We are going to host an application for 20 customers. Our application is related to online order system. We will create 20 virtual host on Windows machine. Application developed in dot Net and database is MS SQL 2005. each client have its own database. I Just want to get an Idea from you people about CPU, RAM, Hard Disk, and Bandwidth.
View 1 Replies
I've got a e-mail notification problem since i upgraded from Plesk 11.5 to Plesk 12: One specific Application Update for customer X is being sent to all my customers.
Last week we did have a problem with a busted customer portal. ( not customer X, plus still on Plesk 11.5 ) I fixed this by using this procedure: [URL] ..... Restored two records and problem solved.
As a temporary resolution we disabled Application Updates for our customers, but I do want that my customers receive Application Updates, but just the one where they are the recipient.
I am asking myself what the best backup strategy for my dedicated server could be. I do not host any commercial website on it (just private ones), but we all know that even losing non-commercial data hurts.
What I already do:
More or less recent backups of the most important websites (just webspace, no email or database) on my local computer
Having hardware Raid-1 on the server and 2 HDs
Using R1Soft Backup Space provided by my server host
I would like to add some FTP space at an external (!) DC to do scheduled cPanel backups.
I think that a further dedicated server or VPS will not be necessary for this task.
Can you recommend a provider of pure FTP Backup Space which is reliable, at least on a 100 Mbps line and affordable?
I guess I need about 100-200 GB of space to keep daily, weekly and monthly backups.
I am writing a website in PHP and just about make the first version live.
I'm a bit concerned with backups at the moment. I don't want to lose all the data, as a lot of effort will be put into adding content to the site. It uses a MySQL database as well as the file system to store data.
I was just going to do MySQL dumps nightly, but I realized that I know nothing about the topic and therefor should ask advice before writing code in PHP ( which only run for 30seconds max? Is that long enough to backup?)
What is the common practices to do backups on a CMS type site? How often? How do you manage backups? Where do you store them too? Does doing backups effect performance? Do you do full backups or just changes? If I write a backup script, should I try do it in perl/python/bash or stick with PHP?
Or any other information which will fill me with confidence.
I'm gonna order my first dedi box. So one question comes up: How should i partition the HD ? It's a low end box with 120gb HD containing CentOS + Plesk, hosting 4-5 websites, nothing special.
Here is my plan:
Quote:
/ - 5gb
/boot - 1gb
/swap - 1gb
/home - 3gb
/tmp - 5gb
/var - 40gb
/usr - 5gb
/backup - 60gb
Surely it is good to have backup, even remote backup, but do you check them on a frequent basis to ensure that they are valid backup ?
What is your backup startegy and how do you verify your backups to ensure they are not corrupt and ok ?
Im interested in cpanel backup strategies.
I am working towards launching a site that, among other things, will be a repository for sensitive data on war crimes. As these crimes are ongoing, and occur in a location where assassinations are endemic, I need to develop a comprehensive security strategy that takes into account all levels of the interface between end user / witness and the site / database itself.
I have considered, but am open to insight and advice on, the following:
1. Data security laws in given countries, in order to ensure the privacy and integrity, as much as possible and away from political / state interference, of data communications. Concerns include the interception of data in transfer and the security of stored data (the United States and the UK are almost certainly cancelled out in this regard. Canada appears significantly better, though Greece, it appears, has the greatest level of legislative protection).
2. Encryption as a technique to ensure the security of transfered and stored data. I am particularly interested in best practice advice on encryption.
3. Javascript as a means to establish a more secure interface between the end user (i.e., the browser interface) and the secured database into which sensitive data will be inputed. Has anyone used this, or other techniques of overcoming the inherent insecurity of the browser interface?
4. Various best practices concerning php, MySQL and Apache security. Any and all advice, or guidelines, welcome.
5. Considerations relative to dedicated hosting, and also colocation hosting as an option.
In general, my problem is to ensure that the identities of witnesses, so much as is technically conceivable, can be protected from extra-judicial interference or surveillance. Nothing about this site will be illegal in any way. The problem is that the witness testimony will be about the actions of a powerful state that has demonstrated its disrespect for law.
Ideally I'd find in these forums a few individuals with whom I could discuss these technical matters off-forum. At the same time, general responses would be values.
