Layeredtech Killing Itself
Jun 29, 2008
I remember long time ago when I used to host on Layered Tech fast network good stuff, affordable price my first server costed me 90 dollars on Layered Tech with about 20 dollar setup one time fee.
I visited today after about 2 years and I'm pretty much surprised to see their prices they are by no means affordable as they were previously and the setup fee is now 50 dollars on every server.
With such large number of servers in their data centers shouldn't they be able to make them affordable? yet I have seen same server on WHT ads section for fraction of the price LT expects and not to mention the excessive setup fee.
I'm not complaining, its their business, but is it really helping them? I cant be the only person feeling this anti-love for Layered Tech being a former LT customer, I had no problems with them or their services I just left after I sold my site and moved into VPS. But seeing the new prices its a bit shocking.
View 14 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 20, 2009
I've got two servers with LayeredTech in Texas. One is seemingly totally down. Their support page is unreachable and their billing page is loading as slow as AOL on dialup. Anyone else having issues this morning?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2009
We are the clients of LayeredTech for 4.5 years. Basically, we're fed up with poor service and below are the details. Love the stories about stupid circumstances leading to major catastrophes? You'll love the story below.
Another incident took place in June. We have ordered another hard drive for our server. During the maintenance, their technician obviously dropped an existing hard drive (never admitted by them), causing the bad sectors to appear immediately after upgrade. They were trying to replace it, but replaced a wrong hard drive (!). Their second attempt to fix things up resulted in a broken SCSI controller (!). Their verdict: the server is dead and can't be restored. It resulted in a huge downtime of three days. During these three days, we experienced the lack of professionalism from their staff (besides group leaders), poor coordination between the shifts (another shift comes and they have no idea of what the previous shift has started) and poor response times.
Now, they are moving their data center forcing clients to order a new server (you guys probably heard about it) and we have the same experience: poor coordination of departments. Friday: technicians offered a configuration and suggested to submit a ticket to sales (I've no idea why clients have to transfer information between their departments). Sales came on Monday refusing to fulfill this order suggesting to order a new server from the web site. We gave another attempt and placed an order, asking to upgrade memory and disk - the features we already purchased. Their response? It's not upgradable. Nothing was suggested.
I'm not to tell about the other issues, about red eyes of our technicians that can't get to bed waiting for their support to reply and restoring the server from backups. I'm not telling about our IPs whitelisted in major mailing services; years of work discarded by moving our server without asking us if we like to. Finally, I'm not telling about minor issues; they happened for these years.
Guys, we're fed up with LayeredTech and moving our server out (we have one more and refer it as "hostage"). Yes, we loose money for the purchased memory, for purchased a hard drive and for a setup fee from another provider. But we can't deal with them anymore. Anyone thinking about LT - keep away. Dear fellows who already own a server there - let's keep our fingers crossed; LT is great when nothing happens, but horrible dealing with incidents. Good luck, guys.
For LT management: if you want to proof the facts, my client ID is 4553.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Mar 31, 2009
My server is down [At layeredtech.com]
I told them I selected 2009/3/28 to migrate my server on 13 march, 2009.
Then, I have not received any information from them, such as the new IP.
Now, my server is down and I don't know how to login my server.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2008
Thought I may as well post up a review of Layeredtech having left them recently after 15 months of service.
Network: 10/10 - Don't recall a single downtime with them, certainly nothing that showed up on my cacti graphs & downtime would certainly show up.
Support: ?/10 - Unfortunately I can't comment on their support as it's something I never used. Ultimately though, given they are an unmanaged provider, support really should be limited to tracking down hardware issues etc.
Hardware: 10/10 - Never had a single problem with the box I was on.
Sales: 9/10 - I'll give em a 9 for the hassle of scanning ID etc, although in fairness these days, you expect that with pretty much all providers so not a major issue.
Other:-
I'd read bad things about their cancellation process, e.g. people continuing to get billed for cancelled servers etc, this hasn't happened to me, I gave my two days noticed (as required in their terms) and they did everything properly.
