Browser Timing Out/ftp Issues Asia Pacific/Australia/Oceania To US
Aug 11, 2008
I have a VPS located in LA, USA.
For over a week now I have had the following network issues:
- browser timing out (for me and visitors to my site)
- ftp connection issues
The server load is low so it's not server related.
Traceroute TO the server appears fine.
Traceroute FROM the server to users IP's appears to have issues over the SingTel/Optus network.
My webhost says it's an issue for SingTel/Optus.
SingTel/Optus Engineer say:
"Our testings point to a problem either within Cogent's network or on a peering link between Cogent and Singtel in LA.
I'd suggest that the owner of the domain (me!) approach his hosting provider and have them escalate to Cogent. We can't escalate to Cogent as we have no peering with them."
So I've been the meat in the sandwich for over a week with no sign of a fix.
My options appear to be to either move the VPS away from the webhost and host it locally (Australia) or to somehow wait for someone to step up and take responsiblity and get this resolved.
My heart says wait as it's not *my* responsibility but it's costing me financially and professionally.
Anyone else experiencing similiar/same issues from the Asia Pacific region to the US?
View 11 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 24, 2009
If you had the option to pick one location for a POP in Asia/Pacific that would leave you best connected to most people ... where would that be?
Hong Kong, Tokyo, Singapore, Sidney, etc etc?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2008
im not able to decide from where to buy dedicated .....money never matter i want good support quality server , most important reliable
serverplace.net or pacificrack.com
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 14, 2009
I've actually had a post-it note pegged to my project board for the last two months to remind myself to write up a review of Pacific Rack. Between the holidays, life and there never being enough hours in the day...I just hadn't had a chance until now. Please allow me to apologize in advance if I go into more detail than what is needed. I have an annoying habit of over-explaining things.
Anyways - here is a bit of background:
My Industry:
A freelance designer that also provides web hosting to design clients on a dedicated server housed with Pacific Rack. My main website can be found at [url]and most of the websites displayed in my design portfolio are also hosted on the server (Caution: Those websites in my portfolio are semi-adult in nature [companionship providers], so if you are at work or have an irrational hang-up about such things, I suggest not following my portfolio links). I don't make a profit from hosting (nor do I try to) - so it's not like I'm a big, high-tech hosting company. In fact, what I know about server management is pretty pathetic and minimal - which is why I pay PSM to manage it for me. I mainly offer hosting as a convenience and extra layer of identity protection to design clients.
The websites I host are mostly smallish, semi-dynamic outfits powered by my own, mysql-based, home-brew CMS solution. I host around 60 accounts, none of which are very resource intensive. My clients typically require require between 3-12GB monthly transfer each.
Server Hardware:
The server specs and package I have with Pacific Rack are as follows:
Intel C2D (2.0Ghz)
2GB Ram
250GB SATA 16MB Cache
CentOS 5.1
cPanel/WHM
2000GB Bandwidth
100Mbps port
50GB Automated Backup
Sign-Up:
I moved to Pacific Rack from Dediwebhosting in May 2008. The initial contact and transition was handled by Alex Ferrier, who was simply phenomenal. Yes. I am aware he is actually Chris so-and-so and that there was a huge controversy about him and some shady way he handled a hosting business several years back (he was a teenager at the time, mind you). Frankly - I don't care. He was not only courteous and helpful to me during my transition, but he didn't make me feel like an idiot for being such a noob. He also had a sense of humor and communicated on a level that was very personable. Knowing what I know now about his past has not changed my opinion of him or Pacific Rack in the slightest. Ok. Getting off topic. So I signed-up/paid on 5/29 and had my server up and running by 6/1. I had some issues with the new server having an updated version of mysql that broke my CMS - but this wasn't anyone's fault but my own.
