I currently have a windows 2003 server box which is being used only for huge file downloads (Media server). Wanted to know if there is some sorta program or script that lets me check the current connections and what speed each connection(ip) is downloading at?
View 3 RepliesI have a windows vps and I want to monitor my bandwidth. How can I do this? I tried using a program called DU Meter but it's counting bandwidth on all users on that node and not mine =[
View 6 Replies View RelatedI know cacti / MRTG can produce traffic graphs, but how you actually get Cacti to graph the VM's on a physical server?
View 9 Replies View RelatedDoes any one know a bandwidth monitor that shows me stats and which programs or Ports and or Servers are using bandwidth and how much they are using in real time?
View 11 Replies View RelatedHow is it possible to monitor the data used (in and out) for each node in XenServer?
View 14 Replies View RelatedI will be setting up a LAN at home where there will be a few PCs connected to the network.
My idea is that I will have linux box where I will route all the traffic through to monitor it. I was wondering what would be a free solution to go "hardcore" on this. When I mean hardcore, I really mean hardcore. I want stats, packet shaper etc.. It would be a learning process for me too. The only thing is that alot of solutions out there are more enterprise and expensive.
Anyone here use or know a good solution? I was told I could use m0nowall on freeBSD. Another thing I was looking at would be Squid. But to be honest I'm not sure.
Whats a good free software that can do this? Perhaps something really cheap if there is a cost involved.
I'm working on setting something up for monitoring my bandwidth/traffic on multiple interfaces. I have setup interface aliases so I have eth0, eth0:0, eth0:1 and the issue I'm running into is that it seems snmp cannot tell the diff between the aliased interfaces. I've found references in the cacti forums of using ipchains rules to track the bandwidth, but I've not found a good howto that explains what I need to get going on this.
Any clues/hints?
Is it possible to monitor the used bandwidth of every virtual machine on a vmware server?
Cause that is something i would like to monitor...
I know it must be possible somehow.. but can anyone point me in the right direction?
Does anyone have a tutorial or instructions to show how to set up munin to monitor bandwidth/traffic utilization?
I have a VPS from a provider that has no monitoring tools, and I need something to monitor.
(The VPS uses the HyperVM software.)
I am using the CentOS version 4.x right now, and munin is already set up and configured with a basic install.
Anyone know how to add traffic/bandwidth monitoring? (Ideally, it would monitor all active ports.. but I only really need it to monitor port 1194 for openVPN software.)
if anyone knows of a good, free tool to monitor how much bandwidth a Windows machine uses monthly. I saw FreeMeter, but I don't know how well that will work to use for a whole month at once.
View 6 Replies View Relatedi can't seem to get access to the health monitor in power user mode. As my plesk license was "upgraded" from a usual 11.x 10 Domains-License to new WebAdmin Package, i can't choose service provider view anymore. How can i get access to the health monitor now?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI already have a UNIX server as the gateway/firewalls for few servers. How do i build an MRTG graph to monitor the bandwidth usage for each IP?
View 0 Replies View RelatedMy users frequently tell me that my website is slow, but it doesn't seem to be so, for me. Are there objective tools and criteria to test its speed (response time, max transfer etc)?
Also, I'm currently paying $1 for GB of transfer. How much does it usually costs?
Since my hosting company sets php_safe off, I'm considering changing it.Can you guys recommend me a hosting plan that has:
- ssh with vi etc: this is important
- A FAST server
- Norway-based (to enjoy .torrents without being bothered) or US Based (to enjoy "fair use", which seems to be exclusive to the USA)
- 1-3GB of space
- LOTS of transfer. I don't consume many gigabytes yet, but someday I will.
- Some kind of hacking protection. I'm damn scared of my website suffering a vampire attack and having to pay for the raeped bandwidth.
As per topic, what is the best method to do to the hardware to improve bandwidth / uplink speed of server?
I have a production server that is used for regular file serving.
P4 3.0Ghz
4GB RAM
500GB + 160GB + 160GB hard disk
2Mbps Dedicated + 10Mbps shared.
