Does OER = Less Internap BW And Less Route Science & FCP
Aug 31, 2007
As we are finishing our migration plans to Cisco OER. I would like to get everyone's thoughts on the low latency "brand name" internap bandwidth.
Do you think that the high priced brandname is going to continue with Cisco finally releasing OER to what a large number of datacenters use as their primary core switch? In my eyes the FCP and the Avaya/RouteScience platform just lost a lot of value. The OER product looks very complete and in testing works excellent, the final verdict will be in what the platform actually does.
If you are wondering Cisco OER information can be found here [url]
View 10 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Mar 12, 2007
I wonder how it effects to network performance? The network will be faster? How much? The normal routers can choose the best routes too, is it correct?
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2009
I don't know if this is the right place to ask this question or not .. but, i am going to try.
I would like to get more informations about nLayer.
Is it good internet provider? Can they be compared with Internap for example? ( if it can be asked that way .. )
I need more info regarding stability, connections with Europe from USACDN etc.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Mar 5, 2008
I see that FDC is offering $12 per Mbit/sec for InterNAP bandwidth. I'm really interest on this offer. Are there anyone colocating severs at FDC and using their InterNAP bandwidth? if so, could you please give me some reviews and your experience?
How is their support and InterNAP bandwidth?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2008
who would you pick? Timewarner or Internap?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2008
My colo is charging about $80/Mbit, they use InterNAP. Is that reasonable? This is in west coast/california.
That brings me to my other question, how do you know whats a good network? How is hurricane electric compared to InterNAP?
fixedorbit.com shows HE on the top 10 list and shows a lot of peering. I don't see InterNAP on that list at all! Does that mean thats it not as good?
The more peering, the better? (I guess we assume that the network provider isn't over selling and isn't cramming a lot of customers into a single port etc...)
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2007
I'm looking at bringing Internap bandwidth into my new cage at the AtlantaNAP to cross connect with a cabinet at 250 Williams.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2009
I am looking for info on Aveas in Seattle. They seem to have gone out of business (domain expired) and hence I also can't send emails to them.
Does anybody have info what happened, where they have gone, and if somebody is still around somewhere? I am looking for Kelly Kline.
I am trying to find out if one of our old company servers is still with them (was in their cabinet), and if a backup could be retrieved for a fee.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2009
I am trying to find dedicated/managed hosts that colo with internap. So far found Softlayer.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2008
I am getting my quote back Tuesday but need a little bargaining power with these guys...
Oakland, Ca datacenter
40mbps, 20A, 42U rack.
What should I be looking at price range here, how much per mbps?
Only info I've seen is from 2003 where people were saying $200/mbps. Obviously prices have come WAY down. I've seen people on here reselling internap bandwidth for $12/mbps, but they might have bought a huge commit.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2008
Does anyone have any ballpark figures on how much InterNAP charges per-mbit on a 200Mbit commit over gig-e?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Mar 24, 2008
We are in the process of starting a new project for a client and we are trying to decide which network to place it on.
We have a choice of a Level3/Time Warner mix or pure Internap. Obviously the Internap bandwidth is a bit more expensive, but since this customers website serves an international community we are thinking that Internap bandwidth would be well worth the cost.
What are the advantages of using Internap? How is the network performance? We've setup a machine on the Internap network and have begun running tests, but I would like to hear from people who have direct experience with Internap bandwidth.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2007
After running 6 or so dedicated servers purchased thru several different resellers, my company decided to get a rack at the Chicago InterNap DC.
The quote we got was $3,400 per month inclusive of cabinet, Usage based 10/100, and Cross connects.
Have a couple questions.
A) Is that price in the ballpark of where it should be?
and
B) Our quote states Usage based 100mb Ethernet (10MBps Min). Tier2 at $150 month and $1,400 for the 10.00 Mbps Base. Being new to this, I have no idea exactly how much bandwidth we can use before the "usage" fees kick in.
How does this work?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2007
Which one has the best routes to Asia, especially South East Asia?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2008
Who are the people/companies with a good reputation with the WHT community who provide Internap or Peer1 colo? And it seems it's mostly in LA or NY, I know both Peer1 and Internap have a presence in other places, is there anyone reselling out of anywhere else?
