I received an e-mail that goes like:
"Data Center Migration Efforts Underway, from SAVVIS to Databank"
"The LayeredTech data center have informed us that in an effort to optimize the network architecture, they are planning to move all servers from SAVVIS location to a more centralized facility, the DataBank data center which is also located in Dallas."
I'm wonder if i can choose Servstra for dedicated server.
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy server with Servstra has been unreachable for 3 days now. The only replies I get from support is "have patience". I wish they would tell that to all my customers that are leaving. They have not even given me a full explanation of what is happening. They do not provide a phone # for me to call either, so I am at their mercy now. Guess it's time to start looking for a new job cause my hosting business is gonna be gone after this.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have 2 servers on LT SAVVIS data center (through Server4Sale).
Today I received mails from them that LT is migrating out of Savvis and so my servers need to be transported/built(!) at the DataBank facility. And the server IPs will get changed.
If the servers requires a build, that will mean ill have to configure/reinstall everything again. Thats apart from moving the client accounts from the old server.
Anyone else received the notice from LT?
Which DC is considered more reliable?
View 3 Replies View RelatedHas anyone else noticed some weird Savvis routing in the NY/NJ area since their maintenance on Friday night?
I'm in NY and a trace to the NJ1 datacenter in Jersey City NJ shows:
Code:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 10.0.0.3
2 24 ms 23 ms 23 ms 10.32.37.1
3 26 ms 24 ms 23 ms at-3-1-1-1732.CORE-RTR1.NY325.verizon-gni.net [1
30.81.11.173]
4 24 ms 24 ms 24 ms 130.81.20.176
5 * 30 ms 30 ms 0.so-3-1-0.XT1.NYC9.ALTER.NET [152.63.10.37]
6 32 ms 75 ms 34 ms 0.so-4-2-0.XL3.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.0.213]
7 32 ms 32 ms 32 ms 0.so-6-2-0.BR1.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.3.149]
8 32 ms 32 ms 32 ms bcs1-so-5-1-0.NewYork.savvis.net [204.70.1.5]
9 34 ms 32 ms 32 ms cr1-pos-0-0-5-2.Washington.savvis.net [204.70.195.1]
10 32 ms 32 ms 32 ms 204.70.197.5
11 33 ms 33 ms 33 ms 204.70.197.14
12 33 ms 32 ms 32 ms hr2-tenge-13-2.Weehawkennj2.savvis.net [216.35.78.6]
13 32 ms 33 ms 32 ms 204.70.196.74
14 33 ms 33 ms 33 ms 204.70.196.78
15 32 ms 32 ms 32 ms bhr2-ge-5-0.JerseyCitynj1.savvis.net [204.70.196.86]
16 33 ms 32 ms 32 ms csr22-ve241.Jerseycitynj1.savvis.net [216.32.223.51]
Why are the packets going from NewYork to Washington to Weehawken and then to Jersey City? Also, what are those 4 unnamed nodes at 10,11, 13 and 14?
I'm also getting 200ms+ ping times and 13% loss to/from our offsite VPSs
Code:
640 packets transmitted, 554 received, 13% packet loss, time 639988ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 192.275/198.945/227.685/3.173 ms, pipe 2
[root@offsite ~]# traceroute 216.32.223.51
1 eqash79.keepitsecure.net (69.65.111.117) 0.173 ms 0.125 ms 0.063 ms
2 r02.iad.defenderhosting.com (69.65.112.2) 3.440 ms 0.345 ms 0.290 ms
3 ge2-10.as.eqxashva.aleron.net (205.198.14.245) 0.473 ms 0.554 ms 0.482 ms
4 ber1-ge-8-10.virginiaequinix.savvis.net (208.173.52.105) 0.591 ms 0.567 ms 0.438 ms
5 cpr2-ge-5-0.virginiaequinix.savvis.net (204.70.193.101) 0.588 ms 0.606 ms *
6 bcs2-so-2-0-0.washington.savvis.net (204.70.193.153) 119.863 ms 3.639 ms 3.378 ms
7 cr1-tengig-0-7-0-0.Washington.savvis.net (204.70.196.105) 198.659 ms 201.783 ms *
8 bcs2-so-2-0-0.NewYork.savvis.net (204.70.192.2) 202.751 ms 195.501 ms *
9 * dcr3-ge-0-2-1.newyork.savvis.net (204.70.193.98) 201.978 ms 198.180 ms
10 204.70.197.5 (204.70.197.5) 7.627 ms 6.984 ms 6.196 ms
11 204.70.197.14 (204.70.197.14) 6.822 ms 6.534 ms 6.460 ms
MPLS Label=1640 CoS=5 TTL=1 S=0
12 hr2-tenge-13-2.Weehawkennj2.savvis.net (216.35.78.6) 6.752 ms 6.634 ms 6.509 ms
MPLS Label=66 CoS=5 TTL=1 S=0
13 204.70.196.74 (204.70.196.74) 7.550 ms 6.600 ms 6.479 ms
MPLS Label=339 CoS=5 TTL=1 S=0
14 204.70.196.78 (204.70.196.78) 6.607 ms 6.633 ms 6.482 ms
MPLS Label=339 CoS=5 TTL=1 S=0
15 bhr2-ge-5-0.JerseyCitynj1.savvis.net (204.70.196.86) 198.841 ms * 201.303 ms
16 csr22-ve241.Jerseycitynj1.savvis.net (216.32.223.51) 196.147 ms * 199.857 ms
The second trace shows that there is a path between New York and Weehawken without going through Washington, even though the first route went through Washington between NY and NJ. The only reason that I can think of is that someone in Washington wants to see the traffic (wink wink)?
