I just recently started monitoring my dedicated server using Top -- previously I used WHM server status -- and noticed that occasionally a "usb-storage" command was being run in SSH under root user. Is that normal?
View 2 RepliesI'm completely torn on going the absolute budget route vs spending more for something that'll allow easy upgradeability in the future. I basically need lots of space but file sending-- media like mp3s, video, etc.
it'll be raid 5 and I'll need at least 2-3TB initially but the ability to expand would be nice.
option 1:
nice chassis with plenty of hotswap bays with sas expanders
expensive sas raid card
option 2:
cheap chassis to serve "immediate" needs and go with more later.
not sure what I'd use as a card? maybe even onboard?
regarding reliability: I once saw a database of failure rates of different models. raptor was the most reliable of the "desktop" drives. anyone have the link? I'm wondering of the seagate ES drives are worth the extra money vs the non-ES drives. they're supposedely more reliable and the "server versions" of sata drives.
Is there a command i can type into the ssh console to stop a current transfer that i started wit the wget command?
the file im wgeting always stuffs up at 51% but then the server just retries and starts again, its done it 3 times so far and i just want to completely cancle the process if possible....
I found these strange random name files on the tmp anyone know what are they and are that normal?
4Hq7Xb Dbrfns lost+found MGlWaF p6w849 PP5uVI SoArWn spamd_light.sock ToL3Ah Vt0ICH xEgXsU zVLVDa
AGs49w fcKNmJ LyC11q O3VQwM pAD0WL psa spamd_full.sock tLnzRx tXqqGI x7uxxo XuFzJl
I had a client ask me earlier if there was any downsides to having his main site be SSL only ,not his billing his actual site.
For exmaple it would be https://www.yoursite.com rather than the normal http and having that redirect to the https.
Obviously he would need all his images being linked to https in order for it to be secure but apart from that, I couldn't think of any of the top of my head, I was wondering what you guys all thought.
I just uploaded a wordpress site and it already used up 300mb ram. The site receives very little traffic so I doubt the traffic is the cause of the ram usage. Is this normal? my control panel is webmin
Code:
ID Owner Size Command
17691 mysql 129620 kB /usr/libexec/mysqld --basedir=/usr --datadir=/var/lib/mysql --user=mysql --pid-f ...
13799 named 70392 kB /usr/sbin/named -u named
14329 apache 44176 kB /usr/sbin/httpd
28588 apache 41028 kB /usr/sbin/httpd
7812 apache 38016 kB /usr/sbin/httpd
23719 apache 37416 kB /usr/sbin/httpd
23825 apache 36800 kB /usr/sbin/httpd
19656 root 24224 kB /usr/sbin/httpd
23973 root 12628 kB /usr/libexec/webmin/proc/index_size.cgi
23972 root 12232 kB /usr/libexec/webmin/blue-theme/left.cgi
19533 root 10776 kB /usr/bin/perl /usr/libexec/webmin/miniserv.pl /etc/webmin/miniserv.conf
18376 root 9024 kB sendmail: accepting connections
18384 smmsp 8116 kB sendmail: Queue runner@01:00:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue
17479 root 7120 kB /usr/sbin/sshd
32654 root 5568 kB /usr/sbin/saslauthd -m /var/run/saslauthd -a pam -n 2
32655 root 5568 kB /usr/sbin/saslauthd -m /var/run/saslauthd -a pam -n 2
32644 root 4396 kB crond
17631 root 3608 kB /bin/sh /usr/bin/mysqld_safe --datadir=/var/lib/mysql --socket=/var/lib/mysql/my ...
32594 root 2716 kB xinetd -stayalive -pidfile /var/run/xinetd.pid
7794 nobody 2480 kB proftpd: (accepting connections)
11909 root 2144 kB /sbin/udevd -d
1 root 2060 kB init [3]
32556 root 1716 kB syslogd -m 0
my server runs sata 2 but this is only consumer and recommended to use 7 hours per day while there is sata 2 server hdd type
which one should i pick?
i have this hard disk ST3500830AS
i want to get this instead but will that be necessary? will RE3 get a longer lifespan ST3500830AS
re3 [url]
And i dont plan to get raid
just reading my exim mainlog
there are soo many entries in there like activities every second
is this thing normal? does everyone get things like that?
