There's something I've always wondered, what makes a Xeon a Xeon?
For instance, what is the difference between a Core 2 Quad Q9300 and a Quad-Core Xeon E5420. Both are quad core, have a 1333MHz FSB, run at 2.5GHz, have SSE4.1, any all the specs seem identical.
Only difference I see is the Xeon has 12MB cache compared to the Q9300's 6MB.
But generally speaking, what makes a Xeon such much better for a server environment than a Core 2 processor.
I'm thinking in changing my actual dedicated server, but I'm not sure if I will win with the change.
I use it for web hosting, but I am going to need a lot of Mysql use.
I also want to work with Flash Media Server or Red5, but I have the project stopped.
All are almost in the same price. What do you recommend me?
I have never touched Linux and my Server is Windows 2003, do you recommend me to change to Linux?
------------------------------------
Intel Xeon 3075
2x 2.66 GHz L2: 4 MB, FSB: 1333 MHz
4 GB DDR2
HD 2x 750 GB
SATA2 RAID HARD 1
Ping: 60 ms
-------------------------------------
Core2Duo E6750
2x 2.66 GHz L2: 4 MB, FSB: 1333 MHz
4 GB DDR2
HD 2x 750 GB
SATA2 RAID HARD 1
Ping: 60 ms
-------------------------------------
Dell R200 Quad Core X3210, 2.13GHz/2x4M 1066FSB
Intel Quad Core 2.13GHz
RAM 2GB 667MHz Dual Rank ECC (2X1GB)
HD 250GB SATA (7,200rpm)
Ping: 40
--------------------------------------
Now I have:
•2 x Intel Xeon 2.40 Ghz Compaq Prol DL 360 G3
•Intel Xeon 2.40 Ghz
•1 GB RAM (PC2100 Mhz ECC DDR SDRAM DIMM
•HD 80 GB UATA
•Cache 512
Ping: 40 ms
Currently my web sites in VPS with PowerVPS and my Server everyday downs and my CPU usage is high load all the time.
My Ram is 1500Mg and I see that my web sites are using 1200-1300 all tha time.
So I will move to dedicated server and need your help to choose my server.
I have only one large web site and all the other web sites are small (20 web sites).
The larg web sites is VB forum
Everyday Visit my large web site 10000-15000 visitors .
Alexa rank 42000.
spend 190-220GB monthly BW.
What do you think about this offer from THPLANET?
Intel Xeon 3040 Dual-core Conroe Processor
DRIVE CONTROLLER: SAS/SATA
PRIMARY HARD DRIVE: 250GB Hard Drive
OPERATING SYSTEM: CentOS Enterprise Linux, Version 4
MEMORY: 2048 MB RAM
CONTROL PANEL: cPanel/WHM with Fantastico
IP ADDRESSES: 10 IP Addresses
BANDWIDTH: 1500 GB Bandwidth
UPLINK PORT SPEED: 10 Mbps Uplink
$186.5 per month and $0 set up
*******
And I have another offer from SoftLayer
Single Processor Quad Core Intel Xeon 5410
Processor: – 2.33GHz
1 x 12MB CPU Cache
2GB FB-DIMM RAM
KVM over IP Access / Reboot
2000GB Public Bandwidth
Unmetered Private Network Bandwidth
5 Public IP Addresses
CentOS
CONTROL PANEL: cPanel/WHM with Fantastico
1 x 250GB SATAII HDD
$284/mo NO SETUP
Which is better for a dedicated server, if you have to choose one? any experience, reviews...
View 12 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to figure out for sure which is best. Which would you do? The second is a bit older technology, I guess, but it seems to me that two discreet older Xeons would be better than one dual core newer Xeon.
Xeon 3040 Dual Core 1.86GHz (Conroe)
+ Single Processor Dual Core
+ 2GB RAM
+ 2 x 250GB SATA Drive
+ Cpanel/whm/fantastico
+ RedHat Enterprise 5 Linux
+ 10 IP Addresses
+ 1500GB Monthly Transfer
+ 10mbps Uplink
$174 Per Month
-OR-
Dual Xeon 2.8GHz
+ 2GB RAM
+ 2x 80GB IDE Drives
+ Cpanel/whm/fantastico
+ RedHat Enterprise 5 Linux
+ 10 IP Addresses
+ 2500GB Monthly Transfer
+ 100mbps Uplink
$172
planing to buy a new server a little confused which i should choose .... which server would you go for...