I've contacted Savvis, but got the stock response "Savvis’ backbone routers forward traffic through the optimal logical path within our network. Although the physical path may seem odd occasionally, it is actually the optimal path."
Anyone else seeing packet loss / high latency? I was told that Savvis and or Layer3 are having some routing issues tonight.
View 4 Replies View RelatedWhich one has the best routes to Asia, especially South East Asia?
View 14 Replies View RelatedI am interested in finding out any experiences people have had in the last year or so with Savvis or Net2EZ.
I'm primarily interested in experience with the IP connectivity they provide, as well as their co-location, reliability, etc.
I have experience with Savvis from quite a while ago, but presumably that experience may no longer apply.
It's likely we will end up buying transit from multiple carriers and deal with BGP, etc.
But I am also interested in hearing about Savvis's Diverse Internet availability product.
As for Net2EZ, I'd be primarily interested in hearing about their colo services and if anyone has had experience connecting to Carriers in the next door Equinix facility.
I've got two servers with LayeredTech in Texas. One is seemingly totally down. Their support page is unreachable and their billing page is loading as slow as AOL on dialup. Anyone else having issues this morning?
View 6 Replies View RelatedWe are the clients of LayeredTech for 4.5 years. Basically, we're fed up with poor service and below are the details. Love the stories about stupid circumstances leading to major catastrophes? You'll love the story below.
Another incident took place in June. We have ordered another hard drive for our server. During the maintenance, their technician obviously dropped an existing hard drive (never admitted by them), causing the bad sectors to appear immediately after upgrade. They were trying to replace it, but replaced a wrong hard drive (!). Their second attempt to fix things up resulted in a broken SCSI controller (!). Their verdict: the server is dead and can't be restored. It resulted in a huge downtime of three days. During these three days, we experienced the lack of professionalism from their staff (besides group leaders), poor coordination between the shifts (another shift comes and they have no idea of what the previous shift has started) and poor response times.
Now, they are moving their data center forcing clients to order a new server (you guys probably heard about it) and we have the same experience: poor coordination of departments. Friday: technicians offered a configuration and suggested to submit a ticket to sales (I've no idea why clients have to transfer information between their departments). Sales came on Monday refusing to fulfill this order suggesting to order a new server from the web site. We gave another attempt and placed an order, asking to upgrade memory and disk - the features we already purchased. Their response? It's not upgradable. Nothing was suggested.
I'm not to tell about the other issues, about red eyes of our technicians that can't get to bed waiting for their support to reply and restoring the server from backups. I'm not telling about our IPs whitelisted in major mailing services; years of work discarded by moving our server without asking us if we like to. Finally, I'm not telling about minor issues; they happened for these years.
Guys, we're fed up with LayeredTech and moving our server out (we have one more and refer it as "hostage"). Yes, we loose money for the purchased memory, for purchased a hard drive and for a setup fee from another provider. But we can't deal with them anymore. Anyone thinking about LT - keep away. Dear fellows who already own a server there - let's keep our fingers crossed; LT is great when nothing happens, but horrible dealing with incidents. Good luck, guys.
For LT management: if you want to proof the facts, my client ID is 4553.
My server is down [At layeredtech.com]
I told them I selected 2009/3/28 to migrate my server on 13 march, 2009.
Then, I have not received any information from them, such as the new IP.
Now, my server is down and I don't know how to login my server.
Thought I may as well post up a review of Layeredtech having left them recently after 15 months of service.
