Mounted RAID Storage - No Access From Apache/php
Apr 25, 2007
I have a problem with my new server's setup. It's using a big RAID storage mounted to the main system. When it comes to shell everything is fine, I have access to the disk and files. Problems rise when I try to access the storage content from my php scripts (running on apache) - "Permission Denied" ...
Anyone knows where might be the problem?
I suppose it's because of using RAID but I'm sure it's doable.. somehow..
When I tried to use CLI mode it looks fine - PHP script can access RAID'ed folders when running like :
php /var/www/html/filetest.php
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 20, 2007
I'm completely torn on going the absolute budget route vs spending more for something that'll allow easy upgradeability in the future. I basically need lots of space but file sending-- media like mp3s, video, etc.
it'll be raid 5 and I'll need at least 2-3TB initially but the ability to expand would be nice.
option 1:
nice chassis with plenty of hotswap bays with sas expanders
expensive sas raid card
option 2:
cheap chassis to serve "immediate" needs and go with more later.
not sure what I'd use as a card? maybe even onboard?
regarding reliability: I once saw a database of failure rates of different models. raptor was the most reliable of the "desktop" drives. anyone have the link? I'm wondering of the seagate ES drives are worth the extra money vs the non-ES drives. they're supposedely more reliable and the "server versions" of sata drives.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2007
We're currently serving approx. 150mbit of traffic (mainly video files) via 2 round robin'ed front-end servers. The front-end servers are NFS mounting the content blades so we can access all content via dedicated links to each blade, A,B,C like:
mainsite.com/A/files.wmv (blade A)
mainsite.com/B/files.wmv (blade B)
mainsite.com/C/files.wmv (blade C)
We're fed up with this way of structuring our content because of space issues and because we need to go to blade A to get file X.wmv and to blade C for Y.wmv
We're looking for a better solution and we need your help, I have looked at the producs from Coraid, e.g:
[url] look for "Bundle - CLN21 + SR1521"
Would this be a way to do it? it will give us plenty of storage space and if we could buy 2 sets, we could mirror the sets and mount a set to each front end server to have some failover protection? and we could remove the A,B,C areas and have it all under:
projectABC/
X.wmv
Y.wmv (not so important just an easier way for us to keep track of it)
But is Coraid even used for this kinda task or is it a LAN product? Can it keep up with the 150mbit of file requests, 20-400mbit a piece.
Another idea was to simply build 2 sets of raid boxed with a 16channel raid card some some disks and it would give us something similar to the coraid?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 18, 2014
So I have a script running on my apache that catalogs pictures and clips. All the actual video files are located on a separate drive which is mounted in to a folder in my site. I've set apache as the owner and have the correct permissions on the mounted folder but I'm getting Forbidden errors accessing files even when on html file in the mounted folder.
I know it's a permissions issue at the disk or mounting level. The way I mount is by using this command:
mount -t ext4 /dev/sdc /var/www/html/media
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2008
I'm trying to setup a shared virtual storage enviroment (much like a external harddisk) for about 5 users working offsite/remote in a drag n drop environment like windows folder.. It's mostly just doc/xls file.
Is there any service out that that allows this or software I could use if I have my own webspace/server?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2007
Quote:
Today we are going to conduct a detailed study of RAIDability of contemporary 400GB hard drives on a new level. We will take two "professional" drives from Seagate and Western Digital and four ordinary "desktop" drives for our investigation. The detailed performance analysis and some useful hints on building RAID arrays are in our new detailed article.
[url]
View 0 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2007
I have WHM/cPanel server.
I am installed ConfigServer (Firewall)
On configserver it says " /var/tmp should either be symlinked to /tmp or mounted as a filesystem" how can i do this?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Aug 17, 2007
I found VPS at Virtuozzo logs that system turns locked and mounted and I believe the system becomes unresponsive at same time.
