i try to upload a document on my server on smart ftp i am having a problem all my document's are saved as .html or .css and when i upload i get a error and then the document goes to a transfer queue.what am i doing wrong ? im able to delete my document's but im not able to upload ?
I would like an email auto-responder to not auto-respond back to the same person twice.
I went to my webhost webmail and set an auto-responder. I tested it by sending an email to it. The auto-responders just blindly replies back with an auto-response irregardless of whether it had auto-responded back to that email or not.
Don't you think that is dangerous? Because if someone else sends me a mail with an auto responder turned on. And I have my auto-responder turned on. They would just auto-respond back and forth hundreds of time until the mail quota is reached or the server goes down. Isn't it?
How can I get a "smart" auto-responder that does not auto-respond to the same person twice?
I came in contact with PC Smart Hosting when looking for a Xen-based cPanel VPS. I already had a VPS provider but they were quite expensive, their setup was something that I was doubting a bit and their financial administration was a mess. PC Smart Hosting offers various options for a cPanel VPS, so I opened up a ticket with sales for something custom.
Chris from PC Smart Hosting asked me some questions about what I was looking for and quickly came with an offer for me, a custom offer. I would get a 1GB cPanel VPS, with a Secondary DNS VPS in the US and backup space, all unmanaged. This all for a very reasonable price. I could optionally upgrade it to semi-managed or fully-managed for a very low price.
I choose to have it all fully managed. Not because I wouldn't be able to handle it myself, but their full management provides extra security, plus they harden your VPS when they install it, so it's way more secure. Add to that that really experienced people set it all up, so it's a timesaver. Besides that, I like to have it fully managed to I can get help when I don't know what to do anymore and I always think it's a good thing to have everything monitored. And the money was not something not to go fully managed for.
The VPS was created very rapidly, even though they had to place a new host machine to create it, and within 24 hours everything was up and running. The VPS is amazingly fast and up until now very stable, so I would definitely recommend PC Smart Hosting for a VPS!
I am considering getting a server from take2hosting.com. Their offer is great and sales has been very helpful and fast. Left definitely a good impression.
The downside is that they are on Cogent-only bandwidth. In the past I have really gotten something against Cogent, mainly due to one of my FDC servers being routed over Cogent and only pulling 10K/sec to Europe.
How is the Cogent network nowadays? Has it improved since a year ago? Worth considering?
From my tests the speeds are actually really great. They are located in San Jose, and I am testing speeds to Europe. For example to Surfnet Amsterdam (Cogent hands off the traffic to Surfnet in Amsterdam, so its on the Cogent network all the way) I am able to pull 2.53MB/sec. This is an incredible speed for a Westcoast<->Europe transfer. It almost makes me believe Cogent has started getting its act together.
For people who would like to test speeds, please use this test file. Especially European tests would be interesting, and it would be great if you could post where cogent hands off traffic from LosAngeles to either your network or a transit network. (In the US or Europe)
Right now I am hosting on a Level3/GlobalCrossing network @ the eastcoast. This works really well but it shows in the price. If I could combine a couple of budget boxes into one of those Quadcores it would save quite a lot. Question is: Is Cogent trustworty nowadays?
Thanks for your input
Ps. I know that hosting on a single-homed network is not the smartest thing to do. However they will add more carriers soon so this will not really be an issue. I'm expecting them to not drop Cogent tho, so my question remains
Does anyone have a good contact or contractor that they can recommend in the vicinity of Equinix Ashburn? Preferably someone who's done work in the facility before. We're in DC4 - which is building E I believe.
While Equinix has great staff, sometimes I just need simple things like servers unpacked and racked - things that I'd prefer not to pay $200/hr. for.
I was wondering if anyone has used any of the Energy Smart servers. We've just been buying the ordinary offerings from Dell that don't have Energy Smart power supplies, but we are considering purchasing them.
to install ESET Smart Security Business Edition (NOD32) firewall and antivirus on Windows 2003 R2 32bit.
Is there any one here who did this before and is this program compatible with above mentioned windows?
Is the firewall good enough to install on the server. Has any one had any problem with this program before? Any suggestion on better antivirus and internet security?
I look forward to receive your answer. Your answer will be really helpful for us.
I've almost got my server ready to get shipped out to colo.
Its a HP Proliant ML570 G2, 4x2.0GHz Xeon, 4GB PC1600 DDR ECC RAM, and a Smart Array 6402 Ultra320 SCSI RAID controller card. The way I currently have the HDs configured is as follows:
I will add one-two more 73.5GB 10k Ultra320 drives for running in RAID 5 or 6.
The 2 36.4GB 15k Ultra320 drives are running in RAID 1. This is the array that I am performing these tests on, -not- the 73.5GB drives.
Anyway, I was a little curious about my performance.
