Processor Opinion
Oct 4, 2007Anyone has an opinion about the following processor:
CPU Intel Xeon Quad Core 3210
ADVERTISEMENT
What's Your Opinion In AMD Sempron64 3000+ Processor
Sep 30, 2008i want take your opinion in this server, i want it to start small hosting services
AMD Sempron64 3000+
1GB RAM
Quad Core Processor Vs Intel Xeon 3060 Dual Core Conroe Processor
Feb 3, 2008quad core processor vs Intel Xeon 3060 Dual Core Conroe Processor which is better any why?
View 2 Replies View RelatedYour Opinion About One.com
Apr 17, 2008I just come across one.com which is offering free domain and webhost with the setup fee of $ 13.80 ...
[url]
one.com was previously known as B-One
just like to know your reviews about this site ..
Any Opinion On Crayonhost ?
Nov 5, 2007Their plans are pretty reasonable. Anybody here have any opinions on them (positive and negative?)
View 14 Replies View RelatedOpinion For Gigenoc
Nov 23, 2008Has any of you ever had any experience with Gigenoc.
They have some nice plans for reseller hosting.
Do you recommend? Their reliability, etc?
Any Opinion About TheGridLayer From LT
Jun 28, 2008I have come across this vps/virtual-grid solution, which at a first glance seems something like a vmvare esx infrastructure: thegridlayer.com does not provide very detailed information but for the little I understood they guarantee you almost 100% uptime because if your vps hardware fails it will be moved to a new node in minutes withouth any intervention. The grid structure also seems to easen scaling.
I am yet to understand what kind of virtualization they offer, but they claim the ability to build your own kernel, so it would seem a complete one.
Prices are quite cheap too: 59$ for a 512mb ram, 80gb disk, 2TB/bw virtual machine... Unfortunately they only seem to run a single prehistoric centos 4.4 distribution, but if you really can compile your own kernel and do all the tweakings would not be a big deal.
Opinion On My Server
Feb 2, 2007I am getting ready to order my server through a reputable company and am new to the colo thing and would like to here from some others letting me know if this server will be plenty for what I want. I have been using a dedicated server with Liquid Web for the past two years. The server I have with them has the following:
Processor: Dual Opteron 242
Memory: 2GB DDR Registered ECC
Hd1: Dual 120GB IDE / Hardware Raid 1
Hd2: 120GB IDE Backup Drive
RemoteBackup: 50GB Remote Backup
The server I am ordering is listed below. This has more memory and hard drive space then my current dedicated server. I am pretty sure that the 2 dual Xeon Woodcrest 5150’s will blow away the 2 dual Opteron 242’s. Am I correct in assuming this?
I would like an opinion on with this is a good server or is it to muck or to little. My train of thought when building and ordering this server was to build one that had plenty of memory and storage along with a good processor that I would not have to worry about for a while. I am thinking of changing my hard drives to 250G hard drives. So was this a good build for my train of thought?
2 dual Intel Xeon Woodcrest 5150 socket 771, 4x 2.66Ghz/2M L2 cores
Supermicro X7DVL-E dual socket 771 server board, Intel 5000V chipset
8G (4x 2G) ECC FB-DIMM DDR2-533, 2x open
2x Western Digital 160-Gig SATA-II RAID Edition, 7200rpm, 16M Buffer
2x Western Digital 160-Gig SATA-II, 7200rpm, 16M Buffer
on-board Intel ICH7R 4-port SATA controller
on-board Intel dual-port gigabit NICs
on-board ATI ES1000 Video, 16M
24x slim CD-ROM, no floppy drive
SuperMicro SC813MT-420B 1U Rack-mount Chassis, Black
4x Hot-swap HDD Carriers & 1x4 SATA Backplane
supermicro 1U 420w Power Supply
1U Mounting Rails/Brackets Kit included
Opinion Needed About Liquidweb
Apr 20, 2007I have 2 dedicated servers and one VPS with liquidweb. Lately I am facing quite an issue with support and I think I am posting 2nd time about liquidweb support.
Its all about my VPS, which use to hold 45 clients consumming around 50 % disk space and around 30 % bandwidth.
On 3rd of April VPS started to shoot emails about services failure and continuously went for 2 days. Then on finally 5th April, it went down. So I reported this to liquidweb support by creating a ticket(I created the ticket by shooting an email to support@liquidweb.com not by logging into PIMS). I got an reply in around 1 hr 20 mins that server is up. So i checked it and yes it was up, but with lots of issues. Still were getting service failure emails as they are failing and above all my root password stopped working. So couldn't login into WHM that time.