Here is the sequence of the status that can be found at VPS/status changes
RUNNING--->MOUNTED--->(LOCKED)-->(LOCKED, MOUNTED)-->
(LOCKED, RUNNING)-->(LOCKED)-RUNNING
Code:
VPS STATUS LOGS:
Aug 17, 2007 01:06:16 PM VPS is locked at the moment. It may take some time.(locked) VPS is up and running now.running
Aug 17, 2007 01:06:10 PM VPS is locked at the moment. It may take some time.(locked,mounted) VPS is locked at the moment. It may take some time.(locked,running)
Aug 17, 2007 01:06:04 PM VPS is mounted now. It is not running and some operations are not available.mounted VPS is locked at the moment. It may take some time.(locked)
Aug 17, 2007 01:05:49 PM VPS is up and running now.running VPS is mounted now. It is not running and some operations are not available.mounted
Aug 17, 2007 12:46:10 PM VPS is locked at the moment. It may take some time.(locked) VPS is up and running now.running
Aug 17, 2007 12:46:04 PM VPS is mounted now. It is not running and some operations are not available.mounted VPS is locked at the moment. It may take some time.(locked)
Aug 17, 2007 12:45:16 PM VPS is up and running now.running VPS is mounted now. It is not running and some operations are not available.mounted
Aug 17, 2007 09:37:13 AM VPS is starting up at the moment. It may take some time.(starting) VPS is up and running now.running
Aug 17, 2007 09:37:10 AM VPS is stopping now. It may take some time.(stopping) VPS is starting up at the moment. It may take some time.(starting)
Aug 17, 2007 09:36:52 AM VPS is up and running now.running VPS is stopping now. It may take some time.(stopping)
Aug 17, 2007 08:51:46 AM VPS is locked at the moment. It may take some time.(locked) VPS is up and running now.running
Aug 17, 2007 08:51:25 AM VPS is up and running now.running VPS is locked at the moment. It may take some time.(locked)
Aug 16, 2007 03:00:18 PM VPS is locked at the moment. It may take some time.(locked) VPS is up and running now.running
Aug 16, 2007 03:00:03 PM VPS is mounted now. It is not running and some operations are not available.mounted VPS is locked at the moment. It may take some time.(locked)
Aug 16, 2007 02:59:39 PM VPS is up and running now.running VPS is mounted now. It is not running and some operations are not available.mounted
Also I'm receiving emails with ftpd, exim, cpsrvd failed
when that happens:
Code:
ftpd failed @ Fri Aug 17 09:37:26 2007. A restart was attempted
automagically.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2007
I mounted sda2 as var and its size is 2GB. I wanna to increase its size to 4GB,which command should i run without umount and mount it again?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2008
I've got a problem with one of my servers, and i dont now how to do it. I need to find a technical service that I could hire for a job.
It's a small job. I've got one server that was compromised by D.O.S. atack and taken down by hosting company they did a clean instal fedora and cpanel and said that the data would be mounted on a old drive I need to restore the webs about 30 small sites
Would anyone suggest a person that could do that?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2008
I have seen quite a few users stack all their desktops together in the datacentre racks instead of using rack mounted servers.
Actually between rack mounted servers and desktop servers (with the same motherboard and parts) which will be better in the racks and why?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2008
I deleted my tmp folder and mounted a secure tmp file via fstab
e.g.
/path/to/tmp /tmp ext2 loop,noexec,nosuid,rw 0 0
the temp files are now written to a secure tmp file, however some processes still need that folder for example cpanel.
"Failed to create directory /tmp/cpanel.TMP.xxxxx"
Should I ignore that and similar error messages or what am I supposed to do?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2014
My hosting company is offering to sell me backup space which will be mounted as a network location. e.g. /usr/local/backup
My question is how would I use this since Plesk seems to be configured either to use an FTP location or to use the server repository. Would I have to change the location of the server repository to this network location? This doesn't seem ideal.
Plesk 11.5 on CentOs 6.4
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 25, 2008
i have a 32 GB hdd the results of df command are:
df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda3 32G 29G 715M 98% /
/dev/sda1 99M 14M 81M 15% /boot
tmpfs 1.5G 0 1.5G 0% /dev/shm
so there are 29GB used
but the du command shows only 19GB used:
du -hs /
19G /
where are the remaining 10GB from 19GB to 29GB?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 24, 2008
Is Motherboard RAID as good as a dedicated PCI-E card? I am guessing a dedicated card is the best option, though costs more.
We are looking at buying a barebones server from Supermicro. It features an onboard RAID controller which supports RAID 0, 1, 5 & 10 - but for some strange reason it will only support RAID 5 if you use Windows. Here is a link to the page detailing the RAID features.
[url]
We are going to be running Linux, CentOS 5.1, so we will only have the choice of RAID 0, 1 or 10. This isn't an issue, as having RAID 10 on 4x SAS (15k) drives will be fine for speed and stability. What is an issue is would this RAID controller be as fast or reliable compared to a dedicated PCI-E card? If it can only use RAID 5 in windows, does that suggest this controller is too reliant on software? It would be a nightmare to suffer downtime and data loss because the controller couldn't hack it during a drive failure, or one day it decided to bugger up the array when rebooting.
So that leads me to looking at this card, this looks very good for what we need. Are adaptec a reliable brand? I've seen it advertised for £200, which is a good price.