The site that I'm building is non-profit (indeed zero budget) and does not represent any political party. It's a people's initiative, against aggressive violence and in support of international law.
when I do "yum update" at my centos 5 box, I saw over 40 packages needed to be updated.
For example, there's minor version update for MySQL 5.
so I am wondering how to determine which packages are absolutely needed.
My box is used to serve web applications. I just want to make sure that it's secure.
I am curious what "methods" Windows providers out there use to deploy Windows Server to Virtual Machines using Virtual Server 2005 when the machine is "remote" at a datacenter.
View 5 Replies View RelatedWhich Reputable Web host has the fastest deployment time for Dedicated Servers? The last server I bought took about one week to setup and that was not so pleasant.
I have read a lot of good reviews about The Planet and Softlayer on WHT. Which is the fastest in server deployment?
I was wondering if anyone here could recommend some hosting companies with solid managed vps hosting with Django support. I am considering Zone.net right now.
View 1 Replies View Relatedfor an enterprise wide deployment, what will you suggest and why among - Red Hat Linux, Suse Linux and Ubuntu Linux, also, do you think, we can negotiate the support pricing down?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI just purchased a Dell 2161DS-2 and I wanted to know if a rumor i've heard is true.
I've had a few people tell me its possible to remotely deploy and install images using this device and a USB hard drive which would plug in to it. If its possible can anyone find me a guide or explain how it is done?
I have a website (PHP, MySQL, or whatever dynamic language and database engine), and I want to set up a sandbox server dedicated only to testing scripts before deploying them, what is my best approach?
I have thought about using rsync to syncrhonize the PHP files. Before testing I would pull the files from the "Live" server using rsync, and then use some way to replicate the live MySQL database to the sandbox. Once done, the procedure would be reversed. Possibly make backups in the middle.
we are expanding to offer vps. i have seen diferent servers config. but am not sure what to choose in terms of hardware
View 14 Replies View RelatedI need a dedicated server sometime in the future and I was wondering if I should use Virtuozzo or Hypervm and how much can I get a dual core or quad core with good support? Thank you for your time.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to do something that I believe is fairly non-standard. What I am looking to do is create a system where I can rapidly deploy web sites without having to restart named and Apache. For example, if a customer completes a process, I want to be able to turn that site on immediately using a temporary domain (somecompany.example.com or othercompany.example.com).
With some programming language (hopefully PHP) I would like to get the customer up and running with their site immediately without having to restart the server. While doing some research I found I could use MyDNS which uses MySQL to manage DNS data instead of configuration files. MyDNS can be updated on the fly.
For Apache I have seen wildcard configurations, but everyone seems to be suggesting the use of mod rewrite. I would prefer that the domain maps directly to a specific folder:
somecompany.example.com -> /sites/somecompany/htdocs
(*.example.com -> /sites/*/htdocs)
Does anyone know how I might do this with Apache. It seems similar to user directories (example.com/~username -> /home/*/htdocs)
It seems that some of my customers are having serious DNS problems because their ISPs have old DNS information, and while I can access their web sites here, entire regions can't access their web sites. Obviously they ban my server because they say the web site is unaccessible is the whole city or region.
What do you suggest in this case? (Using different DNS is not a solution for a whole city; ISPs don't answer my calls)...
Will you still continue with LT?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have been running a small web hosting business now for a couple of years, and have around 100 customers. This is all run through a reseller package with BPWeb.
Recently I decided to expand, and purchased another company. This one has nearer 200 customers, and is with EUK host with a dedicated server.
I am going to merge the two onto the dedicated, as I have Cpanel and WHM there. BPweb only offer their own custom control panel.
All my previous customers are hosting only, so I have no access to their nameservers. I need to as smoothly as possible move these customers across. I thought I'd move the domain that all their namesevers point to already over to the new dedicated server, and that should follow there. But how can I move content of these 200 accounts over. Simple webpages I'd just FTP, but things like Cron jobs and databases....
Is there any SellWHM customer here? Is your VPS also offline?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI know everyone is in the collocation game, and wanted to know the best way they think there is to get collocation customers and to keep them happy? How do you go about gettting new customers for all the collocation Data Centers? Let me know what you do different to get new customers and to keep them happy and be with you long term?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI've never seen a thread like this.
