Are The 100Mbps Of LeaseWeb True ? Without Aggregation Ratio (without Share)

Nov 26, 2008

We are seeking for a new dedicated servers company.

Actually we have 2 windows servers(1Database

View 10 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

50/50 Bandwidth Ratio

Dec 2, 2008

Is this a common practice? None of the hosts I've been at used it, and I was rather surprised to see it. I was just about to order a server from Burst, but then noticed they have this restriction.

Not that I would use all inbound or all outbound, but having a stipulation like that is a bit silly don't you think?

View 11 Replies View Related

Colo Link Aggregation / 802.3ad Alternatives

Apr 28, 2008

I run a small streaming/cdn service and I'm looking at how best to utilize my bandwidth. Here's the scoop:

I have a 1/4 rack and 2 gbit drops from my provider. Currently I am running a single server connected to 1 gbit port - nothing fancy. Business is good so I am about to add another server. As this location is already the backup/failover for my primary colo (different location/provider), I am interested in playing with aggregation options.

I have used 802.3ad in the past, so that was my first choice. I asked my provider if they can trunk my ports on their switch - unfortunately they refused (they only allow it above a certain commit).

So...do I have any other options for aggregation? It's pure mb/sec throughput that I am looking for, rather than failover. I have the rackspace/power/etc to colo my own switch or router, I'm just curious if there is an effective alternative.

View 6 Replies View Related

802.3ad (bonding/link Aggregation) On Cisco 2960 W/linux

Aug 14, 2009

I thought with 802.3ad I could aggregate the links and thus turn a 3x100 megabit pipes to one 300 meg pipe. The problem is when using the default options (and layer2 xmit mode) I only get the bandwidth of a single connection and I see no other traffic on the other two. Here is output from /proc/net/bonding/bond0:

Code:
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.3.0 (June 10, 2008)

Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation
Transmit Hash Policy: layer2 (0)

MII Status: up
MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
Up Delay (ms): 0
Down Delay (ms): 0

802.3ad info
LACP rate: slow
Active Aggregator Info:
Aggregator ID: 2
Number of ports: 3
Actor Key: 9
Partner Key: 3
Partner Mac Address: 00:1e:f6:xx:xx:xx

Slave Interface: eth0
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:1e:8c:xx:xx:xx
Aggregator ID: 1

Slave Interface: eth2
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:04:23:xx:xx:xx
Aggregator ID: 1

Slave Interface: eth3
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:04:23:xx:xx:xx
Aggregator ID: 1
Basically it works in that I get a connection but its no different from being on a regular 100/100 connection. Downloading files my machine from completely different networks always only goes out one connection. I don't even see any received/sent packets from the other two interfaces.

When I tell it to use layer3+4 via the xmit_hash_policy paramter when loading the module IE:

modprobe bonding mode=4 xmit_hash_policy=layer3+4 miimon=100

It seems to work as expected except it looks like all incomming traffic comes in on the same interface and its not much different from a normal load balancing (except from a single IP address). I will stick to this method if I have no choice as I don't really care about the download all that much and it seems to do a good job.

Here is /proc/net/bonding/bond0 from that config:

Code:
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.3.0 (June 10, 2008)

Bonding Mode: IEEE 802.3ad Dynamic link aggregation
Transmit Hash Policy: layer3+4 (1)
MII Status: up
MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
Up Delay (ms): 0
Down Delay (ms): 0

802.3ad info
LACP rate: slow
Active Aggregator Info:
Aggregator ID: 2
Number of ports: 3
Actor Key: 9
Partner Key: 3
Partner Mac Address: 00:1e:f6:xx:xx:xx

Slave Interface: eth0
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:1e:8c:xx:xx:xx
Aggregator ID: 2

Slave Interface: eth2
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:04:23:xx:xx:xx
Aggregator ID: 2

Slave Interface: eth3
MII Status: up
Link Failure Count: 0
Permanent HW addr: 00:04:23:xx:xx:xx
Aggregator ID: 2

My understanding is that with layer2 it should just be one big fat pipe. IE: packets are fragmented and thus even a single connection should be able to sustain 300 megabits (if the other end could provide it). It seems like it just doesn't use my other interfaces at all when doing this.

Here is my config on the cisco 2960:

Code:
interface Port-channel3
switchport access vlan 100
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100
switchport mode access
switchport nonegotiate
spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/10
switchport access vlan 100
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100
switchport mode access
switchport nonegotiate
channel-protocol lacp
channel-group 3 mode active
spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/38
switchport access vlan 100
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100
switchport mode access
switchport nonegotiate
channel-protocol lacp
channel-group 3 mode active
spanning-tree portfast
!
interface FastEthernet0/40
switchport access vlan 100
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100
switchport mode access
switchport nonegotiate
channel-protocol lacp
channel-group 3 mode active
spanning-tree portfast

View 5 Replies View Related

Is That True That Softlayer Better Than Liquidweb?

