why I cannot publish my RSS Feed. I have the validator error here:
Recommendations
This feed is valid, but interoperability with the widest range of feed readers could be improved by implementing the following recommendations.
line 48, column 4: Missing atom:link with rel="self" [help]
</channel> (THIS IS LINE 48)
The actual location is [url]
I've got a vB site which has a RSS Poster Bot (fetches RSS Feeds then posts them). However, for some strange reason, it stopped working. Theres no errors in the error_log and when I do a manual run, it just times out after a minute or so.
The only thing I can think of is that one of the RSS Feeds is down or one of the sites is blocking the server IP for some reason.
way to disable my Wordpress's RSS feed, because I have figured out another website just copies my content via my RSS feed.
I have searched and found three interesting results, which actually all 3 do or suggest you to do the same thing.
[url]
[url]
plugin: disable rss
This works perfectly to disable /feed, but unfortunately /feed/rss will still perfectly work?
I can't see why all those developers just post this, without having actually tested if it really disabled the RSS feed. But can somebody recommend me a good way to disable Wordpress's RSS feed?
Like the title says it: Is there anywhere in the bay area where I could colo a box and get a cable tv feed without paying an arm and a leg? Nothing illegal going on here either
View 0 Replies View RelatedI have probelm when I run this command :
[root@server ~]# tail -f /etc/httpd/logs/error_log
I have this output :
doesn't appear to be a valid Zend extension doesn't appear to be a valid Zend extension ...
this is my php -v :
[root@server ~]# php -vPHP 5.2.5 (cli) (built: Jan 23 2008 12:42:14)Copyright (c) 1997-2007 The PHP GroupZend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2007 Zend Technologies with the ionCube PHP Loader v3.1.32, Copyright (c) 2002-2007, by ionCube Ltd., and with Zend Extension Manager v1.2.0, Copyright (c) 2003-2007, by Zend Technologies with Suhosin v0.9.22, Copyright (c) 2007, by SektionEins GmbH with Zend Optimizer v3.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2007, by Zend Technologies[root@server ~]#
I am unable to mount the 2nd disk's extended partition. Please help.
Commands I tried and returns....
Quote:
mount -t ext2 /dev/hdd2 /second
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdd2,
missing codepage or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
Quote:
mount -t ext3 /dev/hdd2 /second
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdd2,
missing codepage or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
Also I tried to add it to /etc/fstab but it says the same error, Disk /dev/hdd2 doesn't contain a valid partition table... I am able to mount /dev/hdd1 successfully.
I'm an existing customer of Hosting Company X and notice that they have recently launched an offer that is a higher config than what I have right now, at the same price.
When asked about it, I was refused the higher config citing that new offers are not applicable for existing customers. I've been with them for over a year and have been experiencing very good support from them, but this one issue baffles me.
Why are existing customers less important?
I have this customer who have been having trouble to receive some emails from valid senders due to Sender verify failed, both senders have valid accounts.
Here is an example,
De: MDaemon at zeus.XServer.com [mailto:MDaemon@zeus.XServer.com]
Enviado el: sábado, 17 de noviembre de 2007 11:16 a.m.
Para: albertocarbone@XServer.com
Asunto: Error permanente de entrega
Failed address: jsoler@CustomerDomain.com
--- Session Transcript ---
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:19: Parsing message
[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxpd35000148823.msg]
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:19: * From: albertocarbone@XServer.com
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:19: * To: jsoler@CustomerDomain.com
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:19: * Subject: RE: Zona Franca.- Concepto.-
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:19: * Message-ID:
[003201c82934$ba953d00$2fbfb700$@com]
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:19: Intentando SMTP conexión con [CustomerDomain.com]
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:19: Resolviendo registros MX para [ CustomerDomain.com]
(Servidor DNS: 200.118.2.66)...
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:23: * P=000 S=000 D=CustomerDomain.com TTL=(240)
MX=[ CustomerDomain.com] {xx.xxx.13.172}
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:23: Intentando SMTP conexión con [xx.xxx.13.172:25]
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:23: Esperando la conexión del socket...
