Which Xeon (Irwindale OR Woodcrest OR Kentsfield)
Mar 21, 2008
Its been asked many times, please help me decide a new server and we'll keep this topic limited between only 3 configs in question.
I've been using 2 dedicated servers
2.8Ghz dual xeon.
Now its time for a new one. Iam going with Softlayer this time and need your kind suggestion for which of these can handle a good amount of shared hosting traffic.
A).Dual Processor Single Core Xeon - 3.00GHz (Irwindale) - 2 x 2MB cache - HT
Second Processor
Single Core Xeon - 3.00GHz (Irwindale) - 2 x 2MB cache - HT second_processor
B). Processor Dual Core Xeon 5130 - 2.00GHz (Woodcrest) - 1 x 4MB cache
C).Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 3220 - 2.40GHz (Kentsfield) - 2 x 4MB cache
My choice is (A) the Irwindale one.
View 14 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 21, 2008
i think to buy a dedicated which processor is better,
for big vbulletin and medium php/mysql sites
1- Intel Xeon Dual CPU Dual Core Woodcrest 5160 3.0GHz w/4MB L2 Cache Per Core
2 - Quad Core Xeon X3353 Processor 2x6M Cache, 2.66GHz, 1333MHz
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2008
I understand that the woodcrest is a better processor. Just want people's opinions if it justifies the price.
Here are the configurations we are looking at:
Dual Xeon 3.2 SCSI
2GB of RAM
2 x 73GB SCSI Disk
Cpanel
-----------------------------
$222
or
Dual Intel Woodcrest 5130 Dual Core
4GB of RAM
2 x 146GB, 10K RPM SCSI
cpanel
-----------------------------
$385.00
We host approx 100 sites on a server. 60% are static sites and 40% are ecommerce or sites with a database. Just curious if the performance increase will justify the price on the woodcrest vs the xeon.
Also is $385 a good deal for this setup?
View 8 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2008
I have an one-processor Conroe 3060 server as my database server, now i want to upgrade it to a Kentsfield 3210 processor, can I expect a significant performance improvement?
View 8 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2008
I'm thinking in changing my actual dedicated server, but I'm not sure if I will win with the change.
I use it for web hosting, but I am going to need a lot of Mysql use.
I also want to work with Flash Media Server or Red5, but I have the project stopped.
All are almost in the same price. What do you recommend me?
I have never touched Linux and my Server is Windows 2003, do you recommend me to change to Linux?
------------------------------------
Intel Xeon 3075
2x 2.66 GHz L2: 4 MB, FSB: 1333 MHz
4 GB DDR2
HD 2x 750 GB
SATA2 RAID HARD 1
Ping: 60 ms
-------------------------------------
Core2Duo E6750
2x 2.66 GHz L2: 4 MB, FSB: 1333 MHz
4 GB DDR2
HD 2x 750 GB
SATA2 RAID HARD 1
Ping: 60 ms
-------------------------------------
Dell R200 Quad Core X3210, 2.13GHz/2x4M 1066FSB
Intel Quad Core 2.13GHz
RAM 2GB 667MHz Dual Rank ECC (2X1GB)
HD 250GB SATA (7,200rpm)
Ping: 40
--------------------------------------
Now I have:
•2 x Intel Xeon 2.40 Ghz Compaq Prol DL 360 G3
•Intel Xeon 2.40 Ghz
•1 GB RAM (PC2100 Mhz ECC DDR SDRAM DIMM
•HD 80 GB UATA
•Cache 512
Ping: 40 ms
View 11 Replies
View Related
Mar 12, 2008
Currently my web sites in VPS with PowerVPS and my Server everyday downs and my CPU usage is high load all the time.
My Ram is 1500Mg and I see that my web sites are using 1200-1300 all tha time.
So I will move to dedicated server and need your help to choose my server.
I have only one large web site and all the other web sites are small (20 web sites).