Jul 20, 2008

I heard many webmaster said that softlayer is better hosting on management. is that true?

View 5 Replies View Related

Mosso, Too Good To Be True

Jan 3, 2009

I have been running my sites on dedicated servers from The Planet for 4 years now. I go through about 500,000 page views per day with a fairly intensive web app (1000+ queries/s). Mosso keeps coming up and it is really interesting me. The promised peace of mind would be a relief and I often have trouble with site lag during peak times even with fairly high end servers. I am wondering if Mosso could work for me or if it is just too good to be true.

I searched the forums, but most of what I found was from 2006 when it first came out, wondering if I can get any info from people who have had experience or heard things more recently. I am really interested about loading times. I read from a lot of people that they experienced slow load times for pages (again these posts were at least a year old), but I viewed some sites hosted on Mosso and they seemed quite fast to me.

View 14 Replies View Related

FutureHosting Too Good To Be True

Oct 14, 2008

Just signed up for a new FutureHosting VPS last night. Their pricing is very good, and the reviews generally kind to them on WHT.

I paid for the $44.99 account with 30 domain Plesk. They have a 35% discount on at the moment that made the package very tempting. Guarantees 768mb RAM, 30gb disk space etc.

Account activated several hours ago.

Took me 1-2 minutes to establish an SSH connection and authorization.
Trying to login to Plesk control panel for the first time has taken 6-7 minutes and it's still loading as I write this.

Load average: 2.01, 1.51, 0.82
Mem: 786432k total, 91000k used, 695432k free, 0k buffers
Swap: 0k total, 0k used, 0k free, 0k cached

Note all I'm doing is running top and trying to access Plesk.

This doesn't look too impressive to say the least.

I know this happens from time to time with most VPS solutions. I've probably been unlucky that I've hit a spike in server load at the precise moment I tried to use the account for the first time.

But anyone have any experiences with FutureHosting that suggest this could be an ongoing problem?

View 6 Replies View Related

Onehut.com Too Good To Be True?

Apr 3, 2008

looks to me like they've stopped renewing domains; everything for me is intact but shortly after the renewal date the domain name doesn't work and the email addresses that come with the service don't work. i had 5 different emails for support for them, none of them work; ditto for any support phone numbers. Too bad, had 2 years of no problems.

i've contested the last payment made through paypal, don't expect that will do much good. don't really care, except it's a nuisance and some $ to move on. i also have a personal web site with them and that's working fine, probably will die when the year is up. i'm looking through the other services to find a safe inexpensive one.

View 2 Replies View Related

VPS Versus True Dedicated

Dec 10, 2008

We just recently were kind of forced to go from a true dedicated server to a VPS type server and my question is a simple one.

When it comes to SQL databases is the VPS powered server just a secure as a dedicated type server?

View 2 Replies View Related

Failover Or True Clustering

Oct 23, 2007

I have been searching and searching for a solution. We are currently using one single vps to host some of our clients. We are finding more and more that we need to have some redundancy.

I have looked at using DNS failover using RSYNC/mysql replication etc with two servers, but just dont like the idea.

I have also looked at hosts like imountain etc that use h-sphere. I dont like this setup because services are split onto single machines. For example mail is done on one single server, therefor if that server is down, mail is down.

What I am looking for:

I am trying to stay in a budget of 150/month or less.

I would like to get one of the two options here:

option 1: two vps's or dedi's that technically act as one(a true cluster) then on top of that is OS and control panel and done. This solution doesnt allow for whole datacenter outages, or network issues.

option 2: Two geographically placed vps or dedi's that are somehow either load balanced, or failover.

Ultimately our goal is to have high uptime, but we dont really have much server load.

Basically failover is ok as loads are always low anyway, but if we are paying big $$ it would be nice to have it load balanced.

Please let me know if my expectations are way to high or my price is way too low. I need to find a solution here somehow and if I cant find anything will most likely just go with DNS failover.

View 14 Replies View Related

UnlimitedHostWeb To Good To Be True

Aug 12, 2007

which advertises unlimited bandwidth and unlimited space for only 3.95 a month!?

So their website is unlimitedhostweb dot com

Does anyone have experience with this company and do they really deliver what they advertise for that insane price?

View 21 Replies View Related

100mbps Vs. 1000mbps

Jan 2, 2009

Let's say I have a site that gets around 500,000 page views per day, has an average of 150 - 200 users online at any given time, and runs 1000+ queries per second. Should I stick with a 100mbps uplink speed, or would I be able to see a difference with a 1000mbps speed?

