a reseller account with over 100 websites I am hosting. They all have databases or ssl or ecommerce etc so they are pretty intense. I really want to switch hotsing companies.
View 7 Replies View RelatedDo You Prefer To Go For Direct Hosting Companies Or Resellers
Feb 18, 2009Going for a Hosting company Directly or Going for a Reseller that sell's space of a Particular Company?
View 14 Replies View RelatedChaning Hosting Companies Is A Blind Date
Dec 30, 2008Changing hosting companies is pain, let's admit it. You don't know what you're getting until you get it. Yes, it's like blind date.
The hosting company is talked up and fake reviews are posted in hopes of getting an affiliate commission. Some "companies" are actually Uncle George with a reseller account acting like he has a staff of 20 people.
So recently I was looking to 'downsize' after having a dedicated server for 20 months. There's was a hiccup with the hosting company. The email file permissions was constantly getting changed. It was a mystery because everytime tech support fixed it; the next day, it would happen again!
The operations manager was in contact by telephone and even gave me his cell phone number. I was also in telephone contact with Tech Support constantly until they have found the culprit - an old, invalid Cpanel Skin.
After the ordeal, I praise the team and company. But a week later, Omaha Steaks should up at my doorstep. Wow!
Well, now it's a year later and I need to downsize.
I looked at BlueHost, HostGater, Ixhosting, HostingExcellence and others... I could NOT believe what they offered for the money. I looked and looked.. and was excited that I could downgrade from a dedicated server and save $150 a month!
Finally, I decided to try BlueHost reluctantly.. as a test. But I tried to sign up for 30 minutes and the site was down. Uh-oh....
My gut - This is a wake up call.
Stick with what's WORKING.
I immediately emailed the Operations Mgr that hosts my dedicated server. Told him what I wanted. I needed a reseller account with additional IPs. He directed me to exactly what I needed and then asked if we could work something out on my current server. But with my sites slacking off, I just settled on a Reseller account.
They transferred everything and the site got a Internal Error (500).. err.. but don't worry - Tech Support found the .htaccess file was using suexec on the old server. So they commented it out and the sites appeared.
The POINT IS: Stick with WHO you know and What's WORKING. Yes, the current host may be a few nickels more than the Popular Hosting companies advertising in the magazines.. but they do NOT beat the support I've received over the last 20 months.
Final Review: I cannot praise HostDime enough. They are awesome. Mike K. is fantastic. I will keep my account there and it will run into the 3 third year in a few months.
www.HostDime.com is a REAL company, charging very reasonable rates, and you get the best support ever. They guys & gals won't give up until they solve the problem.
If you're considering moving hosts, try them.
What Other Hosting Companies Serve The Same Niche As Alphared
Oct 14, 2008namely, budget prices on servers. in particular unmetered bandwidth.
steadfast and hivelocity are the two I know of, but I'm wondering if I'm missing any.
File Corruption When Moving Hosting Companies
Apr 26, 2007I'm in the middle of moving a bunch of sites from one hosting company to another. For most of the sites, I downloaded the files via FTP from the original server to my local hard drive. Then I uploaded them from my hard drive to the new hosting company/server.
It seems like many of the files -- especially swf files and some image files -- were corrupted. I'm thinking something weird happened with the extensions but I'm not sure.
All extensions LOOK ok but I'm wondering if either my computer or the server is hiding an extra extension. Somewhere today, I saw a file go by called index.swf.fla, which makes no sense at all. And yet, on both the server and my computer, it just says index.swf which is what it should say.
Why Hosting Companies Do Not Show Independant Server Uptime
Jun 7, 2008While every decent host claims 99.99% uptime, its amazing why most rather almost all hosting companies fail to display the related statistics from independent source on their sites.
View 14 Replies View RelatedCompare Dedicated Server Companies/File Hosting Services
Apr 11, 2008I own a semi-popular downloads website which I host on one server while the actual files/downloads are hosted on another server. This downloads server is very low-end ( AMD Sempron 3000, 1 GB RAM, 120 GB HD, CentOS with lighttpd, no control panel, etc.) and is connected via a 100Mbit shared line with a 3300GB bandwidth limit. Originally, I had it on a 10Mbit dedicated unmetered line but I hoped that by upgrading to the 100Mbit, I'd get better burst speeds, faster transfers/downloads, and a bit more bandwidth in general. Well, this doesn't seem to be the case so I'm looking for a new server or file hosting service hopefully on a better and faster network.