The only downside really was they increased the price by $9 or something, although in fairness, that was a pretty small increase and they made up for it by providing remote reboot ports, although I never did make use of them since my box never crashed.
Overall, a pretty positive experience, only left because I needed much more powerful hardware and LT's deals aren't as good as they once were.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jun 25, 2008
While I only had a server with LT for testing and running our helpdesk off network... I'm happy to say that I'm finally fully moved from LT. (My new off network home is at GNAX, btw.)
I went from a reseller of 3+ years, with a peak of ~20 servers ... to nothing.
Way to go Layeredtech!
I started this thread out writing all about my history with LT, and my thoughts on what they've done... but I decided that it wasn't worth it. Layeredtech will probably continue doing what they are doing - swindling customers - and there's nothing I can do to stop it. I'm just happy to no longer be a victim.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Apr 21, 2008
Because they offer AppLogic we chose a company called LayeredTech.com a.k.a layeredtechnologies.com;
I have not had much issues with the access related issues and support was fairly quick;
But, i have decided not to use them as a DataCenter because
- One they they stopped our server by not giving any advance notification by telling us that there were a spammer and they do not allow any account with Spammer
- Earlier their warning were only for 8 hours . So if you happen to sleep when they send notifications you wake up a disabled server; They refused to improve this and they rejected to accept he fact that Web Hosting accounts can have many reasons that can be abused for spam.
- We have woken up to $1800 charge one day and we wanted to dispute it. They have given us RTG charts which does not explain anything about the detailed usage.
We have asked them to listen to our reports from WHM that shows only 200 GB usage rather than 15000 GB they charged us for. They were pretty quick to comment that WHM calculations are not reliable.
- On another note we paid for a year for Cpanel licenses. We had to cancel 2 Cpanel licenses and asked for a refund. They said, they could not refund the payment for Cpanel license; well they charged for a year. At least a credit? No. They offered to enable it if we need;
- Applogic? Another utopia. It does not work for cpanel purposes.
Whenever you have problems, High Availability feature never works. The other server never picks up the functionality.
When you ask why, they say you put so many accounts on one server.
Well, you want us to put 250 account on a server prices for $700 USD per month? That does not make any sense;
I have used in the past so many Data Centers
- Bustnet
- Iweb
- NAC
- Netelligent
- Dedicatednow
Layered is the least flexible one. They do not give any value to your thoughts and rights;
I have started using netelligent.ca and they are great guys. I will be canceling all my accounts with Layered as soon as my account term paid will expire.
Just wanted to share my experience
Bulent Turkoglu
[url]
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2008
I have a Win2003 dedicated server w/theplanet since 2004 and a Win2003 Web and FreeBSD server with LT shortly after purchasing theplanet server. I'm leaving the dedicated world and into the colo world. The reason is i like the total control of my server and when something happened to my server. I know i'll work nonstop to fix it and not reinstall OS as the only option. (My win2k3 server got system corruption at LT and th tech told me, OS reload to fix the problem. I know a lot of you thinking having dedicated server gave you a piece of mind or whatever but if OS reload is the only option then i might as well take the risk and run my own server and buy some spare parts in case of server melt down. However, i think it got to do more with LT using whitebox parts because my theplanet's server take a lot of abuse as well from me and it chuck a long just fine since it's Dell's entry level tower server despite having Cellery as CPU while my LT's windows server have P4 w/HT option. Both have 1GB of RAM. I think 1GB is rather limited nowaday. I also like the option of using whatever hardware that i want with my colo server and not paying extra $20 per month for RAM or whatever.) /end rant.
anyway, here are some pro and con that i hope you guys will find it helpful.
theplanet:
Pro -
1. very stable hardware because they use name brand like Dell
2. good network/tech support
3. Orbit - one place for everything. love it.
4. professional service
5. No price hike since 2004!
6. they have system in place to alter(email) you if your sever went down. LT have no such thing that i know of.