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:23: * Conexión establecida (xx.yyy.51.30:3948 -]
xx.xxx.13.172:25)
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:23: Esperando la iniciación del protocolo...
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:25: [-- 220-svr01.customerDomainHost.com ESMTP Exim 4.68 #1
Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:15:29 -0500
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:25: [-- 220-We do not authorize the use of this system
to transport unsolicited,
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:25: [-- 220 and/or bulk e-mail.
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:25: --] EHLO zeus.XServer.com
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:25: [-- 250-svr01.customerDomainHost.com Hello zeus.XServer.com
[xx.yyy.51.30]
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:25: [-- 250-SIZE 52428800
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:25: [-- 250-PIPELINING
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:25: [-- 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:25: [-- 250-STARTTLS
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:25: [-- 250 HELP
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:25: --] STARTTLS
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:26: [-- 220 TLS go ahead
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:26: SSL negotiation successful (TLS 1.0, 1024 bit key
exchange, 128 bit RC4 encryption)
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:26: --] EHLO zeus.XServer.com
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:26: [-- 250-svr01.customerDomainHost.com Hello zeus.XServer.com
[xx.yyy.51.30]
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:26: [-- 250-SIZE 52428800
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:26: [-- 250-PIPELINING
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:26: [-- 250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:26: [-- 250 HELP
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:26: --] MAIL From:[ albertocarbone@XServer.com
[mailto:albertocarbone@XServer.com] ]
SIZE=23231
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:26: [-- 250 OK
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:26: --] RCPT To:[jsoler@CustomerDomain.com]
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:30: [-- 550-Verification failed for
[albertocarbone@XServer.com]
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:30: [-- 550-Called: 82.165.181.92
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:30: [-- 550-Sent: RCPT
TO:[albertocarbone@XServer.com]
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:30: [-- 550-Response: 550 Backscatter Protection
detected an invalid or expired email address
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:30: [-- 550 Sender verify failed
Sat 2007-11-17 11:15:30: --] QUIT
--- End Transcript ---
Here is another example
2007-11-19 11:50:19 H=dom21.ipowerweb.com [72.22.92.57] sender verify fail for [hguzman@hoftxxx.net]
2007-11-19 11:50:19 H=dom21.ipowerweb.com [72.22.92.57] F=[hguzman@hoftxxx.net] rejected RCPT [jsoler@CustomerDomain.com]: Sender verify failed
Both accounts are valid.
I have has this error for awhile. I know it is due to authentication. I have searched many forums and have tried everything they list which is enable smtp authentication in my email client cause it is said that you must authenticate before sending. Have done all that and no matter what when i try to send...sometimes i get this error. I have a bunch of forwarding domains setup and thought that may be the cause. But really I think it is cpanel bug and forget about help from them so I am turning to anyone that may have fixed this issue
View 3 Replies View RelatedFor the last 5 days, exim has been retrying to resend email to a recipent every
1 millisecond.
As result, logs are huge, and load is being affected.
So I'd like to know how can I set/configure exim to ingore sending to any
email I'd tell it.
I mean is there any config file I can look into, to set a ignore list, or even
how to have it so that it retries sending every 1 hour, instead of every 1 millisecond.
I use PLESK 11 on one of my servers, and use NS.mydomain & NS1.mydomain, everything works fine, DNS Zones are OK, reverse DNS is OK...
Except on MXTOOLBOX this :
SMTP Valid Hostname > Reverse DNS is not a valid Hostname
SMTP Reverse > DNS Mismatch OK - 195.154.XXX.XXX resolves to mydomain.eu
SMTP Banner Check > OK - Reverse DNS matches SMTP Banner
Tried so many searches on Google, but no response and always 3 same pages from MXTOOLBOX.
I migrated IP of this server in datacenter, because they ask us to do it, so in /etc/hosts for example I found old IP, I changed it, restart network interface, but always the same thing... postfix too (changed IP and restart).
I am having complains from our clients that their mails are always going to spam folders istead of inbox. I decided to have some tests and find out problems which couse the issue and solve them. We have PTR records correctly, Our IPs and domain names are not listed in any blacklists, And I checked "Use DomainKeys" checkbox for all our domains in mail settings.
