I moved my wordpress blog from blog.domain.info to domain.net i own both the tld domains. google search already had the posts from old url indexed. if someone clicks in it it shows 404 error. how do i redirect the traffic from old url to new url via htaccess. I dont want duplicate post on google. how to make the transition? i am confused with many online articles about htaccess redirect.
Currently I have DNS as well as IIS configured on the same server. I am using host headers to seperate the sites on IIS. My question is how do I link my DNS to the website residing on IIS? My DNS server set (I can ping it from the internet) and I think I have IIS configured right, but I must be missing something?
I have a .swf file that I directly linked to digg. How can I redirect that specific file to a different page/server to relieve some of the pressure from all those users?
any reliable audio hosting service that can offer an *.mp3 - ending link to a file, not the "server.com/folder/4j8uz22ewssw" thing, please? In other words I'm looking for a hosting service with a direct link to an mp3 (just to clear things up, its not copyrighted since I'm the owner of it).
I was wondering: say I have a website where users discuss different articles and when a user wants to discuss a specific article, he/she will be able to link to that article and then say what they have to say.
Certainly, copying and pasting would violate the site's copyright but simply including a little link sounds like a legal alternative. Is it really? Or, technically that would still require me as the webmaster, or the user who posted it to request permission just for linking?
I know nobody would care because it only gives more traffic to the site but legally, would permission be needed?
If you know about What script to use for 1:1 traffic exchange for a entertainment websites, please let me know as I am looking for some php scripts that does that automatically for a entertainment website
I am currently coding a backend to my website where clients can login and view their webmail, stats, etc.
What I am after is a script that will link my clients directly through to awstats, without going through cpanel or having to re-enter their username/password through the htaccess popup.
Does anybody know if I can pass the un/pwd combo through in the url string to popup the stats in the correct manner?
I have installed lighttpd and set userdir to "public_html". In Apache, we can use WHM to link a userdir to a domain, e.g.: "URL/~example/" => "example.org"
I find that lots of hosts don't put the link to a phpinfo() script on their websites, even though that would save everyone a lot of unnecessary questions.
So I figure we should have a thread where people can add links to phpinfo scripts on their own hosts, or hosts where they happen to have the URL of a phpinfo script.
For those of you who own your own web hosting services, here's a chance to show off all your installed goodness, and all it takes is placing a simple link here (and put one in your FAQ section on your web site too, for the love of God)..
Since the forum doesn't allow editing your own posts (I still think that is nuts), please include all previous links in your post, so visitors will only need to read the LAST post to find all the updated links in one place.
I run a small streaming/cdn service and I'm looking at how best to utilize my bandwidth. Here's the scoop:
I have a 1/4 rack and 2 gbit drops from my provider. Currently I am running a single server connected to 1 gbit port - nothing fancy. Business is good so I am about to add another server. As this location is already the backup/failover for my primary colo (different location/provider), I am interested in playing with aggregation options.
I have used 802.3ad in the past, so that was my first choice. I asked my provider if they can trunk my ports on their switch - unfortunately they refused (they only allow it above a certain commit).
So...do I have any other options for aggregation? It's pure mb/sec throughput that I am looking for, rather than failover. I have the rackspace/power/etc to colo my own switch or router, I'm just curious if there is an effective alternative.
I recently initiated "Hot Link Prevention" on one of my web sites on my Dedicated server (via CPanel). It woks well in re-directing hotlinked images to a small image that says "Unauthorized Hotlink Image." This of course prevents other web sites from leaching my bandwidth. However, I have had a number of people complain that when they visit my forum, they don't get my site's images, but instead see the Unauthorized Hotlink Image. The common thread seems to be the people with the problem are using Security Software. In one case, a guy is using Norton Confidential. Another guy is using some Security software provided by his ISP. I'm guessing that this security software is somehow messing with the Referer in tehir browser and confusing my server into thinking the images are being hotlinked from some other site. Short of turning off Hot Link Prevention, does anyone have any suggestions to tell the folks...are there settings in their Security Software for example that will prevent the problem when they visit my site?
