I don't know if this is the right forum, but someone asked me which processor is better:
Q6600 - 8 MB cache - 4 x 2.4 Ghz
P9500 - 2 MB cache - 4 x 2.2 Ghz
Off course everyone will say the Q6600 now (i know that myself), but the Q6600 server has 4 GB ram and the P9500 server 8 GB. What would be the best choice?
it is for VPS hosting. In my opinion the P9500 is better.
Intel Xeon 3200 series Quad Core VS Intel Core2Quad Q6600
What stood between Intel Xeon 3200 series Quad Core VS Intel Core2Quad Q6600?
3i want to buy new erver and i have choice of the fallowing
AMD X4 Quad Core 9500
RAM : 4096 MB
Disk Drives: 2 X 250 GB SATA
and
Intel Quad Core Q9300 4x2.5 GHz
RAM : 2048 MB
Disk Drives: 2 X 250 GB SATA
both in the same price . so i need some advice for who are the best performance and the ideal for webhosting service.
Intel Xeon 3210 2.1 GHz Quad Core/2Gb RAM/250 gb IDE/SATA /BW: 2000gb
DC ThePlanet
or
Intel Quad Core Q9400 4x2.66 ГГц/4Gb RAM/2x500 gb SAT/ BW: 2000gb DC Gnax/NetDepot
Server choice for hosting.
I'm going in for a new build and I can't decide between the Intel Q9550 and the AMD Phenom II X4 955.
Now, the Phenom is rated as good as and even better in some cases than the Intel but the Q9550 has more cache I think.
However, the Phenom costs $189 vs the $219 for the Q9550.
Anyone have the latest Xeon 3460's, any comparison to the Core i7 920?
[url]
Im serach Server Dedicated, 4x CPU, Core2Duo or Phenom, min. 8gb RAM, localizaction: EUROPA!!
Traffic unlimited or min. 2000/month.
We are hosting our software system which do calculation and file manipulation.
Now we have Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 and would like to get Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 to increase our system performance.
Also we have other choice, get Intel Xeon E5405 Harpertown 2.0GHz
to replace two above.
I think it is better to have one server box because one box easy to manage than two. Also Harpertown is much faster than these two together.
What is your opinion?
I have currently a server with a "Intel Core 2 duo e6640 2.4Ghz".
Now the company I'm at moving to a new data center and offering me a box for the same price with a Intel P3.4.
As I understand I would move from a two core to a single core CPU.
In the first move letter they send me, they where saying I would get a CPU plus, plus 1 GB mem more.
I have a decision to make about hosting.
I have 2 offers for the same monthly price.
Option A - Xeon X3220 quad core
Option B - AMD Phenom 9600 quad core
Everything else is comparable RAM, disk, bandwidth etc
which cpu is best
both some with same 8GB ram + 750GB hdd
if you buying the server then what server will you go for?
i want to know which cpu is the best, the price difference is 30 euro.
I have around 400 active users so i thgought about upgrading however im not sure if E5405 is enough. Can anyone checkthe benchmark of e5405?
There another deal that is dual e5405 it will cost another 30 euro
Which cpu will you take for a cpanel hosting server?
Run PHP/MYSQL for provide share hosting.
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4 GHz 8M
Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 3.00GHZ 4MB
- one box E5420 (dual CPUs) with 16GB RAM
- two boxes Q6600 with 8GB RAM on each
All others parts are the same. Two boxes Q6600 will cost around $700 more
edit: bad, I could not edit the subject. I want to compare E5420 with Q6600
i will upgrade my server to:
Core2Quad Q6600
8 GB Ram
1000 GB HDD
1000 GB 2nd HDD
cpanel
how many sites can this server will handle?
if the sites will be small forums?
Planning on getting a new dedicated server with 4GB RAM, and a 500GB 7.2k SATA2 Hard Drive.
Which processor do you guys suggest? I know the Q6600 is older and runs hotter, but it has better specs than the Q8200. Would I really notice a difference if I'm only hosting static sites without any video streaming or anything?
If you had to buy one or the other at the same price which would you go with? Hosting and gaming usage.