Network: 10/10 - Don't recall a single downtime with them, certainly nothing that showed up on my cacti graphs & downtime would certainly show up.
Support: ?/10 - Unfortunately I can't comment on their support as it's something I never used. Ultimately though, given they are an unmanaged provider, support really should be limited to tracking down hardware issues etc.
Hardware: 10/10 - Never had a single problem with the box I was on.
Sales: 9/10 - I'll give em a 9 for the hassle of scanning ID etc, although in fairness these days, you expect that with pretty much all providers so not a major issue.
Other:-
I'd read bad things about their cancellation process, e.g. people continuing to get billed for cancelled servers etc, this hasn't happened to me, I gave my two days noticed (as required in their terms) and they did everything properly.
The only downside really was they increased the price by $9 or something, although in fairness, that was a pretty small increase and they made up for it by providing remote reboot ports, although I never did make use of them since my box never crashed.
Overall, a pretty positive experience, only left because I needed much more powerful hardware and LT's deals aren't as good as they once were.
While I only had a server with LT for testing and running our helpdesk off network... I'm happy to say that I'm finally fully moved from LT. (My new off network home is at GNAX, btw.)
I went from a reseller of 3+ years, with a peak of ~20 servers ... to nothing.
Way to go Layeredtech!
I started this thread out writing all about my history with LT, and my thoughts on what they've done... but I decided that it wasn't worth it. Layeredtech will probably continue doing what they are doing - swindling customers - and there's nothing I can do to stop it. I'm just happy to no longer be a victim.
Because they offer AppLogic we chose a company called LayeredTech.com a.k.a layeredtechnologies.com;
I have not had much issues with the access related issues and support was fairly quick;
But, i have decided not to use them as a DataCenter because
- One they they stopped our server by not giving any advance notification by telling us that there were a spammer and they do not allow any account with Spammer
- Earlier their warning were only for 8 hours . So if you happen to sleep when they send notifications you wake up a disabled server; They refused to improve this and they rejected to accept he fact that Web Hosting accounts can have many reasons that can be abused for spam.
- We have woken up to $1800 charge one day and we wanted to dispute it. They have given us RTG charts which does not explain anything about the detailed usage.
We have asked them to listen to our reports from WHM that shows only 200 GB usage rather than 15000 GB they charged us for. They were pretty quick to comment that WHM calculations are not reliable.
- On another note we paid for a year for Cpanel licenses. We had to cancel 2 Cpanel licenses and asked for a refund. They said, they could not refund the payment for Cpanel license; well they charged for a year. At least a credit? No. They offered to enable it if we need;
- Applogic? Another utopia. It does not work for cpanel purposes.
Whenever you have problems, High Availability feature never works. The other server never picks up the functionality.
When you ask why, they say you put so many accounts on one server.
Well, you want us to put 250 account on a server prices for $700 USD per month? That does not make any sense;
I have used in the past so many Data Centers
- Bustnet
- Iweb
- NAC
- Netelligent
- Dedicatednow
Layered is the least flexible one. They do not give any value to your thoughts and rights;
I have started using netelligent.ca and they are great guys. I will be canceling all my accounts with Layered as soon as my account term paid will expire.
Just wanted to share my experience
Bulent Turkoglu
[url]
I remember long time ago when I used to host on Layered Tech fast network good stuff, affordable price my first server costed me 90 dollars on Layered Tech with about 20 dollar setup one time fee.
I visited today after about 2 years and I'm pretty much surprised to see their prices they are by no means affordable as they were previously and the setup fee is now 50 dollars on every server.
With such large number of servers in their data centers shouldn't they be able to make them affordable? yet I have seen same server on WHT ads section for fraction of the price LT expects and not to mention the excessive setup fee.
I'm not complaining, its their business, but is it really helping them? I cant be the only person feeling this anti-love for Layered Tech being a former LT customer, I had no problems with them or their services I just left after I sold my site and moved into VPS. But seeing the new prices its a bit shocking.
