Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in /home/ante/public_html/me/classes/http.php on line 418
Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/ante/public_html/me/classes/other.php on line 145
when i try upload big files (up 140mb to my vps using RapidLeech
and here my php.ini
[url]
i chnaged the php.ini to the new value and restart http only
my vps info
safe mod : on
Operating system: Linux
PHP version: 5.2.5
Apache version: 1.3.41 (Unix)
while i am restoring db (110MB) via SSH following error occur
Code: ERROR 1064 (42000) at line 145689: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ' Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in ' at line 1
I have this error when i put import to mysql database
Code: #1064 - You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '<script></script><p>ERROR: Maximum execution time of 300 seconds exceeded (Util.' at line 244
I have in domain > doemainname > max_execution_time Standaard Geef een aangepaste waarde op 0
and insert in usr/local/psa/admin/htdocs/domains/databases/phpmyadmin in the file config.sample.inc.php following command $cfg['ExecTimeLimit'] = 70000;
During the last couple of weeks my main server has started acting weird.
Sometimes(often) when accessing my site, I get a page saying that server or location could not be found. Reload and "bam" page loads again. Average load on the server is 0.50
When executing scripts (I.E uploading files using web2ftp or cp file manager) server shuts the connection after a few seconds and say page cannot be found.
I set the execution time in php to 60sec, so this is not the issue.
When I ping the server, I do not get any packet losses.
Lets say I have a file, doesnt even need to have any PHP functions in the document, could be just pure CSS / images. Say I have a copy of this file named something.html and a copy named something.php, the php one takes about 5 times longer to load than the html page. You can see 90% of the page loads and then it sticks with the loading bar nearly fininshed, waits a while and then pings to finished and the remaining parts of the site load (usually footer links etc).
This has me stumped, even has my hosts stumped. Would any one have any idea why this may happen? Something to do with the installation directory of PHP or location of php.ini?
This is on a Windows 2003 machine running IIS6, I have tested the same files on a Linux installation and its perfectly fine.
Before this thread happens, don't tell me to chmod the file to have execution privs. I want umask to work properly, with no seperarate chmod required.
For some reason, on every single system i've tested this on, linux, freebsd, vps, standalone server, fresh install of operating system, any time I test this, it ends up with the same issue.
Running `umask 000` should result in files created from that point on having a chmod of rwxrwxrwx. However, they always end up having a chmod of rw-rw-rw.
If I create a directory after setting the same umask setting, the directory ends up with rwxrwxrwx.
Code: root@bonkers[/usr/local/etc/php/umask] $ umask 000 root@bonkers[/usr/local/etc/php/umask] $ touch 000 root@bonkers[/usr/local/etc/php/umask] $ mkdir d0 root@bonkers[/usr/local/etc/php/umask] $ ls -la total 10 drwxrwxrwx 5 root wheel 512 Dec 6 03:31 . drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Dec 6 03:21 .. -rw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel 0 Dec 6 03:31 000 drwxrwxrwx 2 root wheel 512 Dec 6 03:21 d0
At times as I'm developing, due to some coding error in PHP on my part, particularly calling a COM object, the apache server crashes. I'm delighted that it recovers, but in so doing it always tries to rerun the query that crashed it, which just causes another crash, and so on. Is there some way of getting round this, so that it recovers but the problematic code is not rerun?
XP SP3 (still!) Apache/2.4.3 (Win32) mod_fcgid/2.3.7 PHP/5.4.9 Firefox (Aurora)
Details: Doing restart of Parallels Installer... File downloading products.inf3: 100% was finished. File downloading plesk.inf3: 10%..20%..30%..40%..50%..60%..70%..80%..90%..100% was finished. File downloading ppsmbe.inf3: 17%..26%..37%..47%..57%..78%..88%..100% was finished. File downloading sitebuilder.inf3: 22%..35%..48%..60%..73%..86%..100% was finished.
[code]....
ERROR: Currently installed version of product with ID 'plesk' is not available from download site anymore.Please upgrade to the next available product version to receive software updates.Seems like the RPM got damaged, but I already fixed that part, now when I put "install" I'm geting the following Installation started in background..Getting bootstrapper packages to installation list:
Following bootstrapper packages will be installed: (empty) ---------------- Getting packages to installation list: Following packages will be installed: (empty) ---------------- Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Patch for plesk 12.0.18 will not be installed since it is already applied.Error: You already have the latest version of product(s) and all selected components installed. Installation will not continue.HOWEVER the "mail" and mail server configuration no longer shows in "tools & settings".