The larg web sites is VB forum
Everyday Visit my large web site 10000-15000 visitors .
Alexa rank 42000.
spend 190-220GB monthly BW.
What do you think about this offer from THPLANET?
Intel Xeon 3040 Dual-core Conroe Processor
DRIVE CONTROLLER: SAS/SATA
PRIMARY HARD DRIVE: 250GB Hard Drive
OPERATING SYSTEM: CentOS Enterprise Linux, Version 4
MEMORY: 2048 MB RAM
CONTROL PANEL: cPanel/WHM with Fantastico
IP ADDRESSES: 10 IP Addresses
BANDWIDTH: 1500 GB Bandwidth
UPLINK PORT SPEED: 10 Mbps Uplink
$186.5 per month and $0 set up
*******
And I have another offer from SoftLayer
Single Processor Quad Core Intel Xeon 5410
Processor: – 2.33GHz
1 x 12MB CPU Cache
2GB FB-DIMM RAM
KVM over IP Access / Reboot
2000GB Public Bandwidth
Unmetered Private Network Bandwidth
5 Public IP Addresses
CentOS
CONTROL PANEL: cPanel/WHM with Fantastico
1 x 250GB SATAII HDD
$284/mo NO SETUP
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 4, 2008
Which is better for a dedicated server, if you have to choose one? any experience, reviews...
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2008
I'm trying to figure out for sure which is best. Which would you do? The second is a bit older technology, I guess, but it seems to me that two discreet older Xeons would be better than one dual core newer Xeon.
Xeon 3040 Dual Core 1.86GHz (Conroe)
+ Single Processor Dual Core
+ 2GB RAM
+ 2 x 250GB SATA Drive
+ Cpanel/whm/fantastico
+ RedHat Enterprise 5 Linux
+ 10 IP Addresses
+ 1500GB Monthly Transfer
+ 10mbps Uplink
$174 Per Month
-OR-
Dual Xeon 2.8GHz
+ 2GB RAM
+ 2x 80GB IDE Drives
+ Cpanel/whm/fantastico
+ RedHat Enterprise 5 Linux
+ 10 IP Addresses
+ 2500GB Monthly Transfer
+ 100mbps Uplink
$172
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2008
Im thinking about make littel upgrade. At this time I have Intel Xeon Dual CPU Dual Core Woodcrest 5160 3.0GHz w/4MB L2 cache and I wolud like to change them to: Dual Xeon E5405 Quad Core (Harpertown). The price and other server parameters are almoust the same. When
I change server I will be have better performance?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2007
server is all decided on. Now the processors are my last choice before picking a colo.
But the processors are confusing. There are other posts on here talking about the Dempsey, Woodcrest and the Clovertown. The research I have done on this has told me to stay away from the Dempsey. So not I need to decide between the Woodcrest 5150 (2x 2.0G) and the Clovertown E5320 (4x 1.86G).
Can someone shed some light on this two and explain in plain English which one would be the better of the two? I have read where some people say the Woodcrest would be the better choice and others say the Clovertown would be the better choice. We know the Clovertown has 4 cores and the Woodcrest has 2 cores.
Could someone explain which would be the better choice and why that would be the better choice?
Just saying it had 4 cores does not always mean it is better from what I haver read.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 24, 2007
I'm planning on getting a new dedicated server from SoftLayer. I'm interested in the Xeon 5100 or 5300 series. Which one is better:
Dual Processor Quad Core Xeon 5310 - 1.60GHz (Clovertown) - 2 x 8MB cache
or
Dual Processor Dual Core Xeon 5140 - 2.33GHz (Woodcrest) - 2 x 4MB cache
Both cost the same.
Also, I heard that Apache is capable of taking advantage of multi-core processors (such as the dual proc quad core Clovertown) but that cPanel does not compile Apache in a correct way for it to function properly (efficient) on such machines. Is this true? Can this be solved? Does this mean I have to compile Apache manually?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2008
planing to buy a new server a little confused which i should choose .... which server would you go for...
