In Messages Log :: Currently Unreadable (pending) Sectors
Jun 13, 2008
I found these lines in my messages log:
Jun 13 16:04:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
Jun 13 16:04:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Offline uncorrectable sectors
Jun 13 16:34:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
Jun 13 16:34:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Offline uncorrectable sectors
Jun 13 17:04:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
Jun 13 17:04:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Offline uncorrectable sectors
Jun 13 17:34:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
Jun 13 17:34:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Offline uncorrectable sectors
Jun 13 18:04:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
Jun 13 18:04:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Offline uncorrectable sectors
Jun 13 18:34:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
Jun 13 18:34:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Offline uncorrectable sectors
Jun 13 19:04:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
Jun 13 19:04:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Offline uncorrectable sectors
Jun 13 19:34:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors
Jun 13 19:34:43 vilabr smartd[2564]: Device: /dev/sda, 5 Offline uncorrectable sectors
What does it mean?
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 4, 2009
what the below means, should i be worried about this error?
Currently unreadable (pending) sectors detected:
/dev/sdb - 38 Time(s)
1 unreadable sectors detected
View 12 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2009
Loaded Ubuntu 9.10 last night and on first boot it tells me my HD have bad sectors. Which is nice, good reporting from the new Ubuntu edition.
So I kicked off "badblocks -f -v -s /dev/sda" this morning before I took off to work using SystemRescue CD. Came home during lunch and it is still running, looks like it is going to take forever.
This is a 500GB HD, I don't intend to buy a new one. I just want all the bad sectors marked so OS don't ever use them again. Is there a better utility than *nix badblocks?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2008
I think mellowhost has gone now,
I have some pending request and helps request.
there is nothing to reply.
even the ffmpeg services have some error and they only 3mb allow to upload file.
i dont know happen to this company...
I post here not for bad reviews, otherwise to call their attentions.
because even i use the forums for mellowhost, and submit some tickets. nothing response from them.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2009
vaserv does not reply my emails now that Rus has kindly provided me a refund ( after my node has been wiped and before that my backup took almost 14 days to get made and after that the catastrophe took place)
Ive sent 3 emails asking for this ( maybe 4) and no one replies back..
View 14 Replies
View Related
Oct 6, 2006
I just got a new box, and I installed a game server on it ( Take in mind it is windows ) and when you type status in console it says STEAMID PENDING on all users.
I have restarted the game servers, and that didnt work. I rebooted the box, but that worked. When i went in game and typed status it said the SteamID's of the user, but when i restarted the game server it went back to "SteamID PENDING".
Can any one help me out why it is doing this?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2008
I am a PHP programmer, working on a script to notify me when a new file is uploaded to my website, thing is it sends on each new file and the database went screwy,
No I am getting a few thousand emails each day from my script, I think my cron job executed it several times,
Anyhow, I deleted the script but I am still getting mail,
I have my own dedicated..
How can I view and or purge the pending mail that is waiting to be sent?
I have rebooted and deleted the script itself, but still sendin me mail
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 6, 2007
I have just noticed that for several days I'm constantly receiving these infos in /var/log/messages. I haven't done anything that would invoke them. How can I disable these messages? Are they anything to worry about?
Code:
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c014f600>] find_extend_vma+0x12/0x4f
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c0134383>] get_futex_key+0x39/0x108
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c011d305>] finish_task_switch+0x30/0x66
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02cf618>] schedule+0x844/0x87a
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c027734b>] sys_socketcall+0x1df/0x1fb
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c0125bc5>] sys_gettimeofday+0x53/0xac
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02d137f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02d007b>] _read_lock_irq+0x4/0x1e
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: Badness in dst_release at include/net/dst.h:149
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<f8d8a555>] ip6_push_pending_frames+0x340/0x369 [ipv6]
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<f8d9883f>] udp_v6_push_pending_frames+0x169/0x185 [ipv6]Badness in dst_release at include/net/dst.h:149
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c0278fa8>]
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<f8d98e7d>] udpv6_sendmsg+0x622/0x770 [ipv6]
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c027a498>] __kfree_skb+0x55/0xf7
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c027e1b8>] skb_dequeue+0x40/0x46
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c027b009>] net_tx_action+0x60/0xfc
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c0126354>] skb_recv_datagram+0x61/0x9b
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02b1ed7>] __do_softirq+0x4c/0xb1
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c010814b>] do_softirq+0x4f/0x56
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: =======================
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c0107a60>] do_IRQ+0x1a2/0x1ae
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02d1d3c>] udp_recvmsg+0x5f/0x271
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02b7b35>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02d007b>] inet_sendmsg+0x38/0x42
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02757f5>] _read_lock_irq+0x4/0x1e
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: sock_sendmsg+0xdb/0xf7
