I am thinking about upgrading my current server.
My current cpy is Q8200, thinking about getting X3220.
Will i see "big improvement".
how much of improvement i will get, also HDDs probably would be upgraded from SATA to SAS 73GB 15k (RAID1).
I just ordered a dell server a few days ago and have noticed in addition to a free harddrive upgrade I now have an upgraded processor for the same price.
PE860 Quad-Core Xeon X3220 2.4GHz/2x4MB 1066FSB (105W)
Free Processor Upgrade to QC Xeon 5320
The question for me is which is better? The previous processor was the low energy 105W one which suited me fine as I'm co-locating this to a DC where they are very strict on power consumption.
Is this one going to provide a noticable performance increase over the first? Is it a major power hog?
Not too experienced with this and need your help. I agreed for a dedicated server deal with Core2Quad Q9300 but now the agent is giving me a Xeon X3220 instead and said there is no difference.
Could I get some opinions? Is it true there is no difference? I had the impression that the Q9300 was more powerful.
Xeon 3220 (2.40Ghz 4MB Cache)
vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.44Ghz 8MB Cache)
vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 (2.33Ghz 4MB Cache)
How do these CPU's compare to each other? From what I've read so far I'm leaning towards the Q6600.
I have a decision to make about hosting.
I have 2 offers for the same monthly price.
Option A - Xeon X3220 quad core
Option B - AMD Phenom 9600 quad core
Everything else is comparable RAM, disk, bandwidth etc
Today, I just found out that PacificRack was offering dedi's with Q9300 CPU and 6GB DDR2 for $129 (Pretty good deal). I picked one up for VMWare ESXi development machine and they had me online in under 4 hours which is very fair. It seems that their service has consistently good over time and this makes me want to work with them for many years to come.
The machine has been living up to its expectations so far although it has only been a day. With the good service I received, I had to put up a review
I'd also like to add that we have been colocating our servers with them for over a year without any major issues. Any ticket has been responded to in a timely manner and the staff is always courteous and professional. The network is absolutely outstanding and constantly improved.
I have written a review in the past for PacificRack and my view remains the same towards them. Excellent job, and keep doing what you do best.
all three looks same. any big difference for a server?
View 5 Replies View RelatedIf you had to buy one or the other at the same price which would you go with? Hosting and gaming usage.
Q6600 vs Q9300
2.4 Ghz vs 2.5 Ghz
8MB cache vs 6 MB cache
1066 FSB vs 1333 MHz FSB
had you ever use q6600 and x3220 to run xen ?
i wonder if they can support xen well.
I'm thinking in changing my actual dedicated server, but I'm not sure if I will win with the change.
I use it for web hosting, but I am going to need a lot of Mysql use.
I also want to work with Flash Media Server or Red5, but I have the project stopped.
All are almost in the same price. What do you recommend me?
I have never touched Linux and my Server is Windows 2003, do you recommend me to change to Linux?
------------------------------------
Intel Xeon 3075
2x 2.66 GHz L2: 4 MB, FSB: 1333 MHz
4 GB DDR2
HD 2x 750 GB
SATA2 RAID HARD 1
Ping: 60 ms
-------------------------------------
Core2Duo E6750
2x 2.66 GHz L2: 4 MB, FSB: 1333 MHz
4 GB DDR2
HD 2x 750 GB
SATA2 RAID HARD 1
Ping: 60 ms
-------------------------------------
Dell R200 Quad Core X3210, 2.13GHz/2x4M 1066FSB
Intel Quad Core 2.13GHz
RAM 2GB 667MHz Dual Rank ECC (2X1GB)
HD 250GB SATA (7,200rpm)
Ping: 40
--------------------------------------
Now I have:
•2 x Intel Xeon 2.40 Ghz Compaq Prol DL 360 G3
•Intel Xeon 2.40 Ghz
•1 GB RAM (PC2100 Mhz ECC DDR SDRAM DIMM
•HD 80 GB UATA
•Cache 512
Ping: 40 ms
I have a question regarding load on this cpu.
Current cpu load is around 1.7 - 2.1.
Is this to much, is it time to upgrade cpu or?
