Simple Network Monitor - PING / TRACEROUTE?
Oct 5, 2006
I was wondering if anyone out there knew of any programs out there that can monitor and record ping times to various server IP's and couple output say a simple graph. There used to be this website I used that you could simply go onto there site, and register, and put in your servers ip addresses and it would output a simple graph that showed latency, loss etc for any ip you put into there system and displayed a web based mrtg type graph. I am having some troubles at one of the datacenters that I have some co-located servers at, and would like to show them how much packet loss they are having at a given time, or over say a 24 hour period.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 13, 2008
I installed net query tool from this site
http://virtech.org/tools/
They say in order for ping and trace to work, you must chmod those executables on the server itself to 755. Is this safe or a security risk? The odd thing is, ping and trace works fine from dnsstuff.com or any other network tool site.
What is the location of those executables?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2007
I'm looking into knownhost and they offer twice the bandwidth in their California option for the same money. Jay from known host said I should pick the one with the best ping times. I'd like to put the information here so someone might perhaps tell me what my best choice is.
I'll put the stats here and then if you could tell me which one is better (Texas vs. California) that would be great.
But if you think that the times between the two are only marginal (both real good), then could you help me decide about getting double the bandwidth for the same price.
I know nothing of course, but the two data centers look like their both giving great speeds (Texas being better though). But perhaps both speeds are great. If that's the case, can anyone tell me why someone would not take the higher bandwidth offer?
Thanks, I really appreciate any help with this!
Here is the info...
Texas (ping):
PING 65.99.213.7 (65.99.213.7) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 65.99.213.7: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=1.26 ms
64 bytes from 65.99.213.7: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=1.35 ms
64 bytes from 65.99.213.7: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=1.41 ms
64 bytes from 65.99.213.7: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=1.22 ms
64 bytes from 65.99.213.7: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=1.51 ms .............
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2009
I'm looking to set up some custom monitoring stuff that ties into my existing systems, so that's why I'm not looking for established monitoring services.
I'm looking for a shared environment where I could ping and trace to my equipment, either from cron or a background daemon which I'd write in perl, python, etc.
I'd also want it located somewhere on the left coast or Texas.
Does anyone know any hosts that would meet the above?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 3, 2008
Is there a simple server monitor tool that can monitor the status of a server and preferably produce a nice graph?
I am using ubuntu linux 8.04
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 1, 2009
I have a windows 2003 vps and I need way monitor how much traffic I make per month. I believe I'm getting close to my quota and I need to measure it.
I've seen some nice free programs that claim to work on windows 2003 server but the fact is they don't use a service so they only work while the GUI program runs, which is obviously silly for a server!
What do you guys use for this? I mean other then web traffic tools since most of my traffic is not HTTP!
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 24, 2007
Anybody have it, or seen it in use?
[url]
I am wondering if it has the ability to monitor not only network services, like apache, iis, mysql, mssql, but also processes? We have an application that runs as a standard process we need to monitor.
Looks like a niffy little device.
See a little demo here: [url]
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2007
Anyone know a network monitor software for a hosting server?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2008
15ms ping vs 40ms ping vs 170ms ping
Which you think is still acceptable for a website?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2007
I have a problem with the traceroute for 72.36.229.84 . Some useres can reatch it, but not all.
I 've attaced 3 routes under that isn't working and 2 that work. Look at the routes that doesn't work, they all stop by gblx.net ( String 9 - 10) Working routes doesn't use gblex.net
My question : What should i do, what can i do ? Is gblex.net the problem ?
Not working route : emil@egenhost:~$ ping 72.36.229.84
PING 72.36.229.84 (72.36.229.84) 56(84) bytes of data...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 21, 2007
My server has been accessible in and out all day.
During these periods of inaccessibility, ping/traceroutes from multiple physical locations around the world show 50-100% packet loss.
During times when the server is accessible, ping times are anywhere from 100ms-700ms and the server does not remain accessible for very long.
I gave my provider traceroutes and pings for those times when it was inaccessible and accessible and they stated it was not on their side. It was on a hop in the middle between me (and apparently everyone else, since multiple locations around the world were used) and my server. They say it is not in their control and they cannot do anything about it.
I am reasonably sure this isn't just me or my VPS. I am on the phoenix node of PrimaryVPS.
The latest traceroute I did showed something new - a router advertisement claiming the TTL was exceeded....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 31, 2006
I am still trying to diagnose a problem some members have on my forums, when they load a page it will load a grey screen (my background color) and stop, after 15-30 seconds+ it will finally load the page
i opened a ticket with my server co and they forwared it to the NOC, NOC said it was apache config problem, server co said it was fixed and was due to apache log reaching 2GB limit, logrotate installed
same problem still existed, opened tk with server management co, they tweaked httpd.conf and disabled logs, problem still exists
I asked 3rd management co about it, changed some settings in httpd, said it may be due to ads on the sites, i took out the ads and a stat script
problem still exists, the thing is the problem exists with some users and not others, doing speed tests to the server shows it is very quick, load is low, no i/o wait and i just installed the second GB of memory so memory is fine
this is happeneing to users on seperate forums, one using vB, one using IPB, so it is server/ hardware related, AMD barton 3000, with 2GB ram, nowehere reaching the bandwidth limit or 10mbps port speed limit
any ideas? doing tracerts to the server shows a timeout before the sites IP address, every time, but doing a tracert OUT of the server shows no time outs....