I reported this back on 6th April. No reply on 6th of April. On 7th april, I sent a reminder about the issue. They repiled by asking for my last 4 digits of credit card for verification purpose (Designatation of that person was written Web Designer) . Now when I ordered this using paypal, there is no question of last 4 digits of credit card. So I politely replied them back within 4 hours that I have used paypal for ordering the VPS.
They didn't reply back on 7th, not on 8th. Finally on 9th, when I lost few customers because I can't login into WHM, I wrote a bit stringly worded post in that support ticket.
To quote myself.....
"OPPS!!!....This has been a tremendous lack of response from you guys. It seems
that you don't have support guys anymore. I have lost few customers
because I can't login into my WHM. And it seems that you have changed my
root password and now not letting me know about this.
Suddenly one web designer is replying my ticket.
Whats is happening there?
Let me know my root password immediately.
Thanks
Krish"
Now after posting this reply, I decided to call them. So within 30 mins of this post I called them. Jason, a system admin replied and we talked politely about the issue. He accepted over phone that it was big mess.
Why big mess?????...because when he restored my old password and I logged into WHM....I don't see any account left . All data lost...everything gone as it appeared there is nothing left.
So he took up the issue of restoring account. He claimed that server was rooted. Now how come after so many days and communications they discovered my server was rooted?
Then he started restoring accounts....all accounts came back but with a loss of around whopping 80% loss of data. Most of customers started complaining about loss of emails and data. On 10th again I reported them about such loss and mysql which was not working. They fixed the mysql issue, but no database was left.
Then I got busy on 11th, could not follow it up as I should have been doing. But still as I was waiting replies from my customer about how much is the loss (I was telling them that we should be able to get them back from backup).
So I reported back to support on 11th as follows...I quote myself...
"I am waiting for reply from them. I noticed one thing. That the content is not
restored properly...as there are only 13% of space used right..which should be
around 50%."
On 12th I got following reply...I quote...
JoltDigital.com - Opinion Of Hosting?
Aug 21, 2009Our company uses ProductCart made by Early Impact (www.earlyimpact.com) for our shopping cart system. People on Early Impact's forums have recommended JoltDigital.com for web hosting for ProductCart.
Has anyone else used/is using JoltDigital.com or know of someone who does?
In your opinion, how are they as a hosting company: Customer support Uptime/reliability Feature reliability (ie- database management, scripting & server languages, etc.) Easy to use...
Vhost / Cirtex. My Opinion.
Mar 5, 2009These guys are atrocious.
So far:
1)I bought a vps from them, got it promptly, except it was set to the wrong port.
2)I requested it reinstalled without there 'extras' so my network admin could do it himself. They do not offer a reboot in there power panel.
3)They reinstalled it, but changed my root password, also it is still set to the wrong port.
4)I then spoke to there live support, they started talking then disappeared for about 10 minutes to chat on the phone without even telling me, leaving a paying customer sitting there thinking 'what the hell'.
5)I requested the VPS be set to my original password by email, and they haven't
I just wanted a clean VPS to do my have my own install done on... how was that so much to ask of them?
I have now sent in another password request, but my advice to you all, steer the hell away!
Opinion XO Shared Hosting With MySQL
Mar 27, 2008Does anyone have an opinion on the performance of XO's shared web hosting solution when you're using their built-in MySQL capability with PHP coding?
View 0 Replies View RelatedWhat Is Your Opinion About Hostgator.com For Hosting Site
Dec 25, 2008What is your opinion about hostgator.com for hosting site?
What is your opinion about hostgator.com for hosting site? is it good from small to big sites?
Custom Server Spec Opinion
Oct 7, 2007I'm considering building the following 1U rack server for colocation. I'm completely new to rack servers and colocation so I would be very grateful to hear your opinions:
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 CPU
ASUS P5B-VM SE Motherboard
8GB PC5300 667MHz Non-ECC RAM
500GB HDD
345W Power Supply
I also have a few specific questions:Are there any differences between the Q6600 and it's Xeon equivalent? (especially power wise?)
Are there any disadvantages using a desktop motherboard in a (1U) server? (again, especially power wise?)
I've read that non-ECC memory is a lot more acceptable for servers now than it was a few years ago, is this true?