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02757f5>] sock_sendmsg+0xdb/0xf7
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c011fee1>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2d
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c027a89e>] verify_iovec+0x76/0xc2
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c0276f44>] sys_sendmsg+0x1ee/0x23b
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c011cb7d>] activate_task+0x88/0x95
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c011d00a>] try_to_wake_up+0x225/0x230
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c011d00a>] try_to_wake_up+0x225/0x230
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c0170776>] inode_update_time+0x80/0x87
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c0164748>] pipe_writev+0x310/0x31c
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02cf622>] schedule+0x84e/0x87a
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c027734b>] sys_socketcall+0x1df/0x1fb
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c0125bc5>] sys_gettimeofday+0x53/0xac
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02d137f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02d007b>] _read_lock_irq+0x4/0x1e
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: Badness in dst_release at include/net/dst.h:149
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<f8d98ef7>] udpv6_sendmsg+0x69c/0x770 [ipv6]
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c027a498>] skb_dequeue+0x40/0x46
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c027b009>] skb_recv_datagram+0x61/0x9b
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02b1ed7>] udp_recvmsg+0x5f/0x271
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02b7b35>] inet_sendmsg+0x38/0x42
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02757f5>] sock_sendmsg+0xdb/0xf7
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02757f5>] sock_sendmsg+0xdb/0xf7
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c011fee1>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2d
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c027a89e>] verify_iovec+0x76/0xc2
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c0276f44>] sys_sendmsg+0x1ee/0x23b
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c011cb7d>] activate_task+0x88/0x95
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c011d00a>] try_to_wake_up+0x225/0x230
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c011d00a>] try_to_wake_up+0x225/0x230
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c0170776>] inode_update_time+0x80/0x87
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c0164748>] pipe_writev+0x310/0x31c
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02cf622>] schedule+0x84e/0x87a
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c027734b>] sys_socketcall+0x1df/0x1fb
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c0125bc5>] sys_gettimeofday+0x53/0xac
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02d137f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Feb 6 14:28:18 server kernel: [<c02d007b>] _read_lock_irq+0x4/0x1e
View 8 Replies
View Related
Mar 30, 2007
What does the #53 mean at the end of the following?
Code:
Mar 25 04:28:23 gamma named[9887]: lame server resolving 'xxxxx.com' (in 'xxxxx.com'?): 207.58.185.160#53
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 13, 2009
I need to backup some emails from my VPS, Can you please tell me where my emails are stored, I have a VPS running CENTOS, PLESK and POSTFIX mail server.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 16, 2007
My messages logs are full with the following:
Aug 16 05:45:08 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23100]: check pass; user unknown
Aug 16 05:45:08 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23100]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=65.111.176.1$
Aug 16 05:45:13 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23119]: check pass; user unknown
Aug 16 05:45:15 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23119]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=65.111.176.1$
Aug 16 05:45:18 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23161]: check pass; user unknown
Aug 16 05:45:18 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23161]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=65.111.176.1$
Aug 16 05:45:21 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23178]: check pass; user unknown
Aug 16 05:45:21 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23178]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=65.111.176.1$
Aug 16 05:45:24 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23187]: check pass; user unknown
Aug 16 05:45:24 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23187]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=65.111.176.1$
Aug 16 05:45:27 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23235]: check pass; user unknown
Aug 16 05:45:27 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23235]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=65.111.176.1$
Aug 16 05:45:29 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23249]: check pass; user unknown
Aug 16 05:45:29 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23249]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=65.111.176.1$
Aug 16 05:45:32 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23262]: check pass; user unknown
Aug 16 05:45:32 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23262]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=65.111.176.1$
Aug 16 05:45:35 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23283]: check pass; user unknown
Aug 16 05:45:35 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23283]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=65.111.176.1$
Aug 16 05:45:38 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23307]: check pass; user unknown
Aug 16 05:45:38 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23307]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=65.111.176.1$
Aug 16 05:45:40 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23321]: check pass; user unknown
Aug 16 05:45:40 sml101 sshd(pam_unix)[23321]: authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=65.111.176.1$
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2009
Does anyone know what the following events in /var/log/messages mean. It looks like some sort of failure on the ata bus. Does the last line mean that it successfully wrote all data using the cache, or could there be data loss?
The output of smartctl looks ok for the disk.
