Apache 2.2.10 - New Release
Nov 3, 2008Apache 2.2.10 - new release
Has anybody upgraded yet? It was released a few weeks ago.
Any noticeable problems, such as with mod_rewrite, etc.?
ADVERTISEMENT
Immediate Release VPS
Jun 3, 2008Who has their VPS's released immediatly after signing up online? I'm looking to a VPS that I can sign up for online and have full access at least within an hour. And not an hour during a business day I mean right now I want to order and ahve access. I will not be faxing documents or scanning anything. Who does this? I'm pissed about the hoops an unamed VPSprovider has been putting me through the last few days just for a stupid $30 a month VPS. They will never get my business again.
View 14 Replies View RelatedServage Will Not Release My Domain
Nov 22, 2008After going through the forums here, i can see i am not the only one who has had this sort of problem with servage, but i am afraid mine is a bit more complicated.
I should also mention, that up to about a month ago, i was a very happy servage customer.
I always received good service, in short time and had a very very good uptime.
So, about 3-4 weeks ago, the time for renewing my registration came (i have been with servage for 3 years now), ofcourse - since i am happy with the service, i log into my cpanel - click "pay for another year" and make the payment on paypal.
On that same day, i also noticed the amount removed from my credit account and paypal noted that the transaction was completed (meaning it was transferred to the other side).
The next day, i get an email from servage telling me my account needs to be renewd - so i don't waste any time and open a support ticket, providing the full information i have for the transaction. In return i get the response, that it will probably take 2-3 days for the transaction to fully process.
Mind you, that has NEVER happened before - everything was always immediate, which was one of the things i liked about servage.
So i thought, maybe they are having more customers, so it takes them longer to process - ok...
But, after 4 more days of receiving these annoying emails, i hop back to the support system and update them that something is wrong. they ask for the details i already gave them, but i give it to them again, and i get the response that they are taking care of it.
I was out of the country on a business trip for the next 2 weeks and the day after i come back i get an email that my account was suspended for not paying.
I open the support page again, and i see no reply from them stating there is a problem with the statement. So, i open another ticket - asking them what is wrong and requesting that my site be immediately returned online, since they had enough time in advance to deal with this.
I get the reply, that they did not receive any transfer from me and that i should pay.
Now i'm really pissed, not only did i pay - i had also notified them on the problem, gave them full details, and now they want me to pay twice...?
I ask paypal for confirmation that the payment indeed made it through and i get the response that everything should be ok and a documented proof.
Suspecting this is some scam, I give the full details to the support staff and ask again for my site to be returned online immediately.
I get the response again that they have no such record and that i should pay (again?).
Now I'm pretty worried - they have fully documented proof of the payment, but they still claim to not have gotten it - something must be wrong!
So i start a dispute on paypal on my transaction, in order to get my money back, and start looking for another host.
I sent them the response that i wish to speak to someone in management who can help resolve this, but i get the response that they can see i opened a dispute and that i should pay, they also locked my domain as clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited.
So, all of the sudden they can see the payment - how about saying we are sorry, some compensation for the downtime? i would have gone for it...
Instead - they keep asking me to pay for a full year, and when i ask the email of someone in management - i get no response at all.
There is something fishy definitely gone on, i have seen some people on this forum suggesting they were hacked, or have gone into the scam business. all those seem possible now through my ordeal with them.
I just want this over so i can get MY domain on another host, anyone know someone there? have an email? a phone number (i tried the ones i found here - all do not work)? a skype contact?
how to get MY domain back or how to avoid this situation in the future (should i register my domain with another company? but they may tank as well...)?
Reseller Refuses To Release EPP Key
Jan 11, 2007We signed up with Cyberheart IT Online because they claim to be a BusinessTrust and Trustsg Company for web hosting (from January 2006 until January 2007) and 3 domain registration and a sql database.
During the year we had 3 main problems as follows;
1. unable to log in via web mail and each time we asked Cyberheart on this the reply is not to use web mail as it is unstable despite us telling them that we travel often and need the service which is included in the hosting plan.
2. When we logged into our web control panel to perform administration, we received messages saying that another user was logged into the system. We asked Cyberheart about this but received no reply or no solution.
3. We initiated a transfer to another Hosting company on the 20th of December 2006. Cyberheart replied to my email with explanation of what issues they had and I should move to their new server. We refused and asked Cyberheart to affect the transfer.
Cyberheart asked for DNS numbers after we sent repeated emails to ask them the status but delayed the transfer and withheld the correct EPP key until one of my critical domain expired on the 07/01/2007.
My new hosting company in the US advises me to renew my domain with Cyberheart so that we can continue with the transfer as they cannot do anything until Cyberheart provides the correct Authentication or EPP key. We suffered with our websites down and emails not working.