Does anyone know of a "Windows Server 2003 Standard" download link? It seems that Microsoft has taken this OFF their 2003 download page, or has somehow "hidden" the link to only show the newer "2008" links (and the updates to 2003).
The trial software link here ...
[url]
...works for 2003 to begin the download process, but in the end no download URL is provided.
I have a website and I have 15 e-mail accounts for my employees for example - my website is Gazeboentertainment.com and I created 15 E-mail accounts for 15 employees like - abc@Gazeboentertainment.com def@Gazeboentertainment.com ghi@Gazeboentertainment.com and so on...........................
But I want to create a seperate link where my employees can login directly.
For doing this it requires my ftp user ID and Pwd.
I created a mssql database. When I click on the weasmin link I go to a 404.Also when I log in as administrator and go to Tools & Settings >>>Database Servers >>>>>click on the .MSSQLSERVER2012 then webadmin it will open myLittleAdmin for SQ Server and I can see the datases.
I thought with 802.3ad I could aggregate the links and thus turn a 3x100 megabit pipes to one 300 meg pipe. The problem is when using the default options (and layer2 xmit mode) I only get the bandwidth of a single connection and I see no other traffic on the other two. Here is output from /proc/net/bonding/bond0:
MII Status: up MII Polling Interval (ms): 100 Up Delay (ms): 0 Down Delay (ms): 0
802.3ad info LACP rate: slow Active Aggregator Info: Aggregator ID: 2 Number of ports: 3 Actor Key: 9 Partner Key: 3 Partner Mac Address: 00:1e:f6:xx:xx:xx
Slave Interface: eth0 MII Status: up Link Failure Count: 0 Permanent HW addr: 00:1e:8c:xx:xx:xx Aggregator ID: 1
Slave Interface: eth2 MII Status: up Link Failure Count: 0 Permanent HW addr: 00:04:23:xx:xx:xx Aggregator ID: 1
Slave Interface: eth3 MII Status: up Link Failure Count: 0 Permanent HW addr: 00:04:23:xx:xx:xx Aggregator ID: 1 Basically it works in that I get a connection but its no different from being on a regular 100/100 connection. Downloading files my machine from completely different networks always only goes out one connection. I don't even see any received/sent packets from the other two interfaces.
When I tell it to use layer3+4 via the xmit_hash_policy paramter when loading the module IE:
It seems to work as expected except it looks like all incomming traffic comes in on the same interface and its not much different from a normal load balancing (except from a single IP address). I will stick to this method if I have no choice as I don't really care about the download all that much and it seems to do a good job.
Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation Transmit Hash Policy: layer3+4 (1) MII Status: up MII Polling Interval (ms): 100 Up Delay (ms): 0 Down Delay (ms): 0
802.3ad info LACP rate: slow Active Aggregator Info: Aggregator ID: 2 Number of ports: 3 Actor Key: 9 Partner Key: 3 Partner Mac Address: 00:1e:f6:xx:xx:xx
Slave Interface: eth0 MII Status: up Link Failure Count: 0 Permanent HW addr: 00:1e:8c:xx:xx:xx Aggregator ID: 2
Slave Interface: eth2 MII Status: up Link Failure Count: 0 Permanent HW addr: 00:04:23:xx:xx:xx Aggregator ID: 2
Slave Interface: eth3 MII Status: up Link Failure Count: 0 Permanent HW addr: 00:04:23:xx:xx:xx Aggregator ID: 2
My understanding is that with layer2 it should just be one big fat pipe. IE: packets are fragmented and thus even a single connection should be able to sustain 300 megabits (if the other end could provide it). It seems like it just doesn't use my other interfaces at all when doing this.
I seem to keep getting this error whenever I try to uploading something thats too large.
It transfers fine for a few mins, then it stalls and eventually I get this error message.
Small files are fine since they don't take long to transfer, it just seems that I can't have a file transferring for too long.
I can actually get the damn file through but since I keep getting that error, I need to keep manually clicking on the transfer button. So it takes about 20 tries before I can finish a 30MB file. And I have a lot of files to transfer so thats very troublesome.
Does anyone know what the problem might be? I tried turning off the firewall and opening ports on my router but it still doesn't work. Using Cute FTP.