Code:
Jul 26 16:44:35 server1 kernel: ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
Jul 26 16:44:35 server1 kernel: ata1.00: cmd c8/00:08:9d:e2:8a/00:00:00:00:00/ec tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 4096 in
Jul 26 16:44:35 server1 kernel: res 40/00:01:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
Jul 26 16:44:42 server1 kernel: ata1: port is slow to respond, please be patient (Status 0xd0)
Jul 26 16:45:05 server1 kernel: ata1: port failed to respond (30 secs, Status 0xd0)
Jul 26 16:45:05 server1 kernel: ata1: soft resetting port
Jul 26 16:45:10 server1 kernel: ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-2)
Jul 26 16:45:10 server1 kernel: ata1: failed to recover some devices, retrying in 5 secs
Jul 26 16:45:15 server1 kernel: ata1: soft resetting port
Jul 26 16:45:15 server1 kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Jul 26 16:45:15 server1 kernel: ata1: EH complete
Jul 26 16:45:15 server1 kernel: SCSI device sda: 976773168 512-byte hdwr sectors (500108 MB)
Jul 26 16:45:15 server1 kernel: SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2009
I have a VPS with Future Hosting and recently I have been getting more and more notifications from LFD regarding high CPU load. For example:
Time: Sun Jun 14 06:50:48 2009 -0500
1 Min Load Avg: 9.47
5 Min Load Avg: 6.25
15 Min Load Avg: 3.68
Running/Total Processes: 2/105
I am getting at least one of these a day now and I am also getting alerts about services failing, SPAMD in particular but also EXIM (and messages about LFD being unable to determine the exim queue length). External monitors are also warning me about SMTP timeouts during the same time period that I get the "high load" errors.
Tech support seems a bit stumped by this one and ALWAYS come back with "load looks fine right now". With the frequency of the warning emails increasing I am getting very concerned about the stability of my VPS.
I am not running anything significant on my VPS yet with minimal visitors and load (RAM usage consistently stays below 300MB on a VPS with 1+GB RAM.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 8, 2008
Is there any way with mysql 5.0 to send query and slow
log messages (e.g. mysql-slow log and/or mysql-query
log messages) to syslog ?
I want to visualize my mysql report online. ( like use Rsyslog )
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 30, 2007
Few days back i began to have problem with server overload, when i checked in /var/log/messages i found a lot of
Jun 28 14:17:59 secure named[3523]: client 200.48.225.146#59035: error sending response: host unreachable
Jun 28 14:17:59 secure named[3523]: client 200.51.211.5#32774: error sending response: host unreachable
Jun 28 14:17:59 secure named[3523]: client 202.55.145.3#32637: error sending response: host unreachable
Jun 28 14:17:59 secure named[3523]: client 66.245.177.163#3936: error sending response: host unreachable
Jun 28 14:17:59 secure named[3523]: client 202.59.163.2#32768: error sending response: host unreachable
Jun 28 14:17:59 secure named[3523]: client 216.247.37.56#24990: error sending response: host unreachable
Jun 28 14:17:59 secure named[3523]: client 194.18.168.184#39718: error sending response: host unreachable
Jun 28 14:17:59 secure named[3523]: client 64.226.28.70#45706: error sending response: host unreachable
all at the same hour,minutes and seconds, this that i wrote is an example (the ip's are reals) but like it i found a lot of more, and is in the same time that the server overload. the server is RHE and i have APF and BFA installed.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 6, 2008
Where can I turn off the emails that go out in response to a message not being delivered?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 29, 2007
I just ran 'rkhunter -c --quiet' and this is the error messages I got:
Line:
Warning: This operating system is not fully supported!
Line: Warning: This operating system is not fully supported!
Warning: Cannot find md5_not_known
Some errors has been found while checking. Please perform a manual check on this machine debian
Is this something I should be worried about??
I'm running CentOS 5.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2007
It appears that MSN / Hotmail have recently began blocking an awful lot of servers I manage. Several of them (for a company I work for) are in a few blacklists however a number of the IP addresses I manage are 100% clean.
Anyone know of something MSN/Hotmail recently began enforcing?
The blocks began at around 6 PM EST on Thursday of last week.
The error message is as follows:
Your e-mail was rejected for policy reasons on this
gateway. Reasons for rejection may be related to content such as obscene
language, graphics, or spam-like characteristics (or) other reputation
problems. For sender troubleshooting information, please go to
http://postmaster.msn.com. Please note: if you are an end-user please
contact your E-mail/Internet Service Provider for assistance.
I feel like a pawn for asking this on WHT but from what I can see
it's fairly widespread.