[url]
This card features RAID 5 and 6, would RAID 6 be better than RAID 10 for redundancy, or is it too slow to bother with? Also it seems to have a battery module available for it, what does this achieve? Cos surely if the power dies the hard drives and motherboard can't run off this little battery, or does it just help the controller stay alive long enough with some hard drive information in its memory if the power goes out during a rebuild?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2009
I could try the Software-RAID 5 of the EQ9 Server of Hetzner.
Does anyone here has experiences, how fast a hardware raid 5 compared against the software-Raid 5 is?
The i7-975 should have enough power to compute the redundnacy on the fly, so there would be a minimal impact on performance. But I have no idea.
I want to run the server under ubuntu 8.04 LTS x64.
On it a vitualisation like VMware the IO-Load could get really high.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jan 14, 2008
So I've just got a server with 2xSATA raid 1 (OS, cpanel and everything in here) and 4xSCSI raid 10 (clean).
Which one do you guys think will give the best performance:
1. Move mysql only to 4xSCSI raid 10
2. Move mysql and home folder to 4xSCSI raid 10
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jul 8, 2007
I am in a somewhat complicated situation... I wanted to order a custom server with hardware 3Ware RAID controller but after over a month of waiting I was told the HW RAID controller, as well as any other 3Ware controller they tried, does not work with the motherboard used in the server from Fujitsu-Siemens and that they simply got a reply from FS that the controller is not certified to work with their motherboard.
So although I'd prefer a HW raid, I am forced to either choose a different webhost or setup a software RAID. The problem is, I haven't done that before and am somewhat moderately...scared
I have read a lot of the info about SW RAID on Linux that I could find through Google but there are some questions unanswered still. So I thought that perhaps some of the more knowledgeable WHT members could help me with this problem...
The server specs will be:
Core2Duo E6600 (2.4Ghz), 2GB RAM, 6-8x* 250GB SATA II HDDs, CentOS 4.4 or SuSe, DirectAdmin
* I prefer 8 HDDs (or actually 9) over 6 but I am not sure if their server chassis can hold that many HDDs, I am awaiting answer from them. They don't have any other drives beside the 250GB ones so I am limited to those.
The preferred SW RAID setup is to have everything in RAID 10, except for the /boot partition which has to be on RAID-1 or no RAID I believe, plus one drive as hot spare (that would be the 9th drive). I am quite sure they will not do the setup for me but will give me access to KVM over IP and a Linux image preinstalled on the first HDD so that I'll have a functional system that needs to be upgraded to RAID-10.
How do I do that? The big problem I see is that LILO or GRUB can't boot from a software RAID-5/10 so I will have to mount the /boot partition elsewhere. It's probably terribly simple...if you have done it before which I have not. I have read some articles on how to setup a RAID-5/10 with mdadm (e.g. [url] ) but they usually do not talk about how to setup the boot partition. Should it be setup as a small sized (100-200MB) RAID-1 partition spread over all of the drives in the otherwise RAID-10 array?
What about swap? Should I create a 4-8GB (I plan to upgrade the server RAM to 4GB in near future) RAID-1 swap partition on each of the disks or swap to a file on the main RAID-10 partitions. The second sounds simpler but what about performance? Is swapping to a file on RAID-10 array a bad idea, performance wise?
Is it possible to grow a RAID-10 array in a way similar to growing a RAID-5 array with mdadm (using two extra drives instead of one of course)? mdadm doesn't actually even mention RAID-10 despite it does support it without having to create RAID-0 on top of RAID-1 pairs if the support is in kernel, from what I know.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2009
How often do RAID arrays break? Is it worth having RAID if a servers hard drive goes down? I was thinking it may just be a better option to just have a backup drive mounted to my system and in the even of a system failure just pop in a new hard drive, reload the OS, and then reload all my backups?
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 20, 2009
I have a new server and it is rather slow during raid 1 recovery after system installed
CPU: Intel Core2Duo E5200 Dual Core, 2.5Ghz, 2MB Cache, 800Mhz FSB
Memory: 4GB DDR RAM
Hard Disk 1: 500GB SATA-2 16MB Cache
Hard Disk 2: 500GB SATA-2 16MB Cache
root@server [~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
256896 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0]
2096384 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md2 : active raid1 sdb4[2] sda4[0]
480608448 blocks [2/1] [U_]
[=======>.............] recovery = 36.7% (176477376/480608448) finish=1437.6min speed=3445K/sec
the sync speed is just 3.4Mb/second and the total hours needs to be more than 40 hours
Also the server load is very high (nobody uses it)
root@server [~]# top
top - 07:00:14 up 16:55, 1 user, load average: 1.88, 1.41, 1.34
Tasks: 120 total, 1 running, 119 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.2%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 4148632k total, 747768k used, 3400864k free, 17508k buffers
Swap: 5421928k total, 0k used, 5421928k free, 569252k cached
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2009
I am in the process of restructuring the infrastructure on our servers. I am thinking of using either RAID 5 (1 hot spare) vs RAID 10 as my 1U server has 4 HDD tray.