However, the most I can pulled through the whole server is always between 1.5Mbps - 3Mbps, anyway to pull the speed up to around 10Mbps should there be availability of bandwidth for me to burst?
For any informations, the hard disk is SATA 2.
In 3 weeks I'm launching a service that will stream about 5TB of music per day.
I currently use Rackspace Mosso cloud, which can get quite expensive for such massive traffic.
After a talk with my dev team, they told me that the 100mbps dedicated unmetered that some providers like ThePlanet or Rackspace advertise might not guarantee the speed until the end-user. That the speed is guaranteed until just outside their hosting facility or backbone and after that it's just pooled bandwith.
I wonder whatLs more important on a shoutcast server, to get more bandwidth per month as possible, or a faster port connection?
I have test a 2 hours music stream at 128k bit rate and was only 5MB per listener !
This is not to host 24/7 radios. Its a project to host DJs /Live Bands at
a maximum of 128k, with no more than 2 hours events.
Also each event between 50-80 listeners, and not at same days or hours.
About the port connection, what this means? :
Port: 10/100MBPS SWITCHED VLAN
Is it shared and from 10 to 100mbps?
I am trying to find the best deal with dedi servers.
Have at this moment a unlimited bandwidth /100Mbps shared, but it seems the CPU is too low (AMD Sempron 3100), as I canLt seem to create more than 40 shoutcast accounts (and no client is streaming, just ON), and the server load goes up to 4.5 !!
So, I am looking on the market , as I saw better deals with better processors (Pentium4, Core 2 Duo), and much cheaper (below $100), but they only offer 2000/3000GB bandwidth.
Whats do you think?
I have a Cisco 4006 with a 4013 Supervisor and a 4232-L3 and 3 x 4148-RJ modules.
When downloading data from ServerA on the switch to ServerB on
the switch the download speed is limited to about 650KB/sec.
ServerA -> ServerB = 650KB/sec.
ServerB -> ServerA = 11MB/sec.
So the problem is in one direction.
Each server has its own VLAN and a /29 IP block and both servers are physically connected to the 4006's 4148-RJ modules.
This seems to affect servers at random.
This issue disappears if I change the /29 IP block on the server experiencing the slow downloads while still using the same VLANs and ports to a /29 not experiencing this issue.
When I change the /29 to one that is not affected the switch is capable of full wire speed which is approximately 11MB/sec sustained. When I change back to the old /29 the downloads are limited to about 650KB/sec max.
I have tried the following:
changing VLANs
changing ports on the 4006
replaced CAT5 patch cords
replaced NICs in affected servers
replaced motherboards in affected servers
had multiple people examine the configs
and a few other crazy ideas yet the problem persists.
This problem affects only a few servers on the switch however I have a similar problem on a larger group of servers as well.
Several servers are limited to 650KB/sec downloads from very fast servers outside the network on the public internet.
For example:
LocalServerA on the 4006 with a /29 is downloading from RemoteServerA on the internet and is getting about 650KB/sec.
RemoteServerA -> RemoteServerA = 650KB/sec
LocalServerB on the 4006 with another /29 is downloading from RemoteServerA on the internet and is getting 3-8MB/sec sustained.
RemoteServerA -> LocalServerB = 3-8MB/sec
If I change the /29 on LocalServerA to a /29 which is unaffected by this issue the speed problem disappears while still using the same hardware, VLANs and physical ports.
High bandwidth, fast speed, any cp, basic hardware-manag. only, trustable
View 4 Replies View RelatedFor those who do shared hosting, how do you go about measuring bandwidth per user? I'm thinking going by log files, but what about stuff like ftp, mail, dns, etc? Is there an easier way?
View 9 Replies View Relatedis it possible to find which user or IP address using the most of the bandwidth, and is there a tool to monitor the bandwidth activity on the server?
Thank you,
Does anyone happen to know how to find the current bandwidth usage for users in CPanel via SSH? I found disk space, which is /scripts/dumpquota, but I can't find the bandwidth.