I can't get access to a certain site. I always get the page with:
network time out - server at *** takes to long to respons. More people have noticed this and apparently it only happens to people with certain specific providers. And not all the time. Some times they DO get access eventy to they belong to the same ISP. So I guess an ISP isn't blocking access to it otherwise it would be permenantly/The site administrator insists that certain ISP's are blocking his site. He's hosting it on his own server. The domain belongs is registered at namecheap.com.
If an ISP is blocking this site (if that's possible?), that would lead to that 'network timeout' page wouldn't it?
What is the most likely reason for getting a timeout page anyway?
What are the maximum number of entries that can go in hosts.deny? Will the server bog down the more entries that are in there? How many is a safe, reasonable number?
I know there's a option in the WHM that says "The maximum each domain can send out per hour (0 is unlimited" and it affects all the accounts under the same server, but, Is there any possibility to configure the WHM/cPanel to give different values to each client?
I use APF and APF is working with iptables , when I define a large number of IPs in deny_hosts.rules or allow_hosts.rules and restart the APF , iptables begins to display errors after applying some number of rules , I have set SET_TRIM="0" in APF , so the number of APF rules is unlimited and the error is from iptables.
Is there any setting in iptables config files for maximum number of rules?
Is it unlimited and depends only on system available memory? O/S , ...?
how to set the restrictions of maximum recipients a singe email can be sent to. I found one customer sending an email to 1233 recipients at a time which is a large number enough to increase the queue on the server. I am running Cpanel/WHM. Is there some tweak to be done in Exim?
I would like to know what is the maximum number of Apache connections a Server can handle? Does this depends on the Config of the Server? Is it Possible for a server to handle more than 2500 Active Apache connections without timeout / connection failure / slowness?
I've setup MDaemon mail server on my local PC to send personal emails to Yahoo Groups.
Maximum recipients per message is set to 100 for the clients.
When there are more than 1 messages pending to be sent to yahoogroups.com, mdaemon creates a message to be sent to this domain and add 31 users in To (BCC) list and the message fails as it should, saying "too many recipients".
There should only be one recipient in To list, but I could not locate the setting where to set maximum recipients for outgoing email
I'm also searching mdaemon forums, but as i get quick response from WHT...
I went there for the low prices to startup my Shoutcast station. At $3 a month, it sounded too good to be true. I got my service, and the owner, seemed like a nice guy. He was very helpful, and was eager to help me get started. This was back in March. The first half of my stent there was great, however, in the last half, downtimes and even a data loss was getting on my nerves. I saw some really personal issues and arguments in the IRC server about the owner and staff, and even some back talk and really personal stuff that I wish I never had heard.
Because of the downtime, the owner did provide me with some free service and features. In these times, I was itching to leave, but the owner lured me back in with something better.
In this time, the service was 'okay', no real big complaints, I was even promoted to an IRCop, on the server.
Four things happened.
1) There was an incident in the chatroom with a regular joke we have done may times was taken really the wrong way. (I did not use my IRCop powers when this happened)
2) After a long outage (last night from 'this' post date), I was the only human on the irc server. In order for me to ask the owner what happened, I silenced a eggdrop bot by banning it from the main room. This was so I can get a new message notification when a real person enters the room. The bot posted every 2min, and it was at 2am in the morning.
3) I actually found a pretty big security hole in the control panel, the owner thanked me yesterday, and was furious the next.
4) because of the top three things, the owner basically got extremely mad and took away my IRCops.
Those 4 things basically were the last pieces of trash I could take. Yes, I forgot to unban the bot I mentioned in #2, but is that a good reason to get me out? Tonight, after a somewhat heated discussion with the owner, my account was instantly closed, all http/ftp pipes closed. I am very lucky I saw the owner start to fall into this cycle he seems to do, I had a full backup of the space I had.
In a nut shell, I would highly advise people NOT to use Maximum-Hosting. If you want low prices, frequent downtime, and the possibility your data could be gone in an instant, this is the host for you!
I can only hope no one else falls into the nightmare I have had to put up with for cheap hosting.