Con - not many. Didn't come across anything that piss me off.
LT (LayeredTech)
Pro -
1. good network/tech support
Con -
1. Not so stable hardware. They have to replace my FreeBSD server with AMD64. Originally the server have AMD XP. I think they use whitebox parts. I'm not saying there is anything wrong with whitebox parts but they could be using cheaper parts.
2. too many different login. Encompass, knowledge base for tech support...etc. It will be nice if they have something like Orbit. plus, you have to call them to change your CC and their reason is it is more secure that way but how so? their employee can write down my CC. why do you need human interaction for CC change?
3. price hike
This is all i can think of right now. I'm leaving the dedicated world and leaving the comfrot of dedicated provider and going into manage my own server plus the hardware. Hopefully, my server hardware can hold up like theplanet's Dell server.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 26, 2008
I've been reading that layeredtech's helpdesk or whatever they call there backend has been hacked again just a few days ago and the hackers got the customers root passwords.
This happened about a year ago also with them. How does this keep happening?
I thought about not giving my datacenter my password but then if it goes down they can't do anything.
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2008
I had two server from LT for few years. I was happy with the server until 6 month ago. I got an email from LT and was told the price will be increased. I have not choice but paid what they asked. I got another email few days later, again LT increased price. I think it's fine if they increase the price. The problem I got is: LT increases the price but at same time LT still offer same package I had back to few years to their new customers. I called LT, they told me they can do nothing. Today I looked the offer carefully. Here's detail.
-------------------------------------
Dual-Processor Opteron 248$59/Month
RAM:2GB
Hard Drive(s):2 x 160GB SATA
Free upgrade to 2 x 250GB
Bandwidth:3300GB
IP Addresses:8 (5 Usable)
Notes:No Reseller Discount
Setup Fee:$999 setup
---------------------------------------
Ha, $59 not bad deal at all. But watch out, $999 setup fee. Think this, LT will increase your price two years later. Then monthly cost will be $59+$999/24=$100 OR if LT increase you price one year later, your cost will be $59+$999/12=$142. Just think twice before you order from LT.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 10, 2008
I've worked with LT and a few others for some years but, never worked with SoftLayer. I'm looking for people's comments and advice that have had at least a years experience with both companies. We have some serious sites. One site reads from MySQL, uses about 30% of its traffic pulling in external data from around the world to create png maps from the data, and serves 10,000 pages in just under a minute and 6 seconds during busy times. We've been moved around inside SAVVIS once for traffic reasons, and the network is fine.
It's time to upgrade. Softlayer seems to have a lot of compelling features not the least of which is KVM. Because of our traffic, a wrong DC choice would be very expensive for us. That's why I'm doing my due diligence here. That’s why I need to hear from people with experience with both.
If you actually use the KVM to load servers, and the power switch to do hard-reboots, I'd like to hear about how well that all works. Maybe iSCSI experience as well if there is any of that out there.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2008
I have a VPS with 768Mb of RAM which was always suitable for the websites I'm hosting
as most of them are not popular and none of them got high traffic recently at all
But for over 2 days the vps is eating the ram and killing all the services (cpanel/httpd/ftp/MySQL..)
I want to know what is causing this and stop it by any way
I contacted my vps support and they told me to write "top" in the SSH but I didn't understand any thing from what I see and I didn't know what to do after writing that command .
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2009
I received an e-mail that goes like:
"Data Center Migration Efforts Underway, from SAVVIS to Databank"
"The LayeredTech data center have informed us that in an effort to optimize the network architecture, they are planning to move all servers from SAVVIS location to a more centralized facility, the DataBank data center which is also located in Dallas."
View 14 Replies
View Related
Sep 29, 2008
I've been a layeredtech customer since early 2005, and until this last insane price-hike fiasco, I've never had a major complaint.
But now it keeps getting worse.
