[lighttpd] Link Userdir To A Domain
Feb 3, 2008I have installed lighttpd and set userdir to "public_html". In Apache, we can use WHM to link a userdir to a domain, e.g.:
"URL/~example/" => "example.org"
How do I do this for lighttpd?
I have installed lighttpd and set userdir to "public_html". In Apache, we can use WHM to link a userdir to a domain, e.g.:
"URL/~example/" => "example.org"
How do I do this for lighttpd?
I have bought a domain name and hosting space from different sources. I,myself want to link the both.
View 5 Replies View Related- Apache version 2.2
- operating system Ubuntu
I think I have tried everything else and userdir would work the best and is essentially what I am looking for. So basically I want be able to view all the folders in the /var/[folders]/www the problem here is that only one of the folders in there is a user. This user is called server. So when I go to http://myipaddress/~server I can view the files and its all fine, but I want to be able to go to http://myipaddress/~mark which would be /var/mark/www but "mark" is not a user. So I just get a 404 page not found error.
I moved my wordpress blog from blog.domain.info to domain.net i own both the tld domains. google search already had the posts from old url indexed. if someone clicks in it it shows 404 error. how do i redirect the traffic from old url to new url via htaccess. I dont want duplicate post on google. how to make the transition? i am confused with many online articles about htaccess redirect.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI currently have a few websites hosted. One of them is a .NET.
I want to purchase the same domain again, but as a .COM.
How do I link the new .com to the older .net domain?
I use cPanel.
There are 2 different domains with the same IP being served by Apache. I want one of the domains to be served by lighttpd, is it possible without having to change the IP of that domain?
View 11 Replies View Relatedhow do I forward all *.domain.com/* to www.domain.com/* in Lighttpd
View 3 Replies View RelatedCurrently I have DNS as well as IIS configured on the same server. I am using host headers to seperate the sites on IIS. My question is how do I link my DNS to the website residing on IIS? My DNS server set (I can ping it from the internet) and I think I have IIS configured right, but I must be missing something?
View 1 Replies View RelatedOn a webpage, I have two links:
[url]
and
[url]
The first one goes 404, and if your refresh the page you get the page.
The second goes directly to the page.
There is one other file in the /xyz directory and it is not named index.* and there is a temp directory.
I can type the url in a browser either way and it gets to you directly to the page. It seems only when it is a link that it is a problem.
I have a .swf file that I directly linked to digg. How can I redirect that specific file to a different page/server to relieve some of the pressure from all those users?
View 0 Replies View Relatedany reliable audio hosting service that can offer an *.mp3 - ending link to a file, not the "server.com/folder/4j8uz22ewssw" thing, please? In other words I'm looking for a hosting service with a direct link to an mp3 (just to clear things up, its not copyrighted since I'm the owner of it).
View 14 Replies View RelatedI was wondering: say I have a website where users discuss different articles and when a user wants to discuss a specific article, he/she will be able to link to that article and then say what they have to say.
Certainly, copying and pasting would violate the site's copyright but simply including a little link sounds like a legal alternative. Is it really? Or, technically that would still require me as the webmaster, or the user who posted it to request permission just for linking?
I know nobody would care because it only gives more traffic to the site but legally, would permission be needed?
to execute the following command into a Solaris 5.11 system.
cp -al ......
The problem is that either -a or -l works on Solaris.
Man pages are not installed and all I can get is:
Usage: cp [-f] [-i] [-p] [-@] f1 f2
cp [-f] [-i] [-p] [-@] f1 ... fn d1
cp -r|-R [-H|-L|-P] [-f] [-i] [-p] [-@] d1 ... dn-1 dn
What I want to achieve is link files instead of copying and also keep permissions on files.
I have 2 TV link sites similar to tv-links.cc etc. Does anyone know where I can host such sites?
I know there are some legal issues with those sites (in certain countries) so I'm not sure who can/will host them.