Server is running 32bit Centos 5.3.
top - 17:17:21 up 27 days, 16:24, 1 user, load average: 1.59, 1.43, 1.22
Tasks: 159 total, 1 running, 158 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu0 : 9.0%us, 1.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 89.7%id, 0.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu1 : 16.7%us, 1.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 82.3%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu2 : 2.3%us, 0.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 97.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu3 : 36.5%us, 2.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 60.5%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 4148576k total, 2738172k used, 1410404k free, 410876k buffers
Swap: 2096440k total, 192k used, 2096248k free, 1413824k cached
Thank you,
s-f-r-j
I am getting a choice between these 2 CPUs
q8200 (quad 2.3Ghz) slightly less powerful
e6850 (dual 3.0Ghz)
I will be running Windows/SQL Server/IIS7.
Which one will be better/faster?
Currently my web sites in VPS with PowerVPS and my Server everyday downs and my CPU usage is high load all the time.
My Ram is 1500Mg and I see that my web sites are using 1200-1300 all tha time.
So I will move to dedicated server and need your help to choose my server.
I have only one large web site and all the other web sites are small (20 web sites).
The larg web sites is VB forum
Everyday Visit my large web site 10000-15000 visitors .
Alexa rank 42000.
spend 190-220GB monthly BW.
What do you think about this offer from THPLANET?
Intel Xeon 3040 Dual-core Conroe Processor
DRIVE CONTROLLER: SAS/SATA
PRIMARY HARD DRIVE: 250GB Hard Drive
OPERATING SYSTEM: CentOS Enterprise Linux, Version 4
MEMORY: 2048 MB RAM
CONTROL PANEL: cPanel/WHM with Fantastico
IP ADDRESSES: 10 IP Addresses
BANDWIDTH: 1500 GB Bandwidth
UPLINK PORT SPEED: 10 Mbps Uplink
$186.5 per month and $0 set up
*******
And I have another offer from SoftLayer
Single Processor Quad Core Intel Xeon 5410
Processor: – 2.33GHz
1 x 12MB CPU Cache
2GB FB-DIMM RAM
KVM over IP Access / Reboot
2000GB Public Bandwidth
Unmetered Private Network Bandwidth
5 Public IP Addresses
CentOS
CONTROL PANEL: cPanel/WHM with Fantastico
1 x 250GB SATAII HDD
$284/mo NO SETUP
Which is better for a dedicated server, if you have to choose one? any experience, reviews...
View 12 Replies View RelatedPlanning on getting a new dedicated server with 4GB RAM, and a 500GB 7.2k SATA2 Hard Drive.
Which processor do you guys suggest? I know the Q6600 is older and runs hotter, but it has better specs than the Q8200. Would I really notice a difference if I'm only hosting static sites without any video streaming or anything?
I'm looking at the Q8200 for a new batch of servers but noticed for 35% more cash I can upgrade them to 8200s models.
Does anyone have any stats about how much power (in Ampage as thats what i am measured on) a Q8200S model will save over a Q8200 model? Is it even worth the extra money in return for the savings (if its very minor)?
I'm trying to figure out for sure which is best. Which would you do? The second is a bit older technology, I guess, but it seems to me that two discreet older Xeons would be better than one dual core newer Xeon.
Xeon 3040 Dual Core 1.86GHz (Conroe)
+ Single Processor Dual Core
+ 2GB RAM
+ 2 x 250GB SATA Drive
+ Cpanel/whm/fantastico
+ RedHat Enterprise 5 Linux
+ 10 IP Addresses
+ 1500GB Monthly Transfer
+ 10mbps Uplink
$174 Per Month
-OR-
Dual Xeon 2.8GHz
+ 2GB RAM
+ 2x 80GB IDE Drives
+ Cpanel/whm/fantastico
+ RedHat Enterprise 5 Linux
+ 10 IP Addresses
+ 2500GB Monthly Transfer
+ 100mbps Uplink
$172
planing to buy a new server a little confused which i should choose .... which server would you go for...
**** config 1 ****
4 Processor single core Opteron 854 2.8ghz (2.8ghz x 4)
4GB FB ECC RAM
2x 36gb 15,000 SA/SCSI
RAID 1
**** config 2 ****
Single processor Xeon 5460 3.16ghz (3.16ghz x 4)
2GB FB ECC RAM (config 1 with 4 gb ram)
2x 36gb 10,000 SA/SCSI (config 1 with 15k rpm sas drive)
RAID 1
**** config 3 ****
Single processor Xeon 5355 2.66ghz (2.66ghz x 4)
2GB FB ECC RAM (config 1 with 4 gb ram)
2x 36gb 10,000 SA/SCSI (config 1 with 15k rpm sas drive)
RAID 1
Softlayer is pricing these both the same, and I've been a big fan of the
x3220 for a long time now. I haven't been able to fine ANY reasonably priced servers that can out perform the x3220 in computational ability.