2007-12-01 15:39:03 [24780] H=(acasa-wunxr966z) [89.137.206.241]:4505 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<hurdlingm290@tulipjewelry.com> rejected RCPT <a$
2007-12-01 15:39:03 [24780] SMTP connection from (acasa-wunxr966z) [89.137.206.241]:4505 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 closed by DROP in ACL
2007-12-01 15:39:03 [24777] H=pool-71-178-230-135.washdc.fios.verizon.net (Wireless_Broadband_Router) [71.178.230.135]:4624 I=[69.16.237.199]$
2007-12-01 15:39:03 [24777] SMTP connection from pool-71-178-230-135.washdc.fios.verizon.net (Wireless_Broadband_Router) [71.178.230.135]:462$
2007-12-01 15:39:03 [24776] H=pool-71-178-230-135.washdc.fios.verizon.net (Wireless_Broadband_Router) [71.178.230.135]:4623 I=[69.16.237.199]$
2007-12-01 15:39:03 [24776] SMTP connection from pool-71-178-230-135.washdc.fios.verizon.net (Wireless_Broadband_Router) [71.178.230.135]:462$
2007-12-01 15:39:03 [1382] SMTP connection from [200.61.182.11]:55819 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 7)
GNU nano 1.2.4 File: exim_mainlog
2007-12-02 01:25:14 [17530] ident connection to 85.168.154.92 timed out
2007-12-02 01:25:15 [1382] SMTP connection from [75.82.171.71]:1614 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 9)
2007-12-02 01:25:16 [17527] H=adsl196-236-229-217-196.adsl196-16.iam.net.ma [196.217.229.236]:59900 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<patti@myrealbox.c$
2007-12-02 01:25:16 [17527] SMTP connection from adsl196-236-229-217-196.adsl196-16.iam.net.ma [196.217.229.236]:59900 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 c$
2007-12-02 01:25:16 [17528] H=79.red-83-42-176.dynamicip.rima-tde.net [83.42.176.79]:29547 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<mostafa.Brindel@bhcat.com>$
2007-12-02 01:25:16 [17528] SMTP connection from 79.red-83-42-176.dynamicip.rima-tde.net [83.42.176.79]:29547 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 closed by $
2007-12-02 01:25:16 [1382] SMTP connection from [79.120.55.8]:4202 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 8)
2007-12-02 01:25:17 [17531] ident connection to 75.82.171.71 timed out
2007-12-02 01:25:17 [17529] H=(cpe-76-91-84-170.socal.res.rr.com) [76.91.84.170]:4913 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<occurrenceq@bhrugu.com> rejecte$
2007-12-02 01:25:17 [17529] SMTP connection from (cpe-76-91-84-170.socal.res.rr.com) [76.91.84.170]:4913 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 closed by DROP $
2007-12-02 01:25:17 [17530] H=m92.net85-168-154.noos.fr [85.168.154.92]:1310 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<Eng-Mroz@ROWELLMANAGEMENT.COM> rejected $
2007-12-02 01:25:17 [17530] SMTP connection from m92.net85-168-154.noos.fr [85.168.154.92]:1310 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 closed by DROP in ACL
2007-12-02 01:25:18 [17531] H=cpe-75-82-171-71.socal.res.rr.com [75.82.171.71]:1614 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<Kallio@jeunesfilles.org> rejected$
2007-12-02 01:25:18 [17531] SMTP connection from cpe-75-82-171-71.socal.res.rr.com [75.82.171.71]:1614 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 closed by DROP in$
2007-12-02 01:25:18 [1382] SMTP connection from [201.228.173.190]:48177 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 6)
2007-12-02 01:25:18 [1382] SMTP connection from [24.29.242.1]:1137 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 7)
2007-12-02 01:25:18 [1382] SMTP connection from [189.138.165.115]:3302 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 8)
2007-12-02 01:25:19 [17535] H=ppp1-139.ciscom.ru [79.120.55.8]:4202 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<attorneylff8@torborg.com> rejected RCPT <azeer@mp$
2007-12-02 01:25:19 [17535] SMTP connection from ppp1-139.ciscom.ru [79.120.55.8]:4202 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 closed by DROP in ACL
2007-12-02 01:25:19 [1382] SMTP connection from [189.31.128.172]:52503 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 8)
2007-12-02 01:25:20 [17538] ident connection to 201.228.173.190 timed out
2007-12-02 01:25:20 [17538] no host name found for IP address 201.228.173.190
2007-12-02 01:25:20 [17538] list matching forced to fail: failed to find host name for 201.228.173.190
2007-12-02 01:25:20 [17539] ident connection to 24.29.242.1 timed out
2007-12-02 01:25:20 [17539] no IP address found for host cpe-24-29-242-1.neo.res.rr.com (during SMTP connection from [24.29.242.1]:1137 I=[69$
2007-12-02 01:25:20 [17539] list matching forced to fail: failed to find host name for 24.29.242.1
2007-12-02 01:25:20 [17540] ident connection to 189.138.165.115 timed out
2007-12-02 01:25:20 [17540] no IP address found for host dsl-189-138-165-115.prod-infinitum.com.mx (during SMTP connection from [189.138.165.$
2007-12-02 01:25:20 [17540] list matching forced to fail: failed to find host name for 189.138.165.115
2007-12-02 01:25:21 [17539] H=(cpe-24-29-242-1.neo.res.rr.com) [24.29.242.1]:1137 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<lesley.Ervamaa@agustinbarreto.com> $
2007-12-02 01:25:21 [17539] SMTP connection from (cpe-24-29-242-1.neo.res.rr.com) [24.29.242.1]:1137 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 closed by DROP in A$
2007-12-02 01:25:21 [17541] ident connection to 189.31.128.172 timed out
2007-12-02 01:25:21 [17541] no host name found for IP address 189.31.128.172
2007-12-02 01:25:21 [17541] list matching forced to fail: failed to find host name for 189.31.128.172
2007-12-02 01:25:21 [17538] H=(201.228.173.190) [201.228.173.190]:48177 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<thiam3@searchhound.com> rejected RCPT <larifi$
2007-12-02 01:25:21 [17538] SMTP connection from (201.228.173.190) [201.228.173.190]:48177 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 closed by DROP in ACL
2007-12-02 01:25:22 [1382] SMTP connection from [82.73.58.94]:1465 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 7)
2007-12-02 01:25:22 [17540] H=(dsl-189-138-165-115.prod-infinitum.com.mx) [189.138.165.115]:3302 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 F=<emasculateq@tulsavrp$
2007-12-02 01:25:22 [17540] SMTP connection from (dsl-189-138-165-115.prod-infinitum.com.mx) [189.138.165.115]:3302 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 clos$
2007-12-02 01:25:22 [1382] SMTP connection from [71.107.124.63]:1886 I=[69.16.237.199]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 7)
I plan on installing dos_evasive as it can temporarily kill/ban an IP that makes over X amount of connections.
I ran netstat -ntu | awk '{print $5}' | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq -c | sort -n, and this is what I got:
10 218.111.214.231
10 219.95.251.185
10 222.124.226.228
10 58.187.167.20
10 61.94.234.75
10 62.168.125.217
10 82.160.42.74
10 87.116.131.18
10 89.41.71.178
11 200.193.24.226
11 218.186.9.1
11 219.93.199.121
11 220.235.171.64
11 59.128.43.234
11 60.53.77.34
11 63.109.246.234
11 83.20.72.102
11 83.237.102.75
11 84.234.144.107
11 88.226.100.145
11 88.240.137.82
12 195.229.236.216
12 203.79.252.192
12 212.90.248.182
12 220.132.87.2
12 80.130.75.239
12 82.114.184.16
12 83.26.18.242
12 85.30.223.227
12 86.108.127.28
12 87.109.49.69
12 88.247.64.131
13 200.52.193.228
13 202.155.71.40
13 222.124.172.177
