its possible to do a P2V migration of a Apache http server 2.2
Present environment:
Windows 2003
Apache http server 2.0.63
There are 2 webservers (running Apache) for load balancing. The backend server runs an application which uses an oracle database. Is a P2V migration of the web servers possible?
I installed apache, mysql, php on my windows vista laptop, and want to test http downloading. This means when selecting a file (for example, contact.php) from a page, and then click download, it will be downloaded to my desktop.
Do we need to install any other softwares to do that?
I have an Xitami server and am migrating to apache httpd. I have the regular server working fine. I tried configuring ssl, but no requests are coming through. I know 443 is open on the router because it works fine under Xitami. I checked the logs and it si starting fine. I am attaching my httpd.conf and the startup log. If I try to access the website using https, it just times out and nothing goes in the log file. I replaced my domain with domain.com. I have tried many different examples, but cannot get it to work and am not sure what to do.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to set up password protection on an Apache HTTP server, and it's not working.
First, the environment: Apache 2.4.4 installed with XAMPP Control Panel 3.2.1 under Windows 7 Professional.
http.config says "AllowOverride All."
The .htaccess file in the protected directory says:
Code:
htpasswd -c .htpasswd samples
htpasswd prompted me for the password twice, and I entered it twice. When it quit I had a file named .htpasswd in the subsidy directory. I typed it and its contents looked correct according to the examples I've seen.
Then I restarted Apache and tried to load a page from the directory. The browser simply prompted me for the username and password over and over.
The Apache error log says, "AH01617: user samples: authentication failure for "/subsidy/filename.html": Password Mismatch."
I deleted the .htpasswd file and ran htpasswd again, specifying a different (very simple) password. I also confirmed that caps lock was not on both before and after. I restarted the server, tried to load a page, and got the same problem.
Apache seems to think I'm entering the wrong password, but that seems impossible when I've just defined it myself -- and I've tried twice, intentionally choosing a very simple password the second time. If the message means what it says, the cause must be something very different from the obvious one.
I'm running Apache 2.4.7 on a RHEL 6.4 server. I'm using the Oracle WebLogic Proxy Plugin ver 12.c to connect to a back end server.What's happening is that Apache answers URL.. and proxies the request via the WebLogic Proxy Plugin to internal.blah.com. Unfortunately, the downstream system encounters a problem and issues an http 302 redirect to internal.blah.com/whathappened. I would like to have Apache intercept this http 302 and redirect the client to URL...
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am tried to integrate Apache HTTP server and JBoss app server 7 with mod_jk module plugin in Apache.I have two instances of Jboss running and Apache server sends requests to them.I have added following code in "httpd.conf" of Apache:
Code:
LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so
LoadModule proxy_connect_module modules/mod_proxy_connect.so
LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so
JkWorkersFile "D:/Program Files/Apache Group/Apache2/conf/workers.properties"
JkShmFile "D:/Program Files/Apache Group/Apache2/logs/mod_jk.shm"
JkLogFile "D:/Program Files/Apache Group/Apache2/logs/mod_jk.log"
[Code] ....
But, though I have configured this way, when my worker1 goes down,Apache is not sending requests to worker2 and I get "Service Temporarily Unavailable" message.
My Linux Server's Http Daemon (Apache) would stop serving websites ever so often, as soon as apache is restarted the error fixes iteself only to resurface within few hours.
The apache process would still be running i.e. apache does not die but no websites hosted on my server would be accessible from browser. And when this happens the apache logs do not log any http requests.
Instead when this happens all http requests to my server would be redirected to some weird Trojan website and my Norton Antivirus would show an Alert/Warning, for example;
"Browser exploit at www.xxx.xxx was blocked"
Risk Name: MSIE WebViewFolderIcon ActiveX Control BO
or another error like;
"Auto-Protect has detected Trojan.Fakeavalert".
