I'm running a Windows 2003 based Vps, I'm looking to have more than 2 sessions of RDP at one time, I think every people know that is setted to 2.
I want only one more, at the moment I have admin acc always running, #1 friend account (where there are running 2 process always) and now I want #2 friend account for run another process.
Ok, I have services at Veritynet on a vps, They have terminated our server that is fully PAID for a year without refund, due to a dispute I opened in paypal because of services being down for a week.
I talked with their customer support for three days to get my services back online, and finally said enough is enough, I want a refund to take my service elsewhere, Now he has totally cut off our services even tho the paypal dispute ended in no refund being given.
What is my course of legal action?
This was sent to an email:
We have received a charge back request from paypal and under our standard policies this constitutes forfeiture of all service rights and possible ban from any future services. Had you allowed us the time and consideration to work out your grievance we may have come to a mutual understanding but in taking the action that you did you have broken any trust that a service relationship will require. At this time we have no intentions of providing any further service for this account.
I downloaded an Apache log for my site in the .gz format on a Windows XP laptop.
How can I view it? Are there any text editors or special log viewers that will allow me to view the file. Or does it need to be unzipped because it's a .gz file?
i recently set up a new testing web server(iis6), but can't view any of my websites hosted on my mac (osx leopard). I can ping the server from the mac, and RDP with out any problems, just can't view any websites. i've tried using the ip of the server (192.168.1.15) in the browser the server name but still no luck. server firewal has been disabled
I have built a website using Notepad and have saved all the files as .html documents.
Up until yesterday my internet provider was AOL and whenever I double clicked the documents they would open as a web page on AOL. All the files even had little AOL icons.
Yesterday I changed my IP to O2. Since then I have not been able to view my .html files on the internet. Whenever I double click them they just open as the Notepad documents.
I suspect that somebody is trying to do SQL injections on one of my websites. Is the POST information that is send using forms logged anywhere so I can read it in the same way I can read the GET requests in Apache logs?
Everytime I try to see the bandwidth in the reseller panel, i got this failure:
Code: "Proxy Error The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. The proxy server could not handle the request GET /reseller/services/bandwidth/show_bandwidth. Reason: Error reading from remote server"
I already restarted epld, httpd, named, and mysql daemons and the error stills...
Description: On prior versions of Plesk, users could attach Microsoft Office (word, excel, etc) files to messages they are composing in Horde, and then, before sending, click on those attachments to view them to make sure they are correct. After upgrading to 11.5, the following error is shown in Horde instead:
"Fatal error has occured could not display attachment. Details had been logged for the administrator."This issue does not occur with other file types, such as a PDF or text file.Steps to reproduce: Install Plesk 11.5 on Centos 6 x64, create an email in Horde, attach a Word document, before sending, try to view the document.
ACTUAL RESULT: Fatal error has occured could not display attachment. Details had been logged for the administrator.
my question. We host around 40 websites that have hundreds of pictures. I have 60gigs dedicated to pictures alone. since we are getting more clients I want to get a bigger hard drive just for the pictures. Since my boss is obssesed with user access times, as in users accessing the pictures on the web on their end, he thinks getting a bigger hard drive will slow down the server and hence slow down access time serving out the pictures to end users. I guess what I'm saying is does a bigger hard drive slow down a website?
Let me know if you need clarification I wasn't sure how to word this.
I've recently moved server and since then I've had a problem with the main site I administrate. The problem is that when I'm moving around the site I frequently get long lag times between clicking on a link and getting to that next page. This isn't slow transfer speeds - the status bar shows 'waiting for xxxx' for sometimes 15 to 20 seconds. The site makes quite heavy use of a MySQL database and associated forum software.
It was suggested I did some tracerts to see what that showed. The thing is I don't know what the significance of tracert results are! It seems to show lots of timeouts - but then it shows lots of timeouts when I try it on other sites as well, which don't have the same lag problems.
I have no reasons to think it's my host, who are really good and responsive. But my ISP says it's nothing to do with them either. If the routing is a problem, where lies the responsibility for selecting the routes between me and the server to my site?
I'm hoping this is just the link between me and my site, as other site users don't seem to have had a problem yet. I'll post a couple of tracert results in case anyone is able to advise me on what their significance might be.
For some reasons I cant access any of my accounts on my dedicated server via FTP. It simply times out when it tried to display the directories.
Heres a log from FileZila...
Code: Status:Resolving address of testdomain.com Status:Connecting to 64.237.58.43:21... Status:Connection established, waiting for welcome message... Response:220---------- Welcome to Pure-FTPd [TLS] ---------- Response:220-You are user number 3 of 50 allowed. Response:220-Local time is now 19:39. Server port: 21. Response:220-This is a private system - No anonymous login Response:220-IPv6 connections are also welcome on this server. Response:220 You will be disconnected after 15 minutes of inactivity. Command:USER testaccount Response:331 User testaccount OK. Password required Command:PASS ******** Response:230-User testaccount has group access to: testaccount Response:230 OK. Current restricted directory is / Command:SYST Response:215 UNIX Type: L8 Command:FEAT Response:211-Extensions supported: Response: EPRT Response: IDLE Response: MDTM Response: SIZE Response: REST STREAM Response: MLST type*;size*;sizd*;modify*;UNIX.mode*;UNIX.uid*;UNIX.gid*;unique*; Response: MLSD Response: ESTP Response: PASV Response: EPSV Response: SPSV Response: ESTA Response: AUTH TLS Response: PBSZ Response: PROT Response:211 End. Status:Connected Status:Retrieving directory listing... Command:PWD Response:257 "/" is your current location Command:TYPE I Response:200 TYPE is now 8-bit binary Command:PASV Response:227 Entering Passive Mode (64,237,58,43,145,153) Command:MLSD Response:150 Accepted data connection Response:226-ASCII Response:226-Options: -a -l Response:226 18 matches total Error:Connection timed out Error:Failed to retrieve directory listing
I have restarted the FTP service serveral times but still It doesnt loads.