These were all good and thought that all works well untill I ran a test on [URL].....
I opened a mail file (.MAI) and copied all content (with headers, contents and all) to that site and got a result like;
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust
[95.108.252.17 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
[Code] ....
The 3rd line from the last confused me. "Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid" and "DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid" parts of that report put a question in mind. Does the "Use DomainKeys" checkbox in the Plesk Panel really working? I mean, it creates all the DNS entries and all, but the email message is starting with a line "DomainKey-Status: no signature" and that supports the 2nd line from the last in that report.
The question is, what should I do to make DomainKeys work as it should? I am using the latest 11.5.30 Update #23 of Plesk Panel for Windows on a Windows 2012 Standart server with MainEnable Enterprise Premium. Enterprise version of MainEnable also has DKIM settings available for all the domains in its own panel, but it's disabled because I didn't set anything in there.
Let's say when i first joined the datacenter, i'm given some 16 IPs from 123.123.123.*.
Now that i need more IPs, and they have to give me IPs from 123.123.124.*, am i right to say i need a new switch?
Now is it possible that i link up the new switch together, so that both switch can pick up any available IPs from either range?
I'm running a web server with mod_evasive and want to know how can I prevent mod_evasive from blocking the googlebot crawler ip address.
Is there a script out there that can detect this crawler and make sure its ip doesnt get blocked by iptables or mod_evasive?
am using APF firewall and am getting ddos from these range ips
4.68.25.*
8.0.4.*
8.0.5.*
how could i delete all the range from these ip's?
I set up a forum for a small group of users, so I don't really wish to see spiders or bots on it, so I've put a robots.txt file there to prevent all of them from accessing the forum pages.
I know not all bots follow the robots.txt rule, and these days a really annoying bot called MUNAXNET or Munax AB with IP range 82.99.30.0 - 82.99.30.127 is causing the forum to have extra and unexpected loads.
I've tried to block this IP range with .htaccess and uploaded it to the root of the site a few days ago, here is the content:
<Limit GET HEAD POST>
order allow,deny
deny from 82.99.30.0-82.99.30.127
allow from all
</LIMIT>
However strangely it seems that all of these are not working for this bot, today I saw my forum had 80 users online and that army still keeps coming and browsing all pages of my forums...
I tested the .htaccess with blocking myself, and it actually worked for me, dunno why it's not working for that bot..
we want a dedicated server with a full range of ip with our own company name(or with my name) and abuse mail
+ kvm and apc access
we need a good support too , for example if we want to check our hard disk the provider check it fast
I need to ban IP range and I inserted say ip 12.44.0.0 in the deny_hosts rules, this should ban range from 12.44 but strange is people from that range still be able to access my site, any idea what went wrong?
View 3 Replies View RelatedServer: OS RHEL 4
Web Server: Apache1.3.37
Hi. I want to block a range of IPs. Currently, I use the following command as an effective weapon against the IPs of people I find in the log trying to do bad things.
/sbin/route add -host x.x.x.x reject
Works like a charm. I then put the offending IP in the file /etc/rc.d/rc.local so that it will reload the bad ips when the server reboots next.
I also use the CSF/LFD firewall, and it successfully blocks single, offensive IPs also.
What I need, though, is the ability to block an entire range of IPs. For example, i have a very persistent hacker trying to access from a certain range like so....
255.155.x.x.
The last two numbers are always changing but the first two remain the same.
How do I block this "range" of IPs from accessing my server?
Note, I know how to block a range of IPs in a .htaccess file for a certain account, I put this in the .htaccess file...
deny from 205.196.
But when I try this with /sbin/route, it will not accept the ip. My firewall will also not accept a range of IPs.
Is there any way to block all and just allow certain IP using APF or iptables?
I want to block all the traffic to the server and just alow IP range.
I have a client who needs to block IP range on a windows server. However, he is using Cloud hosting from Rackspace. I guess they are not being corporative in doing so. Anyway to do this without root? Perhaps from the control panel?
I am getting my quote back Tuesday but need a little bargaining power with these guys...
Oakland, Ca datacenter
40mbps, 20A, 42U rack.
What should I be looking at price range here, how much per mbps?