At first i thought the problem could be with my Laptop/ISP so i logged on to the server via SSH and opened try to open a website using command line "lynx mywebsite.com" and it shows following error;
"Alert!: HTTP/1.0 503 Service Unavailable".
Now if i assume my laptop were to be infected, then as soon as i restart my apache and visit mywebsite.com eveything returns to normal with no such warnings. Why do i see those norton error messages only when apache is down with 503, and when apache is down with 503 how come the http requests always get redirected to some suspicious websites and nothing gets logged in apache error log?
I think my server is being attacked causing http to get unresponsive and thereafter http requests to my server are redirected to some malicious website, is this correct?
Also, i suspect this is a php script exploit as some customers have reported that google have blocked their website due to security reasons, i found <iframe> tage inserted in some php pages which i fixed.
Also, another thinh i noticed;
when apache responds with the 503 it is referencing PHP 5.1.4 in the header response:
[root@]# curl -I xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (my server ip)
HTTP/1.0 503 Service Unavailable
Server: Apache
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.1.4
Retry-After: 20
I am running PHP 4.3.9m why does apache responds with PHP 5.1.4 when this 503 error surfaces?
Also, since my apache was dowan with 503 error a customer mailed in today saying;
"It seems that my site www.xxxx.com is regularly down, and the winlogon virus is involved."
I suspect this is again due to the fact that http requests start getting redirected?
I am 3 days new to figuring out how to get Perl scripts to run on my Windows XP box. I downloaded and installed the Apache installation file "httpd-2.0.65-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8y.msi" and the "strawberry-perl-5.18.2.1-32bit.msi" from the perl.org site in hopes that I could get a feedback form to work for a web site that I am working on.
Out of the many pages that I have viewed online of how to configure the Apache Server, nothing has given any favorable results with their explanations.
My last attempt was [URL] ..... where I could not get the example to work. I did the changes to the Apache file "Edit the Apache httpd.conf Configuration File" fairly easily but I must be having problems with the test.pl because I can't get it to work.
I used a different version of Perl (Strawbery from perl.org because it installed without giving me an error pop up after installation) and after copy pasting the script, in an attempt to get it working, I ended up changing it in hopes that I could get it working, shown below.
#!/strawberry/bin/perl.exe
print "Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
";
print "<phtml>";
print "<body>";
print "Test Page";
print "</body>";
print "</html>";
This is what the site says to create the program with:
#!/perl/bin/perl
print "Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
";
print "<phtml>";
print "<body>";
print "Test Page";
print "</body>";
print "</html>";
where I assumed that "#!" meant the "C:" drive and substituted the first "/perl" with the folder the Strawbery Perl had installed itself to and left the second "/perl" in the first line thinking that it was referring to the executable in the "C:strawberryperlbin" folder.
This is the error I get when trying to get the script to run when typing "localhost/test.pl" in the address bar.
"Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
........"
Know how I can change the title of this post to read "Configuring Apache HTTP Server 2.0 to run Perl in Windows"?
Server Version: Apache/2.2.22 (Unix)
On our production service, we've been getting numerous malformed POST requests to some of our CGI scripts that are showing up as 500 errors in our logs. They are malformed in the sense that the actual content length doesn't match the Content-Length specified in the request.
Here's the most trivial example I can come up with that reproduces the problem for us:
POST /some_valid_alias HTTP/1.1
Host: example.org
User-Agent: Arbitrary/1.0
Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=---------------------------41184676334
Content-Length: 769
-----------------------------41184676334
In addition to the 500 error in the access log, we see the corresponding error in the error log:
(70014)End of file found: Error reading request entity data
Based on the nature of the POST request and the error response, it does appear that Apache is doing the right thing here.
The POST never actually makes it as far as the script being targeted (/some_valid_alias in the above example); in other words, Apache returns 500 to the client, writes the error to the error log and never executes the script.
Is there a way to capture/avoid internal Apache errors like 70014, and return some other HTTP status besides 500 (like 403)? It's particularly annoying in our case, because our server sends us an email for all 500 errors.