View 8 Replies View RelatedIs there a way to monitor or limit the bandwidth usage of a jailed shell user account?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI run 10+ sites on my dedicated server.In last 7 days one of them used over 1.7 TB of bandwidth.
I can't suspend that domain because it's mine.
I can't ban the IP of those who use considerable amount of bandwidth because they are a lot.
So i think about software/mod/whatever else that limit bandwidth usage per user(IP) per day! is there any one who has experience about this situation?
how can i create directories in my (public_html / htdocs folder) that have disk space and traffic quota?
i activated the disk quota to the native linux file system and i tried to create a user but i could not put this user in any folder in the public_html (i dont know how to do this) also there is no option to create bandwidth quota..
one more detail is that the folders need to be protected with login and password because people may try to enter this folders (e.g. www.mydomain.com/protectedfolder)
all this using webmin or another free good script.
I thought I knew enough about my .htaccess stuff to do this, but I can't seem to work it out. What I want to do is if a user visits domain.com/folder, we check to see if the folder exists. If so, show as normal (IE domain.com/support)
If a user visits domain.com/dynamicusername (dynamicusername is not a physical folder), redirect to dynamicusername.domain.com
Is this some thing I should worry about?
[url]
Thats the server I am on and the CPU Graph.
Since Sunday the CPU has been really high. Sunday was the worst though as my site was unavailable by some members and slow by others. I did open a support ticket and was told some one was doing a back up and after it was done things would go back to normal.
Well Monday though today the site was fine and running fast again but the cpu is still pretty high.
Quote:
(page load time) 0.1192 sec (CPU load) 8.05, (sql) 11 queries (GZIP Enabled )
Time is now: 21st November 2007 - 12:04 PM
That is what it says on the bottom of my forum.
I am not sure if I should contact them again or just let it go since the site is loading fine.
Quote:
(page load time) 0.0354 sec (CPU load) 1.43 (Sql) 11 queries (GZIP Enabled )
Time is now: 21st November 2007 - 12:09 PM
I've currently got a friend hosting me but I'm paying £5 ($10) per month ($120 per year) which is quite expensive for what I need.
I currently have two accounts- one personal FTP / Email and one shop where I'm selling CDs. So I need FTP / Email / and MySQL.
I'm winding down the CD store so I rarely get sales now, and I don't require much storage (couple of GB) or very much transfer at all.
Can anyone recommend a good host to me? I'm just looking for something reliable, the less expensive the better (Even free, if that's possible.)
I've been looking at Amazon's web services. Does anyone know if they're suitable for what I want? Their rates seem excellent.
I have been researching i3d.net as a dedicated provider.
I have searched the archives and in order to take a final decision I would like to kindly ask some current clients and even past clients of i3d.net to share some insight on the quality of this provider and it's network.
I want to know the right command by which one can see current connection to the HTTP server.
I searched a while and got 2 different answers, wanted to know which is more accurate as there is lot of difference in results
Code:
-bash-3.2# ps aux|grep -i HTTP|wc -l
19
-bash-3.2# netstat -an|grep :80|wc -l
228
I know there have been some up-and-down reviews for ModVPS, but I was wondering if there were any current reviews out there.
We don't have a ton of money to spend, and their basic package adds some things we really need (cPanel/WHM, ClientExec, Enom reseller account).
I have clients that I host that can't email certain domains which I know do exist.
The support people are telling me that the domain name doesn't resolve, yet the MX records and everything are correct for the particular domain that these people are either sending email to or receiving email from.
For example:
If a user I host sends and email to user@domainx.com ... they receive one of two messages:
retry timeout exceeded
or
retry time not reached for any host after a long failure period
If user@domainx.com sends and email to anyone that host, they receive a bounce back with a message saying that mail delivery was delayed for xx hours and will try for up to 5 days. It will eventually fail.
domainx.com is perhaps one of the largest ISPs in Canada and my host is telling me that everything is working OK because they can send / receive mail from gmail to my customers.