**** config 1 ****
4 Processor single core Opteron 854 2.8ghz (2.8ghz x 4)
4GB FB ECC RAM
2x 36gb 15,000 SA/SCSI
RAID 1
**** config 2 ****
Single processor Xeon 5460 3.16ghz (3.16ghz x 4)
2GB FB ECC RAM (config 1 with 4 gb ram)
2x 36gb 10,000 SA/SCSI (config 1 with 15k rpm sas drive)
RAID 1
**** config 3 ****
Single processor Xeon 5355 2.66ghz (2.66ghz x 4)
2GB FB ECC RAM (config 1 with 4 gb ram)
2x 36gb 10,000 SA/SCSI (config 1 with 15k rpm sas drive)
RAID 1
Softlayer is pricing these both the same, and I've been a big fan of the
x3220 for a long time now. I haven't been able to fine ANY reasonably priced servers that can out perform the x3220 in computational ability.
That said, does anyone have any figures that would suggest the 5410 is better?
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 5410 - 2.33GHz (Harpertown) - 1 x 12MB cache
vs
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 3220 - 2.40GHz (Kentsfield) - 2 x 4MB cache
Clearly the cache is bigger, but for me, it's about speed and computation.
I can't find any references to the x5410 in the VPS vs Dedicated thhread.
I would like to compare a Dual Xeon 3Ghz HT with a single Quad Xeon 2.4Ghz. Does tperformance difference worth $60 month plus?
View 6 Replies View Relatedcan someone give a comparison betwen this two
Intel Quad Core Xeon X3210 vs Dual-Core 3040 Xeon
I just ordered a dell server a few days ago and have noticed in addition to a free harddrive upgrade I now have an upgraded processor for the same price.
PE860 Quad-Core Xeon X3220 2.4GHz/2x4MB 1066FSB (105W)
Free Processor Upgrade to QC Xeon 5320
The question for me is which is better? The previous processor was the low energy 105W one which suited me fine as I'm co-locating this to a DC where they are very strict on power consumption.
Is this one going to provide a noticable performance increase over the first? Is it a major power hog?
Which is a better option? Both priced same, I know with the Xeon 5310 the possibility of upgrading to dual cpu's.
Quote:
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 3220 - 2.40GHz (Kentsfield) - 2 x 4MB cache
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 5310 - 1.60GHz (Clovertown) - 1 x 8MB cache
Which would give higher performance in a shared web hosting environment?
Which one is better: Dual Xeon 2.8GHz/HT vs Dual Core Xeon 2.4GHz (3060) for shared hosting with database intensive? Both with 4GB RAM.
View 3 Replies View RelatedTo those of you who have pushed out Intel i7 platform servers, hows the performance? Also, hows the Desktop performance. Considering buying a new desktop with i7.
View 6 Replies View Relatedon Ebay for some entry level servers to put in colo for some personal sites. I already have the space so I ruled out renting any, and I see that you can get some pretty good deals on the MPs, I see a few quad 1.4/1.5ghz. But how would they compare to todays processors? What should I expect from them?
View 7 Replies View RelatedSo the question is, Intel® Xeon® Processor 7041 (4M Cache, 3.00 GHz, 800 MHz FSB) are those still good for hosting some shared accounts?
Following link does not give it a good ranking
[url] even Atom and Celeron are having better ranking.
Well to make discussion more focused, a bunch of WP blogs around 50, few static, few dynamic, and around 2500 emails (in+out apart from filtered incoming SPAM) are running fine on an old 1Gb OpenVZ VPS without much load, but sites are becoming very slow (maybe shared pipe), now we have to move this client and all of his sites.
What's your say about this Xeon 7041 based server with 2Gb RAM, is it good enough for current scenario?
about thei5 and i7 cpu,
what series of xeon are the same as they are?
2 XEON 2.4 vs C2D 6550 2.33?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow much better are Xeon processors than Core 2 Duo processors? What goes into the brand difference? I know that they're built on the same architecture, but I'm unsure as to which is better.
I've got two choices, both Intel processors built on the Kentsfield Core 2 architecture.