View 14 Replies View Related

100Mbps Port?

Apr 11, 2008

When service providers advertise a dedicated server for lease (or colocation) and they mention 100Mbps port (sometimes uplink port), what are they referring to?

Are they referring to the port speed of the switch that the NIC is attached to?

Or is it the router's port speed where this switch ( which in turn the server's NIC is attached to) is attached to such that no matter what the NIC speed is (e.g. 100Mbps or 1Gbps), the traffic that passes thru the server is capped to 100Mbps?

View 10 Replies View Related

Router For BGP 100Mbps

Mar 18, 2007

We currently have a single 100Mpbs (currently pushing ~40Mpbs) feed from a single upstream provider. Routing is handled by our transit provider.

We wish to provide a more resilient setup and are now looking to install our own BGP router(s) and take a second feed from another provider. I have a looked around the Cisco website and this forum but am unsure which model of routers / layer 3 switch we should be looking at.

A layer 3 switch looks more cost effective but doesn't appear to support enough routes for BGP without great expense. Would a 2600 router be enough or should I be looking at something higher like the 7600 series?

View 14 Replies View Related

Windows Hosting With 'aspcompat=true'

Apr 6, 2009

I've never used windows hosting before but I have just taken over hosting a site for a new client and the website is written in ASP. One of my developers has installed the website and back-end on a Webfusion shared windows hosting account, the site runs okay but there is an admin section that isn't working at the moment as the script uses something called 'aspcompat'.

View 5 Replies View Related

True Multi Site Hosting

Jun 2, 2008

Are there any hosts on the net with reasonably priced true multi site hosting*?

I'd host something like 5-6 small wordpress & blog sites, no special diskspace or bw requirements.

I know Site5 offers something like this, but I'd like something with over 80% uptime

(* By this I mean each site should have its own cpanel & the sites should be completely separate, due to the fact that I'm lazy & don't want to set up domain pointers or whatever they are called.)

View 16 Replies View Related

Looking For 100mbps With Adult Allowed

Apr 9, 2008

I`m looking server with 100mbps unmetered or stable 10mbps unmetered in europe, adult allowed, 2GB RAM, p4 or something, ~300GB HDD... could You help me somehow?

View 12 Replies View Related

10mbps As Opposed To 100mbps

May 20, 2008

I was on the phone with tech support at a datacenter that hosts one of my servers and I asked him as I have all my servers beside this particular one on 100mbps connections about the noticable difference between the speeds as 10mbps is fast to begin with.

I was told that he, from personal experience, never noticed the difference between the two because any computer he accessed his sites/files from never had a connection itself of over 4mbps.

He then went on and said the only people that 100mbps would benefit are people who personally have a computer that has a speed of over 10mbps.

I'm gullable and he was very convincing but does anyone have a better explanation of noticable difference (from the client perspective) between the two speeds?

View 8 Replies View Related

Want Vps With 100mbps Uplink Port

Jun 19, 2008

i want vps with 100mbps uplink port

vps 1 gb or little i just use it for uploading

and i want it with uploading speed 100kb/s

can i get it?

View 5 Replies View Related

DBServer + WebServer For Under 500 - With 100Mbps

Nov 27, 2008

Due to our bad connectivity in our actual French hosting provider (OVH), we need to search for alternatives.

Please post opinions about other hosting companies that can give same configurations at a reasonable price, if possible with related experience with them.

Actually -from 1 year ago- we have the following configuration at OVH:

1xDBServer: Intel Q6600, 1x250GB, 8GB DDR2, 100Mbps (not real on a daily constant), Wind2K3 STD. : 130eur. + vat
1xWebServer: Intel Core2, 1x160GB, 1GB DDR2, 100Mbps (not real on a daily constant), Win2K3 WEB Ed. : 49eur. + vat
All days we have traffic problems, with low real bandwith connection, also with poor pings to/from Spain (where most percentatge of our users come).
We need to find a hosting provider with a same or a litle best configuration with the follow requisits:

-100Mbps per server [If possible, 100Mbps dedicated (non shared, without aggregation ratio)], UNMETTERED.

-IMPORTANT: Good bandwith connectivity

-Preferable Datacenter hosted in Europe

-WebServer same config, but 2GB DDR (also can be an AMD), if possible with W2K8 WebEd.

-DatabaseServer same config. preferable with 16GB DDR, also preferable -optional- with 2x or 3xSAS 15K. (RAID 1 or Raid 5)

-Possible upgrades (specially beacuse OVH is the first to launch a server with Intel 25GB SSL drives that are superfaster (look at ovh.fr for model HG2009). Any other has support or previsions to serve SSL Drives?)