I'm currently at FDC,
I have a dedicated server hosted at domain.com. I want to get a new server and link it to something.domain.com
View 3 Replies View RelatedIf you know about What script to use for 1:1 traffic exchange for a entertainment websites, please let me know as I am looking for some php scripts that does that automatically for a entertainment website
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am currently coding a backend to my website where clients can login and view their webmail, stats, etc.
What I am after is a script that will link my clients directly through to awstats, without going through cpanel or having to re-enter their username/password through the htaccess popup.
Does anybody know if I can pass the un/pwd combo through in the url string to popup the stats in the correct manner?
I was reading on the internet that it was not possible to link php and apache 2 statically.
If this is true then is my only option to install apache 1.3 and link it that way?
Are there any solution anyone know to get around this?
I know DSO is better but the problem is.. some software requires them to be statically linked so its something I have to solve.
I find that lots of hosts don't put the link to a phpinfo() script on their websites, even though that would save everyone a lot of unnecessary questions.
So I figure we should have a thread where people can add links to phpinfo scripts on their own hosts, or hosts where they happen to have the URL of a phpinfo script.
For those of you who own your own web hosting services, here's a chance to show off all your installed goodness, and all it takes is placing a simple link here (and put one in your FAQ section on your web site too, for the love of God)..
Since the forum doesn't allow editing your own posts (I still think that is nuts), please include all previous links in your post, so visitors will only need to read the LAST post to find all the updated links in one place.
I run a small streaming/cdn service and I'm looking at how best to utilize my bandwidth. Here's the scoop:
I have a 1/4 rack and 2 gbit drops from my provider. Currently I am running a single server connected to 1 gbit port - nothing fancy. Business is good so I am about to add another server. As this location is already the backup/failover for my primary colo (different location/provider), I am interested in playing with aggregation options.
I have used 802.3ad in the past, so that was my first choice. I asked my provider if they can trunk my ports on their switch - unfortunately they refused (they only allow it above a certain commit).
So...do I have any other options for aggregation? It's pure mb/sec throughput that I am looking for, rather than failover. I have the rackspace/power/etc to colo my own switch or router, I'm just curious if there is an effective alternative.
cPanel interface and want to create friendly link to access phpmyadmin. So, here is my questions:
1- Is there a way directly in cPanel to do it?
2- What is the better way to do this: Symbolic link or simple redirection?
I got problem with collisions
I think this because of half duplex that nic does:
eth0: no autonegotiation, 100baseTx-HD, link ok
product info: vendor 00:00:20, model 32 rev 1
basic mode: autonegotiation enabled
basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok
capabilities: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD
advertising: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD
link partner: 100baseTx-HD
Is this because of nic or switch?
what is link partner?
I recently initiated "Hot Link Prevention" on one of my web sites on my Dedicated server (via CPanel). It woks well in re-directing hotlinked images to a small image that says "Unauthorized Hotlink Image." This of course prevents other web sites from leaching my bandwidth. However, I have had a number of people complain that when they visit my forum, they don't get my site's images, but instead see the Unauthorized Hotlink Image. The common thread seems to be the people with the problem are using Security Software. In one case, a guy is using Norton Confidential. Another guy is using some Security software provided by his ISP. I'm guessing that this security software is somehow messing with the Referer in tehir browser and confusing my server into thinking the images are being hotlinked from some other site. Short of turning off Hot Link Prevention, does anyone have any suggestions to tell the folks...are there settings in their Security Software for example that will prevent the problem when they visit my site?
View 4 Replies View RelatedLets say i gave user space on my site. They also make there own pages e.g blog or whatver
how would that work. Would those blog pages just automatically get added to my host server as if i uplaoded it
or would it get stored in a databse. if so how. and wer can i laern do u knw?
Does anyone know of a "Windows Server 2003 Standard" download link? It seems that Microsoft has taken this OFF their 2003 download page, or has somehow "hidden" the link to only show the newer "2008" links (and the updates to 2003).
The trial software link here ...
[url]
...works for 2003 to begin the download process, but in the end no download URL is provided.