Stats seem exactly alike, except one difference: the Core 2 Duo processor has a 9x multiplier (2.4GHz), while the Xeon processor has a 8x multiplier (2.13 GHz). I really see no advantage in taking the Xeon processor, which costs more. Multiplier difference shouldn't make a big deal.
So, anybody know what goes into the "Xeon" brand these days? The exact model numbers, by the way, are Q6600 for the Core 2 Duo and X3210 for the Xeon.
How many times better is Intel Xeon 3060 (2 x 2.4GHz) with 2GB of ram VS. a Pentium 4 3.0ghz with 1GB of ram, serving mysql with apache 1.3
View 7 Replies View Relatedif there is already an equivalent Xeon for the i7 processors?
I mean that for example C2Q Q6600 is equivalent for X3220 if I'm right.
Also, I guess those Servers will cost a lot more, not only because the processor is very costly but it also requires DDR3 RAM which is still nowadays quite expensive...
I'm doing some math here for a colocation project. We need each 1U server to consum less than 100W (220V) or else no more than 0,5A
I was looking for Dell PowerEdge R410, it offers several processor options.
Both these have 60W TDP:
Intel® Xeon® L5520, 2.26Ghz, 8M Cache, 5.86 GT/s QPI, Turbo, HT, 1066MHz Max Mem
Intel® Xeon® L5506, 2.13Ghz, 4M Cache, 4.86 GT/s QPI, 800MHz Max Mem
And both these have 80W TDP:
Intel® Xeon® E5504, 2.0Ghz, 4M Cache, 800MHz Max Mem
Intel® Xeon® E5502, 1.86Ghz, 4M Cache, 800MHz Max Mem
I'm thinking of having 4x 1TB HDD's and a 3ware raid controller.
Do you think it's possible to stay under 100W with this configuration, using the L55xx processors?
Are these L55xx worthy? Or it's a waste of money?
Is this processor dual Quad Core processor or motherboard with that processor have hyper threading technology?I ask beacuse i see with top there is 8 cores.And is that processor worse or better then xeon 3220?
View 2 Replies View Relatedhow would systems compare if they were based ont he followinf chips:
Intel core i7 920
VS
Dual Xeon 5405
How many vps about i can add in a server xeon cpu and 8gb ram and 100mbit speed?
Openvz technology.
One's a desktop chip, the other a specialised server one.
In terms of performance, will there be a big difference between the pair? I know the Q9950 is a cheaper processor but there isn't much difference between them on the cpu benchmark Website.
This is what I was told by ThePlanet:
As for the quote you wanted for the core 2 quad Q9550, that is slightly less powerful than the xeon 3360. We do not offer desktop grade procesors in our servers, that would be misleading to our customers. Same as the RAM we offer, we offer ECC fully buffered RAM, not desktop grade.
This is a huge difference between providers like The Planet and other mom and pop shops you see around the internet.
I can't find any direct comparisons but I am thinking of upping our server to quad core. I'm just wondering if there is a direct comparison out there - and frankly hoping it won't be much of one seeing as how it's dual core vs. quad core.
View 13 Replies View Relatedwhile I'm surfing the net i find this site where it has a price list for the parts of a computer and i saw an Intel Xeon processor and it's priced is affordable to me.. Hmm.. My question now is it Ok to buy this processor? because some of my I.T. friends here tell me that it is for Server based processor only and it is not suitable for PC HOME USER..
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've noticed many questions on this site about xeon and quad-core server technology and products. I work at intel and we have a new open online community space where we are inviting IT professionals to come and ask questions to product and technology experts, engage in open dialogue, or read about topics and trends impacting IT and business.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI can have this refurb for 300$!
What could you potentially host on that? A phpBB with 100 000 visits a day ? About 150 small blogs?
Plesk shows my CPU details as below
CPU - INTEL Pentium III (Katmai) EM64T Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 6 ~1995MHz
VPS provider promised Dual core Xeon CPU. Is above CPU a Dual core Xeon?
what would you recommend as more powerfull processor for the dedicated server (for one heavy traffic php+mysql site)?
The price is almost same, I would like to choose better proc, not the cheaper one. The rest is same: 2 GB RAM, 250 GB SATAII HD.