**** config 1 ****
4 Processor single core Opteron 854 2.8ghz (2.8ghz x 4)
4GB FB ECC RAM
2x 36gb 15,000 SA/SCSI
RAID 1
**** config 2 ****
Single processor Xeon 5460 3.16ghz (3.16ghz x 4)
2GB FB ECC RAM (config 1 with 4 gb ram)
2x 36gb 10,000 SA/SCSI (config 1 with 15k rpm sas drive)
RAID 1
**** config 3 ****
Single processor Xeon 5355 2.66ghz (2.66ghz x 4)
2GB FB ECC RAM (config 1 with 4 gb ram)
2x 36gb 10,000 SA/SCSI (config 1 with 15k rpm sas drive)
RAID 1
View 14 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2008
Softlayer is pricing these both the same, and I've been a big fan of the
x3220 for a long time now. I haven't been able to fine ANY reasonably priced servers that can out perform the x3220 in computational ability.
That said, does anyone have any figures that would suggest the 5410 is better?
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 5410 - 2.33GHz (Harpertown) - 1 x 12MB cache
vs
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 3220 - 2.40GHz (Kentsfield) - 2 x 4MB cache
Clearly the cache is bigger, but for me, it's about speed and computation.
I can't find any references to the x5410 in the VPS vs Dedicated thhread.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2008
I would like to compare a Dual Xeon 3Ghz HT with a single Quad Xeon 2.4Ghz. Does tperformance difference worth $60 month plus?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 6, 2007
I was talking to a friend tonight and he mentioned that CentOS 32 bit may not support dual Woodcrest 5150 2.66GHZ chips.
I was wondering if there is anyone out there that is using CentOS 32 bit version and is running with 2x Woodcrest 5150 chips or even one of them. I would like to put this myth to rest (I hope) before I have CentOS installed on my server.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2008
can someone give a comparison betwen this two
Intel Quad Core Xeon X3210 vs Dual-Core 3040 Xeon
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 16, 2007
We are using the SC512L-260B chassis for our lower end machines, what is a good recommendation for say Dual Opteron or Dual Woodcrest servers?
Looking 1U that will handle 2 drives, but would also like a recommendation for going with 4 drives (would this require 2U?). Hot swap not necessary.
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 11, 2007
When it comes to CPUs I am pretty clueless, so excuse any silly comments here.
I am little confused by the performance benefits vs price of quad core and duale core processors. I am hoping some of you experts can clarify this for me.
For example, on newegg they have the following:
Intel Xeon 5160 Woodcrest 3.0GHz for $877
and the
Intel Xeon E5345 Clovertown 2.33GHz for $879
Now though the Clovertown has a lower processing speed, I get to run 4 processes simultaneously and have an aggregate total processing power of 9.32 ghz.
On the other hand, the Woodcrest proc allows me to run 2 processes simultaneously and I have an aggregate total processing power of 6 ghz.
Now I am probably reading this wrong, but why would you purchase the woodcrest when the price is essentially the same and benefits are much greater?
On a last note, do programs such as mysql and apache 1.3 take advantage of the multiprocessors?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 18, 2007
I just ordered a dell server a few days ago and have noticed in addition to a free harddrive upgrade I now have an upgraded processor for the same price.
PE860 Quad-Core Xeon X3220 2.4GHz/2x4MB 1066FSB (105W)
Free Processor Upgrade to QC Xeon 5320
The question for me is which is better? The previous processor was the low energy 105W one which suited me fine as I'm co-locating this to a DC where they are very strict on power consumption.
