I am getting these emails everyday. Two of them in fact, one after another.
------
Drive Warning: /dev/sda8 (/home) is 82% full
-----
Tried disabling notifications in Tweak Settings to no avail.
That apparently only affects end users.
I'm getting these emails for root.
Any way to disable it as it is annoying to receive them daily.
I just got this email today, don't know how to remove unused space in that drive or what to do exacly, please help in advice.
Code:
Drive Warning: /dev/sda2 (/usr) is 81% full
How can I disable the daily low space warning emails?
View 14 Replies View RelatedI have server with 2 hard disk 250gb for each and
I got this message a lot of time
Drive Warning: /dev/sda3 (/usr) is 86% full
how can I clean it?
and what sda3 does mean?
[root@tash /]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda5 7.9G 306M 7.2G 4% /
/dev/sdb1 230G 93M 218G 1% /backup
/dev/sda1 122M 18M 98M 16% /boot
none 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda8 201G 11G 180G 6% /home
/dev/sda3 7.9G 6.4G 1.1G 86% /usr
/dev/sda2 9.9G 2.0G 7.4G 22% /var
none 2.0G 3.4M 2.0G 1% /var/spool/exim
/usr/tmpDSK 2.7G 37M 2.5G 2% /tmp
/tmp 2.7G 37M 2.5G 2% /var/tmp
[root@tash /]#
What is SDA mean?
there are many from sda1 to sda8?
What is it? and why there many dir named SDA?
to delete same files can you help me how can I delete it without any problem?
Code:
df -h
Code:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 9.7G 7.4G 1.8G 82% /
/dev/sda5 109G 36G 68G 35% /home
/dev/sda2 15G 13G 1.6G 89% /var
/dev/sdb1 135G 95G 33G 75% /backup
none 2.5G 0 2.5G 0% /dev/shm
/usr/tmpDSK 485M 52M 408M 12% /tmp
/tmp 485M 52M 408M 12% /var/tmp
I have a cpanel/centos box with dual drives. I mounted the 2nd drive and wondering how I can go about using it as ftp space, even http space. Basically, in a sense using it as if it were a second "primary" drive so to speak.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow can I do to send email without the security warning?
I want the clients sending mails no longer have a security warning.
I tried with SSL port 465
I tried with port 587 TLS> Mail settings for the entire server> Enable Send Message
Warning: Unknown(): write failed: No space left on device (28) in Unknown on line 0
Warning: Unknown(): Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct (/tmp) in Unknown on line 0
I am getting this error on my site. I have googled this error and it is telling me it relates to a /temp/ folder of some form. I am currently on a hosting plan (not a dedicated server). Is there ANY way I can access to fix this problem either from my control panel or by code?
Redundancy or more hard drive space, what is your vote?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have a site hosted on a vds with Godaddy. For the past couple of months, every single day I get at least 12 emails coming though with the subject title -
'Status warning from ip-218-119-109-95.ip.secureserver.net'
each email reads something as follows -
System integrity monitor on ip-218-119-109-95.ip.secureserver.net has taken action in responce to an event. Recent event logs are enclosed below for your inspection. There has been 10 events today, if an average of 8 events is reached, e-mail alerts will be terminated for the duration of the day.
>
> - Events Summary:
> Total event count: 10
> Average event count: 3
>
> - Service Summary:
> HTTP [restarted - 8 events]
> DNS [online - 1 events]
> MYSQL [online - 1 events]
>
> - System Summary:
> No system modules enabled - edit conf.sim
>
Can anyone tell me what on earth these emails mean? I don't get much sense out of Godaddy when I ask, they just state it is a monitoring system in place. I really would like to know what all these emails refer to? is it a regular happening, or something to be worried about, or what the heck do they mean?
Would really appreciate if you don't be too technical in your answer as I'm not too familiar with a lot of hosting issues. (Also please note I have altered the ip address in the email details for privacy reasons).
Basically all i want to know is this something I should be worried about?
My server is gradually running out of space as my websites expand. I have a spare second drive - is it possible to reconfigure plesk to use this second drive ? I see I can use the plesk config tool - but looking at the documentation it moves all your sites over to the new drive which I don't want to do ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow can I disable cpanel from sending me this email about my server running low on space, still 5GB free. It gets annoying
Drive Space Critical on server.com
In our quest to stop 'some' of the spamming techniques, I was wondering if there is a way to disable user 'nobody' from sending emails on either a domain or account level - rather than server-wide?