-If possible, with X days break of contract agreement (money back guaranteed)
We can pay some more at a month, but on the first months we can't pay more than around 500$/Euros.

View 7 Replies View Related

Current 100Mbps/4U Pricing

Feb 16, 2007

I've been happily hosted in Equinix Ashburn for over a year now, so I haven't been looking into price changes over the past months. However, my colo provider suddenly decided to raise prices by 20% on me, saying that space and bandwidth has become scarce over the past year and their own cost went up by 75%. So they are asking me to lock the new hiked price by signing a new contract, otherwise I won't be able to get such offer from them or any other provider in that location.

Before signing anything, I'm trying to get a feel of the current prices. I see a lot of ads in here for same bw and space, but I'm sure there are variations in the level of service they provide, depending on the colo company, location, bw providers, package type, etc... So, just as crude estimate, can you please tell in general whether prices/costs has went up or down or stayed the same since last year, and by how much?

And if someone has experience with Equinix/Ashburn, what would be a reasonable price for a dedicated 100Mbps/4U colocation with a quality bandwidth provider?

View 14 Replies View Related

Dedicated Server With True Unmetered Bandwidth

Oct 15, 2009

Looking for a dedicated unmetered server to stream movies and audio for over 500 visitors a day. Anybody knows any place that is good?

Also, what kind of hardware specifications would be OK for me - in terms of speed and memory? And would we be OK with a 10mbit port or 100?

Would I survive on a dedicated server with a shared bandwidth?

View 14 Replies View Related

Acronis True Image Server Vs. Workstation

Mar 16, 2008

Does anyone use Acronis True Image Server Worksation Edition instead of the expensive Server Edition ?

View 6 Replies View Related

True Standlone Multi-home Setup

Apr 19, 2007

I am trying to get my own set of ips from ARIN, and I need to qualify under the multi-home. My understanding of this setup is that I have 512 or more ips that I am using and that I have multiple routes in from the internet from at least 2 providers. Right now where I am coloing at I just have servers and no routers (only the ones that are provided by the co-location). In order to setup a true multi-home for my org will I need to have my own routers/switches and such to accomplish this?

View 12 Replies View Related

Surf Speedy Servers - Too Good To Be True

Aug 10, 2007

Recently I saw an advertisement about Surf Speedy Servers [url] and I am interested in one of their VPS servers.

[url]

However when I searched for reviews in WebHostingTalk and other websites, I got only REALLY bad and REALLY good reviews regarding Surf Speedy Servers (mostly at webhostingjury.com).

Can you tell me if you had any good or bad experience with Surf Speedy, and what are their problems?

View 1 Replies View Related

What Is The Different Between 10MBPS And 100MBPS Unmetered Port

Mar 30, 2009

need about 2000-3000 GB BW per month and i have two choice now :10MBPS unmetered port and 100MBPS unmetered port. I need BW for image hosting. What is the different between it? What is better for me?

View 7 Replies View Related

Budget 100mbps Unmetered Provider

Mar 3, 2008

I have 4 servers in fdc right now. My company is growing and i need some more servers like those at fdc. But I don't like the idea of having all of my servers in one location. I'm looking for budget price arround $200 per server.

View 13 Replies View Related

What Should Be The Avg. Price Of 100mbps Unmetered Bandwith

Apr 26, 2008

i was just roaming around the websites of different server providers, coz i was willing to start cheap ftp backup services so for me bandwith prices would be more of an issue than the actual server prices coz what i've noted down from all these providers there server prices vary b/w plus minus $100 or less but their bandwith my GOD it varies like STOCK EXCHANGE!

Serverbeach.com offers for less than $1400 and some like others even for $1000 but TO MY SURPRISE LIMESTONE OFFERS IT FOR A WHOPPING 2K YA $2000 and server beach offers 10mbps unmetered for $80-100 so for $2000 i can buy 150mbps unmetered rather than 100mbps from LIMSTONE means rather than 33000gb i can get 33k+16.5k gb = approx 50,000gb
so i can earn more!

View 11 Replies View Related

Good Rep From Level3 For Low Price On 100mbps

Jul 31, 2007

Anybody have a good sales rep I can use from Level3 for a great price on 100mbps commit?

View 4 Replies View Related

Difference Between 10mbps & 100mbps Port

Jan 8, 2007

What is Difference between 10mbps & 100mbps port. Do you get high speed if your server is connected with 100mbps port?

View 10 Replies View Related

'plugin' For MRTG Which Will E-mail Or Send An Sms If Certain Conditions Are True

Dec 4, 2007

Just wondering if there is some 'plugin' for MRTG which will e-mail or send an sms if certain conditions are true (bandwidth exceeded on some server /device)?

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved