Has anybody here had experiences with Phase.com [[url] as a provider or the "Phase Engine" as a hosting environment?
Background: We are a marketing firm, and we've been engaged to work on a website for a medium-sized not-for-profit, and I've just learned that their hosting environment is something called the "Phase Engine" [url]. It's not real easy to figure out what it is, exactly, but it seems to be some kind of comprehensive CMS system. We've pitched to them the idea of putting them on a CMS because it appeared to us they weren't, already; it now seems that they are.
We have a small Hosting reseller account at eNom. We have a new customer that moved his website from another hosting company to ours. The website is on a shared IP. Enom also uses a internal IP for internal use associated to the domain.
The problem we have is that AOL users can not see the website. As far as we can tell no other ISP's are having this problem. Everyone can see it except AOL users.
When AOL users go to the site they get "Page can not be found". After several calls to eNom support and them triple checking the DNS we still have the problem.
I looked at the error log for the website this morning. I found several errors. I looked up the IP's with the errors and they all pointed back to AOL.. See below for two examples of the errors....
Is this a server problem or DNS?
What do these errors mean and what do I do about it?
The domain is http://2hotlicks.com . They sell Hot Sauce.. Would AOL block it because of the keywords in the Domain name?
[Wed Oct 17 08:11:56 2007] [error] [client 207.200.116.7] ModSecurity: Access denied with code 400 (phase 2). Pattern match "(?:\bhttp.(?:0\.9|1\.[01])|<(?:html|meta)\b)" at REQUEST_HEADERS:Via. [id "950911"] [msg "HTTP Response Splitting Attack. Matched signature <http/1.1>"] [severity "ALERT"] [hostname "www.2hotlicks.com"] [uri "/"] [unique_id "uPWvAgoHAlYAAA25N5AAAAAI"]
[Tue Oct 16 13:11:20 2007] [error] [client 207.200.116.137] ModSecurity: Access denied with code 400 (phase 2). Pattern match "(?:\bhttp.(?:0\.9|1\.[01])|<(?:html|meta)\b)" at REQUEST_HEADERS:Via. [id "950911"] [msg "HTTP Response Splitting Attack. Matched signature <http/1.1>"] [severity "ALERT"] [hostname "www.2hotlicks.com"] [uri "/combos.htm"] [unique_id "yddhwAoHAlYAAEEfgyEAAAAi"]
I am currently running a web site that does benchmark tests. The thing is the graphs could definitely be more visually appealing than what they are now. I am good at programming with Alias Maya, so I could definitely automated 3D Image generation for the charts.
I would think, just jump right to the dedicated Windows server... but is that really necessary? If the VPS was just used for this one purpose, and nothing else. It would only need say 1GHZ of processing power, and maybe 512MB of RAM. Granted it would be slower, but it would still do what I need it to do.
Is this possible on a Windows VPS? I would think it could be... but you guys might no better.
I really don't want to throw down 200 a month for this just yet, 50-80 a month wouldn't hurt as much though.
I have a site with heavy use of large and small images. The site gets majority of traffic from US and Asia. Using a CDN for JS, CSS, site images and user uploaded images will help the site a lot to speed up.
One of the cheaper options is Cachefly which I was considering, until I found an article about using Google's App Engine as CDN. http://www.google.com/search?q=google+app+engine+cdn
I think it is very inexpensive way to put your content on a CDN. Has anyone tried App Engine as a CDN? Does anyone know if they serve content from local servers in Asia, Europe or is the content served from US?
i have nameservers in my domain (let's say [url]n [url] that registered for my first vps, i want to make 2 more nameservers from my domain for my second vps [url]n[url]so i have 1 domain with 4 nameservers in 2 vps (2 ns in each vps), it would be like this.
[url]= vps1 [url]= vps1 [url]= vps2 [url]= vps2
ns1 n ns2 is working (can connect to the first vps), but ns3 n ns4 isn't work (cannot connect to the second vps), in different way i tried to make ns3 n ns4 for the second vps with different domain and it's work, it would be like this.
[url]= vps1 [url]= vps1 [url]= vps2 [url]= vps2
so, i wanna ask can i use 4 nameservers in 1 domain for 2 vps? i mean use one domain for more that one ip (different engine)
how I could get rid of the "newest members" "last logged in" and "most popular members" on the home page of my social engine script.. Just curious on how to get rid of them.
I am thinking about creating my own search engine and I was wondering what some basic server hardware would be required to do this (e.g., RAM, hard drives, memory, storage space). Would I have to run a minimum of 1TB on storage and 4 to 6GB of ram to do it right?
I am getting error28 from storage engine with every application using mysql. The issue started a few weeks ago so i thought emptying /tmp folder would solve the issue but it didn't . Problem seems to disappear when i reboot the server but problem comes back again after a few hours . I even got tmp partition deleted and recreated
less /var/lib/mysql/latte.quicklyweb.net.err 091028 2:13:57 [ERROR] /usr/sbin/mysqld: Disk is full writing '/tmp/STH2JAx1' (Errcode: 28). Waiting for someone to free space... (Expect u p to 60 secs delay for server to continue after freeing disk space) 091028 2:13:57 [ERROR] /usr/sbin/mysqld: Retry in 60 secs. Message reprinted in 600 secs 091028 2:23:57 [ERROR] /usr/sbin/mysqld: Retry in 60 secs. Message reprinted in 600 secs ....
I require a VPS system for my main dedicated (Softlayer, 4GB ram - to become 8gb ram after implementation, Dual Xeon 4 CPU).