Right now, I'm considering the following companies/services:
* Profithost.net - Decent Dedicated server with nice bandwidth
* Redhostservers.com - OK Dedicated server with awesome bandwidth
* Server4you.com - Great Dedicated server with good bandwidth
* File-services.com - Decently priced pure file hosting with OK features
* MegaUpload Business account with Hotlink Quota - Decently priced pure file hosting with nice features
Do Hosting Companies Give U Sciprts For Users To Login/register
Jun 23, 2008Do the hsting comapny provide a system for you website for users to login or register
or do i have to do it myself
"wordpress Expert Hosting" Companies
Nov 1, 2009I like to know that the companies who claim to be "wordpress expert host" are really different than other hosts or they just try to attract wordpress users?
For example
[url]
CBL Listed
Dec 1, 20074 times already this month we been listed by CBL
i cant for the life of me figure out why!
IP Address XX.XX.XX.XX was found in the CBL.
It was detected at 2007-11-30 16:00 GMT (+/- 30 minutes), approximately 17 hours, 30 minutes ago.
It has been relisted following a previous removal at 2007-11-25 23:59 GMT
I emailed them and it seems i get an autoresponse which makes no sense they reply me the following:
The IP was detected most recently at:
2007:11:20 ~21:00 UTC+/- 15 minutes (approximately 18 hours ago)
sending email in such a way as to strongly indicate that the IP itself
was operating an open http or socks proxy, or a trojan spam package.
In short, this IP is impersonating being a machine we know it _cannot_
be. No properly configured mail server does this under any circumstances.
You will need to examine the machine for a spam trojan or open
proxy. Up-to-date anti-virus tools are essential.
If the IP is a NAT firewall, we strongly recommend configuring the
firewall to prevent machines on your network connecting to the Internet
on port 25, except for machines that are supposed to be mail servers.
Software notes: If you are running Email Architect, set the
"Masqueraded domain" in SMTP service to be the fully qualified
domain name for the machine.
If you are using an Internet Security Systems firewall (eg:
Proventia M10), please contact ISS and obtain new firmware.
They are aware of issues with the CBL. The firmware version
that fixes this bug is, we believe, "3.5" (at least for
the M10).
Useful links:
[url]
[url](see "Securing your System" and "proxies")
[url]
For more information on securing NAT firewalls/gateways, please
see [url]
This entry has already been delisted from the CBL. Unless otherwise
stated, the CBL will relist this IP if the underlying issues are not
resolved, and the CBL detects the same thing again.
has anyone been in this problem before? ive got myself delisted but its just a pain keep waking up each morning to find this happening
is it possible that someoen who is accessing their email through outlook has a virus on their pc?
Where Are Nameservers Listed
Jul 25, 2008Which file can I find my nameservers listed in?
Godaddy was disallowing me to edit nameservers, so cPanel prevented me from setting up ns1.domain.com and ns2.domain.com, this has meant now I have a major problem: A client paid me to develop his site and he has now gone on holiday, he wanted it finished today but I can't put it online because he set the nameservers to ns1.domain.com ns2.domain.com whereas I have had to set up the nameservers as one.domain.com and two.domain.com due to godaddy disallowing me to create ns1 and ns2.
Now my question is: Is it possible to edit a config file that can set up NS1 and NS2 to work along side ONE and TWO? I'm using cPanel and I have root access.
Repeated CBL Listed
Dec 7, 2007They kindly provided me with timestamp as to when detection was happening and they sent me this description:
Timestamp: 2007-12-02 22:55:32
(ive attached the logs from below for around couople of minutes) If anyone knows how to solve this much appreicate it..or if anyone know what could be the issue!
In a nutshell, your IP is forging a well known domain as theEHLO/HELO - imagine connecting to, say aol.com and having your IPHELO as "apple.com". Understandably, when an IP connects to ourservers and presents such an obvious forgery, we're going to consider ita virus emitter or otherwise compromised.] This is what you need to keep in mind when you're trying to resolvesituations like this: 1) Our detections are based on port 25 SMTP connections your IP makesto one or more of our mail servers. The CBL listing _itself_ is theevidence/"proof"/log of the incident. We generally do not keep samples of CBL detections, because thevolumes are so horrendously high (presently more than 700,000detections per day). They never provide any additional information,because the headers, if any, are all fake anyway. In order to preserve the effectiveness of the CBL, informationbeyond what we've already given you will not be revealed.We can sometimes give additional information (eg: more precisetimestamps) if and only if we know it's necessary to find/fixthe problem. 2) The CBL detects suspicious SMTP activity, NOT spamming per-se. Inother words, the CBL detects email being sent in such a way as toindicate that the sender is compromised in some fashion into sendingviruses or spam.