We have a video streaming server, sometimes the server gets really slow and when we digg into it, we see that the same ip is trying to download the same file many many times. for example i either run this command
if any of you could give a quick idea on the set up times for dedicated servers from ECATEL
I paid 515 euros 9 days ago, and the server still hasn't been set up (Hardware delivery problems I have been told) and before I ordered, they stated the setup time would be 48 hours.
Is this normal? The last email i received from them was 3 days ago.
I find this completley unproffesional, It is always another few days.
What are your experiences with them? I am utterly dissapointed so far.
In both cases a hacker created email accounts (through cpanel?) and then sent out spam through the webmail system. I don't see on the log where they accessed the cpanel, so I'm thinking they may have done it on another day, or they may have done it using some remote script.
Im very curious. For most of us, we probably wont have to go through it. But how many times does the average customer change their web host in 4 years?
way to keep server times synchronized? All servers are in the same location.
For example, a website has two web servers and one database server. What's the best way to keep the time syncd on all servers (they should be the exact same time really)?
I'm looking into knownhost and they offer twice the bandwidth in their California option for the same money. Jay from known host said I should pick the one with the best ping times. I'd like to put the information here so someone might perhaps tell me what my best choice is.
I'll put the stats here and then if you could tell me which one is better (Texas vs. California) that would be great.
But if you think that the times between the two are only marginal (both real good), then could you help me decide about getting double the bandwidth for the same price.
I know nothing of course, but the two data centers look like their both giving great speeds (Texas being better though). But perhaps both speeds are great. If that's the case, can anyone tell me why someone would not take the higher bandwidth offer?
Thanks, I really appreciate any help with this!
Here is the info...
Texas (ping):
PING 65.99.213.7 (65.99.213.7) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 65.99.213.7: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=1.26 ms 64 bytes from 65.99.213.7: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=1.35 ms 64 bytes from 65.99.213.7: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=1.41 ms 64 bytes from 65.99.213.7: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=1.22 ms 64 bytes from 65.99.213.7: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=1.51 ms .............
<IfModule worker.c> StartServers 100 MaxClients 500 MinSpareThreads 25 MaxSpareThreads 75 ThreadsPerChild 25 MaxRequestsPerChild 100 </IfModule> Here is what is in the /var/log/httpd/error_log file before it dies:
Code: [Wed Jul 01 18:06:32 2009] [info] server seems busy, (you may need to increase StartServers, or Min/MaxSpareServers), spawning 8 children, there are 98 idle, and 108 total children [Wed Jul 01 18:08:17 2009] [info] server seems busy, (you may need to increase StartServers, or Min/MaxSpareServers), spawning 8 children, there are 74 idle, and 76 total children [Wed Jul 01 18:08:18 2009] [info] server seems busy, (you may need to increase StartServers, or Min/MaxSpareServers), spawning 16 children, there are 63 idle, and 63 total children [Wed Jul 01 18:08:19 2009] [info] server seems busy, (you may need to increase StartServers, or Min/MaxSpareServers), spawning 32 children, there are 79 idle, and 79 total children [Wed Jul 01 18:11:36 2009] [info] server seems busy, (you may need to increase StartServers, or Min/MaxSpareServers), spawning 8 children, there are 93 idle, and 108 total children
About the middle of the month I started to get SMTP service down messages from a service monitor site I had signed up with. Initially I wasn't concerned but I started to get at least one notice a day. I decided to monitor the server a bit more closely so I setup a virtual appliance on my home server to monitor SMTP response times a bit more frequently -- I let the monitoring application run for a few days to gather data and noticed an unusual trend.
SMTP response times would spike dramatically during business hours -- up to almost 19 seconds at some times. However after business hours and on the weekends response times would return to normal.
My mail volume is really low for my VPS so I don't think it is the problem -- I even ran a mail stress test and pushed close to 500 messages through in 30 minutes (more than I normally get in a day) and I didn't see any SMTP response time spikes. I have also set up monitors to watch some other sites I have running on shared servers with other providers and do not see any unusual SMTP response issues with them at all.
system information is below:
Linux OS: CENTOS Kernel Version: 2.6.18-028stab053.4 Hardware Information: VPS (1500MB RAM) Exim Version: Exim version 4.69 #1 built 16-Mar-2009 16:41:00 Spamd Version: SpamAssassin Server version 3.2.4 running on Perl 5.8.8
Has anyone else noticed the support responses from knownhost are taking longer and have less detail and not actually solving the problem on the first email? The service has been great so far but I find they are no longer going the extra mile in their responses?