Tell me what you prefer your host to have, to do, give me a description of your ideal VPS host.
I'm a client of netdirekt.de starting from today. I want to move my old sites from EV1 to Netdirekt.de but unfortunately , they didn't gave me the dns servers. I've already set-up the domains from Plesk CP , but I don't know the name servers.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have recently started my own hosting company, but I am having trouble attracting customers. My website get's around 500 unique visits per months, yet within 4 months of it being online I have only 2 customers so far. Can anyone point out what am I doing wrong? I am not overselling at all and prices are fair. Support, that I offer to customers is very good (compared to the support I get from the datacenter where I have the servers housed), so I don't really get what is wrong.
The website is at www.torqhost.com (torqhost . com)
how to renumber new customers.I have a situation where my company took over number of DSL customers who have routers with old IPs block mapped on them from an old company.
Once the carrier connects those customers to my router via PVC can I some how access those routers from withing my network even though thy have old IPs in them and renumber them to my own IPs? Is it true that if I bind an old gateway IP to my router that those customer's routers were using I would be able to access those customer routers?
Also, I would like to eliminate interaption of service to the new customers, so if I make an agreement with their old ISP where I would start advertising the IP blocks those customers were using with the old ISP via BGP while renumbering is taking place. How long would the down time be for switching route of IP blocks from their router to mine?
Are there any other fast colocation customers here?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am running CentOS 5.2 with cPanel on my server,
And i am wondering how can i let customers on virtual hosting watch their own CPU load for their account?
I'm currently considering a host change, so I'm putting out feelers to potential candidates. As always, I'm putting on my difficult customer mask (turning down my rationality and patience module) to find out if the host can actually handle real-life customers (one of the things I find most important and that I don't want to find out once the server is already on fire). Most companies pass the test very well. Here's how LiquidWeb handles new customers:
Quote:
Originally Posted by yosmc
Hi guys,
I'm looking to switch hosts in the next couple of months. I'd probably wait until January, but since the recent experience has been a bit bumpy with our current host, I'd like to get some basic info now so we can move more quickly if circumstances force us to do so.
MY SITUATION: I'm a do-it-yourself webmaster who has been managing his own server for years. It's become a curse though because managing your own server means you have to be online virtually every day. I'm looking for a solution that will allow me to be offline for several weeks (a REAL vacation, something I haven't had in a decade), knowing that whatever major issue there is with my sites, someone will take action and make sure the service stays available.
- Last year, I've switched to my first managed solution, but as it turns out, they're not doing what I need. Yesterday, for example, I came home to find my sites offline. The site was unavailable for over 40 minutes, and after asking about it I learned that they didn't take action because the server wasn't quite dead yet, only really, really, really slow. To me, this is hairsplitting, the only thing that matters is whether or not my site is available to visitors. - And once the service has been restored, I would also expect a managed host to figure out what caused the issue, and to propose a solution (or just implement one, e.g. change the mysql configuration) so that a similar issue won't happen anymore under the same circumstances.
- If my sites are unavailable due to a fatal error (e.g. a table needing repairs, or max users reached, "can't connect" or whatever else) I would also expect my managed host to catch it on their own, restore things to normality, and possibly think of ways to keep similar issues from happening in the future.
- If my site suffers a DOS attack, I would expect a managed host to think about how my site can be protected.
And so on.
- My largest database tables are 2.5 GIGs in size, but the /tmp disk my host configured has only 600 MB available, so everytime I perform a major operation (even if it's about slimming it down and running an OPTIMIZE afterwards) everything goes down the crapper (/tmp 100% full and load average shooting up to 200). Seems like the fact that /tmp is 100% full doesn't even trigger any alarms with my host, they send the alert to me, and expect me to contact them and ask for a fix. - When I needed to run a business-critical script that keept failing due to the small /tmp, it was me who reconfigured mysql so that it would temporarily use another partition for /tmp - no suggested solution from the host whatsoever. Not good at all.
- I would also like to see a host being able to learn from past incidents. This would require the host admitting though when they made a mistake, or gave the wrong advice. A host not admitting mistakes means that they will not learn, and will therefore keep making the same mistakes all over again (for the client that's a horrible outlook).
- I also think it's embarrassing if a host tells the client that fixing a certain issue is beyond the scope of their support, if it turns out afterwards that the issue happened because of some update done by the host. If in doubt, the host should always provide assistance.