RAID 5 would have better capacity but RAID 10 has better overall performance. Which one do you guys go for a shared hosting server?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Dec 23, 2008
Is it possible to turn a non raided setup into Linux software raid, while it is live, and if it's the OS drive? Can you even software raid the OS drive remotely? I've been thinking about doing it for the redundancy (and possible slight performance boost for reads, but doing it more for redundancy). I'm using CentOS.
View 12 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2008
I want to take some data from a raid-disk (taken from a raid-1 sstem). Put it into a new system already, but this system doesn't have any raid.
When viewing "fdisk -l", it said /dev/sdb doesn't contain valid partition. Is there anyway I can mount it now? I am on CentOS 4 box
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2008
As per subject, I have a cpanel server and lately there is something seems wrong with my apache access logs.
/usr/local/apache/logs/access_log
The problem is the log did not recorded website being accessed in details
Quote:
218.111.202.105 - - [24/May/2008:22:53:37 +0800] "-" 408 -
127.0.0.1 - - [24/May/2008:22:55:01 +0800] "GET /whm-server-status HTTP/1.0" 200 31811
74.53.197.2 - - [24/May/2008:22:55:17 +0800] "-" 408 -
74.53.197.2 - - [24/May/2008:22:55:23 +0800] "-" 408 -
219.93.152.12 - - [24/May/2008:22:56:34 +0800] "-" 408 -
207.234.129.249 - - [24/May/2008:22:56:42 +0800] "-" 408 -
203.130.242.48 - - [24/May/2008:22:56:56 +0800] "-" 408 -
203.130.242.48 - - [24/May/2008:22:57:01 +0800] "-" 408 -
76.184.65.88 - - [24/May/2008:22:58:07 +0800] "t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&client=firefox-a" 501 -
127.0.0.1 - - [24/May/2008:23:00:01 +0800] "GET /whm-server-status HTTP/1.0" 200 32935
127.0.0.1 - - [24/May/2008:23:01:36 +0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 3473
58.186.201.58 - - [24/May/2008:23:02:22 +0800] "-" 408 -
203.130.242.48 - - [24/May/2008:23:04:11 +0800] "-" 408 -
203.130.242.48 - - [24/May/2008:23:04:15 +0800] "-" 408 -
127.0.0.1 - - [24/May/2008:23:05:01 +0800] "GET /whm-server-status HTTP/1.0" 200 32548
72.29.95.45 - - [24/May/2008:23:06:13 +0800] "-" 408 -
72.29.95.45 - - [24/May/2008:23:06:13 +0800] "-" 408 -
195.82.99.126 - - [24/May/2008:23:06:43 +0800] "-" 408 -
195.82.99.126 - - [24/May/2008:23:06:49 +0800] "-" 408 -
195.82.99.126 - - [24/May/2008:23:06:54 +0800] "-" 408 -
74.53.197.2 - - [24/May/2008:23:08:16 +0800] "-" 408 -
127.0.0.1 - - [24/May/2008:23:10:01 +0800] "GET /whm-server-status HTTP/1.0" 200 31890
127.0.0.1 - - [24/May/2008:23:10:18 +0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 3473
208.101.51.84 - - [24/May/2008:23:10:46 +0800] "-" 408 -
62.193.196.250 - - [24/May/2008:23:13:18 +0800] "-" 408 -
62.193.196.250 - - [24/May/2008:23:13:24 +0800] "-" 408 -
62.193.196.250 - - [24/May/2008:23:13:29 +0800] "-" 408 -
127.0.0.1 - - [24/May/2008:23:15:05 +0800] "GET /whm-server-status HTTP/1.0" 200 33145
127.0.0.1 - - [24/May/2008:23:19:08 +0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 3473
127.0.0.1 - - [24/May/2008:23:20:02 +0800] "GET /whm-server-status HTTP/1.0" 200 32720
67.15.205.17 - - [24/May/2008:23:22:26 +0800] "-" 408 -
127.0.0.1 - - [24/May/2008:23:25:16 +0800] "GET /whm-server-status HTTP/1.0" 200 31203
209.25.195.74 - - [24/May/2008:23:26:21 +0800] "-" 408 -
209.25.195.74 - - [24/May/2008:23:26:24 +0800] "-" 408 -
209.25.195.74 - - [24/May/2008:23:26:27 +0800] "-" 408 -
209.25.195.74 - - [24/May/2008:23:26:29 +0800] "-" 408 -
209.25.195.74 - - [24/May/2008:23:26:33 +0800] "-" 408 -
209.25.195.74 - - [24/May/2008:23:26:36 +0800] "-" 408 -
127.0.0.1 - - [24/May/2008:23:28:05 +0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 3473
My old logs /usr/local/apache_bacup/logs/access_log record them fine
Quote:
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:21:13 +0800] "GET /ss-xs/?action-spacelist-uid-356-type-blog-starttime-1181520000-endtime-1$
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:21:53 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-1303.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:22:18 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-819.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:22:37 +0800] "GET /ss-xs/?17/spacelist-blog.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:22:44 +0800] "GET /ss-xs/?viewthread-1745.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:23:21 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-2074.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:23:29 +0800] "GET /forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=35 HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:23:58 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-998.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:24:02 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-784.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
127.0.0.1 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:25:01 +0800] "GET /whm-server-status HTTP/1.0" 200 21150
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:25:01 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-2100-page-1.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:25:10 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-1211-page-3.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:25:37 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-834.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