I wound up keeping this particular server around after the price hike (for several reasons, one of which was misinformation from a LT sales person regarding the prepay option) and several days ago received an email stating that my server would have to be moved, and that due to the chassis type of my old server, they could not move my server, I would need to migrate to a new server.
The email was less than forthcoming with details, so I tried to phone the person who sent me the email. The call went straight to his voicemail, where I left a couple messages asking him to return my calls, which he never did.
Finally I called their Sales department to figure out what was going on, and finally spoke with a nice & friendly guy (in a different department), who he stated that he felt like he was in the middle, and he just wanted to help us (the affected customers) out.
Okay, I figure I can handle moving all my custom software to a new server figuring that they would find some comparable piece of hardware to move me to at the same cost.
No.
I was told I would have to pay around 10% more per month for a server with only a slightly faster CPU, only 1GB of ram and only 1 hard-drive (current server has 1.5GB of ram & 2 hard-drives mirrored)
Oh, and I have to have everything moved by the 18th of October.
And I'll have to pay for 2 servers while I move.
Or, I might be able to have the server moved to a different space at Savvis, but that would likely only be a short-term solution, and this situation would come up again.
I find this really appalling--they really must hate their customers who helped them through the early years!
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2008
the server load averges on my VPS have been very high - escalating to 6.5 in cases.
The process causing this is:
PidOwnerPriorityCpu %Mem %Command 7370 mysql -10
76.7
3.0 /usr/sbin/mysqld --basedir=/ --datadir=/var/lib/mysql --user=mysql --pid-file=/var/lib/mysql/opal.ngwebservers.net.pid --skip-external-locking
My VPS is hosted by Virpus Networks, and has spec:
512RAM (1024 burstable), 10GB hard drive space.
8 of these processors on node:
Processor #1 Vendor: GenuineIntel
Processor #1 Name: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz
Processor #1 speed: 174.594 MHz
Processor #1 cache size: 2048 KB
No hardware or software changes were implemented on the VPS as far as I am aware.
The MySQL process causing this is:
28993movies_mybblocalhostmovies_mybbQuery36Copying to tmp tableSELECT t.tid, t.dateline, p.edittime, t.subject, f.allowhtml, f.allowmycode, f.allowsmilies, f.allow
This has been going on since I first saw the loads go high...
View 8 Replies
View Related
Mar 10, 2008
I have many servers on vrtservers.net and is happy of they support. And I planing be a reseller of them.
But the nightmare come from last day..
My main server have got some SPAM report from spamcap.net
[url]
the spamcap.net report my server runing a open proxy.and somebody using it as SPAM.
before the SPAM report..
I know this ISSUE and have fix it..
so the proxy just run many hours.[ check the mrtg graph.[url]
sinse the SPAM report.
vrtserver.net put this server offline..
I can Understand it.
And I have contact the support@vrtservers.net Instantly.
And I proceed the case of spamcap.net too.
But the nightmare is ....
When I ask "how to reconnect my servers/What time will the case close?" to VRTSERVERs.NET.
the vrtservers.net reply to me said the server has been terminated and there is no way to get my data back.
My god ..
all of my server's data has been lost!
vrtservers.net is killing me now!
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 25, 2007
I have a VPS with 320MB of RAM. The problem is that spammassassin is killing my VPS.
Spamd service was using 50% of memory (+- 150MB of RAM).
Do you think that this is normal RAM for Spamd?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2007
trying to get mod_security installed on my HSphere server, the install goes ok until i try and load rules?
If i just load the exclude.conf rule then php sites work, if i also load rules.conf or any other rules then my php sites get 'connection refused error' ?