13 82.116.129.110
14 195.93.21.1
14 41.251.65.79
14 80.5.154.95
14 81.10.80.75
14 82.224.40.111
14 86.17.117.193
15 196.218.42.134
15 201.19.134.99
15 212.200.185.213
15 217.171.180.249
15 218.208.196.224
15 222.124.101.183
15 80.134.70.222
15 85.160.97.238
15 88.232.120.183
16 200.188.254.9
16 200.52.193.236
16 212.118.15.140
16 81.192.124.52
16 83.14.145.170
16 85.138.71.91
16 87.207.16.154
16 89.113.75.141
17 61.196.234.202
17 82.89.37.29
17 86.135.231.183
18 80.232.249.45
18 82.114.184.206
18 88.101.26.210
19 163.121.149.170
19 194.29.137.41
19 194.44.45.13
19 195.242.99.125
19 196.202.14.244
19 196.218.117.135
19 202.158.121.223
19 81.67.245.180
19 84.255.141.132
20 200.52.193.229
20 219.83.5.20
20 88.229.128.50
20 89.245.120.136
21 196.218.143.124
21 203.130.201.196
21 63.170.84.176
21 66.249.72.173
21 72.14.207.191
21 81.192.135.224
21 82.66.227.150
21 84.29.1.151
22 155.143.244.17
22 195.207.101.112
22 202.153.240.168
22 61.94.125.143
22 85.101.146.161
23 124.106.151.75
23 88.149.99.7
24 82.77.27.129
24 88.16.34.231
25 160.39.145.94
25 202.153.240.70
25 216.125.127.12
26 196.205.97.92
26 200.104.157.183
26 202.163.117.8
26 213.180.127.198
26 60.50.95.39
26 85.71.230.49
27 194.29.137.52
27 195.189.142.249
27 201.226.162.206
27 210.6.13.208
27 81.203.41.204
27 86.90.238.96
28 193.0.240.121
28 212.76.37.150
28 89.120.133.44
29 125.162.66.116
29 74.53.121.131
30 203.222.202.121
30 213.39.219.81
30 71.109.116.122
31 222.124.143.18
31 89.34.87.91
33 193.0.240.113
33 201.9.175.242
33 212.71.37.101
33 70.68.249.239
33 81.77.85.207
34 195.229.236.215
34 86.123.142.128
35 72.49.255.217
35 85.31.137.11
36 193.231.17.50
36 202.69.97.206
36 90.156.29.82
37 77.122.158.251
37 89.40.138.184
38 121.52.52.6
38 203.218.71.132
38 82.167.71.189
39 213.17.10.87
40 196.218.145.82
40 201.22.94.226
40 206.73.210.65
40 86.9.66.1
41 152.78.243.248
42 201.220.93.84
42 210.5.121.190
43 196.204.241.250
43 196.218.89.213
44 196.218.96.82
46 84.56.103.77
48 125.212.148.112
48 41.251.69.199
49 83.203.134.84
50 213.119.151.116
50 80.133.209.50
52 81.38.15.124
53 195.245.232.26
54 88.0.63.179
57 82.201.222.144
57 83.131.27.137
57 84.226.41.129
61 129.215.149.96
64 195.113.227.31
65 198.150.36.49
65 61.102.87.80
71 84.56.109.139
73 82.216.54.222
76 196.218.136.202
76 87.118.157.79
77 89.35.90.211
78 59.127.203.49
79 81.10.35.77
81 82.148.97.68
82 213.171.62.94
84 84.36.132.189
104 213.6.215.214
108 213.51.9.184
108 41.250.0.35
110 83.41.58.76
125 84.22.2.55
132 87.209.11.249
155 196.218.142.212
165 195.242.99.84
176 200.73.225.104
190 62.135.105.86
2946 195.242.99.102
server:/#
Does that look normal to you? Because I read somewhere that you should allow no more then 30 connections per IP. But most are taking much more then that.
the Normal VPS load,
As for mine is:
Server Load 0.35 (2 cpus)
Memory Used 57.5 %
Swap Used 0.00 %
Disk /dev/simfs (/) 27 %
Also I am not getting why the swap on VPS is not used at all...
We've just started to use a VPS, and so far no problems I've been looking at the resources and they seem a little high considering it's pretty much out of the box, and I've only setup 4 sites which aren't even public yet. The only thing I've changed is the php.ini to increase the memory limit to 32mb. My main concern is that these sites don't suffer when they go live.
In the Plesk control panel the memory says:
3.8 GB of 3.8 GB used; 47.1 MB available
The 47.1mb is pretty much average, although I've seen it go as low as 115mb.
In Virtuozzo the system usage (resource: capacity) is usually around 60-75%
Both of these seem a little high, but I'm not sure if these readings are for the whole physical server, or just my portion of it.
