Which CentOS Distribution I386 Or X86_64 For Intel Core 2 Duo 32bit Desktop
Apr 27, 2009Which CentOS distribution i386 or x86_64 do I need for intel core 2 duo 32bit desktop.
View 5 RepliesWhich CentOS distribution i386 or x86_64 do I need for intel core 2 duo 32bit desktop.
View 5 Repliesi386 or x86_64 ?
When i go CentOS website, it have 2 versions.
i386 and x86_64. May i know which version should I download?
Quote:
Dual Core Intel Xeon Processor X3110
2Gb (1 x 2Gb) DDR2 DIMM Memory
1 x 320Gb Serial ATA Hard Drive
do you have use any intel desktop board for Core i7 and run well?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to install CentOS 4.4 in dual core 2 box without success, can't even finish installation. Read about a bug closed because it doesn't happen in CentOS 5, thus leaving me no option but to use unstable cPanel 11. Does anyone have any clue about this? Seems strange that there's no workaround.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe are hosting our software system which do calculation and file manipulation.
Now we have Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 and would like to get Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 to increase our system performance.
Also we have other choice, get Intel Xeon E5405 Harpertown 2.0GHz
to replace two above.
I think it is better to have one server box because one box easy to manage than two. Also Harpertown is much faster than these two together.
What is your opinion?
Intel Xeon 3200 series Quad Core VS Intel Core2Quad Q6600
What stood between Intel Xeon 3200 series Quad Core VS Intel Core2Quad Q6600?
Intel Xeon 3210 2.1 GHz Quad Core/2Gb RAM/250 gb IDE/SATA /BW: 2000gb
DC ThePlanet
or
Intel Quad Core Q9400 4x2.66 ГГц/4Gb RAM/2x500 gb SAT/ BW: 2000gb DC Gnax/NetDepot
Server choice for hosting.
from the title, which one is better for a server?
View 14 Replies View RelatedAnyone have the latest Xeon 3460's, any comparison to the Core i7 920?
[url]
quad core processor vs Intel Xeon 3060 Dual Core Conroe Processor which is better any why?
View 2 Replies View Relatedcan someone give a comparison betwen this two
Intel Quad Core Xeon X3210 vs Dual-Core 3040 Xeon
I have a dedicated box with following specs
Core2Quad 2.4ghz
2x500gb hdd
8gb ram
I installed 32bit centos5 in it ( because I use lxadmin ;lxadmin wont support 64bit)
Installed kernel-PAE successfully and rebooted the server. but the server still boots into the old kernel. I need the kernel-PAE to be booted, then only I can utilize full RAM. help me . below there is ssh logs
[root@t241 ~]# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 3357036 kB
MemFree: 3204984 kB
Buffers: 8148 kB
Cached: 109516 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 33504 kB
Inactive: 103664 kB
HighTotal: 2477180 kB
HighFree: 2343972 kB
LowTotal: 879856 kB
LowFree: 861012 kB
SwapTotal: 6409892 kB
SwapFree: 6409892 kB
Dirty: 16 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 19524 kB
Mapped: 7608 kB
Slab: 7732 kB
SReclaimable: 3964 kB
SUnreclaim: 3768 kB
PageTables: 400 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 8088408 kB
Committed_AS: 45232 kB
VmallocTotal: 114680 kB
VmallocUsed: 3992 kB
VmallocChunk: 110560 kB
[root@t241 ~]# uname -rm
2.6.25.10 i686
[root@t241 ~]# cat /etc/grub.conf
default 1
timeout 7
color cyan/blue white/blue
title=CentOS (2.6.18-92.1.22.el5PAE)
root (hd0,1)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5PAE root=/dev/sda2 pci=nommconf
initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5PAE.img
title=linux
root (hd0,1)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda2 pci=nommconf
[root@t241 ~]# rpm -qa | grep kernel
kernel-2.6.18-8.el5
kernel-PAE-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5
kernel-headers-2.6.18-8.el5
[root@t241 ~]#
2 server configuration will look something like below. I heard that the 32bit kernel is better for the web server since I'll have cpanel on it. Anyone able to confirm this or should I just put 64bit on both of them?
Web Server
5420 2.5GHz (Dual QuadCore)
2x250GB SATA2 (RAID1)
2GB RAM
DB Server
5310 1.6GHz (Clovertown, DUAL processor)
2x73GB SAS (RAID1)
4GB RAM
which one do i have to choose?? and why?
my server is P4 3.6GHz HTT with 2GB RAM
Yesterday i got new Centos 5.2 server running.
For some reason, load shows 0.4-1.2.
There is no software installed on it yet, there is nothing actually running expect what came with fresh installation of that OS.
top - 16:42:22 up 2:34, 1 user, load average: 0.53, 0.75, 0.78
Tasks: 158 total, 1 running, 157 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu0 : 0.3%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu1 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu2 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu3 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu4 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu5 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu6 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu7 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 4149456k total, 767820k used, 3381636k free, 66628k buffers
Swap: 2096472k total, 0k used, 2096472k free, 600680k cached
What should i check?
