Will the APF firewall work without the "ip_tables" module? I contacted my server management company and told them my previous tech said enabling ip_tables module on any VPS on our system would cause a kernel panic. Their response was to install APF on the VPS in question and not enable ip_tables, saying it should still block IPs and ports that aren't supposed to be open. Is this true? Or am I getting the runaround?
Does the iptables service need to be running in order for APF to function? If so, can APF act like it is running, when the iptables service is not running, thus giving you a false sense of security?
Is it me or that anyone else experiencing the VZ master node not properly configured for those front-end firewall programs?
I recently purchased couple Linux VPSs (OpenVZ) from different vendors and both seems not having iptables properly configured. One of them finally got resolved, but took like a week for them to figure out what's wrong with it.
I'm currently still stuck with second VPS not protected.
I have not check into which iptables modules APF or CSF requires, but VPS vendors/resellers should expect their clients would be using those and properly configure their VZ master prior to deployments.
I'm begin to wonder people that purchases VPS slices, are they using any decent firewall front-end or not.
It always seems that ip_conntrack is missing. When exists, everything works.
after turning on the iptables firewall i can't receive emails anymore on a dedicated centos 5.3 server with postfix and dovecot.
with iptables firewall turned off everythin works fine.
following is the /etc/sysconfig/iptables # Firewall configuration written by system-config-securitylevel # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0]
-A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type any -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p 50 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p 51 -j ACCEPT # -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp --dport 5353 -d 224.0.0.251 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 631 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 631 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
# ************ tried doing this first ************
I've got problems with my APF firewall. Here is are the errors I get :
[root@ks123456 ~]# apf -r apf(6493): {glob} flushing & zeroing chain policies apf(6493): {glob} firewall offline apf(6530): {glob} activating firewall Opening /proc/modules: No such file or directory apf(6570): {glob} unable to load iptables module (ip_tables), aborting. apf(6530): {glob} firewall initalized apf(6530): {glob} fast load snapshot saved
The /var/log/apf_log file is full of these errors.
I've been told that it was a compatibility issue with the server's kernel. So I upgraded the kernel to the last version, but the problem still remains and I get the same errors...
I have two similar VPS plans with identical software setups. I installed APF Firewall on VPS A, modified the conf.apf file to change the interfaces to venet0 and set monokern to 1 and then opened all the ingress ports required. Started the firewall with 'service apf start' and everything went fine, and everything is working fine with no errors.
I did the same on VPS B but when I start apf I get the following error that reoccurs during the startup sequence:
iptables: No chain/target/match by that name
While the firewall does seem to be running (by checking iptables -L) I am unable to download files on the VPS, via wget or yum ...
Am am getting several "iptables: Invalid arguments" message. I traced this to these iptables calls from within /etc/apf/firewall. Each of these iptables calls gives "iptables: Invalid arguments":
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i venet0 -p tcp --tcp-flags ALL NONE -j IN_SANITY
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i venet0 -p tcp --tcp-flags ALL FIN,URG,PSH -j IN_SANITY
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i venet0 -p tcp --tcp-flags ALL SYN,RST,ACK,FIN,URG -j IN_SANITY
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i venet0 -p tcp --tcp-flags ALL ALL -j IN_SANITY
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i venet0 -p tcp --tcp-flags ALL FIN -j IN_SANITY
Any thoughts? According to my ISP, I have these iptables modules: iptable_filter iptable_mangle ipt_limit ipt_multiport ipt_tos ipt_TOS ipt_REJECT ipt_TCPMSS ipt_tcpmss ipt_ttl ipt_LOG ipt_length ip_conntrack ip_conntrack_ftp ip_conntrack_irc ipt_conntrack ipt_state ipt_helper iptable_nat ip_nat_ftp ip_nat_irc
I temporarily enabled and activated Plesk firewall module (which I wish I didn't the first time) and for some reason it seems to have overwritten the default iptables configuration that was set, leaving my ftp unable to be logged into. I tried to disable the firewall module and reboot the server. It didn't work.
I also noticed that it somehow seem to have changed my hostname to my previous server hostname as well
Is there any way to completely revert back to original iptables settings before enabling the Firewall module?
I'm in the process of installing PPA on infrastructure running Parallels Cloud Server. Each container has 2 interfaces, one public facing and a private interface for inter-server communication.
No problems installing PPA 11.5 (specifying IP's on commandline) or adding service nodes however, the firewall rules the documentation speaks of are nowhere to be seen? i.e.:
Important: After the installation, PPA creates the special firewall chain PPA-SN-Rules-INPUT used for communication with service nodes. Do not change it, otherwise, you will not be able to add service nodes to PPA.Click to expand...
Has this been dropped from PPA 11.5 ? (I recall seeing the firewall settings in 11.1) There is also no sign of the ppa.firewall tool that is also mentioned.
The only rule I see inserted is for Postgres on the management node, and 2 for pleskd on all of the nodes (open to world!).
Do you recommend a software firewall when behind a hardware firewall?
All of our servers are behind Cisco ASA 5505 firewalls which we rent from Liquidweb. All are being managed correctly and setup to there optimal levels. With hardware firewalls firmly in place, do you still recommend a software firewall such as APF or IPTables (we're talking linux); in our opinion we see it as an extra administration overhead. If this is however untrue, we will change out thinking.
I've found a dedicated server at a great price and plan to stick with it, my first ( already have 2 vps accounts ). I don't have the money for a hardware firewall. However, I do have a chance to renew a Kerio WinRoute Firewall license from way back.
Does anyone think this would be better than the default windows 2003 firewall?
It possible to disable the disable function for all user expect one account for running few application i need shell_exec, passthru, exec these so for other account it possible to disable it?
I got this warning message from a script I was working on to read XML feeds.
Warning: file_get_contents(url) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond. in C:Apache2.2htdocs est5.php on line 8
I am starting to webhosting company in it I have included a package will be free and add supported and also I want to disable some functions like mail() ..........I mean I want to disable SMTP services anyone have idea how can I do that.
Can anyone tell me in order to use the crypt function (amd md5sum) in a c++ program (g++ on CentOS assuming the cryptography libary is installed) what do I have to
I have just changed servers and uploaded a mail() script which was working on my previous config but does not work on the new server config. What is stopping the emails from being delivered, is there something new in WHM that I need to do?
Here are my WHM and cPanel details:
WHM 11.11.0 cPanel 11.15.0-R18264 REDHAT 4 i686 on standard - WHM X v3.1.0
I just re-installed PHP4, Apache, and MySQL and now the "mail" function in PHP will not work. Is there a way to correct this? Is there some configuration value in Apache or PHP I must change?
I have mixed feelings on the mail() function in php. I've seen it send out amazing numbers of emails and yet I keep reading that it is prone to problems. I'm wondering if someone can put an approximation on what you could/would send out in say 60 seconds. I know that there are tonnes of variables, so i'll try and remove a few:
- server hardware is typical of a cpanel/WHM shared hosting environment - running apache/linux - email is say 20kb HTML format - mail is sent in a php script loop, one by one; alternatively, mail() could be called in clusters of x emails - like send 5 emails at once - there are 400 recipients
I used the mail function in php to send mails to my 25000 members in a loop..
After using it my server has gone very slow.. Load has increased a lot from 2 to around 20.. Major load is taken by sql and then httpd (both have increased)..
I had restarted mysql and httpd.. even reinstalled apache but no help..