tried to download files from http links to my ftp server. i looked all over the forums but could not find any services. google spitted out this one. [url]Well, it really does help to upload http links to an ftp server and move files from one ftp server to another. does anyone know other services or free scripts that help to do this?
Why is it that you can upload large file size when you are using FTP, but you cant upload large file size beyond the max when you are using browser to upload?
i have a problem trying to upload files to a server, when i try and upload a file, (.htm) i get a message: file already exists (even though it doesn't), which if i then say to overwrite, it creates an empty file of 0mb, (with the name of the file i am trying to upload).
i don't know a great deal about web servers - are there any web server settings which may be causing this.
I am being hacked & I don't know how they are getting files on my server. They are doing it on two of my domains, I suspended one and then they got it on the other. My FTP access log does not show anything suspicious..
Can someone volunteer (using the word "volunteer" because the one who agrees to help can be getting some really beginner level questions) to help me on uploading my website to a web server. The thing is i have designed and optimized (seo) some websites but i never had an experience of uploading a website on webserver (in other words launching it). I have this simple webpage and a free hosting service (Frihost) ... once i learn how to upload a webpage and get it running online .. i will make changes in the webpage and go for some paid hosting service. So can someone guide me at this? Specially the one who has hosted some page at Frihost.
I have a Dating Portal >>> Dating Sites but HTML file isn't uploading on my server "site5.com" Except HTML file every file is uploading there but HTML isn't
i have free hosting server and a rule to upload 3MB file max. it works for FTP, but somehow it doesn't work for php. It seems for php the limit on my server is 100MB (no idea why)
i use following directives to limit file size in php.ini :
; Maximum size of POST data that PHP will accept. post_max_size = 4M
(4 just for some margin )
; Maximum allowed size for uploaded files. upload_max_filesize = 3M
and i still can find 100MB files on disk. this is part of log file from apache from the account that uploaded it to me:
HTTP/1.1" 302 188 [url] "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pl; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3"
as the effect of this (at least i think so), there was 100MB file in his home dir.
any idea how can he POST such big files even with those two directives?
i have also set LimitRequestBody to 5194304 and LimitXMLRequestBody to 5194304 in apache2.conf which also should stop files being POSTED as big as 100MB.
i have php 4.4.4-9, Linux Debian, apache 2.2.3 working in worker mpm, and php as fastcgi.
P.S. i removed server info like IP, dir and address to not show specifics about my server in public, i put [] there.
When I go through my AWStats under "Links from an external page (other web sites except search engines)" I see several domains that have linked to me. When I visit these sites they are generally porn and drug sites that do not contain a link. Some of the sites redirect you to other sites. When you look up these domain names they are all from Russia.
These sites account for mulitple hits as high as +14.5%. These sites do not represent the content on my sites.
My questions are.
How do I stop this? I have found banning IP addresses does nothing.
My company hosts our primary website on a Linux box. We link to a third party for term life quotes. The quoting server is going down this weekend and I need to change the links to their page to one on our site. Unfortunately, our content management server is also down while we re-organized our network.
I have SSH access to the live server. Can someone tell me how to search for a specific href in files under the document root and automagically change them all? It would save me the time of finding each one and changing it by hand.
have a few different list of links in my link section for eg one page i give people links to about 20 or so games company where they can buy from. another has a small list of forums people can join eg, another list of places that i shop at.i do not have any reciprocal links with any of them and only included them cos i thought it would be handy for my readers. now can i leave the links or should i take it all off because all these external links would not help in my pr? there seems to be so many conflicting opinions
how many external links can you have in a page before it's bad for you.
idea to just use robots.txt on all these pages to be on the safe side?
my friend's server is being attacked, the http processes shoots up causing the server load to go above 200 in minutes of starting httpd which causes server to die.
this is how the apache web server's access_log would log a normal http request; ------------------------------------------------------ "xx.xxx.xx.xx - - [01/Jun/2007:22:13:21] "GET /folder/name.gif HTTP/1.1" 200 877 [url]"Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1)" ------------------------------------------------------
Today when the http load increased we saw hundreds of following requests; ------------------------------------------------------ "xx.xxx.xx.xx - - [01/Jun/2007:22:13:21] "GET /? HTTP/1.1" 200 16305 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)" ------------------------------------------------------
You see the difference between a legitimate http access log entry and the above one is that the legitimate one shows the filename(GET /folder/name.gif) and domain name being requested whereas the second one shows ("GET /?")
Above requests continously originate from 30 to 40 different ip addresses. Most of them russian ips, and many form US and canada to.
When i do a grep "GET /?" in access log there are thousands of these which started just today.
I cannot block each ips because i feel they have hundreds of IPs to initiate these requests from.
I am trying to install a FTP Server in my computer so that I can simply login into my own computer to grab important files at work... since carrying laptop and loosing flash drives are becoming annoying .
In my home computer I have Linksys Router, and Verizon as my ISP (blocks port 80, 21 I believe).
Since Verizon blocks those ports the configuration has become a nightmare.