I cannot find any thing in logs and there is no log written for mod_security?
here is my modsecurity.conf
Quote:
#If you want to scan the output, uncomment these
#SecFilterScanOutput On
#SecFilterOutputMimeTypes "(null) text/html text/plain"
# Accept almost all byte values
SecFilterForceByteRange 1 255
# Server masking is optional
#fake server banner - NOYB used - no one needs to know what we are using
SecServerSignature "NOYB"
#SecUploadDir /tmp
#SecUploadKeepFiles Off
# Only record the interesting stuff
SecAuditEngine RelevantOnly
SecAuditLog /var/log/audit_log
# You normally won't need debug logging
SecFilterDebugLevel 0
SecFilterDebugLog logs/modsec_debug_log
#And now, the rules
#Remove any of these Include lines you do not use or have rules for.
#First, add in your exclusion rules:
#These MUST come first!
Include /etc/modsecurity/exclude.conf
#Application protection rules
#Include /etc/modsecurity/rules.conf
bash-2.05b# cat /etc/modsecurity.conf
<IfModule mod_security.c>
# Only inspect dynamic requests
# (YOU MUST TEST TO MAKE SURE IT WORKS AS EXPECTED)
#SecFilterEngine DynamicOnly
SecFilterEngine On
# Reject requests with status 500
SecFilterDefaultAction "deny,log,status:500"
# Some sane defaults
SecFilterScanPOST On
SecFilterCheckURLEncoding On
SecFilterCheckCookieFormat On
SecFilterCheckUnicodeEncoding Off
SecFilterNormalizeCookies On
# enable version 1 (RFC 2965) cookies
SecFilterCookieFormat 1
SecServerResponseToken Off
#If you want to scan the output, uncomment these
#SecFilterScanOutput On
#SecFilterOutputMimeTypes "(null) text/html text/plain"
# Accept almost all byte values
SecFilterForceByteRange 1 255
# Server masking is optional
#fake server banner - NOYB used - no one needs to know what we are using
SecServerSignature "NOYB"
#SecUploadDir /tmp
#SecUploadKeepFiles Off
# Only record the interesting stuff
SecAuditEngine RelevantOnly
SecAuditLog /var/log/audit_log
# You normally won't need debug logging
SecFilterDebugLevel 0
SecFilterDebugLog logs/modsec_debug_log
#And now, the rules
#Remove any of these Include lines you do not use or have rules for.
#First, add in your exclusion rules:
#These MUST come first!
Include /etc/modsecurity/exclude.conf
#Application protection rules
#Include /etc/modsecurity/rules.conf
#Comment spam rules
#Include /etc/modsecurity/blacklist.conf
#Bad hosts, bad proxies and other bad players
##Include /etc/modsecurity/blacklist2.conf
#Bad clients, known bogus useragents and other signs of malware
##Include /etc/modsecurity/useragents.conf
#Known bad software, rootkits and other malware
##Include /etc/modsecurity/rootkits.conf
#Signatures to prevent proxying through your server
#only rule these rules if your server is NOT a proxy
##Include /etc/modsecurity/proxy.conf
#Just in Time Patching for Vulnerable Applications
##Include /etc/modsecurity/jitp.conf
#Google Hacks signatures
##Include /etc/modsecurity/recons.conf
#Include /etc/modsecurity/
</IfModule>
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2007
I have a VPS with 256m guaranteed RAM .. and I have CPanel. A couple of days ago I got to fiddling with a database issue and had phpMyAdmin open for the better part of an hour. So I got to wondering what something like that does to my VPS?
A secondary question .. same thing but on a dedicated server with 1g RAM?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 25, 2007
guys im tired off fighting those hackers everyday! i have about 20 websites,and everyday i have one of them hacked! i restore a backup then another one hacked!
thats unbelivable!!!
those bastards upload there shell scripts to websites via bugs or whatever from php files!!
is there anyway to stop these commands?
can .htaccess helps? how?
i talked to my webhosting companies for my websites! ....
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2009
Virtuozzo 3.0 is killing VPS's /usr/bin/mysqld_safe process but leaving /usr/sbin/mysqld UP which is causing cPanel to be unable to automatically restart MySQL after that.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2008
from top:
12478 root 35 19 2004 680 308 R 39 0.0 8:54.95 gzip
using anywhere from 30-50% of my cpu for nearly 10 min now. but, no memory usage.
any ideas? should i kill the pid?
site is running pretty slow as a result of this.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2007
24 hours ago something wired happend..