We asked registrar WEB COMMERCE COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED DBA WEBNIC.CC to intervene and only after did Cyberheart reply on the 10/01/2007 that we had outstanding invoice and Cyberheart will not provide the EPP key until we paid. We asked for the invoice to affect the payment and Cyberheart did not reply until the second reminder email today (11/01/2007). In the email (with no invoice) Cyberheart asked for $129.00 per domain name renewed which totals $258.00. The initial quoted amount was $18.00 per domain registration.
We have sent another email today to ask for a official corrected bill, still no reply.
We want the Authentication key to affect the hosting transfer. We do not want any other dealings with this unethical company but do not want to be bullied into paying what Cyberheart arbitrarily charge.
How To Upgrade Fedora Release On Old OpenVZ Vps?
Aug 14, 2008On my desktop I keep up with the Fedora life cycle by upgrading via DVD every six months or so, and I am currently running Fedora 9. By contrast, my hosted VPS based on OpenVZ/CentOS is still providing me with a Fedora Core 5 virtual environment. I used to keep up with FC5 updates via yum until FC5 maintenance ended, long ago. Question: is it possible to upgrade from Fedora Core 5 to Fedora 9 via yum and without any intervention on the current underlying VE by the VPS host? If so, how would I do that?
View 2 Replies View RelatedDedicated Server With Gentoo Release 2
Mar 23, 2008I have dedicated server with Gentoo Release 2 (installed Apache 2, mail, admin, PHP 5, MySQL 5). What I need to do next? How to more secure that server?
View 7 Replies View RelatedAny News On A Release For Cpanel For Windows 2003
Feb 8, 2007anybody know anything?
View 9 Replies View RelatedPlesk 12.x / Linux :: Debian 7.6 Point Release Causes Autoinstaller To Break
Jul 18, 2014Recently Debian released point release .6 of Debian Wheezy (Debian 7). This change in version number is causing all Plesk updates and upgrades to fail, due to 404 errors:
Code:
Getting new version of Parallels Installer...
File downloading parallels_installer_Debian_7.6_x86_64.md5sum:
ERROR: The required version '3.16.20' was not found on the server.
This could happen because of configuration error at the download site.
Failed to download the package [url] ....
The requested URL returned error: 404...This has been going on a couple of days. When will this be fixed?
Plesk 12.x / Linux :: See And Release Emails Blocked By Outgoing Mail Control
Jan 10, 2015Is it possible to see what e-mails are blocked/prohibited by Plesk Outgoing mail control? Currently i've set a limit of 20 mails on each mailbox. Yesterday I received an e-mail that there were messages blocked. For me personally it would be good to see what the receivers email adresses are and optionally what the content of the e-mail was. This way I can find out if it was really spam or not.
If the e-mails weren't spam, is there a possibility to release and send them?
Apache :: Capturing Internal Apache Errors Return Custom HTTP Status
Nov 15, 2013Server Version: Apache/2.2.22 (Unix)
On our production service, we've been getting numerous malformed POST requests to some of our CGI scripts that are showing up as 500 errors in our logs. They are malformed in the sense that the actual content length doesn't match the Content-Length specified in the request.
Here's the most trivial example I can come up with that reproduces the problem for us:
POST /some_valid_alias HTTP/1.1
Host: example.org
User-Agent: Arbitrary/1.0
Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=---------------------------41184676334
Content-Length: 769
-----------------------------41184676334
In addition to the 500 error in the access log, we see the corresponding error in the error log:
(70014)End of file found: Error reading request entity data
Based on the nature of the POST request and the error response, it does appear that Apache is doing the right thing here.
The POST never actually makes it as far as the script being targeted (/some_valid_alias in the above example); in other words, Apache returns 500 to the client, writes the error to the error log and never executes the script.
Is there a way to capture/avoid internal Apache errors like 70014, and return some other HTTP status besides 500 (like 403)? It's particularly annoying in our case, because our server sends us an email for all 500 errors.
So far, our best "defense" against these 500 errors is to disallow POST for these aliases, which normally just ignore the POST data anyway (when the request is not malformed):
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^POST$
RewriteRule ^/(some_valid_alias)(.*)$ $1$2 [R]
But this won't work for all our scripts, because in some cases we do want to permit POST.
Apache Procs Constantly Rise, Until Apache Is Restarted
Jul 23, 2007I've had this problem a long time now with my hosting network and decided to ask here hoping I get some good solutions, or if someone is willing to looking at this (I'll pay if they want).
Here's what I mean:
[url]
Problem is as you can see apache processes constantly rise infinitely, at least until I restart apache (/etc/init.d/httpd restart). The point of restart is shown in red lines.