I have a Win2003 dedicated server w/theplanet since 2004 and a Win2003 Web and FreeBSD server with LT shortly after purchasing theplanet server. I'm leaving the dedicated world and into the colo world. The reason is i like the total control of my server and when something happened to my server. I know i'll work nonstop to fix it and not reinstall OS as the only option. (My win2k3 server got system corruption at LT and th tech told me, OS reload to fix the problem. I know a lot of you thinking having dedicated server gave you a piece of mind or whatever but if OS reload is the only option then i might as well take the risk and run my own server and buy some spare parts in case of server melt down. However, i think it got to do more with LT using whitebox parts because my theplanet's server take a lot of abuse as well from me and it chuck a long just fine since it's Dell's entry level tower server despite having Cellery as CPU while my LT's windows server have P4 w/HT option. Both have 1GB of RAM. I think 1GB is rather limited nowaday. I also like the option of using whatever hardware that i want with my colo server and not paying extra $20 per month for RAM or whatever.) /end rant.
anyway, here are some pro and con that i hope you guys will find it helpful.
theplanet:
Pro -
1. very stable hardware because they use name brand like Dell
2. good network/tech support
3. Orbit - one place for everything. love it.
4. professional service
5. No price hike since 2004!
6. they have system in place to alter(email) you if your sever went down. LT have no such thing that i know of.
Con - not many. Didn't come across anything that piss me off.
LT (LayeredTech)
Pro -
1. good network/tech support
Con -
1. Not so stable hardware. They have to replace my FreeBSD server with AMD64. Originally the server have AMD XP. I think they use whitebox parts. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with whitebox parts but they could be using cheaper parts.
2. too many different login. Encompass, knowledge base for tech support...etc. It will be nice if they have something like Orbit. plus, you have to call them to change your CC and their reason is it is more secure that way but how so? their employee can write down my CC. why do you need human interaction for CC change?
3. price hike
This is all i can think of right now. I'm leaving the dedicated world and leaving the comfrot of dedicated provider and going into manage my own server plus the hardware. Hopefully, my server hardware can hold up like theplanet's Dell server.
I've been reading that layeredtech's helpdesk or whatever they call there backend has been hacked again just a few days ago and the hackers got the customers root passwords.
This happened about a year ago also with them. How does this keep happening?
I thought about not giving my datacenter my password but then if it goes down they can't do anything.
I had two server from LT for few years. I was happy with the server until 6 month ago. I got an email from LT and was told the price will be increased. I have not choice but paid what they asked. I got another email few days later, again LT increased price. I think it's fine if they increase the price. The problem I got is: LT increases the price but at same time LT still offer same package I had back to few years to their new customers. I called LT, they told me they can do nothing. Today I looked the offer carefully. Here's detail.
-------------------------------------
Dual-Processor Opteron 248$59/Month
RAM:2GB
Hard Drive(s):2 x 160GB SATA
Free upgrade to 2 x 250GB
Bandwidth:3300GB
IP Addresses:8 (5 Usable)
Notes:No Reseller Discount
Setup Fee:$999 setup
---------------------------------------
Ha, $59 not bad deal at all. But watch out, $999 setup fee. Think this, LT will increase your price two years later. Then monthly cost will be $59+$999/24=$100 OR if LT increase you price one year later, your cost will be $59+$999/12=$142. Just think twice before you order from LT.
I've worked with LT and a few others for some years but, never worked with SoftLayer. I'm looking for people's comments and advice that have had at least a years experience with both companies. We have some serious sites. One site reads from MySQL, uses about 30% of its traffic pulling in external data from around the world to create png maps from the data, and serves 10,000 pages in just under a minute and 6 seconds during busy times. We've been moved around inside SAVVIS once for traffic reasons, and the network is fine.
It's time to upgrade. Softlayer seems to have a lot of compelling features not the least of which is KVM. Because of our traffic, a wrong DC choice would be very expensive for us. That's why I'm doing my due diligence here. That’s why I need to hear from people with experience with both.
If you actually use the KVM to load servers, and the power switch to do hard-reboots, I'd like to hear about how well that all works. Maybe iSCSI experience as well if there is any of that out there.
I've been a layeredtech customer since early 2005, and until this last insane price-hike fiasco, I've never had a major complaint.
But now it keeps getting worse.
I wound up keeping this particular server around after the price hike (for several reasons, one of which was misinformation from a LT sales person regarding the prepay option) and several days ago received an email stating that my server would have to be moved, and that due to the chassis type of my old server, they could not move my server, I would need to migrate to a new server.
The email was less than forthcoming with details, so I tried to phone the person who sent me the email. The call went straight to his voicemail, where I left a couple messages asking him to return my calls, which he never did.
Finally I called their Sales department to figure out what was going on, and finally spoke with a nice & friendly guy (in a different department), who he stated that he felt like he was in the middle, and he just wanted to help us (the affected customers) out.
Okay, I figure I can handle moving all my custom software to a new server figuring that they would find some comparable piece of hardware to move me to at the same cost.
No.