Is this one going to provide a noticable performance increase over the first? Is it a major power hog?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2007
wondering in general and specifically for woodcrest vs conroe and kentsfield vs clovertown
I can't find either
a) an explanation as to why the server cpu's are superior to the desktop equivilents
or
b) benchmarks comparing them.
even mainstream hardware sites like tomshardware has benchmarks for server hdd's, but not server cpu's for some reason.
apart from the ability to use dual cpu's in a single machine, what is the advantage? what warrants the price difference? are there benchmarks available anywhere to compare comparable models? (example, woodcrest xeon 5150 2.66ghz vs conroe c2d e6700 2.66ghz)
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 2, 2008
There's something I've always wondered, what makes a Xeon a Xeon?
For instance, what is the difference between a Core 2 Quad Q9300 and a Quad-Core Xeon E5420. Both are quad core, have a 1333MHz FSB, run at 2.5GHz, have SSE4.1, any all the specs seem identical.
Only difference I see is the Xeon has 12MB cache compared to the Q9300's 6MB.
But generally speaking, what makes a Xeon such much better for a server environment than a Core 2 processor.
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2008
Which is a better option? Both priced same, I know with the Xeon 5310 the possibility of upgrading to dual cpu's.
Quote:
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 3220 - 2.40GHz (Kentsfield) - 2 x 4MB cache
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 5310 - 1.60GHz (Clovertown) - 1 x 8MB cache
Which would give higher performance in a shared web hosting environment?
View 12 Replies
View Related
Dec 9, 2007
Which one is better: Dual Xeon 2.8GHz/HT vs Dual Core Xeon 2.4GHz (3060) for shared hosting with database intensive? Both with 4GB RAM.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2009
To those of you who have pushed out Intel i7 platform servers, hows the performance? Also, hows the Desktop performance. Considering buying a new desktop with i7.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2007
on Ebay for some entry level servers to put in colo for some personal sites. I already have the space so I ruled out renting any, and I see that you can get some pretty good deals on the MPs, I see a few quad 1.4/1.5ghz. But how would they compare to todays processors? What should I expect from them?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2009
So the question is, Intel® Xeon® Processor 7041 (4M Cache, 3.00 GHz, 800 MHz FSB) are those still good for hosting some shared accounts?
Following link does not give it a good ranking
[url] even Atom and Celeron are having better ranking.
Well to make discussion more focused, a bunch of WP blogs around 50, few static, few dynamic, and around 2500 emails (in+out apart from filtered incoming SPAM) are running fine on an old 1Gb OpenVZ VPS without much load, but sites are becoming very slow (maybe shared pipe), now we have to move this client and all of his sites.
What's your say about this Xeon 7041 based server with 2Gb RAM, is it good enough for current scenario?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 27, 2009
about thei5 and i7 cpu,
what series of xeon are the same as they are?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2008
2 XEON 2.4 vs C2D 6550 2.33?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2008
How much better are Xeon processors than Core 2 Duo processors? What goes into the brand difference? I know that they're built on the same architecture, but I'm unsure as to which is better.
I've got two choices, both Intel processors built on the Kentsfield Core 2 architecture.
Stats seem exactly alike, except one difference: the Core 2 Duo processor has a 9x multiplier (2.4GHz), while the Xeon processor has a 8x multiplier (2.13 GHz). I really see no advantage in taking the Xeon processor, which costs more. Multiplier difference shouldn't make a big deal.
So, anybody know what goes into the "Xeon" brand these days? The exact model numbers, by the way, are Q6600 for the Core 2 Duo and X3210 for the Xeon.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Apr 9, 2007
How many times better is Intel Xeon 3060 (2 x 2.4GHz) with 2GB of ram VS. a Pentium 4 3.0ghz with 1GB of ram, serving mysql with apache 1.3
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2009
if there is already an equivalent Xeon for the i7 processors?
I mean that for example C2Q Q6600 is equivalent for X3220 if I'm right.
Also, I guess those Servers will cost a lot more, not only because the processor is very costly but it also requires DDR3 RAM which is still nowadays quite expensive...
View 8 Replies
View Related
