I have a Windows 2000 Advanced Server where there's a performance issue with some of the .asp pages that retrieve data from Access databases, (I know Access databases aren't ideal for data). These pages will just get stuck/freeze, and then either suddenly spring back to life, or give a script timeout error 0113.
The largest Access database I've seen is 136MB (is that way too large?)
I will probably move some of the large Access databases onto a different server but before I do:
- Are there any tools you can recommend to diagnose exactly what files / databases are causing the problem. I don't think the Win 2000 performance monitor tools even work.
- Can anyone explain more about the technicalities behind this issue. I expect it has something to do with processes, threads, memory, Access drivers being loaded into memory etc etc. Can anyone tell me what they know to put me in the picture better?
I have successfully installed PHP onto my MS Server 2000 platform, and can execute the files without problem.
html files no longer work, but I think this is to be expected? Renaming them .php allows them to work.
However, I am struggling to set a default page - I have gone to 'document' in the IIS settings, and removed all other default pages, and added index.php. This has not worked. I can access xxx.myserver.com/index.php, but it does not show when accessing xxx.myserver.com
I have a Windows 2000 server running Raid 1 software raid. Recently, one hard disk in the mirror crash, I replace another trying to build the mirror. Problem is the existing hard disk has a few bad blocks, even after chkdsk it still failed to rebuild the software raid, error msg was due to bad blocks in the existing hard disk.
Just checking how do I add a Windows Defined service in Windows 2000. I saw some info.
But it seemed to apply to Microsoft Windows 2003 Server as there isn't instsrv or srvany in Windows 2000 server even after I uploaded the Resource Kit Tools. Am I missing something?
Or can someone tell me where to download these for Windows 2000?
How well patched and secure is Windows 2000 and old ASP as it stands today? I am considering using this combo for something and need to know if there is anything I need to be concerned about?
Our windows 2000 NT server will not allow users to login to the FTP unless they are classified as administrators. I have the domain set up with all of the correct permissions (to my knowledge).
1. Access to FTP folders
2. Access to Read under FTP
If there is some permission not set, please let me know.
The users are added to the Domain controller under Active Directory. I saw a post about the same exact problem on another forum, but there was no answer.
These few days I keep having error logs for form delivery
Message delivery to the remote domain 'xxx.xxx' failed for the following reason: Unable to deliver the message because the destination address was misconfigured as a mail loop.
Perviously everything was fine , wonder anyone know what could have suddenly cause this issue.
The website has encountered a problem and cannot display the page you are trying to view. The options provided below might help you solve the problem. For self-help options:
Frequently Asked Questions
Find Solutions
Windows Update Newsgroup For assisted support options:
Microsoft Online Assisted Support (no-cost for Windows Update issues)
I followed their FAQ and still cant update.I am already using IE 6
The minimum requirements that I am seeking for is that it must be a Windows 2000 or Windows XP machine with at least 1024 MB of DDR PC3200 RAM and at least a single-core 2 GHz CPU whether it be AMD or Intel (something suitable for a gameserver and webserver combo), 40GB SATA/RAID Harddrive, and a Full Duplex 100 Mbit port with plenty of bandwidth to run a 32-Player 66tic CSS Server.
The price range that I seek is between $60 to $120 per month.
I have a windows 2000 server and I would like to configure two domain names, c.com and bnvsaj.c.com and requests to these domains should be forwarded to 192.168.0.1 and 192.168.0.2. How can I configure like this?
We have discussed all the basic methods of securing and hardening the server. Lets leave all the basic and general server securing and hardening I have started this to get advance knowledge in securing and hardening of the server so that it will usefull for all the person So i request all to provide all the vaulable tips and suggestions in advance securing and hardening of linux servers I welcome all the comments related to advance securing and hardening of linux servers.
I recently signed up with cartikahosting.com only to find out they do not support SQL server 2005 when I tried to install my application.
Their features and price are excellent so I would like to stay with cartika if possible, is there a way to convert my database to 2000? Or backup the database using sql server scripts?
I've got an app that I've built using FastCGI, PHP, MS SQL and it's currently running on a single IIS 6 (Win2K3) server. The MS SQL database is very large and some of the pages return large result sets so I've also installed memcached to cache the data.
Right now the web app and the database are both running on the same server. I'm looking at moving the database to a 2 node cluster, and the web server to it's own 2 node cluster for higher availability. But I've got a couple of questions:
1. Would IIS 7 (Windows 2008) be faster than IIS 6 (Windows 2003)?
2. Would Apache (on Windows) be faster than IIS?
3. Can Apache be clustered?
4. Would it make more sense to have a load-balanced pair for the web servers instead of an active-active cluster?
5. How does IIS 7 Kernel Mode caching compare to using memcached?
6. Would there be any decrease in performance if the database is running on another machine instead of the same machine as the web app?
7. Should memcached run on the web servers (which will be storing and retrieving the data), on the database servers (which actually has the data), or on it's own dedicated server?
Since my linux server is out of disk space, I just use cifs to mount some drives from the windows server for people to download files (usually 100-200mb/file).
But I found the performance is not good. For example, I need to wait for a long time before the download process begin. Also, it seems the load average of the server becomes high too.
Is there any suggestion? Should I mount the windows drives through cifs? Or should I change to another server which allow me to add more local harddisks? How about if I mount drives in other linux machine, will the performance better?
People have been abusing my web proxy servers to send SPAM emails. I use PHProxy and I have no mail ports open on my server, or any mail scripts. My network is http://privax.us
Examples of emails (I have listed some notes):
My IP: 75.126.48.148 [url]
Received: from mail.anpmall.net ([75.126.48.148]) by mail.anpmall.net with HTTP (Code-Crafters Ability Mail Server 2.55); - Hmm?