So far, our best "defense" against these 500 errors is to disallow POST for these aliases, which normally just ignore the POST data anyway (when the request is not malformed):
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^POST$
RewriteRule ^/(some_valid_alias)(.*)$ $1$2 [R]
But this won't work for all our scripts, because in some cases we do want to permit POST.
I am currently running a server on Apache, with PHP and MySQL addons installed. However,
I would now like to install Plesk and run all websites from its administration interface. How would this be done?
I have asked SW Soft regarding this issue, and I got this response:
Quote:
It is possible to migrate from one of the platforms listed in the Guide or from IIS.
Unfortunately, migration from an Apache server is no possible.
I find this hard to believe. Is there anyone who can confirm this before I buy a copy of Plesk, which according to SW Soft would not work with my current server...
Also, if they are wrong, how should this be done? I have searched for an answer to this, but I have not come up with anything, maybe because of wrong search terms.
Someone seems to be flooding our HTTP server somehow. We use the latest version of Apache on Windows.
Is there any Windows modules that can filter the total amount of IP connections, or something built into Windows that could filter this?
I'm in the process of trying to pin down a couple errors I've been running into, and after installing and configuring SSL I have occasionally been receiving the following error:
View 2 Replies View RelatedSuddenly on a particular website (possibly following an easyapache php minor version update) if I specify a folder rather than a specific file I get a 503 response.
If I do the same on https it's ok. But http always gets a 503.
If I specify a file it's fine, but the folder always hits a 503.
I have removed the htaccess file and php.ini to rule that out and indeed they weren't factors - it seems like it goes wrong before reading the htaccess file.
I am trying to migrate a VPS with:
- Plesk 12 (v12.0.18 Update #40) and
- Linux CentOS 6.6 (v2.6.32-504.12.2.el6.x86_64)
to another VPS with:
- Plesk 12 (v12.0.18_build1200140606.15) and
- Linux CentOS 6.6 (v2.6.32-504.12.2.el6.x86_64)
I tried to do the following:
- Tools & Settings / Tools & Resources / Migration & Transfer Manager / Start New Migration
- Data source: Transfer data from another server
- Transfer the following data / Migrate the whole server
Following error/warrning message is recieved then:The following Apache modules are disabled on the destination server: sysenv. Please enable these modules to prevent possible problems.
I have two domains that are sharing one IP address. One site is meissenation.com and the other is mifbody.com.
My httpd.conf file looks like this: ...
Does anyone know if there is an Apache directive where you can have Apache call a script on HTTP PUTs to a specific location and also for HTTP GETs?
View 0 Replies View RelatedI keep hearing that redirecting from http to https is not very secure [non-SSL to SSL]. Among other reasons, one reason is that the browser may continue to think it is communicating with non secure server and may not encrypt the data. Is it true? I hope not, I am using the following -
<VirtualHost 12.34.567.89:80>
ServerName www.mysite1234.com:80
Redirect / https://www.mysite1234.com/
</VirtualHost>
I made the idiotic move of not making a backup of the default configs and now I can't access my http website externally. ssl works fine, but I need http to work too.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI was trying to set up a JBoss cluster with apache httpd mod cluster in windows.I was able to start the apache using the command 'httpd. exe'. But when I tried to access it using localhost:6666/mod_cluster_manager , the page was not accessible.I have the entry 127.0.0.1 localhost in my hosts file.
The http.conf contains lines as given below:
# MOD_CLUSTER_ADDS
# Adjust to you hostname and subnet.
<IfModule manager_module>
Listen 127.0.0.1:6666
ManagerBalancerName mycluster
<VirtualHost 127.0.0.1:6666>
[code]....
I'm using a turnkey image for smallmachineforum system, installed on amazon aws instance.
In the default configuration I can't use the http version of the site, only the https.
It does not seem to be a network issue, a telnet on port 80 opens.