- And if an issue does go beyond what can be expected from managed hosting, it would be the icing on the cake if the host could offer to fix it anyway, possibly against a fee. Such a situation could occur if a major site error is due to a broken script that was provided by the client. ("Looks like your script blah.php is causing the fatal error, we can look into it but this will likely take X hours and cost you Y USD.") Again, the ultimate goal for me is to be able to be offline for several weeks at a time, knowing that any major interruptions to my sites can be resolved without me.
- I would also appreciate a system that will allow trusted site members to report issues - i.e. one where I can give users the ability to report problems without at the same time giving them the privilege to push any red buttons that may damage my site.
So in a nutshell I'm trying to figure out if Liquid Web is the right hosting solution for me. Please let me know if your hosting philosophy meets me needs (and don't hesitate to let me know if it doesn't ).
Thanks!
Quote:
Greetings,
Thank you for contacting us. Liquid Web offers Heroic Support which covers the
hardware, OS, and installed components. We will also monitor your server, and
if a service fails one of our reps will log into your box and restart the
service. We do not provide support for your content (including backups). If
you are having a problem we will help you to troubleshoot the problem, however
if the fault is in your content or scripts we will not be able to assist you
with that.
For more information on what your support covers please see our website at:
[url]
If you have any further questions please let us know.
Quote:
Originally Posted by yosmc
Hi,
I hadn't written such a long email because I'm bored, but because I wanted to know where Liquid Web stands on the issues mentioned ("what would have happened in these situations if I was hosting with Liquid Web"). You have basically answered the question about fixing script problems, and for the rest sent me to a page with unspecific promotional teasers. If that's all I can get as a reply I guess that also answers my questions (I'm already Googling for alternatives) but then again maybe you just want to give it another try?
Thank you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidWeb
Greetings,
We will take care of server administration issues, we do not take care of any
content issues. From the email you sent it sounds as if you are looking for a
web developer that can watch over your site, and make corrections and
adjustments as needed. This is beyond the scope of what we offer.
If you have further questions please let us know.
Quote:
Originally Posted by yosmc
XY, right now I am just looking for someone to answer my questions. For what it's worth, I didn't draw the name "Liquid Web" out of a hat, and I had already been to your website prior to sending you my mail. Anyway, here's what I read from your responses:
THE BAD NEWS:
- Even if it's a one-time emergency, you are paid extra and not providing help would ruin the client's business because the client is currently in a thunderstorm in the middle of the Atlantic, it is not possible to convince Liquid Web support to fix a fatal error that may have been triggered by a programming error in one of the client's scripts.
- Although Liquid Web's server monitoring is called "Sonar" it is - in practice - just as slow as the one I've described in my intitial mail (because if it was any better, you would have told me by now how LW would have handled the given example differently).
- Even if all my sites are down because your staff has misconfigured mysql to break under heavier traffic, or because one of the tables crashed, Liquid Web's staff will do nothing until notified because as long as the mysql service itself is up, you don't see any reason to intervene (if this is something you'd care about and fix, I'm sure you would have let me in on it by now). - EDIT: Or wait - you guys are installing mySQL but you're not configuring/tweaking it so it actually works for the client? Not sure, seems like I actually have to *guess* on that one.
- Liquid Web's ticket system cannot provide sub-accounts with lesser privileges (because if it could, you would have advertised it to me).
- When Liquid Web sets up new servers, /tmp is below 1 gigabyte as well, and when this causes issues, it is definitely not Liquid Web's fault (because if you would be handling this any differently, you would have pointed it out).
- Liquid Web has too many customers already, which is why even customers who know what they want aren't told what they can get, but instead receive links to canned information that doesn't answer their questions, along with the info that Liquid Web probably isn't for them anyway.
- Generally you're in a hurry and can't spend more than 5 minutes on the average ticket.
THE GOOD NEWS:
- LiquidWeb offers DoS protection (I had missed that, but see it clearly now).
Hope there was nothing I missed. So - thanks for all the extensive information you gave me (and sorry for using up so much of your precious time), I will make sure to honor it when I reach my decision.
No further replies.
Anyone know what's wrong with these people? Are they full, or do they only take on easy customers who need nothing?