The domains in question do have basic SPF implemented as well.
not limited to a contact at hotmail / msn that would enjoy a phonebeating.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 10, 2007
we send mailing tih php through smtp connection
All ok in the last 5 month
But now when set more than 1000 emails x sessione (any 10 minutes) we get this error:
"421 too many messages in this connection"
There aren't new configuration on exim.
So we have set 1000 emails max and lower minutes in the session (5) but there is another problem:
Warning: fsockopen() [function.fsockopen]: unable to connect to mx.***.com:25 in /home/***.php on line 47
Connection refused (111)
Can be too lower 5 minutes?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2007
I am on a DirectAdmin server, with root access. Exim mail server.
Is there any way to filter outgoing messages? Let's say if IP of client is listed in blacklist, they can not send out emails
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 18, 2007
messages such as
Apache/2.2.6 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.6 OpenSSL/0.9.7a FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_bwlimited/1.4 mod_jk/1.2.25 mod_mono/1.2.4 mod_auth_passthrough/2.1 PHP/5.2.4
when you go to browse a folder with no index file..
is there away to remove this?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 14, 2007
/var/log/messages is full of messages like this every 5 minutes:
[INFO] New connection from 209.85.4.32
pure-ftpd: (?@209.85.4.32) [INFO] Logout
is there any way to stop it?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2007
Quote:
Feb 19 15:57:39 server proftpd[1363]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session closed.
Feb 19 16:06:02 server proftpd[1982]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session opened.
Feb 19 16:06:02 server proftpd[1982]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session closed.
Feb 19 16:14:24 server proftpd[2471]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session opened.
Feb 19 16:14:24 server proftpd[2471]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session closed.
Feb 19 16:22:46 server proftpd[3062]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session opened.
Feb 19 16:22:46 server proftpd[3062]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session closed.
Feb 19 16:31:09 server proftpd[3696]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session opened.
Feb 19 16:31:09 server proftpd[3696]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session closed.
Feb 19 16:39:31 server proftpd[4185]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session opened.
Feb 19 16:39:31 server proftpd[4185]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session closed.
Feb 19 16:47:53 server proftpd[4946]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session opened.
Feb 19 16:47:53 server proftpd[4946]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session closed.
Feb 19 16:56:16 server proftpd[5495]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session opened.
Feb 19 16:56:16 server proftpd[5495]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session closed.
Feb 19 17:04:38 server proftpd[6206]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session opened.
Feb 19 17:04:38 server proftpd[6206]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session closed.
Feb 19 17:13:00 server proftpd[6661]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session opened.
Feb 19 17:13:00 server proftpd[6661]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session closed.
Feb 19 17:21:23 server proftpd[7225]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session opened.
Feb 19 17:21:23 server proftpd[7225]: server.com (127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]) - FTP session closed.
I see over a few hundred of these lines in /var/log/messages. The timestamp is exactly the same for every 2 lines (Proftp session- Opened and Closed). It's occuring every hour of the day. Is someone attacking the ftp daemon or something?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2007
We're on a VPS and lately we've been getting a few 'exim has failed...A restart was attempted automagicly.' messages. Support indicated that we're hitting our limits and suggested that we move to a bigger package or remove accounts. I only have 2 active sites on this account. We're new at this and don't know if there's anything else we can do.
Does anyone know what could be causing exim to fail?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2014
I have 2.4.3 (Win-64) installed and running. When it starts up, I get a command prompt window that has messages in it, but the window closes so quickly, I can't read the messages. They don't appear in the log. I have tried to manually start the server, but when I do, the messages do not appear!
How can I get that window to stay open or where can I see those messages?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 27, 2008
I can not download messages from the server via pop3 and browsed on outlook
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2007
I am getting these strange messages in the shell.
Message from syslogd@hostname at Thu Feb 8 02:08:10 2007 ...
hostname kernel: Call Trace:
Message from syslogd@hostname at Thu Feb 8 02:08:10 2007 ...
hostname kernel: <c01c2650> do_lookup+0x5a/0x78 <c01c2de3> __link_path_walk+0x775/0xbf0
Message from syslogd@hostname at Thu Feb 8 02:08:10 2007 ...
hostname kernel: <c019fa60> prep_new_page+0x2f/0x148 <c01c32a1> link_path_walk+0x43/0xae
Message from syslogd@hostname at Thu Feb 8 02:08:10 2007 ...
hostname kernel: <c01c69d7> vfs_readdir+0x5f/0x67 <c01c6e3d> sys_getdents64+0xb8/0xc3
Message from syslogd@hostname at Thu Feb 8 02:08:10 2007 ...
hostname kernel: <c0345252> _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x2a/0x44 <c01c36b5> do_path_lookup+0x1f6/0x241
Message from syslogd@hostname at Thu Feb 8 02:08:10 2007 ...
