suddendly some of my sites in my server is taking sessions errors...then after a while all its going ok and then again the same problem...the problem still continues.from what might be the problem?a php update?mysql update?any exprerience?
i havent made any change.my server is linux has centos 4.7
we are getting the following error message during our scheduled backup..Warning: mysql "wordpress_9"...Not all the data was backed up into /mnt/backup/web03/domains/domain.com.au/databases/wordpress_9_1 successfully. Use of chdir('') or chdir(undef) as chdir() is deprecated at /opt/psa/PMM/agents/shared/Storage/Bundle.pm line 39.
mysqldump: Error 2013: Lost connection to MySQL server during query when dumping table `backupdb_wp_commentmeta` at row: 717
I'm having some problems configuring my server sessions in php.
Server espec:
WHM 11.2.0 cPanel 11.11.0-S18033
CENTOS Enterprise 4.5 i686 on standard - WHM X v3.1.0
PHP version 5.2.4
MySQL version 4.1.22-standard
Apache version 1.3.39 (Unix)
Sessions def. in php.ini:
Quote:
Code:
[Session]
session.save_handler = "files"
session.save_path = "/tmp/sessions"
; in the case of files, this is the
; path where data files are stored
session.use_cookies = 1
session.name = "PHPSESSID"
; name of the session
; is used as cookie name
session.auto_start = 0
session.cookie_lifetime = 0
; or if 0, until browser is restarted
session.cookie_path = "/ "
session.cookie_domain =
session.serialize_handler = "php "
; php is the standard serializer of PHP
session.gc_probability = 1
; 'garbage collection' process is started
; on every session initialization
session.gc_maxlifetime = 1440
; data will be seen as 'garbage' and
; cleaned up by the gc process
session.referer_check =
; externally stored URLs containing ids
session.entropy_length = 0
session.entropy_file =
; session.entropy_length = 16
; session.entropy_file = /dev/urandom
session.cache_limiter = "nocache "
; determine HTTP caching aspects
session.cache_expire = 180
session.use_trans_sid = 1
; by compiling with --enable-trans-sid
Register globals are ON
First I recieved about 7 e-mails from clients saying that in joomla pre instllation teste sessions.save_path was unwritable.
I went to /temp created a sessions folder and chmoded it to 777
After that they still can't login on the admin area
Error: Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot find save handler files in /home/asasdosa/public_html/site00/administrator/index.php on line 111
From what I could read on-line in joomla this means that clients can't save sessions file in the session.save_path although it is writable. But never saw a solution for it, because it was all client oriented. All the solutions were contact your isp.
Well they did contact, but the isp doesn't know how to fix it
I have a server Windows 2003 Server
I have a problem for ask WHT. I have 3 session in my Windows 2003 Server but we can only 2 person connect but i want 4 or more connection to my server. Hown can i do it?
My server has been crashing quite alot lately, it does have some high traffic sites on there but it has never really been this bad before. Today i noticed these in cpanel, what are they and is there anyway I can control them?
View 13 Replies View RelatedI was on a 100mbps shared port with a dedicated server from FDC and I use it only for downloads. The downloads took a little long to start but once they did, were as fast as they could be.
Thinking this was definitely a shared bandwidth problem, I ordered a dedicated port of 25mbps from FDC to fix it but it seems to have gotten worse.
The website uses around 10/15mbps but it takes forever for the server to respond. Even logging into cPanel takes around 40/50 seconds for the dialog box to appear but everything is fast once I log into my cPanel.
I also hired a sys admin to look into the server and He says everything is fine. I don't know what to do. I could increase my port bandwidth higher but it'll be disappointing if I do and it's just a waste of bandwidth (and money!)
Look this:
root@empresarios [~]# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 2017 1966 50 0 20 1054
-/+ buffers/cache: 892 1125
Swap: 2000 1378 621
U know more than me, but why my dedicated server is taking Swap if as u cann se still have 50 Mb free of RAM?
