files core.xxx are generated on one shared hosting account.my server is using CPanel 11 current. these files use almost free space left on the account. They can be deleted but next time they appear again.
View 3 Replies
"Auto-generated hostname" what's that? i can't delete or stop it
File: /etc/hosts
208.53.183.27 omega.maishare.com omega
# Auto-generated hostname. Please do not remove this comment.
208.53.183.27 fast.box.net fast
but it's not my host name also i got all cpanel mails from it
How do i enable auto mount file system in my system? I am using linux ver4
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy server running centOS4 and cPAnel.
Can anyone let me know how to auto detect a hack local file ? eg: review cgi-telnet, c99sell ....
I'm assuming this has something to do with all the new cache settings I've added for my community site. the file core.11601 is 33megs and its located in the webroot of my site.
View 5 Replies View RelatedShall I chose the xeon quad core 2.4 GHZ or the dual core 2.66 GHZ for an adserver's database?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhich is the better performer?
(1x) Quad Core Intel Xeon X3220 2.40GHz 2x4M Cache
OR
(2x) Dual Core AMD Opteron 2216 2.4GHz 2X1MB Cache 1Ghz HyperTransport
This is for a web/application server running, Windows 2003 Server Professional, IIS, MySQL, MSSQL 2005 Express, Plesk 8.5. The price is about the same.
i already setup caching for html, images, css, js etc. but my pages are dynamically generated by CMS like wordpress and similar.Is there any apache module or any clever way how i can cache whole dynamically generated page on my server?I mean like i have 6GB ram free, so i would like to dedicate like 3gb for this cache.
View 2 Replies View RelatedAfter enabling DomainKeys via 'Server-Wide Mail Settings' and 'Mail Settings for domain.com'.The DomainKeys are not generated and placed in the TXT resource records created in the domains' DNS zones.
Specs: OS: Up-to-date CentOS 7, Control Panel: Plesk 12.0.18 Update #15.
We are using 4 apache and 8 weblogic.When little high load is coming on application (say 300 users), we are getting non-http response code (Non HTTP response code: org.apache.http.conn.HttpHostConnectException).And also all the load is generated from one single IP address.And we are using apache 2.2.
View 1 Replies View Relatedhow to prevent full backup to generated in cpanel server
iam seen this in few host what we cant able to generate the fullback if the size of the amount is more than 1-2GB
quad core processor vs Intel Xeon 3060 Dual Core Conroe Processor which is better any why?
View 2 Replies View Relatedcan someone give a comparison betwen this two
Intel Quad Core Xeon X3210 vs Dual-Core 3040 Xeon
I have the following problem, the files and folders generated by PHP are hidden in FTP.
I can see in the Plesk file manager that users, permissions and groups are the same for all files and folders (those that can be seen and those that cannot be seen from FTP).
All the options in the server are set by default. It is a new installation of Plesk 12.0.18 #4 in CentOS 6.5 (Final).
SO: CentOS 6.5 (Final)
Plesk: 12.0.18 #4
PHP: FasctCGI
Apache Modules:
I have an address that receives hundreds and hundreds of e-mails a day. It's an address people aren't supposed to use (basically noreply@mydomain.com), but people do. I'd like to stop being the guy that gets these and routes them as appropriate, but we can't just turn it off and cause a hard bounce, because that will bewilder too many people who don't get that replying to noreply@mydomain.com is a bad idea. (Our website sends out notifications to people. A lot of people reply for various strange reasons, and we also get a lot of autoresponders sending us junk.)
I'm a Linux admin, so I'm a bit out of my league -- this needs to be configured on our Exchange box.
What I'd really like is an auto-responder for this address that will tell people that they e-mailed a mailbox that no one uses, and give them directions on how to contact a real person if need be.
However, fully half of the e-mails we receive are people's auto-responders. Is an Exchange auto-responder going to reply to their auto-responder? This will completely bewilder people.
And if this will auto-respond to auto-responders, is there a cleaner solution here? Again, it's got to be Exchange, but I'm a Postfix guy, so I have very little experience here.
Which one you suggest for running database server and VPS's?
Dual Xeon3ghz 1mb dual core vs Quadcore 6600 2.4ghzx4 core 8mb.
We are hosting our software system which do calculation and file manipulation.
Now we have Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 and would like to get Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 to increase our system performance.
Also we have other choice, get Intel Xeon E5405 Harpertown 2.0GHz
to replace two above.
I think it is better to have one server box because one box easy to manage than two. Also Harpertown is much faster than these two together.
What is your opinion?
3i want to buy new erver and i have choice of the fallowing
AMD X4 Quad Core 9500
RAM : 4096 MB
Disk Drives: 2 X 250 GB SATA
and
Intel Quad Core Q9300 4x2.5 GHz
RAM : 2048 MB
Disk Drives: 2 X 250 GB SATA
both in the same price . so i need some advice for who are the best performance and the ideal for webhosting service.
I'm build Plesk Panel for Linux and Presence Builder, I don't want my user can upload their website to hosting via File Manager. How can I do it...
View 2 Replies View Relatedwe are planning to have 1 more dedicated server and also planning to collocate.
Core 2 Quad 6700 [ OR ] Core 2 Quad Q9450 | Which is better
Say I have 2 websites and they all use file.php which is located on mainserver.com/file.php.
I want to use the file like this:
website1.com/file.php
website2.com/file.php
I cant decide between
Dual Processor Single Core
Dual Processor Single Core Xeon - 3.00GHz (Irwindale)
Or
Single Processor - Quad Core?
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 3220 - 2.40GHz (Kentsfield)
My site needs "raw" processing power due to the applications it runs. ram (over 2 gb) and hdd are not that important to me.
could someone point me in the right direction.
Which is a better option? Both priced same, I know with the Xeon 5310 the possibility of upgrading to dual cpu's.
Quote:
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 3220 - 2.40GHz (Kentsfield) - 2 x 4MB cache
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 5310 - 1.60GHz (Clovertown) - 1 x 8MB cache
Which would give higher performance in a shared web hosting environment?
I am going to buy a new server and I am unsure of which route to take.
Basically the cost is identical for a Dell server with:
1 AMD Operton Dual Core 2.4Ghz
OR
2 AMD Operton Dual Core 2.0Ghz
What is the felling? Does the 4 cores out weight the extra 400 mhz per processor, but only having 2 cores?
The server will be running:
Windows 2003 Standard x32
Plesk 8.2
IIS 6.0 [ Application Pools Setup ]
MySQL
Microsft SQL Express 2005 [ONLY CAN USE 1 CPU/CORE]
MailEnable
Can my applications even handle/utilize four cores?