Kernel Version:
2.6.18-92.1.6.el5PAE
3i want to buy new erver and i have choice of the fallowing
AMD X4 Quad Core 9500
RAM : 4096 MB
Disk Drives: 2 X 250 GB SATA
and
Intel Quad Core Q9300 4x2.5 GHz
RAM : 2048 MB
Disk Drives: 2 X 250 GB SATA
both in the same price . so i need some advice for who are the best performance and the ideal for webhosting service.
I was just wondering which is better..Should I pick a intel core 2 duo E6750 at 2.66 GHz Bus speed 1333 MHz 4MB L2 or Intel Xeon 3060 Dual Core Conroe(2.4 GHz) bus speed 1006 MHz
Which is better for a Game server?
Which one is better?
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz goes with 2GB RAM
and
Dual Opteron 246 2.0 Ghz goes with 4GB RAM
I use this server for a little big forum with about 16,000 member, 300 members + visitors online everytime and 2 more sites (small sites).
One more question, Is 10Mbps switch port or 100Mbps switch port affected to speed?
I have currently a server with a "Intel Core 2 duo e6640 2.4Ghz".
Now the company I'm at moving to a new data center and offering me a box for the same price with a Intel P3.4.
As I understand I would move from a two core to a single core CPU.
In the first move letter they send me, they where saying I would get a CPU plus, plus 1 GB mem more.
Just curious if any dc already got those?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI've spend some time today in reading about different Intel based processors. I'm learning fast (I didn't know too much about chips... untill now ) but there is something I still need to ask, since I didn't find an answer. So:
Which Quad-Core Xeon processor (from low cost ones) do you like more?
... Kentsfield, Yorkfield, Clovertown, Clovertown" (low voltage), Harpertown, Harpertown (low voltage).
From waht I saw I could guess that Clovertown is the most popular...?
I'm considering to buy new Intel Quad Core box for running CPanel shared hosting (high traffic sites).
Supermicro 6015P-8
Intel Clovertown E5310 Quad Core (Quantity 2)
4 x Kingston 1GB 240-Pin DDR2 FB-DIMM ECC Fully Buffered DDR2 667
2 x Seagate Cheetah 10K.7 ST3146707LC 147GB 10,000 RPM (RAID-1)
LSI LOGIC 320X2128-F
Total: $3742
Supermicro 6015V-MT
Intel Clovertown E5310 Quad Core (Quantity 2)
4 x Kingston 1GB 240-Pin DDR2 FB-DIMM ECC Fully Buffered DDR2 667
2 x Western Digital Raptor WD1500ADFD 150GB 10,000 RPM (RAID-1)
3ware 9550SX-4LP
Total: $2950
Which one of the above offers better performance and I/O?
I went with higher end SCSI chassis and higher end LSI card to have 133Mhz on the PCI-X slot, but is it worth the extra cost?
Any better recommendation with similar or cheaper prices?
I'm also wondering which one is faster between a single Intel E5310 Quad Core vs dual Woodcrest 5130?
Does anyone have an opinion on the Intel Dual Xeon Quad Core Clovertown versus the AMD Dual Core Dual Opteron? I'm assuming the Xeon is better. I recently put in an order for one, and I'm hoping I made the right decision (Yes I know it would have made more sense to ask before ordering but that's not how I roll) .
View 8 Replies View RelatedTrying to determine how much better, if any, the Dual Opteron 265 would be over the Quad 6600... this is for a dedicated server.
Also... would it be worth $20 per month more for a Dual Opteron 2212?
Would you provide some quick considerations, if Intel Q9400 Quad Core would be "better" than Dual Xeon 2.80GHz/Hyperthreaded at the same price?
well, I know xeon is an old one, but does it worth bothering to change from Xeon to that Q9400?
What's better? I guess for a forum that has 200+ people on throughout the day. Both would have 2gb of ram.
View 1 Replies View Relatedwe've been testing CentOS 5.3 on Intel DG35EC board (G35+ICH8+82566 Gb NIC), and found that the write speed out of 7200rpm SATA-II drive, connected to on-board ICH8 controller, is consistently under 10MB/sec which is quite horrible!
the same set of hardware can get 100MB+/sec transfer rate with Debian 5.0 and FreeBSD 7.1, just not the CentOS5.3! it doesn't matter whether AHCI mode is selected in BIOS or not, and of course BIOS has been updated with latest version.
i have a CENOTS 5.3 server / i686 with a Q8200 core 2 quad processor,
for some reason when I run
cat /proc/cpuinfo each cose doesn;t report that its running full speed..
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 23
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 1998.000
cache size : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 4
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 0
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm
bogomips : 4668.98
it shows all 4 cores but look at the MHZ, is there something i can do about this to fix this?
i have a forum on centos with php and mysql,
im not sure why there are many files like core.2323 or core.2742... in the folder of my forum,
i do not download or upload any files to there,
Whats the Difference between Fedora Core & CentOS?
I think my host installed the wrong OS, but just wondering to see if it's worth changing the OS if they're both the same.
I currently run a dedicated with redhat 9 and am looking at a new server with either Fedora Core, CentOS, or FreeBSD.
I'd like your opinions on the best o/s to go with overall and also bearing in mind I'm coming from redhat and will be running cpanel on it...