Does a 500GB drive use much more power than a 160GB drive?
How many watts of power can I expect the server to use?
Does a 1U chassis usually come with uATX mounting points?
Iron Mountain: My Opinion After 3 Weeks.
Jul 25, 2007Brand new to posting on this forum, but been browsing for a while. Also brand new to VPS, but i recently decided to take my first plunge into the VPS world. I've been using Iron Mountain VPS for about 3 weeks now, and since there seems to be very little talk about their services on this forum, I thought it would be useful to post my opinions, and maybe get the opinions of some others about this provider.
My Background:
I began my search for web hosting because I had been hosting my own email server at home, but began to have several issues keeping the server up and running (power outages, network outages, power supply failures, etc...). My wife was complaining about her email being down, so I began looking for a more reliable solution I'm also a software developer, so I also had some interest in running some "hobby" type j2EE programs, so I began to look at VPS solutions. Since I am pretty technically inclined, I was just looking for a low cost unmanaged VPS solution with at least reasonable reliability that was powerful enough to run j2ee applications, host email, and run a couple other services like hosting my digital photos and setting up a versioning control repository (svn). I actually took the time to make a speadsheet to compare over 10 VPS providers, and eventually found Iron Mountain to be the best solution for me.
Setup:
Their sales department was VERY quick to answer my questions, and very accomodating to my requests. I purchased their Pearl package online, and once the transaction was complete, I recieved an email that I could already log into my control panel. Here is the timline that things happened:
11:35am - Purchase transaction complete
11:36am - Recieve email on my billing info, and how to get into my VPS control panel.
11:48am - Recieved email that my VPS has been initialized, and I can no SSH to my instance
12:22pm - Recieve email that they have already setup a MySQL database for me (on their servers), and it is ready to use (without me even asking mind you).
4:31pm - I send an email (not even a support ticket) saying that I actaully prefer PostgresSQL
4:40pm - Recieve email that they will setup a Postgres instance for me
5:34pm - My PostgresSQL instance is up and ready to go (on their servers!)
So in summary, that is 13 minutes from purchase to having my instance up and running. 34 minutes additional to have a database ready for me to use (without me even asking for one). And another hour of time it took them to get a Postgres instance up for me... Not bad
Perfromance/Reliability:
Let me preface this by saying that I am a father of 2 with a full-time job, so I really don't have time to run benchmarks and such. Also, my VPS is more of a personal site, so I don't have to worry about reliability as much as say a reseller or ecommerce customer. So I'm only basing these comments on preception and my knowledge of the technology Iron Mountain uses. In genereal, I have experienced NO downtime, and performance seems VERY quick. My J2EE application almost seems to run faster off these servers than it does on my localhost development environment... which is good enough for me.
Now let me rant about why I am very comfortable with their ability to continue to have great perfromance and reliability. One key here is that this is clustered web hosting! This means they have (for example) 30 servers working together like 1 giant computer. This giant computer runs all of their customer's VPS instances. If one server were to fail, nobody is losing service, it just means that there are now only 29 servers making up this one giant computer until they can get #30 back up and running. This not only protects us customers against one possible cause of downtime, but it also allows Iron Mountain to do server maintanence and upgrades without interupting any of their customer's service. My employeer has a similar setup in their datacenter, so I am semi-knowledgable on the benefits of a cluster. Now their service could still go down because of things like network issues (which is often out of the control of the VPS provider), but at least it removes risk at one point of failure. If you need anything more reliable than this, you should consider other alternatives such as having a mirrored service with another VPS provider on a completely different network.
Another HUGE selling point for me is that they host my databases, email, and spam filters (and DNS if you need to use it) on THIER servers! All three of these can potentially hog system resources (disk space, memmory, and bandwidth), so to not have them taxing my personal instance is HUGE. This also spares me from having to configure and maintain these services on my own. Oh, and to top it off, the perfomance of these services are VERY fast. However, the flexibiblity is there if you decide you want to host your own database and email on your own servers (obviously).
Support:
As I mentioned earlier, I only really needed an unmanaged provider, and I haven't experienced any issues to this point, so my opinion on their support is limited. However, I have sent about 5-7 emails their way, and have received a response from them within 10 minutes every time! This gives me quite a bit of comfort should a real issue arise.