Reliability:
It hasn't been a full year yet, but I've had very little downtime with my server and none that I can even recall clearly. Far less than I'd experienced with a reseller account at H9 or with my first dedicated server with Dediwebhost (neither of which were excessive either). I also noticed a definite improvement in overall server response and performance when I moved to PR - though my hardware specs were much better than where I was coming from. I'm not sure if is due to a better network, but previously my server couldn't send/receive mail with AOL accounts (yes. I'd gone through all the troubleshooters) - but this problem was resolved after moving to PR.
Support:
So this is where I think they really shine. I'd mentioned above that I currently use PSM for my management needs. I think they're a terrific service but there are some limitations in terms of response times and how thorough they are in making sure things aren't broken after doing an update for you. There have been a few times in the last year when a server package install/update has caused problems with my client sites, which ... after waiting an hour or more for a response from PSM (while I'm stressing from clients yelling at me) - I'd get impatient and submit a ticket to Pacific Rack instead. In every single one of those cases, Pacific Rack responded to (and often resolved) my issue within 15 minutes. They're just darn quick with support requests. They have the pay-per-incident option (usually only $5), but they've only actually charged me a couple of times out of all the instances I've contacted them.
Not only that, but as touched on above - they just don't make me feel like the server idiot I know I reveal myself to be at times. WHT is intimidating for me to post on because it seems as if most of you are big shot hosting gurus (or big companies that can afford to hire your own hot shot hosting gurus). I'm just a rinky-dink freelancer, whose hosting requirements are quite modest compared to many of the people here. Yet, all things being relative - my hosting needs are still important and significant in my own little world.
I guess what I'm saying is that I'm sure PR has much larger accounts than my small little server...yet they don't project an attitude that I'm any less important to them. Support is quick, friendly and informative. In fact, I'm waiting to hear back from their sales department about what management services they offer. I really have appreciated having PSM, but because I host so many accounts that depend on me for uptime - I feel like I need to look into more reliable management options.
Actually, 'reliable' isn't the right word...as PSM has been pretty great. I just need a service with faster turn-arounds on tickets.
So all in all, I highly recommend Pacific Rack. I realize my modest server requirements may not be the proper scale from which to judge your own performance and reliablity needs...but their support and network uptime would apply to anyone ... and that I can vouch for. I just feel like I'm in good hands with them.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2008
I just thought I'd take a moment to share a few of my thoughts on my initial experiences getting set up with Pacific Rack...
It was finally time for me to take the plunge for a dedicated box, and after browsing through these forums and hearing a lot of good things about Pacific Rack, I decided to contact their sales department. I was immediately responded to and soon found myself talking to Alex and Jordan (both very helpful). We quickly found an appropriate solution for my company, and soon I was off to the setup queue.
Setup took longer than expected, but I think that was due to some custom configuration issues on my end (they had to wait for parts to come in). Support/sales were pretty good about keeping me up to date on what was happening though, and soon things were rolling along nicely.
(Initial experiences with the network...)
Wikipedia lists 14 Tier 1 networks on their article page (for whatever that's worth!), and I think PacificRack (and parent(?) company OC3Networks) sits on Gigabit links to 6 or 7 of those networks. So I was excited to see what the network would look like once I was set up.
Once my server was provisioned and I received a login to their client portal, I started messing around with things and was quite impressed. I signed up for a 1Gbps switch and I've seen several transfers in the 20BM/s - 60MB/s range (PM me if you would like a speed-test file link). These guys have got quite a network!
(Initial experiences with the client control panel)
Their client section is minimalistic, but has the basics. Server info, billing info, ticketing system, and a nice little graph showing you how much throughput your server is experiencing at the moment (or historically). I can't really think of anything it's missing, though it looks a bit bland.
(Initial experiences with the sales/support team)
So far I've sent in several tickets for a number of things (they don't set up rDNS by default), and from what I can tell a support/sales agent is usually on it within minutes. Once it almost felt like I was on a chat with the support rep. Everyone seems to know his/her stuff, and they have all been quite helpful, resolving each issue in (usually) a manner of minutes.