Also in the (Virtuozzo) QoS alerts I've had quite a few Yellow zone, black zone and one red zone reports, at around 5am - quite possibly the quietest time on a server which isn't hosting any live sites yet. These have both been on the numproc and the privvmpages services (the red zone was one the privvmpages). Is there anything I should be looking at or is this fairly normal operation for a VPS? I have nightly backups scheduled for around 1am. These were originally set for 4am, but reports were showing that they were running out of memory, so I’ve now staggered the times of these to see if that helps. I've haven't changed anything resource-wise other than the php, so I thought it would be good to go from the start, but maybe it needs some fine tuning.
i type in reboot in my root. does it break it or just reboots it like a normal cpu?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am running asp.net on my 1and1 "shared" hosting account. I just was told I could not add a simple .mp3 player control because it requires "higher" security. I only have "medium" security. They could only suggest a dedicated server.
Is this going to be normal amongst all asp.net hosting companies? Are most asp controls at the higher security level?
Is there a hosting company that gives this to you as a shared customer?
I recently got a VPS from VPSLand before reading all the negative reviews... Everything seems to work fine EXCEPT disk operations. Sometimes it seems writing big files to disk, or moving/copying files around on the server will completely lock it up.
I opened up PerfMon and with my IIS/mySQL services stopped (which means my system is running absolutely nothing), the disk queue and disk % values are ridiculous.
See:
www|europeinruins|com/temp/disk-noiis-nomysql.JPG (can't post URL's so switch the | with .
I'm not sure if the trafic showed by munin graphics is normal or not because it seems it jumps to 2mbps in the morning and after few hours drops down to .5mbps
I don't host any storage websites, which should have lots of uploads, just normal websites, maybe a total of 10000 unique visitors/day on all accounts (I estimate this as I don't know how to find out exactly the number of visitors on all websites hosted on this server - 182 accounts)
My question is how can I see what exactly is making that trafic, maybe using a netstat command to see what processes are using the bandwidth.
I currently have a VPS host that, for the past 45 days or so, has delivered an average of 66% uptime. The best results are 75% and the worst are 50%. I'm still waiting for an official response from the company so I'm not including any names. But I do have sites at Dreamhost and Hostgator and they're reporting 99% and 100% respectively.
Is it normal for VPS hosts to have lower uptime? Or is this just the result of a bad server or cluster?
Note: I have about 10 sites on the VPS host and all report the same results. Dreamhost has about 3 sites and Hostgator has 1.
My server is running slow, and some process are using high % of CUP.
Please take a look at the screenshot, and also tell me if it's normal to have : /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -DSSL running as nobody and root, and what is this command ?
I have a server with Core2Duo E6600 CPU, 4 gigs of RAM and 2x250 GB HDD's. What is the "normal" load average I can expect having ~50 websites running on it with medium visits. My current load averages (and most of the time ones) are:
load average: 0.24, 0.13, 0.16
Is this "normal"?
I have an dedicated server 2 x Xeon CPU 3.20GHz (2GB RAM), now 30 minutes ago my admin tryed to make a benchmark test on it and after a period the server was not responding ( SSH or http.. ftp ) we asked DN to reboot the server. After the reboot in Service Status page (WHM) there ware many services down and the load was ~ 45.00 (4 cpus) .. after aprox. 5 - 10 minutes the load has droped:
Server Load 2.61 (4 cpus)
is it normal to have such a higher load 45.00 (4 cpus) after an reboot ? The memory used was 32%.
Normally on our slowest day of the week, RAM usage is around 20%-25%. We see RAM usage increase as more users hit the site, thus, RAM usage historically, has been tied to public bandwidth. Recently, RAM usage has been hitting 32%-35% on our slowest day of the week (as indicated by bandwidth usage). I am guessing that something is keeping apache threads opened and/or a cron-driven process which invokes httpd isn't finishing for whatever reason. This is only my guess after some research and looking at whm reporting and top. With my limited server knowledge, these are only my guesses.
1. What could be causing this increase RAM usage?
2. How do we find out what is causing it?
3. We did recently installed the OpenX ad server but there are no ads being served, we just implemented the CRON job for testing purposes. Maybe this could be the cause but how do we tell?
Sitemeter is telling me the site gets an average of 38000 page views a day.
The web host is telling us we're using 51gb of bandwidth a day on average.
This is not a video site, or a download site. This is an article site, with jpg images. Our biggest page has about 2.4 meg of images on it. The average page is about 1.34 mb's, counting the navigation images which repeat on every page.
