Our group composed of 5 people would like to have 1 Windows VPS each where we can access it via RDC, basically we want our own remote computers.
How do we go on doing this? What type of server should we choose (CPU/RAM wise)? Which datacenter or provider do you recommend we should go? And what software is required for this aside from Windows 2003.
I was wondering whether anyone knows one which allows you to provide your own box/rackmount. I know it's unlikely, but I figured I would ask.
View 8 Replies View RelatedCan someone help me with web hosts providing WHM as standard feature on their web hosts instead of in only reseller plans.
I do not need a reseller plan, just want a plan to host multiple sites of my own but don't want to use the addon domains route.
I am currently hosted on Axishost for exactly the same reason as they provide WHM access but I need a little more space than what Axishost offers.
My requirements: 1.5 GB of storage & around 20 GB bandwidth per month for around $10 per month. (Axishost provides 1 GB space and I may just fall a little short on space. Except for this, I am quite happy with Axishost)
I could only find Resellerzoom which fits my budget perfectly but not sure about their Acceptable Use Policy which seems to be quite scary for the Budget Reseller Plan based on what I read on these forums.
I'm in a little shock to see umbrahosting user (umbrahosting.com) to spam this forum with their hosting offers when the sites on their servers are down for DAYS now (mine has been down for about 2 days now). No customer support (unless they want you to pay them). Terrible experience overall.
View 12 Replies View RelatedI would like to hear about sites providing fully managed servers.
View 14 Replies View RelatedHosting: VPS Hosting with 320 MB min and 1024 MB burst.
Websites: All the websites (about 20+) on my current vps hosting are very database heavy. They include blogs, ecommerce sites and a few small forums.
Before: In the beginning, when I had less than 10 websites on my hosting, the web hosting worked great. No hiccups and all websites worked flawlessly.
Now: Now that I'm hosting 20+ websites, I find that websites sometimes tend to timeout or not show up in my browser as well as browsers in other locations.
Do you think I need more resources? Do you think that upgrading to Hybrid Server hosting will rectify the situation?
I was actually curious about this since Windows 2008 version came out.
What is the difference between Windows media services on Windows 2003 and Windows 2008?
Any company rent Windows Server 2003 Web Edition ?
SPLA and External licenses ?
With Micfrosoft need pay 2,000$
I wait your answerds.
With Windows 2003 server, there are comprehensive lists of what you need to do to secure the server before use. For Windows 2008, I wonder is there such a list? Or is it true as what I heard from Microsoft that it is already secured out of the box?
Anyone has any resources on the hardening or preparation of 2008 for server hosting uses?
FTPS is not working after upgrade from plesk 11. On plesk 11 windows and linux worked fine, after upgrade my windows server, it stopped working.
Code:
PS C:Windowssystem32> & "C:Program Files (x86)ParallelsPleskadmininpmm-ras.exe" --check-repository --dump-storage=ftps://****:****@***.***.***.***:21 --debug --verbose
[2014-11-11 21:16:12.981| 4688] INFO: pmm-ras started : "C:Program Files (x86)ParallelsPleskadmininpmm-ras.exe" --check-repository "--dump-storage=ftps://****:****@***.***.***.***:21" --debug --verbose
[2014-11-11 21:16:12.997| 4688] INFO: Repository 'ftps://***.***.***.***:21': Initializing...
[code]....
I'm making a reasonably uninformed comparison here. Since Windows Vista is noted to be more resource intensive and slower than Win XP, are we right in assuming that Windows 2008 is slower than Windows 2003?
For instance, with two boxes with an identical hardware setup but the two different server OSes, will the same application like, say MySQL run slower on the Win 2008 machine?
There seem to be strong forum rules in place about the kinds of posts that hosters can make.
But from my perspective it is somehow leaving a large gap in useful information I would like to know that I can't quite put my finger on right now.
So I would like to get responses from Windows hosters in this thread without violating any forum spam guidelines and I sure hope I'm not wasting my time here with this concept but here goes...
So, the topic:
Ultimately, the thing Windows Web Hosters are providing is the delivery of information that has been constructed by developers using program code they have assembled using a large array of mostly .NET technology.
The reason the Hoster is providing Windows hosting is that a sufficiently large enough population of Web Developers have been attracted to some aspect of the Windows technology stack.
And there is certainly lots of innovative and interesting technology that attracts developers to focus on .NET in just the same way that there is also interesting technology in the Linux world.
So here's the problem. It appears as if the Windows hosting companies with the odd exception have almost no interest in Windows and .NET technology.
But if they actually did have such an interest, it is not clear how they would communicate it for discussion here at WHT because of the spam rules and of course trying to communicate anything at all about hosting on the general internet is just swamped by spam. The noise level is just insane!
So I am hoping that such a discussion can take place in this thread by asking some very specific questions:
1. What interesting Microsoft technology have you researched, tested or played with lately?
2. What programs or scripts have you personally developed lately to investigate .NET 3.5 features?
3. What do you think of XBAP delivery from the net and why do you think it hasn't caught on in a larger way since it sure delivers a richer client experience than Flash or even Silverlight.
4. What do you think of Azure and will Microsoft let hosters be part of the cloud anytime soon? Can you think of useful or interesting Azure mashups from a hosting perspective?
5. Have you tried any totally silly and insane things with the .NET runtime inside of SQL Server 2005/2008 that would give your DB guys a heart attack?
6. Have you tried out the Google systems where you give your employees 20% of company time to play around with personal projects like this?
Latest Update 12.0.18 Update 12 appears to have removed PHP 5.4 and PHP 5.5 from my dropdown under hosting settings.