All in all I'd have to say these guys are great. I've only been around for about a week now, but I've been quite impressed. If anyone finds this post useful I'll probably write another one at the 6 month mark.
Feel free to respond here or PM me for further information/speed test links, etc.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jun 17, 2008
This is my review of my initial setup with Pacific Rack.
After the issues with the fire at TP, I decided to pickup another server at a different data center as an additional server.
I ordered a Supermicro, which is a quad core processor. The price was well within the range, the extras were all within range as well, except cpanel, which was $35.00. I'd rather see that at $25.00, but overall that was fine. Total price as $266, right around what I expected to pay.
Setup took a few days, right at around what I expected.
When it was delivered, I asked why I couldn't log into WHM. They told me everything was fine. After some communication and about an hour and a half they said that they forgot to install cpanel... That wasn't a good start.
They failed to meet expectations because of the following:
1. RDNS was not setup at all. I shouldn't have to request it be setup. This is small, but if I didn't know to check/ask, it would be a major issue in the future.
2. The box always fails to reboot and requires manual intervention. Why can't they fix that? or even address the issue?
3. cPanel was not installed properly and when I asked for help, they told me that the box was unmanaged and I choose the configuration. If it didn't work right out of the box, the fault was my own for choosing that configuration.
Alex said, "You have received a standard Fedora 64 bit install, that we downloaded just for you. What you need must not be included in the standard install, or the cPanel install.
If you want us to manage your server, then you will have to subscribe to our server management service which is $29/month with a 6 month commitment. Otherwise you can just google for the command to install an RPM, as I don't know if off hand, but I know its really simple."
Just to comment, if it turned out to be as simple as installing an RPM, then I would have just killed myself due to the shame of it.
Turns out after working with cPanel support, it was an install error, cPanel was not installed correctly. (Don't know if that is PacificRack's fault or cPanel's, but I know it's NOT my fault and I would expect the data center to get my server up and running properly so I could manage it)
My expectation was that I would be delivered a box that worked properly and if it didn't, PacificRack would help me get it working so that I could use it. It appears that PacificRack's expectation was they just install the crap, it's up to me to make it work. If the install is bad, I can just Google it.
I'm fine with managing a server, I have four years experience running serveral servers, but I am not able to debug install issues where the box NEVER worked properly in the first place.
So, in this area, they fail to meet expectations.
I also found their technical staff to be arrogant and unfriendly, though I'm personally arrogant and unfriendly, but I always am very nice to support people, no need to cut my own throat.
Overall, I'd say that my experience doesn't seem to be typical, but the fact that they were unwilling to resolve the issues really bothers me. I detest companies who hide behind "unmanaged" as a shield against providing the services that they should be providing as a data center. I also refuse to pay a $29.00 a monthly fee to get a managed server (basically a $180.00 commitment) to get them to deliver a working server, when that should be a "Free" service provided when I purchase.
The DNS servers are pacficrack work well and the connections are fast and reliable.
The server still is not working up to expectations and their support people seem to be unwilling to get it to meet expectations with out going "managed". Now, honestly, $180 would be far cheaper than any other options, but its the principle of it.
Overall, I'd rate pacificrack about average. The server is a good server and at a reasonable price. The support people where knowledgeable. The turn around on tickets was very good, no ticket sat for more than a few hours. It really seems like pacificrack is a very small operation. I think that is a big plus.
At this point, I'm not sure if I should just move on or continue to try and get this server to work properly. I'll make a decision in a week when the server is close to renewal.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2008
I'm interested in the free control panel from pacificrack mycp. Does anybody have any experience with it? What's it's functionality like? easy to use? many feutureS? how does it compare to plesk or cpanel?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 24, 2009
I have a php cli shell script that I want to be running continuously without ever stopping. However, I noticed that it would stop executing after a while on its own.
Is there a way to keep a script running forever without timing out, or daemonize it?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2007
i have had a problem for some time now, regarding my CRON jobs. I am trying to download a large amount of data from ebay (through their API, totally legal and aboveboard) using php, but my CRONjob times out.