Reason for asking is that I would like to allow 'nobody' emails to just a handfull of trusted clients that have never had problems.
1- i did Os Reload with new Hard drive for "home"
2- data "backups" drive lost
3- replaced the old home drive as "/old drive"
4- " /old drive " is now the secondry drive in my server and it has the all sites usres and evry thing
5- what i need , to trasfer, copy this sites from " /old drive " to "home"
but data center said
The /olddrive/home directory contains the contents that were previously in the /home directory. You can copy files from this directory to any other directory on your server.
The command to copy files in the UNIX environment is the "cp" command.
The user directories in /olddrive/home directory contain the web page files for the users. However, simply copying the contents over will not recreate the users or domain entries in DNS/httpd. If you wish these back you will need to recreate them manually or restore them from backups.
Primary drive (centos/cpanel) is corrupt
The server is displaying these errors when I tried to do an FSCK:
Bad inode IO
ext3-fs error (device(8,3)) IO Failure
I am having a new primary installed and old primary set as 2nd drive. I need to recover the cpanel domain accounts from this 2nd drive after I mount it with the method below:
mkdir /backup
mount /dev/sdb1 /backup
However, how do I actually recover these accounts in an automated process via whm? I've done this before with the same matter (corrupt primary drive, mount as 2nd, etc) but cannot exactly remember the proper steps.
I just purchased a brand new 10K 150GB drive. How can I take an exact copy of my current drive and transfer everything over to the new drive? I think I need to create a snapshop, or mirror it somehow.
What software will do this? I was told trueimage, but its very pricy, is there anything else?
I have a dedicated box and I started getting Input/output errors today.
I tried:
# fsck
fsck 1.40-WIP (14-Nov-2006)
e2fsck 1.40-WIP (14-Nov-2006)
/dev/hda2: recovering journal
fsck.ext3: unable to set superblock flags on /dev/hda2
then I tried:
# fsck -a -t ext3 /dev/hda2
fsck 1.40-WIP (14-Nov-2006)
/dev/hda2: recovering journal
fsck.ext3: unable to set superblock flags on /dev/hda2
My data is backed up, so was going to ask for a reimage, but is this an indication of bad hardware? Should I ask for a replacement drive? Is there anything else I should try on my own before going to the host?
im running out of space on one of my sites but i have more then plenty of data transfer.
Unfortunately my hosting packaged it weird where they provide not enough hd space. Im trying to figure out is there a way where i can use another server or hosting company that can provide space only and use their servers just for space?
i think amazon.com offered this but wasnt sure how exactly this works.
Apache 2.2.25 on windows 32
I have a ProxyPass that looks like
ProxyPass /Share Documents http://partner2/Shared Documents/
But Apache will not start with spaces. I tried
ProxyPass /Shared%20Documents http://partner2/Shared%20Documents/
Apache would start but the passthrough doesn't work. What do I need to do? I have several url's with spaces.
which case is more preferred: a shared web hosting service with unlimited space/bandwidth, or a dedicated one with limited space/bandwidth?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a Win2K3 server which has 2 hard drives. I was considering backup options and I thought that I might try mirroring Drive A ==> Drive B. I would think that, then, if Drive A has a hardware failure, I could simply switch Drive B into the Primary slot (A) and the server would continue to hum along as nothing has happened. This would reduce the downtime, hopefully.
I have 3 questions.
1. Is this idea practical (will it work)?
2. What is a good software program to use fto handle the mirroring?
3. Any considerations, warnings, technical advice in regard to this method?
Since Jan 07, one of our servers has been sending thousands of emails to ne.jp hosts.
Eg from logs:
Code:
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FY9ME016602: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:02, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYB7d016734: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FY9A4016629: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:02, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FY9la016616: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:02, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYCkO016807: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:36:58, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYB7B016730: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYCO0016757: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:36:59, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYDjq016819: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:36:58, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYBhL016751: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYDPw016811: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:36:58, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
We're absolutely unable to track or find out who is sending it or how to stop this.