Q6600 vs Q9300
2.4 Ghz vs 2.5 Ghz
8MB cache vs 6 MB cache
1066 FSB vs 1333 MHz FSB
had you ever use q6600 and x3220 to run xen ?
i wonder if they can support xen well.
I have read benchmark comparisons and found the Q9400 and even the Q9300 to be a better performing processor compared to the Q6600 processor, even with 2MB less L2 cache.
I am just wondering, how significant of a difference do you think the Q6600 processor and the Q9400 processor is in a server environment? Currently I have a Q6600 processor but am looking to upgrade my server, possibly to the Q9400 processor..will it be worth it? It's not that much more expensive..the only thing I am concerned about is the 2mb L2 cache loss.
My site is "kind-of" high traffic. We receive a lot of connections and visitors, and most-importantly my sites are run by PHP and MySQL databases.
Please help me choose the right processor. Currently I have 4GB DDR2-800mhz installed, which I will be upgrading to 8GB DDR2-800mhz, no matter what processor I choose to run.
I discovered that upgrading to 1ghz RAM is just not worth the extra money because the performance gain is very little and not noticeable.
Would anyone possibly know of a Intel Quad Core processor that has 8mb or more of L2 cache, 1333mhz FSB, and is comparable to the processors listed above and relatively the same in price?
Xeon 3220 (2.40Ghz 4MB Cache)
vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (2.44Ghz 8MB Cache)
vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 (2.33Ghz 4MB Cache)
How do these CPU's compare to each other? From what I've read so far I'm leaning towards the Q6600.
Is a Core2Quad Q6600 cpu a good choice in a dedicated server compared to a Xenon or Dual Xenons?
I'm sepcifically looking at this page...[url]
Is this a good deal?
The 1TB SATA can be swapped for a 300GB SCSI at no extra cost.
Intended for a vbulletin forum so lots of database queries, I assume the 8GB ram would be good for that.
i want to choose a new server,it will run with forums,
and general blogAhtml pages.
there are two spec.
====================
Q6600
4G RAM
250G SATAII HD*2 with raid 1 or 250G SATAII HD*3 with raid5
====================
dual Xeon 604pin 3.2 GHz (irwindale)
4G RAM
36G SCSI HD*3 with raid5
====================
which one will be better?
I now have 2 options for my new servers,first one specs:
Core2Quad Q6600
4GB DDR-II 800Mhz
2 x 250GB SATA II
and another one:
Dual Opteron 280
4GB ECC DDR (it should be 400Mhz)
2 x 250GB SATA
They are about same price as the second one is used system and the first one is brand new.
So which one should i choose?
from the title, which one is better for a server?
View 14 Replies View Relateddifferent speed between Quadcore Q6600 2.4Ghz and Xeon 3060 Dual core 2.4Ghz? Typically i can tell the Q6600 is faster than Xeon 3060 but i am not sure which one is faster and more stable for dedicated server.
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe have been offering mostly AMD servers for various reasons, but I am curious the reason many offer one vs. the other?
More demand? Reliability? Power consumption? Heat output? Compatability? Performance?
am leasing a dedicated server, but am stuck when it comes to choosing AMD or Intel processor.
Am planning to start a company, and am only going to be offering shared
I just bought one of these today but not only does it not have hdd's it doesn't have caddies... i can't find them anywhere, where do you guys get missing caddies?
View 3 Replies View RelatedHello guys what do you prefer For you servers?
Amd or Intel i always prefer to have Intel
if there is already an equivalent Xeon for the i7 processors?
I mean that for example C2Q Q6600 is equivalent for X3220 if I'm right.
Also, I guess those Servers will cost a lot more, not only because the processor is very costly but it also requires DDR3 RAM which is still nowadays quite expensive...
I recently came across the pricing of Intel Atom powered Dedicated Servers which are as low as $39 (not managed of course) but, the hard disk space and bandwidth bundled with it is tempting.
I currently host a vBulletin Forum of mine of a 512 MB VPS and it performs fine but, I was thinking whether it would be better on an Atom as most are bundled with 2 GB of RAMs.
Anyone can help me out here - whether am thinking in the right direction or am entirely wrong in thinking this?