Using BulletProof FTP Server I made the FTP Server listen to port 5000. And in my router's forwarding section I opened the port 5000, and made it listen to 192.168.1.100 (Port Range Forwarding, TCP UDP both).
I did the same for my Apache server and made it to work with port 443.
When I access [url] the web server loads up fine.
But when I try [url] it doesn't load up, where 1.2.3.4 is my IP.
When I visit just my IP in the web browser, it loads up the Router Configuration page.
And the FTP server doesn't connect when I try with the
I have an SSL cert installed to have a secure commerce area. Some of the pages have external links to non-secure sites like say [url]The padlock icon breaks and warns that there's unauthorized content. The hosting provider says it's because the external links need to be https links. Obviously that can't be done to a non-secure external site.
So the question is: do external http links break security on a secure https page? If so, is there a work around other than removing external links?
I'm creating a site similar to slickdeals & bensbargains and I'm trying to find a script that I can integrate into my text editor (tinymce.moxicode) that will create a tiny url as well as the redirect page automatically using php & mysql.
Looking at the following mouseover link from slickdeals:
slickdeals dot net/?pno=6999&lno=1&afscr=1
where it always starts with slickdeals dot net/
?pno=6999 each deal added gets a +1 to this number. The next deal would be 7000.
&lno=1 each link within a particular deal. Where the first link to the deal is lno=1, the next link (rebate) would be lno=2, etc.
&afscr=1 I'm not sure what this is for, I moused over a bunch of their links and they are all =1.
But the bottom line effect is that when you click on one of their links, it brings you momentarily to a blank page and then bestbuy dot com/etc/etc/etc comes up. The user never sees the funky affiliate link.
The best I've found so far is gentlesource dot com/short-url-script/
If i put domain.com on uptime checker,and downtime is detected,downtime will be reported if dns is down or if http server is down.So question is what i need to do to see what exactly went down?For network uptime i can ping ip adress,but for these two i really don't know.
I need to find out what would be the best software to run an image website for one of my clients, there is only one domain so I've considered using LiteSpeed Standard (Free)... What server do you think would be the best?
All I need is PHP support for the image viewer software.
I've setup a dedicated server that is currently running with a domain bound to it. However this time I want to setup a centos 5.1 + latest apache 2 + bind 9 server that can only be connected to by IP address and doesn't have a domain name. So what do I need to modify in the below files to do so:
First of all will I even need bind at all? I already have it setup and (mis-)configured but I guess if I don't need it I can just take if off of autostart and stop the process "named".
zone "server.domain.com" { type master; file "server.domain.com.db"; }; I don't even want the zone have domain.com in its name but that's just there so I could show you how I'd include server.domain.com.db.
server.domain.com.db
$TTL 14400 @ IN SOA ns1.domain.com. root.server.domain.com. ( 2007052503 14400 3600 1209600 86400 )
server.domain.com. 14400 IN NS ns1.domain.com. server.domain.com. 14400 IN NS ns2.domain.com.
localhost 14400 IN A 127.0.0.1 www 14400 IN A 78.129.174.164 I'm not sure what to do about those references to domain.com here, they shouldn't be needed but without them I don't know what to put here. ^^ Obviously I can't use those nameservers...
resolv.conf
nameserver 127.0.0.1 nameserver 78.129.143.155 nameserver 87.117.198.200 nameserver 87.117.196.200 The only thing missing from this file is "search domain.com" at the top, is that needed even though I won't really have any domains used by this server?
/etc/hosts:
# Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail ....
SO the last few months I been trying like crazy to tweak Apache or find a better http setup such as running lighttpd with Apache, etc. I have been frustrated by the way Apache easily fork bombs under any decent load or dos attack. You get about 100 bots all making 30+ connections a piece on Apache and it kills it.
Bot kids have adapted to ddos protection and connection flooding banning by sending low bandwidth attacks that do not make enough connections to get banned if you do have protection, its real low bandwidth incoming but is like a massive vampire attack outgoing. And it destroys Apache no matter what you do, what modules you have, etc. You basically have to go in and manually ban or set your connection tracking limit down to where it starts banning regular users too.
So I seen on here somewhere someone recommending litespeed to someone so I went and checked it out and was amazed by the performance. I installed the trial enterprise in a p4 server I been having problems out of lately crashing all because a busy site and I installed it in my main server.
The only thing I needed to do was compile my own php5 for it, which is real easy via their wiki instruction. After a few snags here in there I finally got it working tip top on both servers, both of which are cpanel.
So with the p4 that was always crashing and keeping hi load, We would end up having to remote reboot that box almost once a week not due to any misconfiguration or wrong setup, just couldnt take all that Apache usage and would die. We instantly noticed a difference with litespeed. The average load used to be about 1-2 always, with litespeed the average stayed about ..2 even under heavy traffic. So this was a big improvement and we have not had to reboot that box since.
My main server which I take my high risk clients on, core2duo 2.4. I thought there for a Lil bit the sites were starting to outgrow the server as its average load always was around 1 which was fairly acceptable seeing the traffic it gets so normal for Apache.