I was told I would have to pay around 10% more per month for a server with only a slightly faster CPU, only 1GB of ram and only 1 hard-drive (current server has 1.5GB of ram & 2 hard-drives mirrored)
Oh, and I have to have everything moved by the 18th of October.
And I'll have to pay for 2 servers while I move.
Or, I might be able to have the server moved to a different space at Savvis, but that would likely only be a short-term solution, and this situation would come up again.
I find this really appalling--they really must hate their customers who helped them through the early years!
I've been on shared hosting for nigh on 3 years now. My site suddenly started growing rapidly recently and my shared host now has requested that I move onto a VPS or Dedicated as soon as possible (I would stay with them, but they don't have VPS options sadly)
My site is an image host, a dynamic image host too.
About 80% of my visits are from the US so I have decided, even though I am UK, that I need a US VPS.
I need it to be cheap, like $30 (To start with, while I gain funds) and generally reliable.
Would anyone know where such VPSs are? I would like 300MB or more RAM and about 5-10GB of disk space. My main issue right now is quality of customer service, I don't want to end up with a company that either has poor customer service or puts extreme restrictions on activity.
I have two reseller accounts at the moment, where all my domains are spread out at the moment. And I have just purchased a VPS from SolarVPS, and I'm awaiting the account details. Is there a way that I can transfer the sites across easily, such as creating a full backup and then restoring on the new VPS, or would I have do it individually for each website?
View 12 Replies View RelatedIt's now coming to the point where I really want to consolidate all of our kit (mainly in the UK) and move to our own AS number, now I already know what routing equipment we're going to use and that is appropriate for the amount of traffic we need to carry, but what I'm stuck with now is which transit providers to use. I don't mind spending a reasonable amount on transit, but not stupid amounts. It also doesn't matter where I can pick these up as the plan we have includes our own links between buildings.
First of all let me say this is going to be a very slow process, so please do not PM me with your offers for transit, I'm not interested.
The plans are to peer at a couple of exchanges, most likely LINX and Xchangepoint, and to pick up around 3/4 transit providers. Because most UK traffic goes via peers, what I'm really looking for are the bigger providers to improve transatlantic routes rather than smaller providers which just make the hop count longer, my shortlist is currently:
Level3
Telia
T-Systems
PCCW
C&W
Interoute
GBLX
Viatel
recently moved from webhosting to VPS less than a month ago.
I got my VPS set up quite easily, however I have been experiencing a lot of downtime.
I have experienced around 60 hours of downtime in the last month itself, and i am quite pissed cause the provider claims 99.9% uptime guarantee.
I want to try out another provider but would not want to get burnt again…
Could you guys recommend any good VPS providers to me?
I would need 512 Ram / 2 IP’s >10GB Disk space and about 250-300GB bandwidth.
But one unique requirement that I have is that I need to run a few irc clients( not ircD servers, eggdrop type bots ) for my services.
Other than that the VPS would be used for a heavy duty forum and high hit website. With several other low hit websites as well.
Services wise I mainly need apache/php and mysql (heavy usage)
Anyone have thoughts about moving from APF to CSF? We are running a cPanel server and have heard lots of good things about CSF.
Anyone have details for a non-technical person?
I'm moving from a VPS to a dedicated server and most of the files/databases have been transferred.
I have a folder (with files) in the /usr/local/ folder of the VPS (chatroom software), is there anyway I can transfer them to the dedicated server in its /usr/local folder through SSH/Telenet?
I have used it before to move my MYSQL database but I was following step-by-step instructions from Vbulletin, I guess this will be different compared to transferring a database backup.
MOVING from LIQUIDWEB to ... ?
I want to move from liquid web, but i don't know where to go.
the reason is, i need more bandwith (about 1000GB) and they said, the limit in a VPS is 700GB, to get more i should go to a dedicated.
my budget doesn't allow me to go to a dedicated.
i am moving from godaddy.com.
i am facing a lot of technical errors hosting asp.net pages.
it does not support emailing it gives out errors.
it does not support file handling and directory creation
can anyone tell me a good hosting company.
I am presently running a website at ICDSoft on a shared hosting account.
Here are the specs on the server where my site is hosted
Server has
Quote:
2 Quad-core Xeon processors
8 GB RAM
multi-terabyte RAID 6 disk array.
Now, I would like to know, if I move to VPS, which VPS plan would be the best.
How much should my minimum VPS ram be?
Are there any speed tests you would like me to run on my present server?
I just had a thought. If I am moving from one host to the other, the old host would still have my files. Whats stopping them from just using the files to copy my site. Basically is there an easy way to delete my files from my old host?
View 14 Replies View Related