Bandwidth :: Reaching Japan With Low Latency From NYC?
May 21, 2008What would be the best provider for reaching Japan with low latency from NYC?
View 3 RepliesWhat would be the best provider for reaching Japan with low latency from NYC?
View 3 RepliesI have a reseller package and when creating a new site i grossly underestimated the traffic and am now approaching my bandwidth limit already.
Im just curious what happens when i reach this limit so i know what to expect. Will my site just go down until next month comes along when my bandwidth refreshes again?
I am currently running a VPS in the Colo4Dallas datacenter. A couple users of regional Japanese sites report sluggish loading from Japan.
I am contemplating a couple possible solutions to this problem:
Move the VPS to a facility near 1 Willshire in Los Angeles. I think that one issue might be the risk of earthquakes.
Set up a separate small VPS in a facility near 1 Willshire in Los Angeles. Other than the issue above, I wonder if I am not overdoing it by setting up a second VPS.
Set up a separate small VPS with Clara Japan. They run an English service brand Usonyx.
As above, I am wondering if I am truly doing myself a favor running a separate VPS, though the benefit would be the local proximity.
Am I missing something? What are your experiences? How have you solved similar issues?
Is it possible to use US IP Address assigned to my home server in Japan?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI am testing out a proxy we have in NY, and a proxy we have in Japan. The computer that I am using is in Toyoseu, Japan. What I want to know is why, when navigation to the website: stuttgarter-zeitung.de/stz/page/detail.php/1693599
it takes longer to load using the Tokyo proxy. Normally, I would think that it would be shorter than having to go to the NY proxy, get the site, and then come back.
I have a lot of international users connecting to my server. They are from all around the world including the philipines , germany, etc. Im thinking those users experience distance lag (Latency?). How do i cut down on this distance lag. Should i upgrade from 10mpbs to 100mpbs would that do any good?
View 9 Replies View RelatedThe server is up and running, so the server is not an issue. I therefore suspect there must be a DNS problem somewhere.
The common denominator among those that are having the problem is that they are using connections with high latency (e.g. Satellite). Could high latency be the problem? If yes, is there anything I can do so my users will stop having this problem?
Id like to know if I could use a remote desktop ( remotely ) as I have about 350msec latency to the server where I am planning to install it. I am planning to use remotely anywhere server .
View 6 Replies View RelatedOne of my apps is based on querying Youtube API. My response times are badly slow: something like 2 to 3 seconds. The guys on YouTube APIs Developer Forum suggested that the response time should be more like <.5 seconds.
Would you guys do me a favor and post your results for this command:
curl -w "
Total: %{time_total}
" -o /dev/null http://gdata.youtube.com/feeds/api/videos?vq=dog
It basically queries the API and tells you how much time it took API to return the data.
Please post your result and the NOC/hosting company you use. I am now considering moving to another hoster.
two setup issues:
1) We have 3 web servers each with IIS and ColdFusion. When updating the site which setup is better:
a) upload the changed file to all 3 web servers, keeping them in sync
b) move the source files to our storage server, then change the site root on the web servers to point to a network share in the storage server
Main issue: Will the network latency of fetching the source files be a performance problem?
2) We have a storage server that will serve up some audio/video via http. Which setup is better:
a) expose it to the Internet and serve it directly to the users via its own IIS
b) create a network share and let the 3 web servers serve the files
If you think long and hard about this issue you'll realize there are many cons and pros to each approach. I can't seem to make up my mind.
I want to get ideas about any dedicated server experience in these countries.
Denmark , Sweden , Japan, Portugal , France
my vps at VPSColo is down, the support at vpscolo is down too..
IS there a way to reach someone there?
Due to certain reasons I am looking for a fast reseller plan to Melbourne Australia. I would prefer the best from USA for Melbourne customers.
At the moment I would like to search and get quotes from various companies in the right city in USA which will be able to provide cpanel /whm and great support.