But don't user's browsers cache anything?
Is that bandwidth usage normal?
I currently have a Signature VPS with Servint and although I have found their customer service good and am getting concerned about my VPS's reliability. This is the only VPS I have experience with.
At the beginning of the year I was experiencing downtime at least once every couple of weeks and for at least 20 mins each time. Sometimes my VPS was down for over an hour. Most of the time the explanantion I received was a "Kernal Panic". Then for the last month and a half things have been good with no downtime, until today when my VPS went down again for about 50 mins.
So here I am asking what is normal downtime?
Is the downtime I am experiencing the norm and would I get the same reliability from any provider?
Would a dedicated server tend to be more reliable than a VPS?
I am considering moving to a dedicated server at LiquidWeb, not because I need the resources but I am wondering if reliability would improve. I am willing to pay for reliability! Any advice as to whether this would be a good move?
Sitemeter is telling me the site gets an average of 38000 page views a day.
The web host is telling us we're using 51gb of bandwidth a day.
This is not a video site, or a download site. This is an article site, with jpg images. Our biggest page has about 2.4 meg of images on it. The average page is about 1.34 mb's, counting the navigation images which repeat on every page.
Don't user's browsers cache anything?
Are those bandwidth usage numbers normal?
I found out that my server has open DNS. Anyone in the world can query it for domains it is not authoritative for. Is it normal?
View 6 Replies View RelatedWhat is the maximum load on a shared hosting server for it to be considered normal?
View 6 Replies View Relatedwhat is the normal load on this server
Single Processor Quad Core Xeon 5310 - 1.60GHz (Clovertown) - 1 x 8MB cache
4 GB ram
i hosted on it about 220 VB forums
I've recently purchased a VPS 250P package from EuroVPS and actually signed up for a two year contract as I respect the company so much however the speeds I've got, since finishing optimising the server, surprise me.
I'm already using a VPS from another dutch company until I move everything over to EuroVPS but the difference in speeds are a little concerning to me.
Please can you guys look at these response times and tell me if they are normal?
Current VPS: Page created in 0.035 seconds with 11 queries.
EuroVPS: Page created in 0.199 seconds with 8 queries.
Both servers are using the same spec, optimisations and PHP cache however my current VPS is using Apache1/PHP5/MySQL5 and with EuroVPS I can't afford to get them to upgrade to version5 so it's running on Apache2/PHP4/MySQL4.
I did get this response from EuroVPS, does it explain the difference in times?
"...we are using enterprise kernels which are slower than standard SMP/UP kernels. The performance of our VPS instances is not as high as some competitors who are using these faster, but smaller kernels.".
Once again, I have the utmost respect for EuroVPS and love their support but would appreciate some opinions on this from you guys.
Hi over the last week ive been having numerous problems with hosting accounts on 2 different servers which has lead me to think that my 'security' is not 'secure' and a malicious user is at play. im in the uk on broadband on a private connection to the internet - no-one else should be sharing this connection. This is the traceroute from my connection at home to the server ive had the most problems with - is this normal?
Traceroute has started ...
a certain host I've been with for over 6 months now experiences what I would consider always very high server load. The server load is normally around 4-6ish, rarely below that. A few times a day it spikes to around 12ish, sometimes even more. The server has 4 cpus. Is this just some really big time overselling? They had downtime once for 2 days when a server crashed, and after that the server load has been really high, when before that it was normally around 1-2, and in the 0.50s
View 14 Replies View RelatedI reserved a private server on a company n I supposed to have 10GB of space, I recived it with about 2.4GB space used, I thought it's the system files, is that correct or the files shall be deleted?
View 14 Replies View RelatedI recently got a dedi from Hivelocity, and they installed CSF/LFD. On my previous hosts, I didn't have this, just cPHulk. With this dedi, I'm receiving nearly a dozen daily emails from LFD with IPs that have been blocked for multiple failed logins, mostly with username root, but also sales, staff, admin, system, etc., and a few for port scanning.
Is this normal? I've already disabled direct root login via SSH, and I'm not really worried about anyone actually managing to gain access, I'm just curious about the high number of attempts. On previous hosts, where I actually had active sites and forums, with links posted on other forums that are indexed and nicely ranked by Google, I rarely received any emails from cPBrute at all.