And after restart, it goes down again for X amount of hours then eventually rises again infinitely until it's restarted again.
But the fact that after restart it remains down, it means it had the potential to be down all along.
So my question is: what could be causing this and does anyone have solution to keep them low at all times (as per graphs)?
Increasing The Apache ServerLimit In Apache 2.2.8 Version.
May 28, 2008The Linux Server got down when the MaxClients 256 is reached.
Error Log:
"server reached MaxClients setting, consider raising the MaxClients setting"
So that I have tried to increased the MaxClients Value to 500, after changed the value in httpd.conf and restart I get following error message.
" [notice] SIGHUP received. Attempting to restart
WARNING: MaxClients of 500 exceeds ServerLimit value of 256 servers,
lowering MaxClients to 256. To increase, please see the ServerLimit
directive."
So that I tried changed the Server limit in /usr/local/apache/include/httpd.h header file. but it seems like there is no entry.
Apache Version : 2.2.8
So I have added the ServerLimit 500 entry in httpd.conf file and restart the httpd service. But still shows the same warning mesg. Please help me regarding this.
We have the Dedicated server for Flash Game Server with following configuration.
RHEL4 OS
2GB RAM
Intel(R) Xeon(R) X3210 @ 2.13GHz
Cpanel Installed.
Apache 2.2.8
PHP 5.2.4
MySQL 4.1.2 (MySQL Server is working in differend server)
.htaccess Issue With Apache 1.3, But Works On Apache 2.2
Mar 22, 2008I have the following Apache redirect code in .htaccess:
RewriteRule ^sap-latest-news/([0-9]*)/([A-Za-z0-9_-.]*).htm$ /domain.com/app/modules/content/latestNews.php?id=$1 [L]
This redirect works fine on Apache 2.2.8, but doesn't work on Apache 1.3.41
The following is the entry from error_log:
RewriteRule: cannot compile regular expression '^sap-latest-news/([0-9]*)/([A-Za-z0-9_-.]*).htm$'
A simple Rewrite is working fine in Apache 1.3, but the above regualar expression doesn't seem to be working on Apache 1.3. Does anyone know whether Apache 1.3 doesn't support it?
Installed Apache And PHP Only Seeing Default Apache Page
Jun 1, 2007I am having an issue where I have a server that Directadmin is installed on. I go to the a url that is on the server and all i see is the default page of apache saying congrats, it is installed. Although there is no file like that in the public_html any longer and I can see my files in the public_html folder of that specific site.
View 6 Replies View RelatedDowngrade CentOS 5's Apache 2 To Apache 1.3
Jan 3, 2008I've been searching around with google regarding how to downgrade the Apache 2.2 which comes with CentOS 5 to Apache 1.3.39.
View 2 Replies View RelatedPerformance: Apache 2 Prefork Vs Apache 1.3
Jan 12, 2008I'm building a new server for a predominantly php5/mysql5 website and was wondering which version of apache to put on. I know there are some issues with PHP and Apache in MPM, but what's the performance comparison between Apache 1.3 and Apache 2 Prefork?
View 4 Replies View RelatedCan Not Compile Htppd Apache Because Of Apache APR
Aug 6, 2008I am trying to install dedicated web server on my Slackware 12.0.0 machine. I am a novice in Linux, but succeeded in MySQL & proFTPd installation. The problem now in httpd compiling.
I downloaded the latest Apache 2.2.9, but it needs Apache Portable Runtime 1.3.2 installed. I downloaded 1.3.2 version and run ./configure
1. checking size of size_t... 4
2. checking which format to use for apr_size_t... %u
3. checking size of off_t... 4
4. checking for mmap64... yes
5. checking for sendfile64... yes
6. checking for sendfilev64... no
7. checking for mkstemp64... yes
8. checking for readdir64_r... yes
9. checking which type to use for apr_off_t... off64_t
10. checking whether ino_t and unsigned long are the same... yes
11. configure: using unsigned long for ino_t
12. checking size of pid_t... 4
13. checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no
14. checking size of struct iovec... 8
15. checking for strnicmp... no
16. checking for strncasecmp... yes
17. checking for stricmp... no
18. checking for strcasecmp... yes
19. checking for strdup... yes
20. checking for strstr... yes
21. checking for memchr... yes
22. checking for strtoll... yes
23.
24. Checking for DSO...
25. checking for dlopen... no
26. checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes
27. adding "-ldl" to LIBS
28. checking for dlsym... yes
29.
30. Checking for Processes...
31. checking for waitpid... yes
32. checking for Variable Length Arrays... yes
33. checking struct rlimit... yes
34.
