How Do I Set Up Web Based Emails For A New Website
Sep 24, 2009
I have set up a new Web site on one of our servers which has Qmail on it.
This web site is SmartsWin.com
What are the Steps necessary to take so that I can set up the email addresses of the various people affiliated with this Web site? That is like john@SmartsWin.com, jane@SmartsWin.com, etc.?
Also I want the emails to be Web accessible via a Web based interface such as
Hoard or Squirellmail, or another Web based interface if you think it is better or easier to set up.
What are the easiest way (Steps) to get the above task done?
View 12 Replies
Oct 5, 2009
Let’s say I have the website myname.com
Myname.com is a very popular website and his content mirrors in 2servers (Server A and Server B) in 2 different datacenters (exactly same content).
When Server A fails due to datacenter or rack problem and no site is responding, then I need some service to transfer ALL traffic to server B. Is there any (paid or free) service doing such a thing? If yes, what about dns propagation? As far as I am concerned, dns propagation is a very slow procedure depending on each internet provider.
So how could we instantly make Server B to come live to ALL visitors? Is there any quick and reliable dns redundancy system without having to wait for dns propagation?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2007
Since Jan 07, one of our servers has been sending thousands of emails to ne.jp hosts.
Eg from logs:
Code:
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FY9ME016602: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:02, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYB7d016734: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FY9A4016629: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:02, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FY9la016616: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:02, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYCkO016807: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:36:58, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYB7B016730: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYCO0016757: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:36:59, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYDjq016819: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:36:58, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYBhL016751: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:37:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
Sep 4 19:11:11 debian sm-mta[25383]: l84FYDPw016811: to=, ctladdr= (2001/2001), delay=01:36:58, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=930403, relay=lsean.ezweb.ne.jp., dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with lsean.ezweb.ne.jp.
We're absolutely unable to track or find out who is sending it or how to stop this.
So I'm wondering if it is possible to prevent sendmail from sending to:
lsean.ezweb.ne.jp, OR
docomo.ne.jp, OR
softbank.ne.jp
/var/mail/vhostswww logs are not showing helpful info at all. Eg:
Code:
--l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian--
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: hanako.@docomo.ne.jp
Subject:
To: a_j.n-y_bluespider-tattoo@softbank.ne.jp
Message-Id: <200709041410.l84EA0Fh007971@debian>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l84EA0Fh007971;
Received: (from vhostswww@localhost)
for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id l84EA0jk007973
Received: from debian (localhost [127.0.0.1])
Return-Path:
Content-Type: text/rfc822-headers
--l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:16 +0200
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Invalid recipient:
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx.softbank.ne.jp
Status: 5.1.1
Action: failed
Final-Recipient: RFC822; a_j.n-y_bluespider-tattoo@softbank.ne.jp
Arrival-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
Reporting-MTA: dns; debian
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
--l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian
<<< 503 No recipients specified
550 5.1.1 ... User unknown
<<< 550 Invalid recipient:
>>> DATA
... while talking to mx.softbank.ne.jp.:
----- Transcript of session follows -----
(reason: 550 Invalid recipient: )
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
from localhost [127.0.0.1]
The original message was received at Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:10:00 +0200
--l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian
This is a MIME-encapsulated message
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
boundary="l84GRnX5029819.1188924137/debian"
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:
Message-Id: <200709041642.l84GRnX5029819@debian>
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:17 +0200
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:17 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) id l84GRnX5029819;
Received: from localhost (localhost)
Return-Path:
From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Sep 4 18:42:17 2007
--l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian--
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: hanako.@docomo.ne.jp
Subject:
To: a_j.n-y_bluespider-tattoo@softbank.ne.jp
Message-Id: <200709041411.l84EB8CS011861@debian>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:08 +0200
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:08 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l84EB8CS011861;
Received: (from vhostswww@localhost)
for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:09 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id l84EB8f6011862
Received: from debian (localhost [127.0.0.1])
Return-Path:
Content-Type: text/rfc822-headers
--l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:15 +0200
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 Invalid recipient:
Remote-MTA: DNS; mx.softbank.ne.jp
Status: 5.1.1
Action: failed
Final-Recipient: RFC822; a_j.n-y_bluespider-tattoo@softbank.ne.jp
Arrival-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:09 +0200
Reporting-MTA: dns; debian
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
--l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian
<<< 503 No recipients specified
550 5.1.1 ... User unknown
<<< 550 Invalid recipient:
>>> DATA
... while talking to mx.softbank.ne.jp.:
----- Transcript of session follows -----
(reason: 550 Invalid recipient: )
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
from localhost [127.0.0.1]
The original message was received at Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:11:09 +0200
--l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian
This is a MIME-encapsulated message
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details
boundary="l84GRnX4029819.1188924135/debian"
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:
Message-Id: <200709041642.l84GRnX4029819@debian>
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:15 +0200
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:42:15 +0200
by debian (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) id l84GRnX4029819;
Received: from localhost (localhost)
Return-Path:
From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Sep 4 18:42:15 2007
--l84GRnX3029819.1188924134/debian--
How would I solve this problem as it's making our server load skyhigh 24/7.