----------------------------------------
My IP: 75.126.48.148 [url]
----------------------------------------
My IP: 75.126.48.146 [url]
Received: from 216.154.195.49 ([172.18.12.134]) by vms047.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 - hmm Java?
----------------------------------------
My IP: 75.126.48.148 [url]
I found in logs access to webmail.bellsouth.net at the time of the spamming, so I have blocked use of bellsouth.net on my proxy and banned the IP's. See [url]
----------------------------------------
These are just some of the spam reports I have, and this is really doing my head in. As mentioned my servers do not have mail ports or mail scripts on them. They use webmin (stripped features) for a control panel.
I really need to find out why my IP is always at the bottom of this. I have asked in this forum before but did not have much luck. I have also contacted security companies to help but they were not sure what is happening.
One theory is the spammers use web based email systems, and when they submit the form the IP (from a PHP POST variable) is my IP because they are running under my proxy. But I have always assumed that if you have an email form and submit it, the server hosting the forms IP gets sent, not the actual persons IP.
That is one theory, but at the end of the day I'm still clueless to how to block this. I have blocked the use of bellsouth.net on my servers but a lot of the spam is coming from anpmall.net as mentioned above.
I am using dreamhost host 3 of my web sites and 1 blog. Dreamhost is great, offers alot space and bandwidth.
but I think they are oversellling their space, sometimes it gets really slow. (overselling ? ok, I dont really know, but sometimes its really slow, and most my asian readers said need to refresh to load the page. I am wondering if theres a way to check if they are overselling or not.)
I am thinking about buying vps, even tho, I still got 5 month left with dreamhost.
I found 2 vps companies are highly recommanded on this forum, JaguarPC and LiquidWeb.
theres already a post compared both companies in terms of price and service. I say I will pick JagarPc, cuz, its basic plan just 20 USD, and htey got promotion now, its even cheaper. and basic Liquidweb vps plan is 60 bucks.
I am wondering why Jagarpc is so cheap , are they overselling? how can we check if they are overselling.
I found a few posts saying how good jaguarPc is. and they are not overselling, but those members just signed up this month, and only have 1-3 posts. I cannot really trust those new members.
Can someone share their experience with JaguarPC? compare JaguarPc performance and liquidweb performance. antoher question is switch from dreamhost to JaguarPC basic vPS plan, will performance gets better?
last question: VPS account allows 3 IP, 3ip = 3 domains? if not, how many domains can I have?
I'm trying to delete the IP addresses in the nameserver registration but when I follow the instructions by clearing each input box and then clicking save I get these errors:
ns1.domain.com Error: Nameserver registration failed due to error 533: Object association prohibits operation ns2.domain.com Error: Nameserver registration failed due to error 533: Object association prohibits operation
Ive contacted namecheap but I still havent heard back from them. Anyone know whats going on? I cant seem to delete these.
We are getting into VPS hosting and wanted to get some opinions and feedback as we're quite unsure on what to expect as for performance and how many clients we can generally keep on a box.
For now we've bought 3 dell R710 with dual Xeon L5520, 72GB ram and 8 x 2.5" SAS drives.
We are thinking of a base offering of 512 megabytes of ram and was hoping to get about 40-50 onto a server.
With 40 there should be -plenty- free ram and plenty drivecache.
Then a next offering of 1 gig ram and next one of 2 gigs.
Even if we do the biggest 2 gig offering with 25 on a server we should have free ram to spare.
The software would be virtuozzo.
Any thoughts on this, am I expecting too much, or am I being fairly realistic?
I am trying to find an application that can listen on a given UDP port, say "6271" and forward all traffic (UDP) sent to that port to another IP (not on the same subnet).
I should not call this forwarding, but instead, cloning (because forwarding usually is only on the same subnet or vlan). The packets should not be modified, (thus IP information in packet ect.)
Is this possible? I have tried some applications such as,
Hi"Optimization of computing resources has long been an important management issue. One of its aspects concerns server scalability and the question of whether an organization should scale-up or scale out.Assume that the computing performance of the servers can be measured by variable 0 <=p, that their total cost is given by "c" and the relationship between server performance and cost is defined by c=αp^β"
a. What is the cost-performance elasticity(ђ), precisely?
b. What would be the range of values for ђ that would be expected by moore's law and what are its implications?
c. What would be the range of values for ђ that would lead managers to scale-out? Draw a graph and throughly explain the implications.
We are a web-based Yacht Charter company, with offices scattered around the world: www.boatbookings.com
Currently, both our web site and our back-office business management system are hosted on a single server in the UK, with an automatic fail-over to a server in Dallas, TX, USA.
The problem we are having is that our sales office in Singapore is having really slow response times and this is very frustrating for them.
Using an application called "JustPing" we see that response times From Singapore are much slower than other parts of the world. (the cities closer to London are fastest, the ones further away are slowest) JustPing Results
Is there anyway to improve this or is hosting our applications on multiple servers the only way to improve performance. What's the best cost-effective method of multiple server hosting?
(Incidentally, if I JutPing Google, response times are fantastic worldwide, but we know they're hosted on many, very large servers)
I was just playing around with litespeed and I thought I would switch back to apache for a few min to see how the server reacts. The load with litespeed was 1.00 - 3.00. I switched to apache the load jumped to 28.00 - 35.00. Its amazing how litespeed is handling connections.
Is there a site which will enable me to enter url of my website and it will simulate visitors from multiple locations. It needs to open the page completely, and run for example 10 minutes. Two things I found are host-tracker, but it just gets headers from multiple locations, and does it only once. Another thing is Paessler software which can test exactly what I want (number of visitors for some period of time with full page download) but it must be run from one (my) PC, so I can not test bandwidth from multiple locations. I need combination of these two, anyone knows for something like that on the net?