As such, the CBL focuses on identifying how to prevent the behavior infuture, instead of, for example, identifying spammers that need to beterminated. Indeed, in the case of NAT firewalls, it is almost always impossiblefor us to precisely identify which machine behind your NAT is infected. Only your NAT logs (if you keep any and know what to look for) knowwhich machine is infected. In the case of NATs, our focus is on blocking the malicioustraffic getting to the Internet. We can give tips/pointers on howyou can identify specific infected machines behind a NAT, but ourpriority is to prevent _any_ infected machine behind your NATspewing junk to the Internet, because we know that for everyinfected machine you fix, another one (or more) will eventuallyspring up in its place, and we (and we suspect you) don't likeplaying a never-ending game of whack-a-mole. 3) The viruses we detect carry their own SMTP clients with them, and donot attempt to relay through your mail servers. Hence, email transitfilters (either inbound or outbound) on your mail servers can't help.Only AV scanning the infected machine does.
Similarly, the spamware (open proxy or spam trojan) we detect donot route through your mail servers either. 4) Most AV tools aren't very good at detecting/cleaning out establishedinfections. Especially those resulting from day-zero attacks.Particularly since many of these infections open back doors, and theoriginal infection vector downloads many pieces of software that _may_not be in themselves malware, just used in a malicious fashion. 5) The headers don't help at all. Since the virus/spamware has its ownclient, and doesn't pass through your server[s], the only thing knowableabout the virus/spamware is the peer (connection) address at therecipient's mail server - which is what we've listed - your NAT firewallif you have a NAT... Only your NAT firewall logs can tell you anydifferent. Short of AV scanning the infected machine, the only useable informationabout which machine is infected is in your NAT firewall logs - ifyou actually make any logs and keep them long enough. For the most part, then, a CBL listing of an IP means that the IPneeds to be fixed. If it's a NAT IP - port 25 blocking (and youcan find/fix the infected machine[s] at your leisure), if it's nota NAT - virus/malware eradication. 6) Outbound port 25 connection blocking on NAT firewalls (permittingonly your authorized mail servers) is the best solution for NATs. 7) If you have a NAT, once you've implemented port 25 blocking, younot only contain the viruses, your NAT firewall logs will immediatelytell you who is infected or is compromised with a spam trojan oropen proxy. 8) As far as we're aware, once port 25 blocking is instituted in ANAT, the only times people have continued to have trouble with CBLlistings is when the blocking wasn't working for some reason. Itwould be a good idea to test whether the blocking is in fact working.We have suggested procedures for this if you want - ask us.
2007-12-02 22:55:05 [19907] list matching forced to fail: failed to find host name for 201.58.9.244
2007-12-02 22:55:05 [9913] SMTP connection from [81.129.182.181]:60329 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 3)
2007-12-02 22:55:06 [9913] SMTP connection from [85.177.218.230]:9468 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 4)
2007-12-02 22:55:06 [19907] H=(20158009244.user.veloxzone.com.br) [201.58.9.244]:61429 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<vash989@lfcc.edu> rejected RCP$
2007-12-02 22:55:06 [19907] SMTP connection from (20158009244.user.veloxzone.com.br) [201.58.9.244]:61429 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 closed by DROP$
2007-12-02 22:55:07 [19908] ident connection to 71.217.38.129 timed out
2007-12-02 22:55:07 [19909] ident connection to 81.129.182.181 timed out
2007-12-02 22:55:08 [9913] SMTP connection from [213.36.8.1]:3542 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 4)
2007-12-02 22:55:08 [19909] H=host81-129-182-181.range81-129.btcentralplus.com [81.129.182.181]:60329 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<markhuu.Fabris@$
2007-12-02 22:55:08 [19909] SMTP connection from host81-129-182-181.range81-129.btcentralplus.com [81.129.182.181]:60329 I=[69.16.237.199]:25$
2007-12-02 22:55:09 [19910] H=e177218230.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.177.218.230]:9468 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<Vesterinenowao@jcel.com> rejected RCP$
2007-12-02 22:55:09 [19910] SMTP connection from e177218230.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.177.218.230]:9468 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 closed by DROP in ACL
2007-12-02 22:55:09 [19908] H=71-217-38-129.tukw.qwest.net [71.217.38.129]:63507 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<0agwampler@rapidreply.net> rejected $
2007-12-02 22:55:09 [19908] SMTP connection from 71-217-38-129.tukw.qwest.net [71.217.38.129]:63507 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 closed by DROP in ACL