The only PHP that is left is PHP 5.3
Yet, the updates and upgrades page still lists PHP 5.4 and PHP 5.5 as installed.
Also PHP is still working on the virtual websites that were previously enabled with either 5.4 or 5.5, but not able to change using the Plesk Panel.
Given that Parallels has broken the Panel in that latest automatic update I'd hope it can be resolved ASAP.
I can't even find any references in the KB about Plesk 12 on Windows regarding PHP versions
I can even give feedback about the broken patch as every feedback channel requires paid support.
I have faced the following ftp backup error in windows plesk 11.5.30
Transport error: unable to send directory to repository: Transport error: unable to put local file C:Program Files (x86)ParallelsPleskPrivateTemp/repo_transport_tmp_01cf171bcedd7710ackup_1401220130.zip to backup_1401220130.zip: Curl error: Failure when receiving data from the peer
Prior to using plesk, I had a few sites that had SSL certificates installed, the old fashioned way (manually through IIS). I have now setup those domains in plesk, and I need to somehow make PLESK aware of these SSL certificates.Right now, I setup the domain in plesk, give it a dedicated IP, and allow SSL connections. It chooses the default certificate and my already installed in IIS SSL certificate isnt listed.
Is there any way I can get it listed? I went to the add an SSL area, and it seems that this area is only good for generating new SSL certificates, but mine is good for another 1+ years.The bummer is that for some reason, anytime I make any type of change to the site in plesk, that it seems to overwrite the SSL bindings and changes my manual changes to the correct certificate (through iis) back to the default certificate.
Is there hosting that use windows xp rather than windows server 2003? What is the advantage of using windows server2003 anyway?
Most of the time I just need to run some programs that need huge bandwidth. If I want to host sites, I'll just use xamp.
I think windows xp license is cheaper.
Does someone know what that means? I can sometime choose this option if I want to buy a server.
View 14 Replies View RelatedIs there a registry key that can distinguish between Windows 2000 and Windows 2000 server?
In
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREMicrosoftWindows NTCurrentVersionProductName
That key is Windows 2000 for both Win 2k and Win 2k server so if there's anything else that would be GREAT.
I need a windows vps with a lest 512 mg of ram hard drive any bandwidth Unllimited with remote access price for 40.00 to 60.00
View 3 Replies View RelatedI need to buy a windows vps ram:atleast 700 or 1gb ram and atleast 10gb hd,i need remote desktop connection, gonna run a .exe batch file coded outta java,where can i buy a vps like this such where for a good deal?
View 14 Replies View RelatedWe are looking into to selling Windows VPS aswell as Linux which would you guys prefer to use panel wise:
HyperV
Or
VMWare
how is this pricing possible considering the licensing cost of Windows Server 2003 Ent?
I am not familiar with Microsoft's SPLA program, but I would imagine individual licenses for every single VPS would leave this company with a really small profit margin.
Is there a reliable host who will let me install my own CD key for Windows?
View 4 Replies View Relatedwhich software for mms in windows free or paid and which is best ? with video, windows media encoder work with local can it also work on webserver
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to track down a quality windows VPS hosting supplier based in the US. I'm looking for a geat reputation, strong customer support and good flexibility...
We are running a website that that has applications running fulltime in the background and will require for our beta phase - about 1.5GB of RAM...
Can anyone point me in the direction of a good host?
Ram is most critical, followed by uptime and service quality / parts quality...
Things that aren't important are bandwidth, storage .etc
I've got someone building a website for me and I'm told I need a webhost on a Windows paltform that supports PHP and ASP.
I don't know much about this stuff.
I'm running Windows Server 2003 and Apache, trying to get some type of *domain parking*(All domain point to IP:80) to work.
Actually, my nameserver's domain itself works well, and other domains work too just by creating new *forward entries*, but i don't want that..
I just want all domains forwarded to xx.xx.xx.xx:80, so Apache just resolves these domains.
My site is suspended because of more usage of resources on shared server thats why am All scripting in my site are in asp along with access databases at backend. My site only consume 200Gb bandwidth per month and 6GB harddisk space. There is an online music streaming section and online games section that consume too much resources. Other entertainment content includes wallpapers, free trial softwares, mobile stuff etc.,
I read reviews by many members in the forum and at the momment i have 2 packages by 2 different companies in my mind,
1. PowerMVS Advanced, $70.00/month (512 Mb RAM, 20GB disk storage, 600GB bandwidht) by POWERVPS
2. SaturnX, $80.00/month (640 MB RAM, 25GB disk storage, 500GB bandwidth) by SOLARVPS
Please let me know, which one is better interms of reliablity and support; i have read that PowerVPS is more prone to hacking and for restoring backup i have to pay again, is that right.
Also i think both of them offer 'Equal CPU Share', so other VPS client on same server consume more bandwidth then it will effect my VPS performance.
a Windows VPS hosting in the UK (strict)
I've found some bad words about eukhost.com, 1and1.co.uk and webfusion.co.uk
But I can't find any more respectable companies.
I need atleast 512 Mb RAM, 10-20 Gb space, 200-300 Gb / month bandwidth, not shared CPU (I'm going to overload it), no control panels and other 'great features' - just a possibility of setting up any software (I'll run my own web server).
I am connecting my laptop(windows) to centos box using crossover cable, but laptop has wireless connection. When I enable the LAN connection, I can't see websites. How do I disable LAN to not to connect to internet? The web pages are trying to launch using LAN connection instead of wireless.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a windows VPS, every time i try and install IIS I get asked for a windows CD. with is being a VPS I dont have a CD Drive so cant install it. Is there anywhere I can get the drivers I need to finish the installation?
View 8 Replies View Related