For some reason httpd is causing high serverload.
ATM : 22:44:17 up 22:17, 2 users, load average: 6.23, 6.12, 8.88
U
Will keep gooing up and httpd need to be restartet when serverload comes up to 30.
The traffic on the server is normal, no changes is made on the server.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 7, 2007
Opt 248
3gb ram
250gb sata II
I have a fairly unique problem. My server runs great 95% of the time. Loads average under 1. However backups have become a server killer. I use cpanel scheduled backup at early morning hours. The reason backups kill my server is that I have 300,000+ (and counting) images in a directory. They are all small pngs generated by LaTeX. It takes my server several hours to backup the images. I usually even have to stop apache to free up some power. This problem is only going to get worse as I get more images. Maybe I could upgrade proc or upgrade to faster HD? That would be costly, hopefully not.
Should I hire a professional backup service? Costly, and would that help? Or is there a way of storing the images or doing the cpbackup I am doing wrong?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2008
if it was possible to kill a server running WHMCS by executing the cron.php via cronjob on a remote server once every minute.
I just wanted to see if this was potentially harmful, so I can submit it to Matt without sounding like an idiot...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2007
One of these rules is causing name server lookups to fail, but I can't seem to figure out which one, can anyone spot the problem?
Code:
[root@example ~]# iptables -L -n
Chain INPUT (policy DROP)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
INVDROP all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state INVALID
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x3F/0x00
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x3F/0x3F
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x03/0x03
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x06/0x06
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x05/0x05
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x11/0x01
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x18/0x08
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x30/0x20
ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:20
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:21
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:22
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:25
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:53
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:80
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:110
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:143
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:443
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:465
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:953
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:993
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:995
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:10023
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW udp dpt:20
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW udp dpt:21
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW udp dpt:53
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW udp dpt:953
ACCEPT icmp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW icmp type 8
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp spt:53 dpt:53
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp spt:53 dpt:53
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp spt:53 dpts:1024:65535
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp spt:53 dpts:1024:65535
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp spts:1024:65535 dpt:53
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp spts:1024:65535 dpt:53
LOGDROPIN all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
Chain FORWARD (policy DROP)
target prot opt source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy DROP)
target prot opt source destination
INVDROP all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state INVALID
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x3F/0x00
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x3F/0x3F
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x03/0x03
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x06/0x06
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x05/0x05
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x11/0x01
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x18/0x08
INVDROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp flags:0x30/0x20
ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:20
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:21
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:22
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:25
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:53
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:80
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:110
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:113
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:443
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:953
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:10023
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:9999
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW udp dpt:20
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW udp dpt:21
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW udp dpt:53
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW udp dpt:113
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW udp dpt:123
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW udp dpt:953
ACCEPT icmp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW icmp type 8
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp spt:53 dpt:53
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp spt:53 dpt:53
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp spts:1024:65535 dpt:53
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp spts:1024:65535 dpt:53
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp spt:53 dpts:1024:65535
ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp spt:53 dpts:1024:65535
LOGDROPOUT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
Chain INVDROP (18 references)
target prot opt source destination
DROP all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
Chain LOGDROPIN (1 references)
target prot opt source destination
DROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:67
DROP udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:67
DROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:68
DROP udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:68
DROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:111
DROP udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:111
DROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:113
DROP udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:113
DROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpts:135:139
DROP udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpts:135:139
DROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:445
DROP udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:445
DROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:513
DROP udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:513
DROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:520
DROP udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:520
LOG tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 30/min burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `Firewall: *TCP_IN Blocked* '
LOG udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 30/min burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `Firewall: *UDP_IN Blocked* '
LOG icmp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 30/min burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `Firewall: *ICMP_IN Blocked* '
DROP all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
Chain LOGDROPOUT (1 references)
target prot opt source destination
LOG tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 30/min burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `Firewall: *TCP_OUT Blocked* '
LOG udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 30/min burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `Firewall: *UDP_OUT Blocked* '
LOG icmp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 limit: avg 30/min burst 5 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `Firewall: *ICMP_OUT Blocked* '
DROP all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2007
My nobody_check is killing a process that seems to be o.k. but I'm not sure. The process is running /usr/bin/perl-bin which I never heard of. I thought it was /usr/bin/perl
Should I be concerned? Again, I don't know what /perl-bin is.