I need to decide whether to use HyperVM (Lxlabs) or some other sort of system (Not Viruozzo had a bad experience with them a few months ago). I want something good and easy setup and efficient. I don't require EYE-CANDY.
I need to know what you recommend and what is easy to setup. I could also pay a third party organization for setting it up (if they have the knack for it and experience).
I would like to know everyone's experience (hosts and users) on what they like or prefer (except Virtuozzo/Parallel which I wont even consider anymore).
Also my main server has CPanel with around 100 web sites already on. Can I install hypervm or such on the existing server or do I need a fresh server for the same. The VPS accounts based on hypervm or such will end up having cpanel vps licensing anyhow since I am pro-CPanel (anti Parallel) (No plesk)
I recently reorganized my music site, putting my songs in their own directory (off of public_html), and now a couple of search engines are generating a boatload of 404 errors.
Can I redirect the file requests to the new location and, if so, how?
Google App Engine offers free quotas of 1 GB outbound traffic per day and 6.5 CPU-hours (based on a 1.2 GHz Intel x86 processor) per day.
How do those free quotas compare to web hosting plans? For example, the traffic supported by the free quotas -- is that generally higher or less than the traffic supported by a typical $5/mo shared hosting account?
Above the free quotas, Google charges $0.12 per GB outgoing traffic, $0.10 per GB incoming traffic, $0.10 per CPU-hour, $0.15 per GB storage per month.
How do those numbers translate to normal web hosting plans? For example, the traffic that can be supported by a $40/mo VPS plan and $200/mo dedicated server plan, what would they cost on Google App Engine?
I know it depends on a lot of factors, but if anyone has any ballpark estimates or experiences they're willing to share I'd really appreciate it.
I'm trying to decide between App Engine and standard web hosting for a DB-backed Python site. The site will start small, but if the traffic grows I want to see which would be a better option long term.
i have a mp3 search engine website, i dont host any mp3 file, and i want buy a dedicated from france, but the seller of yourwebhoster.eu say its no allowed the mp3 search engine, where i can host that?
keywords: ?L=, cecen hacked, cecen, hacked, phpizabi hacked, How to hack phpizabi
Hacking mechanism: 1. this is not hacking indeed. This is usage of phpizabi engine imperfection
Usually the path till the admin area looks like this: ?L=admin.general.configure
If changing the path to ?L=admin//general//configure Then anyone can obtain full access to the admin area and can do everything he wants.
Similarly changing the path till any keyword file on the web site you can freely get the access to the database.
HOW TO CORRECT THIS ERROR:
mechanism: 1. Below I’ll show an example on how to correct the imperfection of phpizabi engine. This is only example and I recommend all the programmers to code by themselves their own mechanism of this error correction. Unque character of this mechanism will be one more obstacle against hacking.
So, in the very beginning of the script index.php we should put the following code:
It cleans everything from the query except “dots”, “letters” and “digits”.
2. All the folders in main directory of the web site which are located under the path /pages/ should not be accessible for opening! The easiest and fastest way is to set password access for all the folders in /pages/ through «Password Protect Directories» - this is client’s admin area on the hosting. You should set password to all except “chat” and “gallery”.
3. File upload:
By default any file can be uploaded for scripts phpizabi for dating web sites. They could be uploaded like a picture for gallery or attached file for other web site elements. Specially created *.php file which will be loaded at the server, can give full access to hacker and finally to walk away it from you!
I do not enclose the correction code of this error as you should restrict file uploading on the server by the class objects jpg/jpeg, gif and png.
One of the sites I have, is placed on a non-Apache server (the others are). Phpinfo() gives this: Server API CGI
I'd like to make search engine-friendly URLs for all my sites. All of them will do fine with mod_rewrite, but that's not possible on this server, it seems. Anybody here knows how I can do this for this particular server?
Is it possible to install and run Plesk on Google App Engine? If so, could you point me to some appropriate documentation? If not, what about Google Compute Engine?
I want to host a torrent search engine (not a torrent site with actual torrents hosted, only a search engine).
It has to be really fast. I have a few questions?
What hosting is required for this site to be lightning fast? Most of it is due to the coding of the site but how much of it is reliant of the server? Any suggestions?
Also, is it better to start small and upgrade as more visitors come? Or is it just better to get a big server?
I am considering a server from Iweb wich is based in Canada.
My question is about search engines especially google. My site will be targeting US visitors and I am in the US. When google and other search engines see that my IP address is in Canada will it have any affect on search engine ranking for the regular us google.com? I don't care much about rankings on google.ca since my visitors will mainly be in the USA. anybody have any insite on this? I also want to mention my domain name will be a .com domain
on a fresh installation of Ubuntu (at first 14.04 but on 12.04 the same problem occurs) I installed Plesk via the autoinstaller. It seems to be all fine except I cannot open Plesk in the browser.
The web browser shows "502 Bad Gateway", a look into the error_log at "/var/log/plesk/sw-cp-server" shows the following error:
Code: 2014/08/11 09:37:22 [crit] 4988#0: *4 connect() to unix:/var/run/sw-engine.sock failed (2: No such file or directory) while connecting to upstream, client: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, server: , request: "GET / HTTP/1.1", upstream: "fastcgi://unix:/var/run/sw-engine.sock:", host: "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8443" So the problem seems to be the sw-engine service that cannot be started. If I try to start it manually with `/etc/init.d/sw-engine start` it just fails:
Code: * Starting Plesk engine pool manager sw-engine-fpm [fail]
Where to find any startup error log for sw-engine, where I could find any further information.