So I'm wondering if it is possible to prevent sendmail from sending to:
lsean.ezweb.ne.jp, OR
docomo.ne.jp, OR
softbank.ne.jp
/var/mail/vhostswww logs are not showing helpful info at all. Eg:
Code:
--l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian--
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: hanako.@docomo.ne.jp
Subject:
To: a_j.n-y_bluespider-tattoo@softbank.ne.jp
Message-Id: <200709041410.l84EA0Fh007971@debian>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l84EA0Fh007971;
Received: (from vhostswww@localhost)
for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id l84EA0jk007973
Received: from debian (localhost [127.0.0.1])
Return-Path:
Content-Type: text/rfc822-headers
--l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:16 +0200
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Invalid recipient:
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx.softbank.ne.jp
Status: 5.1.1
Action: failed
Final-Recipient: RFC822; a_j.n-y_bluespider-tattoo@softbank.ne.jp
Arrival-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
Reporting-MTA: dns; debian
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
--l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian
<<< 503 No recipients specified
550 5.1.1 ... User unknown
<<< 550 Invalid recipient:
>>> DATA
... while talking to mx.softbank.ne.jp.:
----- Transcript of session follows -----
(reason: 550 Invalid recipient: )
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
from localhost [127.0.0.1]
The original message was received at Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
--l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian
This is a MIME-encapsulated message
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
boundary="l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian"
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:
Message-Id: <200709041642.l84GRnX5029819@debian>
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:17 +0200
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:17 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) id l84GRnX5029819;
Received: from localhost (localhost)
Return-Path:
From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Sep 4 18:42:17 2007
--l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian--
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: hanako.@docomo.ne.jp
Subject:
To: a_j.n-y_bluespider-tattoo@softbank.ne.jp
Message-Id: <200709041411.l84EB8CS011861@debian>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:08 +0200
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:08 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l84EB8CS011861;
Received: (from vhostswww@localhost)
for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:09 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id l84EB8f6011862
Received: from debian (localhost [127.0.0.1])
Return-Path:
Content-Type: text/rfc822-headers
--l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:15 +0200
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Invalid recipient:
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx.softbank.ne.jp
Status: 5.1.1
Action: failed
Final-Recipient: RFC822; a_j.n-y_bluespider-tattoo@softbank.ne.jp
Arrival-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:09 +0200
Reporting-MTA: dns; debian
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
--l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian
<<< 503 No recipients specified
550 5.1.1 ... User unknown
<<< 550 Invalid recipient:
>>> DATA
... while talking to mx.softbank.ne.jp.:
----- Transcript of session follows -----
(reason: 550 Invalid recipient: )
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
from localhost [127.0.0.1]
The original message was received at Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:09 +0200
--l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian
This is a MIME-encapsulated message
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
boundary="l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian"
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:
Message-Id: <200709041642.l84GRnX4029819@debian>
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:15 +0200
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:15 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) id l84GRnX4029819;
Received: from localhost (localhost)
Return-Path:
From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Sep 4 18:42:15 2007
--l84GRnX3029819.1188924134/debian--
How would I solve this problem as it's making our server load skyhigh 24/7.
Additional info about system:
> Debian Linux, latest kernel
> Sendmail (we've tried postfix, exim, with same results)
> Non cPanel system.
A while ago i had signed up with the affiliate program of 3ix.com webhosting.
After a few months some commisiions had been confirmed insid their panel, when all of a sudden further access had been denied.
Since two months they keep on mailing lies such as the affilate manager will respond, we are working on it etc.
But now they no longer respond and it seems, that 3ix.com will be vanishing soon with more and more complaints arriving at the FBI internet fraud department.
Certainly not a host, that deserves any trust.
dnsreport(.com) displays this warning for my domain:
Quote:
WARNING: Your SOA (Start of Authority) record states that your master (primary) name server is: server1.[domain].com.. However, that server is not listed at the parent servers as one of your NS records! This is legal, but you should be sure that you know what you are doing.
Although I've created an SOA in my Windows DNS Console. Whats it then?
Also, it says:
Quote:
ERROR: I couldn't find any MX records for [domain].com. If you want to receive E-mail on this domain, you should have MX record(s). Without any MX records, mailservers should attempt to deliver mail to the A record for [domain].com. I can't continue in a case like this, so I'm assuming you don't receive mail on this domain.
Whereas I've already created an MX record - mail.[domain].com
around in cpanel and noticed a change in the Apache Update menu.