All the mail sent from your server is going into the JUNK folder of other servers, such as Hotmail, GMail, Yahoo,etc, not reaching the inbox What are the steps needs to be taken to prevent mails going JUNK folder
IP not Blacklisted
SPF record Present
Domain key Present
tried doing a search for my problem, but I guess I'm searching for the wrong criteria. Anyways, I'll try to keep this simple and straight forward:
1. We have about 10 web servers running on Plesk
2. We are running out of space
3. The servers have no more slots for adding new disks.
In this scenario, what would the next option be? Assuming that we will be increasing the basic hosting size, I think we're going to hit a brick wall soon. And hard.
How do you guys run your hosting setup? Multiple web servers with local storage, or do you guys make use of NAS (SANs are a bit pricey)? Hope to be able to pick your brains a bit!
I run a popular community and there are a number of notifications the user can receive.
The notifications are sent via PHP mail() function. For an increasing number of users, emails never get to their mailbox (neither in their junk mail folder).
When I look in qmail's logs, I see a lot of these :
Quote:
@40000000469233dd346d5d24 new msg 331743
@40000000469233dd346d610c info msg 331743: bytes 637 from <myscript@mydomain.com> qp 14664 uid 81
@40000000469233dd34bb8cc4 starting delivery 151: msg 331743 to remote user@hotmail.com
@40000000469233dd34bb90ac status: local 0/10 remote 1/20
@40000000469233df02a4e334 delivery 151: success: 65.54.244.40_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250__<20070709131043.14663.qmail@ns22299.ovh.net>_Queued_mail_for_delivery/
@40000000469233df02a4eb04 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
@40000000469233df02a4eb04 end msg 331743
So I receive a "250" answer, but with this "Queued_mail_for_delivery" message, and the user never gets anything of the email. This exact message is for an hotmail account, but I get other similar ("queued") messages for other accounts.
Is there anything i can do to prevent this from happenning ? A lot of new registrant get these messages with their validation emails and that is lost customers for me.
am running CentOS 4.4 i686 and WHM 10.8.0 and we are having trouble receiving email from certain domains.
Undere whm tweak settings we do not have the "SpamAssassin Spam Filter" enabled.
Mails sent from two domains (that we know of) do not reach us at all and no error message is deliver to the sending address.
Emails sent from us to them DO reach they destination so we are thinking some spam filfer or configuration in exim must be the culprit.
to buy a good dedicated server to serve my clients here. So im looking from advices on a good hosting company USA based.
But i have been ping several major hosting USA company (like, mediatemple, theplanet, etc...) and i still didn´t get a Ping under 130ms.
If i ping a good EU company i get 60 to 90ms.
I know that the distance is bigger but,
Does anyone knows any good USA hosting company with a Ping to Europe lower than 100ms?
My budjet goes up to 800 $/moth
I have a Sonicwall NSA 3500. Does anyone know if you can use it to create bandwidth charts of Network Objects (e.g. IPs or Groups of IPs)?
I am thinking something like Cacti, but I don't know the code to pull that info or if it's even technically possible.
which case is more preferred: a shared web hosting service with unlimited space/bandwidth, or a dedicated one with limited space/bandwidth?
View 4 Replies View RelatedHey can anyone tell me How the whole bandwidth thing works? like lets say..if i get 100k views a month, how much bandwidth would that take?
View 7 Replies View RelatedHow will I assign the bandwidth for a VE in virtuozzo power panel. I could not find any fileds that corresponds to bandwidth in the steps during creation. I could find how to restrict memory(vmguarpages) and disk space. But where will I assign the bandwidth that a VE can use.
Also what is this bandwidth rate 8kb/s or so?
Now I keep very close tabs on my site stats. Just tonight one of my sites suddenly showed 167gb for "traffic not viewed".
That was a jump from 5gb over the course of a day.
That was done in 604877 pages and 607138 hits.
Can someone explain to me what "traffic not viewed" actually is within AWSTATS.