For some reason, one of the servers can't connect to my mail server. Whenever a user tries to send email from that server to my server, the message won't go through and I see the following in the logs (var/log/exim/mainlog):
2007-02-13 23:56:06 SMTP connection from (***.ca) [***.***.***.***] lost while reading message data (header)
this problem occurs only with this ***.ca mail server (as far as I know).
In fact, trying dnsreport.com tool on any of my server domains, I am getting the error message
"ERROR: I could not complete a connection to any of your mailservers!
******.com: Timed out [Last data sent: RCPT TO: ]
If this is a timeout problem, note that the DNS report only waits about 40 seconds for responses, so your mail *may* work fine in this case but you will need to use testing tools specifically designed for such situations to be certain.
I operate vbulletin across my site including a couple of subdomains. I've just moved to a new server only to find that sessions are no longer recorded unless the user actually visits the forum (ie. forum.mysite.com).
The rest of my site uses the following code to track sessions / maintain connection to database:
PHP Code:
// vB Global File$cwdir = getcwd();chdir('/home/mysite/public_html/forum/');require_once 'global.php';chdir($cwdir);
Would anyone know what could be the problem? I'm running vBulletin 3.6.8, PHP 5.2.3, Apache 1.3 and MySQL 4.1.22. Safe mode is off, mod_security is off, open_basedir is off.
I recently upgraded to PHP 5.2.3 and now some of my customers sites are throwing errors.
Apache 1 with PHP 5.2.3 on RH.
Code:
Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Unknown session.serialize_handler. Failed to decode session object. in /home/kaaoscom/public_html/wow/raids/auth/auth_phpraid.php on line 70
Warning: session_start() [function.session-start]: Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/kaaoscom/public_html/wow/raids/auth/auth_phpraid.php:70) in /home/kaaoscom/public_html/wow/raids/auth/auth_phpraid.php on line 70
Warning: Unknown: Unknown session.serialize_handler. Failed to encode session object. in Unknown on line 0
I'm noticed I was getting bounced email errors from a company I was sending email through and I further investigated this by running a dnsreport on my domain.
Turns out that it fails at Acceptance of NULL <> sender, Acceptance of postmaster address, and Acceptance of abuse address. The domain that I ran a test on is using a new IP that I had recently added to my Direct Admin server. None of the other domains on my server are having issues like this.
Is is possible that I need to do something to enable these new IP addresses in exim? I mean, exim obviously responds to that IP address, but it seems to be having some issues with it.
on my new VDS I get this error in one of my php scripts that ran fine on another server.
Fatal error: Call to undefined function: date_default_timezone_set() in /home/board/public_html/forum_testing/Top.php on line 5
I think it's in the settings somewhere in WHM.
Is there a way in the php.ini file to force all sessions to be stored in a database? For example, in ColdFusion you can configure sessions to be stored in a db. Can you do this in PHP? Thereby forcing all sessions no matter what the customer specifies to be stored in a db.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI've come across an issue where our users are not logging out of their terminal services session properly. Whether via TSWeb or MSTSC (remote desktop), if they close the browser or RDP window using the x it keeps the session alive for upto 1 minute.
The problem with this is that we use terminal services to host an application for users who can't install it, so other users that login (using a generic username and password) are adopting/hijacking the original session and seeing someone elses data.
Does anyone know of a way to force a new session each time a user connects to RDP? Whether via TSWeb or MSTSC (remote desktop)?
I have a fairly good understanding of IIS 6.0 and so this is beginning to confuse me some what.
Our clients are running on Windows 2003 server with IIS 6.0 which in turn runs the site that we had created. The thing is our site does rely on sessions so when one ends it runs the Session_OnEnd within the global.asa and runs some other functions.
But just recently a number of our clients are experiencing the problem that the sessions are not ending so the Session_OnEnd is not running therefore causing some major problems with their sites.
Two of our clients has said recently that they had installed SP2 but I am not sure if this would change any of the settings or **cough** BUGS **cough**. Can anyone please shed some light on what the SP2 actually did and if any of the settings for IIS 6.0 would of been reset.