The following tsets
I know hdparm is not really meant for running tests on SCSI disks, however here is the output:
Code: # hdparm -tT /dev/cciss/c0d1
/dev/cciss/c0d1: Timing cached reads: 1732 MB in 2.00 seconds = 865.91 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device Timing buffered disk reads: 320 MB in 3.01 seconds = 106.45 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device Here is the IOZone output:
Code: File size set to 4096 KB Command line used: /opt/iozone/bin/iozone -s 4096 Output is in Kbytes/sec Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds. Processor cache size set to 1024 Kbytes. Processor cache line size set to 32 bytes. File stride size set to 17 * record size. random random bkwd record stride KB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread 4096 4 188852 523178 658943 688853 610887 484275 572466 539010 580498 182914 471075 644937 671916 Then, just for the heck of it, I ran the tests on my little home Dell server with a ~80GB 7.2k RPM 1.5GB/s SATA drive:
Code: /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 1680 MB in 2.00 seconds = 839.29 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 136 MB in 3.02 seconds = 45.08 MB/sec
Code: File size set to 4096 KB Command line used: ./iozone -s 4096 Output is in Kbytes/sec Time Resolution = 0.000001 seconds. Processor cache size set to 1024 Kbytes. Processor cache line size set to 32 bytes. File stride size set to 17 * record size. random random bkwd record stride KB reclen write rewrite read reread read write read rewrite read fwrite frewrite fread freread 4096 4 152972 1135245 1358510 2132128 1163636 1103448 1184499 1829350 1588205 490774 1006882 1378196 2104830 Can you give me a little insight on my results?
NOTE: The batteries on my Smart Array 6402 controller are DEAD and need to be replaced, they will not charge. Since they are dead, the cache (which is 128MB) will not enable itself. If this cache were enabled, would I experience much different results from the tests?
We recently setup a server with 4 gigs of RAM and installed Fedora core 7 32-bit version in it. After installing the OS, I have found that Fedora is able to detect only 2 GB and not 4 GB of RAM. I installed the kernel-PAE and kernel-PAE-devel modules and restart the server and made sure that the the OS with the PAE switch starts at boot time. However, the OS still does not detect the 4 GB RAM. Any idea what else can be done apart from installing the 64-bit OS in the system?
Just installed fresh centos 5 / cpanel and now I get this:
No filesystems with quota detected.
[root@server scripts]# quotacheck -avugm quotacheck: Can't find filesystem to check or filesystem not mounted with quota option.
Code:
[root@server scripts]# /scripts/initquotas Quotas are now on Updating Quota Files...... quotacheck: Can't find filesystem to check or filesystem not mounted with quota option.
quotacheck: Can't find filesystem to check or filesystem not mounted with quota option.
I am using Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition SP1 and i have recently set the computer up to 4GB RAM. I notice a problem occur error :
When I start the computer, Bios detected all 4GB Ram. However, i have checked Total physical memory in General (My Computer-> Properties) doesnot detect all 4GB Ram. it only detect 3GB Ram.
I have checked that this OS support up to 32GB . Why it doesn't detect all 4GB ? What happen to it?
Mainboard : Intel chipset 915GL
I did following the instruction in internet (exactly is Microsoft) is /PAE in boot.ini file. But, it doesnt work.
I'm just working with my first dedicated server and also in the process of coding a new site. Anyway, I've gotten around to emailing users from scripts on my site (Java Servlet). Using Sendmail as the server (with default config) the emails are detected as spam by pretty much everything.
I'm looking for a complete list of things which need to be done to ensure an email isn't detected incorrectly as spam. I've read through various sites etc but haven't found a definitive list of things which should be done. I'm sure this would be helpful for other forum visitors too.
I'm NOT trying to send spam or anything like that but I haven't set up a dedicated server before.
I am using Merak Mail server 8.0.3 (Windows). From past 2 - 3 days many of my users are complaining their genuine mails are going to spam. The value set for antispam is 5 i.e. if antispam value is above it is detected as spam else not spam.
But from past few days which ever genuine mail is detected as spam I have found an very uncommon thing in it. It shows '10.4 FH_HAS_X Has X: header'
The SpamAssassin table shows the following information:
pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE HTML included in message 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY HTML has "tbody" tag 2.2 DEAR_SOMETHING Contains 'Dear (something)' 2.4 BAYES_80 Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 90% 0.0 NO_RDNS2 Sending MTA has no reverse DNS 10.4 FH_HAS_X Has X: header 1.1 SARE_HEAD_MIME_INVALID SARE_HEAD_MIME_INVALID Invalid mime version 0.1 SARE_HEAD_HDR_XMS SARE_HEAD_HDR_XMS Message headers used whic
I have 2 reseller accounts with one provider, and in the last several days I have noticed that when you visit the site for the first time, my AV software detects a trojan on the site, but the code & html files are 100% clean!
I'm suspecting that there is something being injected into the scripts from the server daemons that's either running or something else.
I installed 2 SATA raptors drives on my server. I formatted/partitioned one of the drives through WHM. After rebooting both drives disappeared. They are still detected within the BIOS but not in CentOS. It is possible that I installed a wrong driver or made a bad configuration change.
Server Info:
CentOS 4.6 64bit cPanel/WHM Motherboard: [url]OS is running on a 250GB IDE drive 2 SATA WD Raptors (That I am trying to get to work)
Behind a pfsense box we have a computer who act as a forward proxy with apache. At the end we have the family computer.This is the problem: i can't hide the forward proxy on internet, the forward proxy is reported "detected".
in CENTOS 6.6 / PLESK 12 when I use the find command I get this notice:find: File system loop detected; "/var/named/chroot/var/named" is part of the same file system loop as "/var/named".
On server are many Wordpress installations after scan all these were added however about 90% have this tool-tip message "A WordPress installation was previously detected at this path, but it is not operating properly now." How to correct and manage these installations