127.0.0.1 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:25:40 +0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 2860
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:26:25 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-623.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:26:41 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-25.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:27:18 +0800] "GET /ss-xs/?10/viewspace-18 HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:27:44 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-802-page-2.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:27:48 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-1802-page-7.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:28:15 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-1569-page-2.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:28:31 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-1133.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
127.0.0.1 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:30:02 +0800] "GET /whm-server-status HTTP/1.0" 200 21041
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:30:19 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-462-page-1.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:30:34 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-1900.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:30:42 +0800] "GET /ss-xs?693 HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:30:46 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-1501-page-2.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:31:48 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-2055.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:31:58 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-2050-page-2.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
127.0.0.1 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:34:04 +0800] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 2860
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:34:32 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-2019.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:34:53 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-744.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:34:59 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-2135.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
127.0.0.1 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:35:01 +0800] "GET /whm-server-status HTTP/1.0" 200 21102
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:35:11 +0800] "GET /ss-xs/archiver/ HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:36:38 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-781-page-2.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:37:04 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-1216.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:38:09 +0800] "GET /ss-xs/?viewthread-1879.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
80.191.80.84 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:38:29 +0800] "GET /forum/archiver/tid-275.html HTTP/1.1" 404 -
127.0.0.1 - - [18/Jul/2007:04:40:02 +0800] "GET /whm-server-status HTTP/1.0" 200 21191
how do I make my apache to log the access log in details again?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 10, 2008
Can't access apache update in WHM I get an http 500 error page.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2007
I'm trying to set up Apache on CentOS 4. I'm using Apache 2.0 and it can't seem to access anything outside of the /var/www directory - it gives an Error 403.
I thought this would be down to SELinux but this is disabled. I've run the following command on the directory but with no luck:
Code:
chown apache /home/jmaskell -R
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 20, 2013
I m newbie to apache server. I have created a web site using apache server with theURL... tutorial. I m able to access my web site on my ip address bt unable to access it using other ip of linux system. I m CentOS user. I can ping that ip with my ip. I have edited files as described in the tutorial.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 1, 2013
Trying to access my website, which is running on my PC on Apache XAMPP, from another PC by typing:
http://IP:80 and I get a simple page not found error.
Firewall on router and PC are disabled.
Port forwarding is done.
Apache is running on port 80 and port 444
Added to httpd-xampp.conf:
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2014
I can't reach my website, I get a "corrupted content" error message in the browser.Looking into apache (version 2.4.7), I get
Code:
~$ apachectl -S
AH00526: Syntax error on line 22 of /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/000-default.conf:
SSLCertificateKeyFile: file '/etc/ssl/private/owncloud.key' does not exist or is empty
Action '-S' failed.
However, I double checked that the file is in the appropriate location and does contain the key, so maybe apache has no permission. afaik, it doesn't run as root all the time - or only for a short time?
permissions for the key file are as follows:
Code:
~$ sudo ls -l /etc/ssl/private/owncloud.key
-rw-r--r-- 1 root ben 1704 Sep 28 04:01 /etc/ssl/private/owncloud.key
, where ben is my normal user.
It was suggested to me on the httpd IRC channel that maybe apparmor was doing something wrong, but I don't know how to investigate that.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2007
I'm getting an error when I try to allow apache access a mount nfs folder...
View 4 Replies
View Related