While I was using my VPS, I was disconnected 2 times and when I re-connected again, it told me to choose 1 from 2 sessions to continue? Can anyone please tell me how can I create sessions like this and how to delete one of them ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm in the process of configuring my company's new server and I've hit a slight stumbling block. What's happening is that PHP is creating its sessions like normal with the exception of no permissions being set for them. This then means that errors are thrown up when PHP attempts to open the session files. Can anybody tell me why this is happening? I have set the sessions directory to octal 0777 for the time being.
The server is running Linux redhat.
I have a server of my own. Unfortunatlly 20% of the time, the server is down even though my connection to internet always up.
I am checking the event log but cannot see anything odd...
OS:Windows server 2003
Is there any tool to detect why the server is down most of the time?
I can post the event viewer errors that I can find suspeicious if needed.
im sitting on a VPS with cpanel+exim 4.66 installed. email accounts are working & i can receive/send emails. however im getting a few errors from some servers that i send email to
Code:
asdf@asdf.com.au
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<asdf@asdf.com.au>:
host asdf.mail.asdf.net.au [111.111.111.111]:
550 Reverse DNS is not setup correctly for this host.
At the moment, my VPS has 3 IP addresses, which are (imaginary) 192.168.0.1, 192.168.0.2, 192.168.0.3,
Exim is currently sending emails(webmail, smtp auth'd php scripts) via 192.168.0.3
my domain.com at the top level resolves to 192.168.0.1, mail.domain.com resolves to 192.168.0.3(aname - should this be a cname?) and the MX pointer record points at mail.domain.com
if i do a reverse lookup of my 192.168.0.3, it resolves to:
Code:
192.168.0.3 resolves to
"3.0.168.192-static.reverse.softlayer.com"Top Level Domain: "softlayer.com"
which is my VPS host.
Have i configured something wrong here? should 192.168.0.3 be resolving to my domain.com instead?
I was looking at some load balancers hosting companies offer and some of the load balancer specs say they can handle up to 15million concurrent sessions(users online at the same time), so does this mean if i had a site like wikipedia that had 15 million users online at the same time, would i be able to do this with only 2 dedicated servers, or will the Cpu's not be enough?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI implemented a Reverse Proxy using apache2 v. 2.4... What i need to do is limit number of sessions against a Virtual Host. Is that possible?
View 13 Replies View RelatedI am trying to capture 3-4 digits when sent as part of a URL, for them to be proxied to another URL. I have no control over how the source sends this data, I am supposed to redirect it. Which works.
#RewriteCond %{HTTP:whoisd-ussd-message} ([d]{2,4})
#RewriteRule ^/original/individual.do(.*)$ https://other.server.com/somewhere/011$1 [P]
The problem is this works for all URLs that have digits to this server. I am expecting to trap URLs that send digits as part of the first call to the server, but this also affects URL calls that are part of other server call transactions, once digits appear, it gets redirected. What can I do to stop this interference?
Tailed apache logs and found this:
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:34 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1778): proxy: initialized single connection worker 0 in child 10308 for (*)
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:34 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1670): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 10309 for worker proxy:reverse
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:34 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1670): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 10310 for worker proxy:reverse
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:34 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1689): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:34 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1689): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:34 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1778): proxy: initialized single connection worker 0 in child 10309 for (*)
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:34 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1778): proxy: initialized single connection worker 0 in child 10310 for (*)
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [info] server seems busy, (you may need to increase StartServers, or Min/MaxSpareServers), spawning 8 children, there are 2 idle, and 45 total children
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1670): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 10311 for worker proxy:reverse
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1689): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1778): proxy: initialized single connection worker 0 in child 10311 for (*)
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1670): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 10312 for worker proxy:reverse
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1689): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1778): proxy: initialized single connection worker 0 in child 10312 for (*)
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1670): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 10313 for worker proxy:reverse
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1689): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1778): proxy: initialized single connection worker 0 in child 10313 for (*)
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1670): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 10314 for worker proxy:reverse
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1689): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1778): proxy: initialized single connection worker 0 in child 10314 for (*)
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1670): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 10315 for worker proxy:reverse
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1689): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1778): proxy: initialized single connection worker 0 in child 10315 for (*)
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1670): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 10316 for worker proxy:reverse
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1689): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1778): proxy: initialized single connection worker 0 in child 10316 for (*)
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1670): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 10317 for worker proxy:reverse
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1689): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1778): proxy: initialized single connection worker 0 in child 10317 for (*)
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1670): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 10318 for worker proxy:reverse
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1689): proxy: worker proxy:reverse already initialized
[Sun Apr 20 08:29:35 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1778): proxy: initialized single connection worker 0 in child 10318 for (*)
What on earth is all these proxy_util.c errors?