I have tried resetting the timeout variable, but then it exceeds the maximum filesize
SO, my question: is there any way to have a script run as a CRON job, and wen it is complete, call another script?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2008
I'm interested in getting a VPS (nothing too much - probably at least 5-10GB space / 30GB bandwidth) for a forum I run based in Australia. My budget is probably around $40/month. BTW I'm after managed.
My main issue is that I would like it to be a decent speed for Australia (specifically Melbourne). Where should a datacenter be located for Australia?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Mar 10, 2008
I'm not sure why my brand new dual proc quad core xeon 2.5ghz harpertown gets time out when the server load is under .5
Like it'll be running ultra fast and suddenly, I can't get into ssh, whm, my websites or anything. When I ping it, no reponse. Is it because it restarted itself?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2007
I'm moving to Australia in a few months, and I'm thinking of hosting a few of my sites down there.
What's the best place to buy domains and hosting in Australia? Should I buy it seperate or from the same company?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 2, 2007
I have used VPSland.com before and was very happy with everything except bandwidth speed. If i ping the server, I get around 198 to 220ms response. VPS is hosted in USA, and I live in Auckland, New Zealand. www.vpsland.com
I am planning on starting my own personal business, which is going to be relatively small to start of with... I wanted to purchase a VPS to host my website as well as host few other websites for clients if required. I will be running typo3 content management system with mysql database. I wanted the response time to be better than VPSland.com.
The companies I have explored in NZ are 3 times more expensive than VPSland. I wanted a server which has around 300mb ram or so. Would prefer Windows 2003, if not Linux.
Please recommend me which VPS provider I should go with? I suppose it should be based in Australia or New Zealand as the traffic will be national mostly. or even USA or UK or any other country which provides good response time for NZ visitors and has competitive prices?
My budget is around $20 - 30 US max
View 11 Replies
View Related
Feb 10, 2007
I have recently tweaked my server (AMD 3000+ 1gb Ram 10mbps port) by configuring the httpd.conf, my.cnf and php.ini.
I am pleased to say that the server is now responding well and the load is always below 1.00.
However, sometimes a user will experience a time-out through their browser. Once they refresh the server will then react as it should and carry out the command which is being asked of it.
tweaking apache so that timeouts do not occur....here are the changes I have made...
php.ini
Code:
[MySQL]
; Allow or prevent persistent links.
mysql.allow_persistent = Off
httpd.conf
Code:
KeepAlive On
MaxKeepAliveRequests 100
KeepAliveTimeout 3
MinSpareServers 16
MaxSpareServers 32
StartServers 20
MaxClients 150
MaxRequestsPerChild 5
and finally here is my.cnf file
Code:
[mysqld]
skip-locking
skip-innodb
max_connections = 400
key_buffer = 200M
myisam_sort_buffer_size = 64M
join_buffer=2M
read_buffer_size = 5M
sort_buffer_size = 5M
read_rnd_buffer_size = 5M
table_cache = 1536
thread_cache_size = 128
interactive_timeout=100
wait_timeout=10
connect_timeout=10
tmp_table_size = 48M
max_allowed_packet = 16M
max_connect_errors = 10
query_cache_limit = 3M
query_cache_size = 64M
query_cache_type = 1
thread_concurrency=4
log-slow-queries = /var/log/mysql/mysql-slow.log
old-passwords = 1
[mysqld_safe]
open_files_limit = 8192
[mysqldump]
quick
max_allowed_packet = 16M
[myisamchk]
key_buffer = 64M
sort_buffer = 64M
read_buffer = 16M
write_buffer = 16M
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 28, 2007
I decided to merge 2 old dedicated servers into 1 colocated machine with better specs the old machines have a combined number of about 280 accounts.