Pure Internap or Pure Peer1 hosts only please. The only one I know of right now is H4Y.us
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2008
I'm in the final stages of bidding on a 10-rack cage, it's come between Internap and Switch & Data.
I know the good about hosting with both of them. Who can tell me the bad?
Please, don't email me telling me about your datacenter, because I'm not looking at any other providers this late in the game.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2008
I have been reading quite a bit lately about the Internap FCP. I am wondering how much it actually improves network performance and how it compares to BGP4. We currently use BGP4, but are considering using a data center with the Internap FCP for a project for a client.
I am looking for reviews from others who have experience with the Internap FCP and it's performance. How does it compare to a network using BGP4? I know that FCP uses more intelligent routing than BGP, but how big of an improvement does it make?
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2008
where I could get the cheapest deals for internap bandwidth?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 3, 2009
My server is down and the hosting company said their is fire at the generators area?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2008
if this is a good deal on internap colo?
Full-Cabinet - $700/mo.
Bandwidth - $ 60/mbps/mo.
Power 20A - $300/mo.
Redundant Power- $175/mo.
Setup Fee -$1000
I see other providers include the power in the cabinet charge. Is it unusual? Do I need the Redundant power if I install a UPC unit?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2008
I got 3 IP addresses i am trying to trace and I want to know where this person has send me those from. Is is possible to get exact addresses/locations?, where the person who sent me the emails is from? and Infos which websites have been visited?
This are the 3 IP's i have got:
216.139.189.105
41.204.234.10
82.13.210.203
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jul 3, 2009
After Trace route whats the next thing to do ? When my ISP dynamic IP address is some like and starts with 112.0.0.0 I cannot see all sites on the server. So what I did run a tracert on DOS prompt. After 9 hops and reach this IP 216.18.239.6 everything timed out and it cannot reach my server.
I already tested several Internet access and its reaching the server except my home DSL with the IP 112. I also checked if the IP is block on the firewall but its not present on the block list. I also mentioned this with my internet provider and still waiting for notification.
what to do next?
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2009
what is needed is a dedicated server or colocation in which my portable IP space (a class c assigned to me in 1995) can be routed to in its entirety. We will then have a VPN back to our own site. This could be accomplished by the ISP BGP peering, or simply announcing the routes themselves. We've got clue in routing, both in OpenBSD and IOS.
The machine doesn't have to be too powerful, and needs little storage space, but the bandwidth provided has to be decent. This is for a hobbyist rather than commercial project, so price is an issue.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2007
I recently moved a customer's site to a new server. Everything went smoothly except for the fact my customer cannot access the new site. When he pings it he gets the right IP address but it just times out.
The URL is regalfire.co.uk
I asked him to run a tracert command and it seems to find the right path but stops just short of finding the server. The last server he connects to is ge-5-2.the.uk.euroconnex.net [87.127.231.90] which is the same as me. The next step is the actual server but for him it just times out.
I can see the new site fine. His ISP is Virgin Media and I have asked several other customers with the same ISP and they can see the site OK.
He has flushed his DNS cache and the problem remains.
Does anyone have any ideas what I could try next?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Mar 16, 2008
I use geoip so that if ($country="CN") { die(); }
This works on my site. But for some reason I still get the occasional IP's through.
I looked at my Lighttpd server-status and I have 600 connections from 3 different IPs that come from China.
I typically use ./route add -host 222.221.81.3 reject as the way to block them, but it changes from time to time. The Chinese are using 90mbps of bandwidth and I want it to stop as they must be directly hotlinking my content.
How to null route large blocks from China? Please note I want to keep Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan.
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2008
ssh is driving me CRAZY right now... On an almost stock CentOS 5.1 install (inside a Xen VPS, though), I changed sshd to listen on 2222 instead of 22 and restarted sshd.
All of a sudden:
Code:
matt@t60:~$ ssh -p2222 64.191.108.xxx
ssh: connect to host 64.191.108.xxx port 2226: No route to host
I should note that I'm actively logged into that IP in another window, and that it responds to ping. There most certainly is a route. Yes, I've quadruple-checked that I have the right IP. And I use the -p2222 daily to connect to another machine. This is a virgin CentOS install; I just changed the "Port 22" line to "Port 2222" and restarted sshd (/etc/init.d/sshd restart).