Also, I could not find any details in the httpd.conf file regarding StartServers, or Min/MaxSpareServers.
I'm using Centos 4 / Apache 2.2 / PHP 5 / Cpanel
So we just switched servers, but some people are reporting that they can either not access the site, or are not being displayed the newest content. What is causing this?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI recently got my very own dedicated server, as in bought one and it is sitting in my desk right now.
I've installed Centos 4.4 (that's what my web server uses, so I just use it for continuity), connected it to my router.
I've gone through a lot of different steps and here's where I am right now:
Because I have a dynamic IP address, I use a free service to direct towards my server. [url]. It works just fine.
I also have to port forward port 80 to go to the server, instead of my laptop or the other desktop currently running off of our router.
I don't know how to set up a web account on the server, so I discovered UserDir. I enabled it in the httpd.conf file. But when I try to access it [url]I get a permissions error. I've made sure the directories are CHMOD'd correctly... so I don't know why I can't access it.
i am tring to setup my own nameservers for the past two days but couldn't get them to work.
i hve already created the ns at godaddy.com. and created dns zone file with corress ponding ips in my vps
iam getting the following error on the dns report. can anyone help me fix them......thanks aloot
Errror 1:
FAIL: Lame nameservers
ERROR: You have one or more lame nameservers. These are nameservers that do NOT answer authoritatively for your domain. This is bad; for example, these nameservers may never get updated. The following nameservers are lame:
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx < -- my ips
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Errror 2:
FAIL : Missing nameservers 2
ERROR: One or more of the nameservers listed at the parent servers are not listed as NS records at your nameservers. The problem NS records are:
ns3.mydomain.com.
ns4.mydomain.com.
ns5.mydomain.com.
ns6.mydomain.com.
Error 3:
FAIL : Single Point of Failure
ERROR: Although you have at least 2 NS records, they both point to the same server, resulting in a single point of failure. You are required to have at least 2 nameservers per section 2.2.
Error 4:
FAIL SOA Record
No valid SOA record came back:
is not mydomain.com.
I am planning to get a Juniper firewall, but due to SSG140 has a maximum of 48,000 concurrent sessions per second, so it triggers me how do I measure the concurrent session of a linux server of the total throughput instead of just port 80?
OS: CentOS
i hosted one server socket application in my dedicated server which is recving the data from different units(vehicle tracking system) through port no 4444.in dedicated machine i am keeping one active session always...that means my socket application exe is opened always in an active session ie sectionA.This session is not logged off insted i used to close the rdp for keeping this session active.Based on settings if userA accessing SessionA then userB cannot able to reach the active sessionA at the same time instead new sessionB will open for userB.
now my question is
if userB also opened socket application in SessionB with same portno ,then which soket application will recive data from the units...whther the applictaion from sessionA or from SessionB?
We have setup and are currently testing a load balanced cluster using heartbeat and ldirectord. One of the problems we have come across is that we are unable to reliably use the same web server for connections from the same user. As a result the php sessions are getting in a bit of a muddle.
Obviously its not something that we can easily sync between servers like the customers other web content. We are looking at either storing the sessions in a database or NFS.
The site is pretty busy and we are a bit worried that when the site goes live both these options will slow everything down.
Apart from using different load balancing software is there any other solutions we could use for this? Has anyone stored php sessions in a database on a busy site or on a NFS?
I'm running a Windows 2003 based Vps, I'm looking to have more than 2 sessions of RDP at one time, I think every people know that is setted to 2.
I want only one more, at the moment I have admin acc always running, #1 friend account (where there are running 2 process always) and now I want #2 friend account for run another process.