Additional info about system:
> Debian Linux, latest kernel
> Sendmail (we've tried postfix, exim, with same results)
> Non cPanel system.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2008
Can anyone of you guys recommend a web based FTP that will allow me to upload folders ---instead of single files.
For the people using it, File Vista was the most logical choice. I was playing around with their demo, but it does not do folder uploads.
Does such a beast exist?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 4, 2009
I'm looking for a cheap VPS with the following requirements:
- Based in the EU
- Unlimited monthly bandwidth
- Price under 50 EUR / month, the cheaper the better
- At least 20GB space, at least 10 MBit, other specs do not matter
- Linux distro or FreeBSD, SSH access
- Good reliability, doesn't mean i want a 99% uptime guarantee, but something that doesn't have too many problems
Preferred locations are near Austria, but anywhere in the EU is good. Also it is a plus if they have upgrade options to better packages if i need it at a later time.
I liked Kimsufi, however I cannot rent from my country even though I can pay by credit card or paypal. I am based in Slovenia and i can pay by Visa debit or Paypal (Visa preferred).
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2009
Just a general question here but does it put you off signing up with a host if their HQ's are not based in the US or UK?
For example, would you always choose a host based in the US or UK over a host based in India, China or the Phillippines (i.e. English not being their first language as per communication with techs/sales staff)?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2009
We've tried before several times RAM based hosting (where you have all files on RAM disk). Our systems were crashing, but my guess is that we were putting about 100,000 or so files on it and since it was formatted with ext3 (everywhere else we are using XFS) - this was a reason for crashing.
Since we have a lot of bandwdith in our data center, we are thinking about becoming a mirror for CentOS, gOS and some other distributions. I am thinking again about using RAM disk based hosting (you use 1 Gb/s port 100% no problem with it even on CoreDuo level of CPU).
Anybody has any experince, good or bad of running RAM based hosting? I am talking about dedicated, not VPS environment.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2008
i suppose this type of post is common in this forum so i hate to do it but i do need come advice.
I hava a shared host but i need to move to a dedicated host. I'm having real problems finding a host that i think i can trust.....i was considering going with 123 reg....the price is about right....£40 monthly and they're in the uk so support should be easier............then i read loads of bad things about them an decided against it.
I need a dedicated host ( linux) for about £40 a month based in the uk....can anyone reccomend anyone reliable with good support....cpanel would also be good......and do they all have setup fees like 123 reg?
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jul 7, 2008
As you might know if you read my other thread I'm often looking for VPS servers (at the moment Linux only), based around the world.
This weeks challenge for me is a china/hong kong based VPS, nothing too fancy, its only going to be used for small websites and as a proxy service for when we run ranking reports for our SEO clients.
Requirements
- English support if possible, although we do have some Chinese speakers in house.
- 128mb ram, 2gb disk space, 20gb transfer/mo
- CentOS 5 preferred, but any system with a working Yum or similar will do.
Budget
up to €30 a month, but could go higher if i had to.
Payment
-for various reasons we cannot use paypal at the moment, so even if its just paypal credit card processing they won't let us use it. This is something we are looking to solve but its not my dept so i'm stuck with it.
- We can pay by Visa Credit or Visa Debit cards, and if we really had to, bank transfer, but I'm told transfers to china are sometimes very tricky to get right.
I have had a look through the VPS offers forum but most of the china-related posts are from 2006 or so and so aren't relevant anymore.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Feb 8, 2006
I've been investigating and testing Xen for a few months in order to add Xen VPS to the hosting services I have available. With the recent news re: VMware Server, and my experience with VMware, I've started to look, and easily prefer, using this product over Xen. Has anyone else started to look at it as a possible alternative for hosting purposes?
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2008
I'm moving away from IPowerWeb after they "upgraded" to the new VDeck application. This thing is horrible. I would like to know of a host that provides the BEST web based file manager/editor.
I do a lot of PHP, HTML, SQL with complex directory structures.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2008
I have a file server, and want to build a system that has network-based reload feature. However, I have no idea how to create it. Is there any tutorial to do that? So whenever I need to reload OS for my server, I can do myself, dont need to ask help from the tech in datacenter?
View 3 Replies
View Related