Also noticed this popup at the top of Easy::Apache v3.2.0 Build 3473
Quote:
Warning (VZ): You are only only guaranteed 496 Megabytes of ram! 512 Megabytes is recommended. ! Warning (VZ): You are only only guaranteed 227 Megabytes of ram when the system is out of ram! 512 Megabytes is recommended. ! Pre allocation testing was successfully able to allocate 90MB ! Ouput from '/bin/sh -c "ulimit -a"': core file size (blocks, -c) 262144 data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited file size (blocks, -f) unlimited max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 32 max memory size (kbytes, -m) 262144 open files (-n) 1024 pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8 stack size (kbytes, -s) unlimited cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited max user processes (-u) 71680 virtual memory (kbytes, -v) 262144
Currently using a 512MB VPS with CentOS
Anything is should be concerned about or am i not getting my full 512Mb VPS as i should be?
My opinion: Do NOT EVEN CONSIDER using HOSTGATOR.
My experience:
I signed up for their hosting on Sunday morning and completed payment for the first month using hostgators online payment system and paypal.
The payment was accepted and confirmed. An email was sent some time later confirming the account had been set up.
The email specified a user ID for cpanel as well as nameservers which I used to point two of my domains at the new hostgator account.
I used cpanel and FTP to set up the add-on domain, create some email accounts and upload content for the two domains (the same content as on the old servers which should now be shown k-free.co.uk and offshoreharry.com).
All appeared to work fine with no problems. I could use outlook to access email and the web sites were available on the new server (the old server was down).
A day and a half later, I WAS HORRIFIED TO SEE
- the emails accounts could not be accessed
- the cpanel user did not work
- Hostgator did not email me or attempt to contact me in any way to tell me there was an issue. (they had my valid mobile phone number - there are no unidentified calls in the period concerned).
- the web sites that had been pointed at hoistgator were showing a suspended message and spammy hostgator context ads. My non-spam mostly non-ads content had been uploaded to the hostgator account.
One of those domains is freeware software on a site with ZERO ADS that has never been moneterised and sometimes gets 100's of uniques a day.
HOSTGATOR WAS STEALING TRAFFIC FROM MY ad free unmonetized site and showing a nasty spammy ad page.
Not only was I rather angry but also amazed that any company would ever do this. Just think how you would feel if all your sites - pages were hijacked and showing some of the nasty ad pages.
My opinion: Do NOT EVEN CONSIDER using HOSTGATOR.
Checking my yahoo email, there was no email from hostgator saying my account had been suspended (if I hadn't checked it they would have continued stealing the traffic until I noticed).
The only email from hostgator was a request for a copy of my passport or utility bill! I am left wondering if they are really a front for an identity theft scam? I am rather unhappy that they have even my name - address - tel no - paypal email.
I obviously immediately changed the nameservers on the two domains back to the old servers. But since nameserver changes take upto 72 hours to fully propogator, hostgator could still be stealing some of my traffic now. The two sites contain nothing that any T+C I have ever seen would have any reason whatsoever to see as a problem. The two sites are k-free.co.uk and offshoreharry.com for anyone here who wishes to verify this claim.
Hostgator COULD be showing my content instead of their spammy ads - I uploaded it.
Hostgator was mentioned by a few on here and I thought them to be a big company who have a reputation to protect. Are you guys really comfortable with a company who behaves like this. Will they suddenly suspend your sites tomorrow and steal your traffic until you happen to notice?
I have requested to them that they provide access TO MY PERSONAL AND BUSINESS EMAILS on the email accounts I set up. I would also like any log data that was collected. I will report back here what the response to that (politely worded) request is. Giving me access to any email and log data that they have effectively kidnapped-stolen hardly makes amends for the wrong they have already done. Like any other victim of a common thief I may just have to accept that I lost something and will not see it again.
Additionally, search engine robots may have visited the sites and got 404s, any users who dropped by will certainly not be back, the damage caused is ongoing and difficult to fully quantify.
Hostgator did not email me or attempt to contact me (they had my valid mobile phone number). They did not tell me why the account was suspended and the trafic STOLEN. I have had web sites for 4-5 years and have never been involved in anything remotely dubious on the web. You can judge for yourself if there is any reason for them to do this [sites offshoreharry.com, k-free.co.uk]. I had sent at most 10 emails whilst testing the 3 or 4 email accounts I was creating.
Obviously I will never use hostgator or any related company.
My opinion: Do NOT EVEN CONSIDER using HOSTGATOR ... EVER.