View 14 Replies
View Related
Dec 13, 2006
One of the other message boards that I am on has a server at LayeredTech.
Now they said in there they had no issues whatsoever with the network. But when I did this tracert: .....
View 8 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2007
I run tracroutes to many IPs often, anyoone could whip up a script to run traceroutes by entering IP and hitting enter and ability to cancel the process (as it gets stuck sometimes) and enter another IP to trace to?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2008
When I try to do a traceroute from my home computer to my rented server, it doesn't end and lots of asterisks but I can reach my site ..........
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 6, 2007
When we do traceroute between 100 -130 ms delay between hop is acceptable? What is the maximum value can be acceptable?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 13, 2007
We're looking to bring in a T3 for our small startup hosting company and when we do traces from multiple location it always runs through a cox.net IP and it concerns me because I dont want our customers to believe they're being hosted on some kids cablemodem. What do you folks suggest, the IP is 64.19.96.5 to their outer router. Should it be a concern that we route through everyone through a cox.net IP?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2008
If I'm doing a traceroute on two IP addresses (different networks).
The one with the less hops means it's the fastest network from where I'm from? Right?
And is it (less number of hops) more important than lower ping time?
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2009
anybody have any experience with SimpleCDN. We are considering using their Hurricane service to stream our media.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 14, 2009
any experiences to report about purchasing used / refurb gear from either Network Liquidators (nweq.com) or Network Hardware (networkhardware.com)?
View 12 Replies
View Related
May 27, 2009
Because i have couple site hosted by both hosting company (DTH=downtownhost and TCH=totalchoicehosting) and have positive experience with them i needed to make decision who will be hoster for my new project.
The problem was by both company and by 99% others that traceroute command is not enabled by default and it is essential for my new project.
After exchanging a couple emails with both companies DTH was winner again because DTH allow on shared hosting traceroute command (in situation that you need it).
Answer from TCH was that only on VPS (semi-dedicated) is traceroute command possible and not on shared envirovment.
I must again praise DTH for the way how they handle with their customers and that they are ready to do everything for their customers. Not wonder that they are one of the greatest hosting company.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2008
where I can get a simple SSL certificate for my web hosting business? So my customers feel safe on submitting their information. Is the standard SSL from GoDaddy pretty good?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2007
So I was trying to run a backup process in Plesk 8.1 and the whole panel froze up on me (it's happened numerous times before).
Anyway, since the panel was all frozen up I just went into SSH and did a simple "reboot" (also, as done before many times). Only problem is, this time after I did the reboot the server never actually came back online... it seems to be locked up or something, I have no idea what.
I called my host and they are looking into it but they have no idea what's going on either and it's taking them forever to figure it out all the meanwhile my sites are down.... this isn't good.
Does anyone have any suggestions or advice as to why this could be occuring?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2007
I have an ssl issued from my domain company and i have hosting in another company.
I have created an CSR with my hosting, submitted to mine domain company so i can have the ssl, and installed in my hosting company.
But now i want to change mine hosting because the hosting company doesn't accept chained certificates..
So if i change mine hosting i could mantain mine old ssl ? or what does i need to do?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2007
using ftp via unix command, how do you get all files and sub directories?
get *.*? but will that get sub dir?
btw, how do you get it to switch between ascii and binary for images? does it do that automaticly?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2007
Can you see if my site will load for you:
[url]
Then (if it loads) post the stats from the bottom of the page:
Page creation time: (Numbers)
And:
Your Os:
Your Browser:
Some people say my site won't load or is loading slowly for them, but I have no one to test it, thanks. If possible, I need quite a few tests.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 3, 2007
We are looking at this software. Seems easy enough, secure enough.
Experiences with Simple DNS Plus?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2009
when I get a server it comes with cPanel and I don't have to do much to get it going, but this time I don't need all the bells and whistles. What should I do to get a server with only CentOS to start running a pretty simple web server that just listens on whatever ip? I just want it to run php,mysql, and a web server which I know how to setup already. What I want to know is what else is necessary to setup? Resolvers, the hostname, bind, named, etc?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2009
I cannot express this enough: Stay away from Simple Helix!
We switched to them after our last $5/mo host kicked us out without warning. Simple Helix is just as bad but more expensive... Their support system is awful. Our website is down at least once or twice a week without any warning or support.
You cannot talk to anyone in their support. You have to write a stupid ticket. Then you wait and wait until someone decides to open it and read it. The if you are lucky, they will respond to it. But you gotta be REALLY lucky that they respond with something useful. Most of their responses are irrelevant or do not make sense.
Last week my website was destroyed because their server crashed. When i wrote a support ticket, which was answered 24 hours later, they said that I did it! Then they told me I had to pay them to fix the problem. Only when I contacted their corporate offices they got their admin working on it. Even then, it took over a week to fix the website. The admin would only respond when he wanted and sometimes he would ignore my messages to the point where I had to open new tickets to tell them to take care of my original ticket.
JUST STAY AWAY! WHATEVER YOU DO-DO NOT GO WITH SIMPLE HELIX.
It seems nexcess.net is a good host and I am going to be calling them tomorrow to talk to them about switching to them.
View 14 Replies
View Related