I have a website and I have 15 e-mail accounts for my employees
for example - my website is Gazeboentertainment.com
and I created 15 E-mail accounts for 15 employees like -
abc@Gazeboentertainment.com
def@Gazeboentertainment.com
ghi@Gazeboentertainment.com
and so on...........................
But I want to create a seperate link where my employees can login directly.
For doing this it requires my ftp user ID and Pwd.
I want to create a seperate link for this,
I created a mssql database. When I click on the weasmin link I go to a 404.Also when I log in as administrator and go to Tools & Settings >>>Database Servers >>>>>click on the .MSSQLSERVER2012 then webadmin it will open myLittleAdmin for SQ Server and I can see the datases.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI want to add a submenu under navigation with link to a page on external website, how can I do that?
It allows submenu to the pages on my website only.
I thought with 802.3ad I could aggregate the links and thus turn a 3x100 megabit pipes to one 300 meg pipe. The problem is when using the default options (and layer2 xmit mode) I only get the bandwidth of a single connection and I see no other traffic on the other two. Here is output from /proc/net/bonding/bond0:
Code:
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.3.0 (June 10, 2008)
Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation
Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0)
MII Status: up
MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
Up Delay (ms): 0
Down Delay (ms): 0
802.3ad info
LACP rate: slow
Active Aggregator Info:
Aggregator ID: 2
Number of ports: 3
Actor Key: 9
Partner Key: 3
Partner Mac Address: 00:1e:f6:xx:xx:xx
Slave Interface: eth0
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:1e:8c:xx:xx:xx
Aggregator ID: 1
Slave Interface: eth2
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:04:23:xx:xx:xx
Aggregator ID: 1
Slave Interface: eth3
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:04:23:xx:xx:xx
Aggregator ID: 1
Basically it works in that I get a connection but its no different from being on a regular 100/100 connection. Downloading files my machine from completely different networks always only goes out one connection. I don't even see any received/sent packets from the other two interfaces.
When I tell it to use layer3+4 via the xmit_hash_policy paramter when loading the module IE:
modprobe bonding mode=4 xmit_hash_policy=layer3+4 miimon=100
It seems to work as expected except it looks like all incomming traffic comes in on the same interface and its not much different from a normal load balancing (except from a single IP address). I will stick to this method if I have no choice as I don't really care about the download all that much and it seems to do a good job.
Here is /proc/net/bonding/bond0 from that config:
Code:
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.3.0 (June 10, 2008)
Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation
Transmit Hash Policy: layer3+4 (1)
MII Status: up
MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
Up Delay (ms): 0
Down Delay (ms): 0
802.3ad info
LACP rate: slow
Active Aggregator Info:
Aggregator ID: 2
Number of ports: 3
Actor Key: 9
Partner Key: 3
Partner Mac Address: 00:1e:f6:xx:xx:xx
Slave Interface: eth0
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:1e:8c:xx:xx:xx
Aggregator ID: 2
Slave Interface: eth2
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:04:23:xx:xx:xx
Aggregator ID: 2
Slave Interface: eth3
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:04:23:xx:xx:xx
Aggregator ID: 2
My understanding is that with layer2 it should just be one big fat pipe. IE: packets are fragmented and thus even a single connection should be able to sustain 300 megabits (if the other end could provide it). It seems like it just doesn't use my other interfaces at all when doing this.
Here is my config on the cisco 2960:
Code:
interface Port-channel3
switchport access vlan 100
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100
switchport mode access
switchport nonegotiate
spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/10
switchport access vlan 100
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100
switchport mode access
switchport nonegotiate
channel-protocol lacp
channel-group 3 mode active
spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/38
switchport access vlan 100
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100
switchport mode access
switchport nonegotiate
channel-protocol lacp
channel-group 3 mode active
spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/40
switchport access vlan 100
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100
switchport mode access
switchport nonegotiate
channel-protocol lacp
channel-group 3 mode active
spanning-tree portfast