The funny part of all this is that I can not tell whether Iron Mountain's plans are managed or unmanaged. I guess they are at least semi-managed, as they have setup a database for me without any questions. I guess my question is whether they are fully managed (ie will do backups and install custom apps for you) or not... Maybe an Iron Mountain rep can chime in here.
Summary:
VERY smooth sailing so far. I have email, databases, subversion, apache, tomcat and more running, and still have plenty of resources left over for more. Sales/Support has been VERY friendly, and I have no concerns their. For what I need out of a VPS, who could ask for more. Their prices are also very reasonable, and their new Quartz plan is an amazing deal for a hobbyist like myself. Not really much to critisize at this point, but I will keep this forum up to date if anything arises.
Sweden – Traffic Payment We Are Interested In Your Opinion
Mar 28, 2009We work with a hosting provider in Sweden. We rent a dedicated server there. The traffic was uneven, from time to time. Sometimes there was no traffic, and sometimes it reached 90Mbit. We bought a configuration with 10,000Gb. Now they sent us the traffic invoice. That has 18Tb if to count according to the 95% system. And in total we used about 12Tb. We didn’t know they counted according to 95%, that wasn’t mentioned in the agreement, it said only about 400sek per TB excluding VAT***. That’s why we thought that we had to pay exactly for the used traffic because if to count according to the 95% system, which means it’s counted per a channel, and the agreement informed only about the Tbs.
View 8 Replies View RelatedWhich Is Better Processor
May 20, 2008In Terms of server speed, reliability, load handling, mysql database handling and other aspects which is better processor with same RAM config..
Processor 1 : P4 3Ghz Dual Core
Processor 2 : Intel Celeron-L Conroe 1.6 Ghz
OR
Processor 3 :Celeron Dual Core E1200's
Which Processor
Jul 15, 2008I have always used Intel processors. Maybe just out of habit but I always have.
AMD Dual-Core Opeteron 1216 2.40GHz
or
Intel Quad-Core Xeon 2.50GHz 2.66GHz
Both would have 4GB ram.
What is the actual performance differences between these two processors? The Intel is $80 more and just not sure if it really is worth it.
RAM Vs Processor - Who Wins
Jan 12, 2009Hows everybody doing. I am hosting a small network of sites (between 5-10) on a dedicated server with HostGator. I have the Standard package which gives me 1024mb as far as RAM and a Dual-Core 3040 Xeon (Conroe) as a processor goes.
My sites run extremely slow on the front end and back end. The sites are blogs which you probably know are php heavy. Not to mention a few of the sites get a decent amount of traffic (Alexa rankings of around 50K). One of the less popular sites with not as much traffic is www(dot)abnormalstyle(dot)com ...You can see how slow this site loads, its on the same server as the other sites, just using a different IP account...
I am looking to upgrade my server. When i talked to HostGator support i got the answer i would expect. "Upgrade to the next package, which is more money".
I am wondering if i would advantage from just upgrading my ram, or going with a processor first. The thing is, if i want to get the next processor i have to defiantly go with the next HostGator package, due to the fact they cant just add a new processor. They can however add more Ram.
Below are some options, if you have the time feel free to leave your comments and pick one of the options below which you feel would best suit the network of Wordpress blog sites i am using.
---------------------------------------------------------
Option 1 - Just upgrade RAM. There is no sense in going from a Dual-Core 3040 Xeon (Conroe) processor to just a Quad-Core 3210 Xeon (Kentsfield) processor, regardless of the ram, it will not make a major difference. ITS ALL ABOUT RAM!
Option 2 - Go for the next HostGator package which offers 4096mb Ram wise and Quad-Core 3210 Xeon (Kentsfield) processor wise. The Processor upgrade along with the RAM upgrade will be MUCH BETTER then just the ram upgrade itself in option 1.
Processor Speed
Mar 3, 2007After reading a lot of good reviews on Softlayer around here, I was thinking about switching to them. They have some really good deals and I'm planning on getting one of their dual opterons, but I have a question about the processor speed in relation to database intense stuff (like a forum with a good number of users on at once, or a CMS).
I have the option of either going for a Dual Opteron 248 (2.2 gHz) or a 252 (2.6 gHz) which costs $50 more. My question: is the 252 really worth the extra money compared to the 248? All I have on my server is an IPB forum with 100-450+ users on at any given time, and a static site (soon to be converted to a CMS), and I'm thinking that RAM is more important than the processor for a database app like those (that, and hard drive speed). So I wanted to know if it would be better to go with the 248 and spend the money on more Ram and a SA SCSI 10k drive or two?