Process ID: 28457 has been killed
Restuls for PID: 28457
total 0
dr-xr-xr-x 3 nobody nobody 0 Jul 23 17:00 .
dr-xr-xr-x 201 root root 0 Jun 29 11:59 ..
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 attr
-r-------- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 auxv
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 cmdline
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 cwd -> /
-r-------- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 environ
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 exe -> /usr/bin/perl-bin
dr-x------ 2 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 fd
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 loginuid
-r-------- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 maps
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 mem
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 mounts
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 root -> /
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 stat
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 statm
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 status
dr-xr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 task
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 wchan
Netstat:
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:783 127.0.0.1:40957
CLOSE_WAIT 28457/spamd child
udp 0 0 xx.xxx.xxx.xx:41008 216.52.190.1:53
ESTABLISHED 28457/spamd child
unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 120878416 28457/spamd
child
unix 2 [ ] DGRAM 120872220 28457/spamd
child
unix 2 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 120847759 28457/spamd
child
unix 2 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 120832442 28457/spamd
child
Environ:
Process ID: 23944 has been killed
Restuls for PID: 23944
total 0
dr-xr-xr-x 3 nobody nobody 0 Jul 23 16:55 .
dr-xr-xr-x 206 root root 0 Jun 29 11:59 ..
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 attr
-r-------- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 auxv
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 16:55 cmdline
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 cwd -> /
-r-------- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 environ
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 23 16:55 exe -> /usr/bin/perl-bin
dr-x------ 2 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 fd
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 loginuid
-r-------- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 maps
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 mem
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 mounts
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 root -> /
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 16:55 stat
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 16:55 statm
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 16:55 status
dr-xr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 task
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 23 17:00 wchan
Netstat:
tcp 1 0 127.0.0.1:783 127.0.0.1:40955
CLOSE_WAIT 23944/spamd child
udp 0 0 xx.xx.xxx.xxx:55606 216.52.190.1:53
ESTABLISHED 23944/spamd child
unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 120847760 23944/spamd
child
unix 2 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 120832442 23944/spamd
child
unix 2 [ ] DGRAM 120677444 23944/spamd
child
Environ:
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 12, 2007
So we've got a client setup with 2 domains; 1 main and 1 secondary.
The secondary domain is a 301 redirect with masking through GoDaddy. The reason for the masking is because we need the domain name to stay the same after the redirect. (So people who come in on DomainB will only see DomainB in the url bar.)
The problem: GoDaddy has uses a "zero frame" element to implement the masking and it's messing up the display of our site.
Note: The display only screws up in IE.
Primary domain: www.BristolCountyWomensJournal.com --> (This works fine.)
301 domain: www.WomensJournals.com --> (Check out the messy background!)
Anyone know of alternatives to Domain Masking?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jan 8, 2009
We're running on Linux/Apache/MySQL/RoR and have a number of cron jobs that run throughout the day on our server. We've been noticing lately that at certain times of the day the site becomes really slow. When I'm online with my engineers I can mention this to them and they can check and see and say "Oh yeah, it's job XYZ that's spiking the server load."
That's great but much of the time when I notice the sluggishness my developers are offline (we're in different time zones). I'm wondering if there's a fairly easy way to track this when they're not online so we can say "Yup, last night at 10 PM your time when you noticed that it was job ABC." There has to be something that allows you to do this right?
View 3 Replies
View Related