Only info I've seen is from 2003 where people were saying $200/mbps. Obviously prices have come WAY down. I've seen people on here reselling internap bandwidth for $12/mbps, but they might have bought a huge commit.
i have 2 range ip
range 1 is : 111.111.111-119
range2 is : 222.222.222-229
how may i add both range?
i can add for one range,but about 2 rage i can`t
from 36 hours we have really critical issue:
we have 3 server with Liquidweb that have problem to "resolve" a server locate in Italy
Email sent from server with LW to Italy server is not sent and stay in queue.
We try to force delivery and error is:
Message 1Je39R-0000wk-3N is not frozen LOG: MAIN
cwd=/usr/local/cpanel/whostmgr/docroot 4 args: /usr/sbin/exim -v -M
1Je39R-0000wk-3N delivering 1Je39R-0000wk-3N Connecting to italyserver.com
[**.**.**.**]:25 ... failed: Connection timed out (timeout=5m) LOG: MAIN
italyserver.com [**.**.**.**]:25 Connection timed out LOG: MAIN
== email@italyserver.com R=lookuphost T=remote_smtp defer (110): Connection
== timed out
--
We have check, there aren't problem with port and firewall
All seesm ok, for all server
We have try to restart exim, reboot, ..
Emails don't start from 3 server LW to 1 in Italy
We have try to ping from server LW the Italian server and the problem is the same, found IP but 100% packet lost..
If we ping from 3 server LW a IP of server that is "over" the server IT is all ok
The problem seems only with single IP
So, we have try to send from server in Italy to 1 of 3 server under LW.. same problem
------
Message 1JeSBO-0003CD-HO is not frozen LOG: MAIN
cwd=/usr/local/cpanel/whostmgr/docroot 4 args: /usr/sbin/exim -v -M
1JeSBO-0003CD-HO delivering 1JeSBO-0003CD-HO Connecting to
mail.serverlw.it [**.**.***.**]:25 ... failed: Connection timed out
(timeout=5m) LOG: MAIN mail.serverlw.it [**.**.***.**] Connection
timed out LOG: MAIN
== email@serverlw.it R=lookuphost T=remote_smtp defer (110):
== Connection timed out
------
LW support not have suggest solutions and also Italian support not have idea of problem solution
we want a dedicated server with a full range of ip with our own company name(or my name) and our own abuse e-mail address
+ kvm and apc access
we need a good support too , for example if we want to check our hard disk the provider check it fast
any body know anywhere to provide this services with a good price?
I would like to use different Class C IP ranges across my domains for better cross linking. Of course, all domains are closely related to a particular niche.
I am currently on imountain.com, they have been extremely helpful and good. But wondering if same host can provide me different class C IP range?
want to confirm this before i order a new server from them.
or should i just go for another hosting provider? wondering anyone as good as imountain?
Is there any way to get the IP Range of providers like SAVVIS, Global Crossing, or Level3?
View 1 Replies View RelatedSome of our client emails are being blocked and it appears that the whole GNAX range of more than 103680 IP addresses was blocked.
Quote:
As you should know now: It is not you, it is your complete provider which got UCEPROTECT-Level 3 listed.
Your IP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx was NOT part of a spamrun, but you are the one that has freely chosen your provider.
By tolerating or ignoring that your provider doesn't care about spammers you are indirectly also supporting the global spam with your money.
Seen from this point of view, you really shouldn't wonder about the consequences.
What I want to know is how often do it happens that a datacenter have all it's IP addresses being blocked?
I contacted Gnax about this but their response was merely that they will take steps and the whole range will eventually be delisted. (Obviously the immediate removal fee of $200 something is too much for them)
Ironically merely a few hours AFTER I contacted them I got a "warning" about spam send from one of our clients.
The date of the email was a few weeks AGO and We already long ago warned our LEGIMATE client that such emails are not allowed and the account will be terminated if it happens again. (In other words WE immediately acted against potential spam while Gnax not and then have the nerve to warn US after WE informed them of the blacklisting)
On the one hand I understand that it can be difficult for a very large provider and uceprotect.net seems a bit harse to block ALL IP addresses due to 0.238 % spam ip addresses.