I purchased a Broadberry Server and requested a specific setup and OS (CentOS) after some delays they finally got it working and shipped it to the Datacentre
I chose 49pence/RapidSwitch for colocation in the UK
I received a email from 49pence on how they wanted it setup and Broadberry did this as well which was good.
Unfortunately I got the email it had been received and installed from RapidSwtich before I received the email regarding server admin and password info
Broadberry set a very weak password up a bit of an oversight this
As within 12 hours of it being installed it was hacked!
Being a UK bank holiday we were unable to do anything till today
And now we are having to retrieve the server to reinstall everything and start again!
I hope the companys involved will be cooperative so we can get this up and running asap.
My severs at Coreix end later this month.
A lesson to be learned for us and I hope anyone reading
Next time we have a check list to make sure nothing gets overlooked!
Luckly no data on the server and no harm done other than cost and time.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2008
if there are any data centers in Australia...
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 8, 2008
I was wondering what people in Australia use with regards to Dedicated Server companies. Do you go local in Australia or are overseas companies just as good?
If local what do you guys use? If overseas, where do you get the fastest bandwidth to Australia, etc.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 10, 2007
I had a strange error this morning, httpd was running fine but nothing was loading. All the other services worked fine but I checked the error log and couldn't find anything. I restarted httpd and it's running fine now.
Quote:
[Sat Feb 10 11:48:01 2007] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec)
[Sat Feb 10 11:48:01 2007] [notice] Accept mutex: sysvsem (Default: sysvsem)
[Sat Feb 10 13:06:02 2007] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down
[Sat Feb 10 13:06:03 2007] [notice] Apache configured -- resuming normal operations
[Sat Feb 10 13:06:03 2007] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec)
[Sat Feb 10 13:06:03 2007] [notice] Accept mutex: sysvsem (Default: sysvsem)
[Sat Feb 10 20:42:26 2007] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down
[Sat Feb 10 20:42:28 2007] [notice] Apache configured -- resuming normal operations
[Sat Feb 10 20:42:28 2007] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec)
[Sat Feb 10 20:42:28 2007] [notice] Accept mutex: sysvsem (Default: sysvsem)
Looks just like normal operations... I checked the access log and nothing looked out of the ordinary either.
Anyway the only suspicious thing I saw was the daily scan by spammers to see if I had anything exploitable.
Quote:
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:32 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/a1b2c3d4e5f6g7h8i9/nonexistentfile.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:33 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/adxmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:33 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/adserver/adxmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:33 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/phpAdsNew/adxmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:33 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/phpadsnew/adxmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:33 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/phpads/adxmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:33 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/Ads/adxmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:33 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/ads/adxmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:33 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/xmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:34 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/xmlrpc/xmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:34 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/xmlsrv/xmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:34 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/blog/xmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:34 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/drupal/xmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:34 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/community/xmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:34 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/blogs/xmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:34 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/blogs/xmlsrv/xmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:34 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/blog/xmlsrv/xmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:34 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/blogtest/xmlsrv/xmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:35 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/b2/xmlsrv/xmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:35 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/b2evo/xmlsrv/xmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:35 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/wordpress/xmlrpc.php
[Sat Feb 10 00:16:35 2007] [error] [client 69.13.76.82] File does not exist: /var/www/html/phpgroupware/xmlrpc.php
I have nothing to be exploited so I'm thinking that wasn't the cause either.
I checked user_beancounters and there are also 0 fail counts.