2007-12-02 22:55:09 [19911] H=dyn-213-36-8-1.ppp.tiscali.fr (dyn-213-36-8-129.ppp.tiscali.fr) [213.36.8.1]:3542 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<Norbe$
2007-12-02 22:55:09 [19911] SMTP connection from dyn-213-36-8-1.ppp.tiscali.fr (dyn-213-36-8-129.ppp.tiscali.fr) [213.36.8.1]:3542 I=[69.16.2$
2007-12-02 22:55:13 [9913] SMTP connection from [201.212.156.23]:51905 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 1)
2007-12-02 22:55:13 [9913] SMTP connection from [200.122.38.174]:1152 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 2)
2007-12-02 22:55:14 [9913] SMTP connection from [201.233.222.43]:2980 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 3)
2007-12-02 22:55:16 [19915] ident connection to 201.233.222.43 timed out
2007-12-02 22:55:17 [19915] H=cable201-233-222-43.epm.net.co (castellanos.une.net.co) [201.233.222.43]:2980 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<Chasityse$
2007-12-02 22:55:17 [19915] SMTP connection from cable201-233-222-43.epm.net.co (castellanos.une.net.co) [201.233.222.43]:2980 I=[69.16.237.1$
2007-12-02 22:55:18 [19920] cwd=/home/annajwa/public_html/forum 2 args: /usr/sbin/sendmail bloochunc@bk.ru
2007-12-02 22:55:18 [19920] 1IyxiY-0005BI-5f <= annajwa@host.mpadc.com U=annajwa P=local S=747 T="Welcome to An- Najwa" from <annajwa@host.mp$
2007-12-02 22:55:18 [19921] cwd=/var/spool/exim 3 args: /usr/sbin/exim -Mc 1IyxiY-0005BI-5f
Keep Getting Listed At DSBL
Aug 27, 2007I have a server that keeps getting listed by DSBL. It is RHEL 3 running Plesk and Qmail. In the MAIL config SMTP relay is set to "Authorization is Required" and the SMTP box is checked. I have a couple other very similar server setups and they have never been listed, so I dont know why this one is. I suspect it may be a bug.
As for the last listing (yesterday) here is the exerpt from the maillog showing the SMTP relay
===================
Aug 26 13:36:48 slv3 qmail-queue[426]: scan: the message(drweb.tmp.0PW0bG) sent by nobody@cor.neva.ru to listme@listme.dsbl.org should be passed without checks, because contains uncheckable addresses
Aug 26 13:36:48 slv3 qmail-queue-handlers[428]: to=listme@listme.dsbl.org
Aug 26 13:36:48 slv3 qmail-queue-handlers[428]: recipient[3] = 'listme@listme.dsbl.org'
Aug 26 13:36:48 slv3 qmail-queue-handlers[428]: handlers dir = '/var/qmail//handlers/before-queue/recipient/listme@listme.dsbl.org'
Aug 26 13:36:48 slv3 qmail: 1188153408.989183 starting delivery 7244: msg 2327042 to remote listme@listme.dsbl.org
Aug 26 13:36:48 slv3 qmail-remote-handlers[430]: to=listme@listme.dsbl.org
===================
why my server is relaying?
IP Addresses Listed On SORBS
Jul 7, 2007I signed up with a new VPS provider and got three IPs and ordered an additional IPS. It turns out all six IPS were listed by SORBS as spam sources.
So I contact the provider and they give me one clean IP but I have to keep the remaining 5 SORBS marked spam IPs that I am going to use for nameservers and "reseller" account with nameservers.
My quetion is . . . is being marked by SORBS going to have any negative effect on my VPS? Alot of places will mention this when looking up a domain like Domain Tools and DNS Stuff, so is this going to make my web sites come off as spammers?
Server's IP Black Listed On CBL
Jul 19, 2007my server's Ip adresse was found listed at the CBL list.
check this out :
[url]
i think i'm listed for naming issue as they referred me to this page to solve the problem.
what should i do to correct the probleme i made some changes on /etc/hostname and etc/hosts and requested delisting but without positive results.
I'm On debian SARGE.
Google UK: Getting .com Sites Listed? Better To Host In The UK?
Jun 8, 2007I did a site for a UK company that has a .com address, and for various reasons the site is hosted in the US. Unfortunately the site doesn't appear under the google search for pages in the UK.
One reason I chose the US hosting company is that they provide ColdFusion hosting, and my plan is to upgrade the site to use ColdFusion in the near future.
They do also have the .co.uk address registered, which is currently set to forward to the .com address, and that doesn't show up in google at all.
I'm thinking the solutions might be:
1) Move the .com hosting to the UK
2) Get additional hosting for the .co.uk address (uk mirror)
3) Both?
The company is based in the UK, and provides holidays in Montenegro, primarily aiming at the UK market.
When I originally looked into it I could not find a UK host that provided ColdFusion and mySQL 5 - and those that had ColdFusion and other database applicaitons were far more expensive than the US one we're using currently.
What would be the best way forward?
Is My Mail Server Black Listed
Jan 25, 2009we have a dedicatd linux server. we use to send daily newsletters to our customers but for last few days, it looks like our mail server is sending out email to client's spam folder.
Is there any way to diagnose our mail server and find out if there is anything wrong or if our mail server has been black listed?