During the low bandwidth ddos attacks I would have to go in and manually ban as well as setting connection limit way down just to keep it from lagging, most of the time it still did. So I was really wanting to do something for this server to optimize http without upgrading, because it seems most of your hardware upgrades are to suit Apache anyway.
So I installed litespeed on my main server, ran into a few snags here and there but eventually got it under control. Just the last few days I got to see it put to the test.
I took on a client who was being extorted by a ddoser who recently got him kicked off his previous host. SO as soon as dns resolves here comes the crapstorm. A low bandwidth http attack, a lot got by ddos firewall on the network level which these are hard to stop because they are so similar to a legit user.
So I started getting hundreds of csf connection tracking blocked emails, was checking the site periodically and it loaded fine. So I logged in the box, looked at the load.
Was at .24. When I done netstat command there was hundreds of syns coming in and about 250 ips all connected about 50 times, this would normally kill Apache no matter what CPU/ram and all that you have. So I set connection tracking down to a reasonable level, 60 connections and I figured I would just let them get themselves banned. Looking in the live stats in the litespeed admin panel which is real cool BTW. I was seeing about 400 requests a second. This was eating a Lil bandwidth, all outgoing as that is how the attack works like a massive vamp attack. So about 2000 connection tracking emails later finally gets em all banned. The entire time the load on that box never even got to 1!
So im pretty much amazed how fast and light this http server is. And especially how well it handles dos. I about know for a fact even if you was on a non protected network it could handle as much http as your pipe will give it, and do all this at a low resource load.
This will end up saving me money on hardware upgrades in the future as well. Long review, long story, but I been so amazed by this http server I had to make a review on it. Im sure some geniouses will try to say "If you do this and that with apache you can make it just as good" But check it out for yourselves and see.
There seems to be some problem with my server, none of the websites hosted on my server are accessible, the http requests either return a blank page or a page with a red quare on the upper left hand corner.
I am not sure if this is some kind of infection or DNS problem or a problem with memory apache is taking up as i have thousands of virtualhost entries in my access log accumulated over the years out of which only a few 100 websites i am serving presently, but never deleted the non-exitent virtualhost blocks.
At times the websites are opening but most of the times they are not. And when they do not open my http requets are not logged in apacha access log.
Even the customers have reported the same problem.
Also, just four days back i had a strange issue where all http requests to my server would take me to [url].
I can SSH to server, and everything else is working fine.
I'm using IIS v5.1 on WinXP SP1 and I encountered this error (Page cannot be displayed.....HTTP 500 - internal server error) all of a sudden. now, i've been using my Web server with no hitches, but now I can't open any pages on the server that run server side scripts so i reinstalled it and still get the same "Page cannot be displayed" or I get part of the source code for the server side script. Pinging the server shows that its ok, it replies. and regular pages with no scripts still run with the http protocol in the address. Any ideas on how to get past this problem?
its possible to do a P2V migration of a Apache http server 2.2
Present environment:
Windows 2003 Apache http server 2.0.63
There are 2 webservers (running Apache) for load balancing. The backend server runs an application which uses an oracle database. Is a P2V migration of the web servers possible?
One of the machines we have at LW crashed 2 weeks ago.
we use relative links for pages and images throughout our site, but now in the new machine, every relative link request gets sent to HTTPS instead of a regular HTTP request.
I installed apache, mysql, php on my windows vista laptop, and want to test http downloading. This means when selecting a file (for example, contact.php) from a page, and then click download, it will be downloaded to my desktop.
Do we need to install any other softwares to do that?
I have a Linux server running some reasonable setups:
Opteron 180, 4 GB RAM, running 8x 36gb 15k scsi with hardware raid 10 -- this is one of the servers from WebNX advertised here not long ago
Running CentOS 4(?), Apache2/MySql 4/PHP5.2, the normal stuff.
I have only one main site on the server, which runs a pretty old PostNuke CMS in Chinese (0.7.2.3 Phoenix) + PNphpBB2 + Gallery 1.5.7 (all integrated into PostNuke). This site is pretty light in "human" traffic, getting about 20K hits per day.
Now, the problem I have noticed with this site, is related to the many MP3 files stored in the Gallery albums. There are lots of HTTP requests to these files, most maybe from Chinese search engine bots (judging from IP), that slows the server to a crawl and even crashes Apache. This happens in the late hours here when it's day time in China. As a matter of fact I just did a reboot, and in 5 minutes there are more than 1000 HTTP requests to MP3 files resulting in a traffic of 2.1+ Gb. So within minutes, the server is brought to its knees again and I can't even get the "apache status" from CPanel now: "Unable to retrieve apache status".
The company that manages the server for me said there's no security problem here. We have installed an Apache extension to limit the number of simultaneous requests to media files to 1. However that doesn't seem to help.
I have an Xitami server and am migrating to apache httpd. I have the regular server working fine. I tried configuring ssl, but no requests are coming through. I know 443 is open on the router because it works fine under Xitami. I checked the logs and it si starting fine. I am attaching my httpd.conf and the startup log. If I try to access the website using https, it just times out and nothing goes in the log file. I replaced my domain with domain.com. I have tried many different examples, but cannot get it to work and am not sure what to do.