Processor Affinity
Jan 9, 2007I have a production windows 2003 server with 2 XEON processors. In task manager I see 4 processors: 0,1,2,3. I assume this is because these processors have hyperthreading. My question is how do I know which 2 of the 4 are the main processors. I have a service I only want to run on processor 2, which 2 would I select to do this? I really don't want to be experimenting as this is a live production server.
View 2 Replies View RelatedAdding 2nd Processor
Jan 11, 2007I have a single Intel Xeon Processor and already found a same stepping code Xeon processor to upgrade.
I'm running CentOS 4.4. If I add the 2nd processor, do I need to configure anything on the system.
Which Processor? Q8200 Vs Q6600
May 4, 2009Planning on getting a new dedicated server with 4GB RAM, and a 500GB 7.2k SATA2 Hard Drive.
Which processor do you guys suggest? I know the Q6600 is older and runs hotter, but it has better specs than the Q8200. Would I really notice a difference if I'm only hosting static sites without any video streaming or anything?
Which Processor Is Best For A Hosting Server
Mar 29, 2009if im going to open a web hosting business, which processor works best for a server, AMD or Intel?
View 12 Replies View RelatedDedicated Server Processor
Apr 13, 2009Intel Dual Quad Core Harpertown Or Core i7?
What would be better for a dedicated server?
Intel Xeon Processor
Mar 30, 2008while I'm surfing the net i find this site where it has a price list for the parts of a computer and i saw an Intel Xeon processor and it's priced is affordable to me.. Hmm.. My question now is it Ok to buy this processor? because some of my I.T. friends here tell me that it is for Server based processor only and it is not suitable for PC HOME USER..
View 2 Replies View RelatedRecommended Server Processor
Sep 9, 2008The the provider we're considering is offering a range of processors at different price points including:
single Xeon 5110 (dual core) with 2GB memory,
single Xeon X3220 (quad) 2GB,
dual Intel Xeon 5100 with 2GB,
dual Xenon 5310 (quads) with 4GB.
Does Xen Run Better On A 2 Separate Processor Platform
Jul 3, 2008Does xen run better on a double processor server rather than an intel duo?
View 1 Replies View RelatedQ6600 Processor Vs. Q9400
Aug 22, 2008I have read benchmark comparisons and found the Q9400 and even the Q9300 to be a better performing processor compared to the Q6600 processor, even with 2MB less L2 cache.
I am just wondering, how significant of a difference do you think the Q6600 processor and the Q9400 processor is in a server environment? Currently I have a Q6600 processor but am looking to upgrade my server, possibly to the Q9400 processor..will it be worth it? It's not that much more expensive..the only thing I am concerned about is the 2mb L2 cache loss.
My site is "kind-of" high traffic. We receive a lot of connections and visitors, and most-importantly my sites are run by PHP and MySQL databases.
Please help me choose the right processor. Currently I have 4GB DDR2-800mhz installed, which I will be upgrading to 8GB DDR2-800mhz, no matter what processor I choose to run.
I discovered that upgrading to 1ghz RAM is just not worth the extra money because the performance gain is very little and not noticeable.
Would anyone possibly know of a Intel Quad Core processor that has 8mb or more of L2 cache, 1333mhz FSB, and is comparable to the processors listed above and relatively the same in price?
TOP On Dual Processor Server
Sep 4, 2007I have a dual processor server and today I was monitoring CPU usage using the ‘top’ command
There was a mysql process I was tweaking around with where the CPU % kept jumping over 100%.. It went up to 155%, 175%, 180% on numerous occasions.
My question is on a dual processor machine does ‘top’ measure CPU usage between 0% and 200% or does the usages I saw earlier mean my server was getting REALLY overloaded?
Microsoft SQL Processor License Vs CALs
May 30, 2009One Webhost is offering MS SQL 2005 Standard Edition (Processor Licence) for US$385 per month.
Another webhost is offering MS SQL 2005 Standard Edition with 5 CALs for US$35 per month.
The first webhost says CALs are not available and that:
"A Processor License is required for running a Web server that is open to public access. Using CALs may put you in question from Microsoft's legal point of view if the inappropriate license is applied."
Only 3 people have access to the server and the website, I think, is very standard. www.culture360.org
Our org does not wish to do anything illegal. Which one is most appropriate? The price differences are very large.
I've had a look here:
[url]