Next I located where most of the bw went and it appears to be http code 206 showing 159gb. My latest visitor report for the addon domain only showed one ip with an odd couple direct requests. The referring site was my own cpanel but registered to a ip in India.
How can i locate where the leak is, latest visitors isn't being much help, I have since denied the india ip which i suspect was the problem maker. How can I prevent instances such as this in the future? Being a streaming video site I have the bw to spare but it is still a bit un-nerving.
Now on top of everything Virtuozzo isn't showing anything of the sort, what do i believe?
I like the LSN server company and have a server there that I plan to keep forever, they do a great job just that I am confused about their bandwidth. Also the prices aren’t exact!
Just wondering what everyone else here thinks about this:
So... LSN are doing a Q9300 server at the moment for $130 “ish” with 2TB of bandwidth. Now let’s say someone wants an extra 0.5TB of bandwidth they pay around $50 for it and if they want 1TB they pay about $95.
So you buy a server for $130 and get 2TB of bandwidth and also the costs of the hardware, space, power is covered for the hardware. Yet they charge nearly the same price for 1TB extra to a single server, which uses no extra space, hardware or power. Another thing is they charge $25 server to pool the bandwidth between your servers.
So what I see:
2 Servers 4TB B/W @ $260 + $50 (pooling charge) = $310
1 Server 3TB B/W @ $230
1 Server 4TB B/W @ $300
So as you can see from the above you can get twice the space, RAM, CPU and Power for only $10 more? Surely it costs them more than the $10?
Also my final point is LSN have a private network, that is not bandwidth monitored and your servers can use, I asked LSN if you could tunnel the traffic from one server to another, their answer was “yes if you have the technical knowledge to do so”... Well that would get rid of the $50 pooling costs... making it actually alot cheaper to get two servers.
I'm looking to get a VPS offshore (please look at my other threads/posts to learn why) primarily for email for 4 or 5 domain names (most of which I'd download to my desktop but would also backup on the server) as well as perhaps to run a virtual desktop through and/or store some data.
For ease of use (for ME at least), I'd install (or have installed) a CP and probably run Centos 5 or Debian as the OS on the VPS. I won't be running websites from the VPS and I'll be the only user.
I've seen offers of all types related to bandwidth but, in some countries, bandwidth is expensive and they offer little as a result. How do I determine how much bandwidth I need for what I want to do and how do I know what's too little?
I have a server with a 10Mbps connection. Is there a way to limit the connection of my VPSs?
Lets say I have 10 VPS on that server, is there a way to limit them to 1Mbps each? Or do something like:
VPS_01 = 0.5Mbps
VPS_02 = 0.5Mbps
VPS_03 = 0.5Mbps
VPS_04 = 0.5Mbps
VPS_05 = 1Mbps
VPS_06 = 1Mbps
VPS_07 = 1Mbps
VPS_08 = 1Mbps
VPS_09 = 2Mbps
VPS_10 = 2Mbps
And/Or is there a way to monitor the data transfer of each VPS (how many GB/month)?
I've found a colocation company that gives me as the default 1.544Mbps as the initial bandwidth. I think this is OK for me most of the time, the problem is their bandwidth isn't really 'burstable', and If I want to expand to more bandwidth, my options are something like buying another T1's worth muxed in for $250.
Is this strange? Old-fashioned? Should I be worried about this?
i'm not familiar with colo. help this noob out.
View 14 Replies View RelatedI have a dedicated server and I would like to know how much bandwidth I use each month, this information is not provided in the control panel, is there any way to find out?
View 6 Replies View Relatedmy plesk control panel for my dedicated server and with all 3 of my domains FTP and HTTP transfers I'm getting below 500MB this month. However, GoDaddy's control panel says that I'm using 486GB. So where could the other 499.5 GB of bandwidth be coming from? I don't have that much email going on. No file attachments or anything.
View 7 Replies View Related[url]
[url]
what is tis error?:
my monthly bandwidth ussage and Partial Content 206 erros is same. what does it mean?