Quote:
Version: 2.5
uid resource held maxheld barrier limit failcnt
509: kmemsize 4679572 9150217 50000000 50000000 0
lockedpages 0 0 256 256 0
privvmpages 51822 84271 262140 524280 0
shmpages 10913 10929 21504 21504 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
numproc 52 91 400 400 0
physpages 14273 24587 0 2147483647 0
vmguarpages 0 0 131070 2147483647 0
oomguarpages 14912 33040 26112 2147483647 0
numtcpsock 16 146 360 360 0
numflock 1 6 188 206 0
numpty 2 2 16 16 0
numsiginfo 0 25 256 256 0
tcpsndbuf 154284 371176 1720320 2703360 0
tcprcvbuf 197308 539932 1720320 2703360 0
othersockbuf 13416 239892 1126080 2097152 0
dgramrcvbuf 0 2800 262144 262144 0
numothersock 13 27 360 360 0
dcachesize 0 0 2273280 2416640 0
numfile 1199 2022 5820 5820 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
dummy 0 0 0 0 0
numiptent 89 89 128 128 0
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2007
I am currently researching into colocation hosting for a 1u rack server. i am looking for a cheapish host that can give me something around 10mbit line and idk how much bandwidth i need yet, but probably something over 300gig. Its to host counter strike source servers.
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2008
I'm working on a script to help users get routed to the nearest, fastest server for the best ping. I'm in 2 datacenters, one on the east and one one the west coast of the US.
I've looked at some of the geo lookup programs based on IP, but they either seem inaccurate or expensive.. and just downright difficult to use.
I found out that some geo load balancers use the connection speed to figure out the best route. So, I'm trying to think of a way of timing the users connection from multiple server locations.
Has anyone here done that sort of thing before? Any suggestions on how to best do that?
Two completely different methods I've considered:
1. putting 2 images on a web page, and using javascript to time the loading of them.
2. pinging the user IP from each coast and seeing which is fastest. (Is there a lighter way than ping? )
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2009
There is a behavour with my server FTP when uploading a whole directory with many files in many sub-directories
Very often, the server disconnect itself when actively uploading files and the log simply says 'timeout'
It is as if the file got 'stuck' half way, and the FTP consider them as idle, therefore it disconnect you with a 'timeout' before reconnecting you.
But i have no problem uploading a single 200mb file to the server via FTP. I suppose no problem with 'keep alive'
So what is this behavior and how to solve it?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Dec 20, 2008
I've just purchased 6 domain names.
3 x .com
2 x .info
1 x .net
The sites will be viewed mostly by an American audience. I've already decided that the hosting package should be a VPS as this fits my budget.
My question is whether I should host these domains in the States or my location, in Australia? My concerns are:
- If I host in Australia, will the States experience a lag in site loading
- Prices in Australia seem to be cheaper
- If hosted in Australia will it have a negative effect on how the site is ranked on American search engines such as google.com
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2007
Does anyone have a good lead on any providers who have sub-cable between seattle & aus?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2013
First time configuring Apache (2.2 w/ mod_jk) and when running locally (192.168.1.x), no problem.
When configuring from a DynDns through my UVerse router, I get several JS and CSS 'not found' and of course bad rendered site.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2008
i just wrote a nice little page on the best location in the US for a VPS server for my Australian and New Zealand customers,
View 10 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2008
can anyone suggest few hosts whos Datacenter in Australia,Canda,UK ? price is $8-$20 USD
requirement
3-5gb space
15-20gb bandwidth
unlimited addon domains
unlimited mysql domains &
cpanel control panel
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2008
We have our main cluster in Atlanta, Georgia, USA and intend to keep it there.
However our customers in Malaysia are not able to connect reliably to that server. They have up to 30% packet loss.
I want to get a server that can sit in the middle and just port-forward between Malaysia and the USA. This needs to be just a low-cost linux vps server as it is doing very little.
Does anyone know of a provider that has good links to the USA and to South East Asia who can provide a server like this?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2008
if there is any one here
who works for rtg asia
if there is i would like to know about your VPS
View 0 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2008
what is the best bandwith to Asia, especially Indonesia?
are NTT & GLBX good?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Mar 16, 2008
I have a small project that I am going to be doing for a client and I am in the need for a small linux (centos) vps, 128mb (would like to have a burstable amount too) ram.
Storage really isnt a issue, dont need more than a couple GB's. Looking to find something around $15 USD. I would prefer the location to be in Japan, but I am pretty much open to anywhere in East Asia.
View 10 Replies
View Related