hostname kernel: <c01c3910> __user_walk_fd+0x29/0x3a <c01bedd8> sys_readlinkat+0x25/0x74
Message from syslogd@hostname at Thu Feb 8 02:08:10 2007 ...
hostname kernel: <c01c69d7> vfs_readdir+0x5f/0x67 <c01c6e3d> sys_getdents64+0xb8/0xc3
Message from syslogd@hostname at Thu Feb 8 02:08:10 2007 ...
hostname kernel: <c0345252> _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x2a/0x44 <c01bee3a> sys_readlink+0x13/0x17
Message from syslogd@hostname at Thu Feb 8 02:08:10 2007 ...
hostname kernel: <c01666ab> sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x89
Message from syslogd@hostname at Thu Feb 8 02:08:10 2007 ...
hostname kernel: Code: 00 00 70 ee a0 d0 bc ee a0 d0 bc ed a0 d0 c4 ee a0 d0 c4 ed a0 d0 4c ee a0 d0 4c ee a0 d0 64 ba 8f d1 64 ba 8f d1 87 2f 39 34 30 <d1> 35 f6 00 0c 10 c2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 36 31 38 00 65 6e
Message from syslogd@hostname at Thu Feb 8 02:08:10 2007 ...
hostname kernel: EIP: [<d0a0ee61>] 0xd0a0ee61 SS:ESP 0068:f320fe44
Is this any issues with the current kernel that i am running. Do I need to change the kernel version ( 2.6.17.6 )
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2009
We've got a dedicated server at our company that hosts several sites and email accounts. Today I noticed that in the mail queue (from Plesk) we have like 5 or 6 messages from the same customer with around 400 destination addresses for EACH one. This would be like 2000-3000 emails to be sent. It isn't spam as it's some kind of newsletter.
I don't really know how the QMail server handles this, but it's been 5 hours since some of those messages entered the queue, and they are still there, so it seems that is having some difficulty.
I don't pretend to limit the amount of emails an user can send per minute or per hour, but I would like to know if there is any way of managing the queue like, lets say, send 50 message per minute. As far as I know, the mail queue right now (by default) starts sending the messages as they come, which means it could send 1000 in a few seconds if it can handle it.
I don't even know if this would be better or worse, meaning that maybe messages could get queued when the server could handle them, so some customers would see that emails are not working instantly as they do now. It also would be good if this tool (if exists) could report the current status of the queue, saturation, etc...
We're a bit worried because a couple of days ago we had some kind of attack and our server started sending hundreds of emails with fake sender and the CPU went overloaded and the mail queue was too big.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 12, 2008
i'm wanting my users to be able to upload pictures to their accounts via email by sending the picture to a central email address (pics@mysite.com, for example).
from there, i'd like to take that incoming email and parse it how i see fit. (matching the email address to the user account, inserting the subject as the photo title, etc...)
what's the best method of handling this?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 21, 2008
I am getting the following warning messages from the nobody check script by Webhostgear [url]
Warning: Malicious Nobody Process Found
=========================================
Options: kill bad proc=1 logging lvl=1
SCAN SUMMARY
========================================
Clean Processes: 12
DETECTED Malicious Processes: 1
DETECTION DETAILS
========================================
DETECTION: Process 7752 with name perl and path /usr/bin/perl
Process ID: 7752 has been killed
Restuls for PID: 7752
total 0
dr-xr-xr-x 3 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 12:35 .
dr-xr-xr-x 1856 root root 0 Apr 2 16:12 ..
-r-------- 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 13:00 auxv
-r--r--r-- 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 12:35 cmdline
lrwxrwxrwx 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 13:00 cwd -> /
-r-------- 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 13:00 environ
lrwxrwxrwx 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 12:35 exe -> /usr/bin/perl
dr-x------ 2 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 12:36 fd
-r--r--r-- 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 13:00 maps
-rw------- 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 13:00 mem
-r--r--r-- 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 13:00 mounts
-r-------- 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 13:00 mountstats
lrwxrwxrwx 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 13:00 root -> /
-r-------- 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 13:00 smaps
-r--r--r-- 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 12:35 stat
-r--r--r-- 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 12:35 statm
-r--r--r-- 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 12:35 status
dr-xr-xr-x 3 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 13:00 task
-r--r--r-- 1 nobody nobody 0 Apr 21 13:00 wchan
Netstat:
Environ:
Server Admin action is required immediately.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2007
I have noticed that hotmail will only accept HTML message from any of my servers.
Is it me or is Hotmail really a webhosters night mare.
View 6 Replies
View Related