I am not behind any sort of firewall, unless CentOS installs one that I don't know about. (I own the physical hardware, not just the virtual machine.)
I figured it had to do with this error in /var/log/secure
Code:
May 31 19:18:39 relay120 sshd[23359]: Server listening on :: port 2222.
May 31 19:18:39 relay120 sshd[23359]: error: Bind to port 2222 on 0.0.0.0 failed
: Address already in use.
So I changed (uncommented) the ListenAddress directive to:
Code:
ListenAddress 64.191.108.xxx
and restarted sshd again.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 9, 2007
Recently two servers of mine have stopped communicating with each other and I've been told to create a static route between the two, I am using CentOS 4.4 and not sure what the exact syntax would be
I also have the gateway IP which would be needed.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2007
Hi over the last week ive been having numerous problems with hosting accounts on 2 different servers which has lead me to think that my 'security' is not 'secure' and a malicious user is at play. im in the uk on broadband on a private connection to the internet - no-one else should be sharing this connection. This is the traceroute from my connection at home to the server ive had the most problems with - is this normal?
Traceroute has started ...
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 9, 2007
I'm looking for a solution that I can place a firewall between 2 vlans on
a BigIron router with L3 enabled.
For this moment there is one big vlan2 with a ip-route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
123.123.123.123 and a router-interface ve2 with the IP of the router, the
address I use as gateway on the machines behind it.
The WAN port has the IP address to communicate with to the GW of the
carrier-router (123.123.123.122)
Because I want to let the BigIron the routing I was thinking of 2 vlans,
one for the lan-vlan and one for the wan-vlan, but this will be a problem
because I only have one IP-block what I can use.
So the sitiuation must be as follow on the BigIron:
WAN => vlan2 => firewall => vlan3(lan)
Because of the fact that the firewall will be transparent, this should be
no problem to place it between the vlans. The actual problem is how to
manage this. In simple words, I should be able to replace the firewall
with a cross-cable and it should still work.
Cisco for an example has a SVI solution for this, but I can't find such
thing for a Foundry router.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Dec 1, 2008
Cisco Switch IP Route setup
This is probably an easy and simple task for someone that have a good knowledge in Cisco, BGP and Blackhole/Synchole communities.
We do have a Cisco 2948G that is our border and through this equipment we apply Blackhole (a sequence of commands to filter all the traffic from the world except our country, this is done by communities that is setup in cisco).
These are the sequence of the commands to apply it for IP 189.1.XXX.40
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. asw-hl01(config)#router bgp 184XX
asw-hl01(config-router)#network 189.1.XXX.40 mask 255.255.255.255 asw-hl01(config-router)#exit
asw-hl01(config)#access-list 50 permit 189.1.XXX.40
asw-hl01(config)#ip route 189.1.XXX.40 255.255.255.255 Null0 250 asw-hl01(config)#
I have another Cisco 2948G that is connected in a FastEthernet port of the border above, and this other cisco is holding another subnet. To make it clear,
Border - I have 189.1.XXX.1 ~ 189.1.XXX.127 (subnet 255.255.255.128)
Cisco2 - I have 189.1.XXX.128 ~ 189.1.XXX.255 (subnet 255.255.255.128)
This is being done through a ip route from Border to Cisco2 to forward subnet 128 ~ 255 to the switch,
ip route 189.1.XXX.128 255.255.255.128 172.16.1.2
Ps: 172.16.1.2 is the internal IP for switch2
Now we go to the problem. If I want to apply a Blackhole (those sequence of commands for an IP located at subnet 128 ~ 255 switch2) it block all the traffic for that given IP, and I cant get access from national backbones. To make it clear,
Blackhole for IP 1 ~ 128 - It works fine
Blackhole for IP 128 ~ 255 - It doesnt work correctly, instead of blocking only international traffic its blocking everything in the world
View 0 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2008
This worked yesterday.
Now I get connect: No route to host when I try to FTP.
What to do?
I can ping the IP without problems.
View 9 Replies
View Related