That said, does anyone have any figures that would suggest the 5410 is better?
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 5410 - 2.33GHz (Harpertown) - 1 x 12MB cache
vs
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 3220 - 2.40GHz (Kentsfield) - 2 x 4MB cache
Clearly the cache is bigger, but for me, it's about speed and computation.
I can't find any references to the x5410 in the VPS vs Dedicated thhread.
I would like to compare a Dual Xeon 3Ghz HT with a single Quad Xeon 2.4Ghz. Does tperformance difference worth $60 month plus?
View 6 Replies View Relatedcan someone give a comparison betwen this two
Intel Quad Core Xeon X3210 vs Dual-Core 3040 Xeon
There's something I've always wondered, what makes a Xeon a Xeon?
For instance, what is the difference between a Core 2 Quad Q9300 and a Quad-Core Xeon E5420. Both are quad core, have a 1333MHz FSB, run at 2.5GHz, have SSE4.1, any all the specs seem identical.
Only difference I see is the Xeon has 12MB cache compared to the Q9300's 6MB.
But generally speaking, what makes a Xeon such much better for a server environment than a Core 2 processor.
Which is a better option? Both priced same, I know with the Xeon 5310 the possibility of upgrading to dual cpu's.
Quote:
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 3220 - 2.40GHz (Kentsfield) - 2 x 4MB cache
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 5310 - 1.60GHz (Clovertown) - 1 x 8MB cache
Which would give higher performance in a shared web hosting environment?
Which one is better: Dual Xeon 2.8GHz/HT vs Dual Core Xeon 2.4GHz (3060) for shared hosting with database intensive? Both with 4GB RAM.
View 3 Replies View Related3i want to buy new erver and i have choice of the fallowing
AMD X4 Quad Core 9500
RAM : 4096 MB
Disk Drives: 2 X 250 GB SATA
and
Intel Quad Core Q9300 4x2.5 GHz
RAM : 2048 MB
Disk Drives: 2 X 250 GB SATA
both in the same price . so i need some advice for who are the best performance and the ideal for webhosting service.
To those of you who have pushed out Intel i7 platform servers, hows the performance? Also, hows the Desktop performance. Considering buying a new desktop with i7.
View 6 Replies View Relatedon Ebay for some entry level servers to put in colo for some personal sites. I already have the space so I ruled out renting any, and I see that you can get some pretty good deals on the MPs, I see a few quad 1.4/1.5ghz. But how would they compare to todays processors? What should I expect from them?
View 7 Replies View RelatedSo the question is, Intel® Xeon® Processor 7041 (4M Cache, 3.00 GHz, 800 MHz FSB) are those still good for hosting some shared accounts?
Following link does not give it a good ranking
[url] even Atom and Celeron are having better ranking.
Well to make discussion more focused, a bunch of WP blogs around 50, few static, few dynamic, and around 2500 emails (in+out apart from filtered incoming SPAM) are running fine on an old 1Gb OpenVZ VPS without much load, but sites are becoming very slow (maybe shared pipe), now we have to move this client and all of his sites.
What's your say about this Xeon 7041 based server with 2Gb RAM, is it good enough for current scenario?
about thei5 and i7 cpu,
what series of xeon are the same as they are?
2 XEON 2.4 vs C2D 6550 2.33?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow much better are Xeon processors than Core 2 Duo processors? What goes into the brand difference? I know that they're built on the same architecture, but I'm unsure as to which is better.
I've got two choices, both Intel processors built on the Kentsfield Core 2 architecture.
Stats seem exactly alike, except one difference: the Core 2 Duo processor has a 9x multiplier (2.4GHz), while the Xeon processor has a 8x multiplier (2.13 GHz). I really see no advantage in taking the Xeon processor, which costs more. Multiplier difference shouldn't make a big deal.
So, anybody know what goes into the "Xeon" brand these days? The exact model numbers, by the way, are Q6600 for the Core 2 Duo and X3210 for the Xeon.