The server is apache version 2.2.22, on a Debian 3.2.57-3+deb7u2 x86_64
I am trying to find out if redirecting an https URL to an http URL will still provide the security of the original https? Should the page information for the redirected http page show it as being unencrypted or shouldn't it have the same encryption as the original https?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI moved a tomatocart website with its database, www-root. + keeping all its file and folder permissions.The username on the new server is the same, same id same name same permissions ect. The database name is the same the passwords are the same, location of www-root server same.
The website works it fetches and stores in the mysql database.At the old server with the same tomatocart website you could browse to example domain. ex/1-catagory-bananas and you would see a nice grid of bananas you can order. But there is no folder 1-catagory-bananas on the old or new server you just stay on the index.php but the url goes exampledomain.ex/1-catagory-bananas and the viewed website reloads
On the new server with the same URL i get a "NOT FOUND /1-catagory-bananas ect."so the website works perfeclty on the new server?
We are getting the below message produced in error.log when accessing from mobile application. Even I have updated apache from 2.4.9 to 2.4.10 also. Still facing the same error like below.
[Thu Jul 31 15:27:10.934564 2014] [ssl:error] [pid 12000:tid 6520] AH02032: Hostname teampark3.sogeti.com. provided via SNI and hostname teampark3.sogeti.com provided via HTTP are different
How to resolve the issue?
The problem is that HTTP file download speed is nearly 10 times lower than FTP download speed. What could be limiting it? It's about 7Mb for FTP and 70-100Kb for HTTP. Strangely, download speed is OK when browsing from the server itself (e.g. via RDP)
View 2 Replies View RelatedI want to run an HTML webpage that accesses an MP3 resource that's also on my website. However, I only want the webpage to have access to the file and block access from those attempting to access the file directly. That leaves me with two options:
1. Block access through the Apache configuration so that only my Webserver can access the resource, or
2. Hide the URL in the code.
How I can go about doing this?
I have to create a structure in which there is a client, a server and an authentication authority.
The authentication authority verifies the identity of both the client and server before they can communicate, so that the client can access the content offered by the server. Everything must be made using HTTP with SSL (HTTPS).
For now I have installed xampp on my pc with ubuntu, I performed the initial configuration and was able to view a test page locally hosted by entering the URL of the virtual server "www.server.it" (added to the configuration of apache2).
I have a custom software that runs it's own webserver. I then found instructions on how to use apache2 as a proxy that will enable ssl for that site. (long story short, my custom software doesn't support ssl and it's not an option)
View 2 Replies View RelatedI recently got a SSL-certificate for my website. Now the old links to my website (using only http) doesnt work, the visitors just getting redirected to my index page. How can I change my .htaccess so both http and https works, but keep https as the preferred? Or even better, redirect old http links to https? I'm not using www.
My current .htaccess:
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteRule (.*) https ://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI}
i want to redirect main domain http //, www request to https://
i added this code
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off# First rewrite to HTTPS:# Don't put www. here. If it is already there it will be included, if not# the subsequent rule will catch it.RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]# Now, rewrite any request to the wrong domain to use www.RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://www.%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]
Apache2.4.6
apr-1.4.8
openssl-1.0.1c
arm-linux-gcc4.4.4
Recently I cross compiled Apache2.4.6 to run in my ARM cpu, and I found that http can work well if only it's own port such as 80 is listened, but if add one more port to be listened in conf file, http fails. That means http is good, but after https is on, http stop working and https is good. At the same time, I built the same apache2.4.6 in X86 gcc4.6.1, http and https can both work well. In addition, I also tried apache1.3.33 in the same ARM system, http and https can work well too. It seems like that in apache2.4.6, http can't work well if there is one more port listened in ARM system. Actually http port is listening and is established when using netstat to monitor it.
root@freescale /usr/local/apache/bin$ netstat -a
Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp 0 0 :::www :::* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 :::443 :::* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 (null):www (null):3705 ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 0 (null):443 (null):3720 ESTABLISHED