35. Checking for Locking...
36. checking for semget... yes
37. checking for semctl... yes
38. checking for flock... yes
39. checking for semaphore.h... (cached) yes
40. checking OS.h usability... no
41. checking OS.h presence... no
42. checking for OS.h... no
43. checking for library containing sem_open... none required
44. checking for sem_close... yes
45. checking for sem_unlink... yes
46. checking for sem_post... yes
47. checking for sem_wait... yes
48. checking for create_sem... no
49. checking for working sem_open... yes
50. checking for union semun in sys/sem.h... no
51. checking for LOCK_EX in sys/file.h... yes
52. checking for F_SETLK in fcntl.h... yes
53. checking for SEM_UNDO in sys/sem.h... yes
54. checking for POLLIN in poll.h sys/poll.h... yes
55. checking for PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED in pthread.h... yes
56. checking for pthread_mutexattr_setpshared... yes
57. checking for working PROCESS_SHARED locks... yes
58. checking for robust cross-process mutex support... yes
59. decision on apr_lock implementation method... SysV IPC semget()
60. checking if all interprocess locks affect threads... no
61. checking if POSIX sems affect threads in the same process... no
62. checking if SysV sems affect threads in the same process... no
63. checking if fcntl locks affect threads in the same process... no
64. checking if flock locks affect threads in the same process... no
65. checking for entropy source... /dev/urandom
66.
67. Checking for File Info Support...
68. checking for struct stat.st_blocks... yes
69. checking for struct stat.st_atimensec... no
70. checking for struct stat.st_ctimensec... no
71. checking for struct stat.st_mtimensec... no
72. checking for struct stat.st_atim.tv_nsec... yes
73. checking for struct stat.st_ctim.tv_nsec... yes
74. checking for struct stat.st_mtim.tv_nsec... yes
75. checking for struct stat.st_atime_n... no
76. checking for struct stat.st_ctime_n... no
77. checking for struct stat.st_mtime_n... no
78. checking for inode member of struct dirent... d_fileno
79. checking for file type member of struct dirent... d_type
80.
81. Checking for OS UUID Support...
82. checking uuid.h usability... no
83. checking uuid.h presence... no
84. checking for uuid.h... no
85. checking uuid/uuid.h usability... yes
86. checking uuid/uuid.h presence... yes
87. checking for uuid/uuid.h... yes
88. checking for library containing uuid_create... no
89. checking for library containing uuid_generate... -luuid
90. checking for uuid_create... no
91. checking for uuid_generate... yes
92. checking for os uuid usability... yes
93.
94. Checking for Time Support...
95. checking for struct tm.tm_gmtoff... yes
96. checking for struct tm.__tm_gmtoff... no
97.
98. Checking for Networking support...
99. checking for type in_addr... yes
100. checking if fd == socket on this platform... yes
101. checking style of gethostbyname_r routine... glibc2
102. checking 3rd argument to the gethostbyname_r routines... char
103. checking style of getservbyname_r routine... glibc2
104. checking if TCP_NODELAY setting is inherited from listening sockets... yes
105. checking if O_NONBLOCK setting is inherited from listening sockets... no
106. checking whether TCP_NODELAY and TCP_CORK can both be enabled... yes
107. checking for TCP_CORK in netinet/tcp.h... yes
108. checking for TCP_NOPUSH in netinet/tcp.h... no
109. checking for SO_ACCEPTFILTER in sys/socket.h... no
110. checking whether SCTP is supported... no
111. checking for struct ip_mreq... yes
112. checking for set_h_errno... no
113.
114. Checking for IPv6 Networking support...
115. checking for library containing getaddrinfo... none required
116. checking for library containing gai_strerror... none required
117. checking for library containing getnameinfo... none required
118. checking for gai_strerror... yes
119. checking for working getaddrinfo... yes
120. checking for negative error codes for getaddrinfo... yes
121. checking for working getnameinfo... yes
122. checking for sockaddr_in6... yes
123. checking for sockaddr_storage... yes
124. checking for working AI_ADDRCONFIG... yes
125. checking if APR supports IPv6... yes
126. checking langinfo.h usability... yes
127. checking langinfo.h presence... yes
128. checking for langinfo.h... yes
129. checking for nl_langinfo... yes
130.
131. Restore user-defined environment settings...
132. restoring CPPFLAGS to ""
133. setting EXTRA_CPPFLAGS to "-DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE"
134. restoring CFLAGS to ""
135. setting EXTRA_CFLAGS to "-g -O2 -pthread"
136. restoring LDFLAGS to ""
137. setting EXTRA_LDFLAGS to ""
138. restoring LIBS to ""
139. setting EXTRA_LIBS to "-luuid -lrt -lcrypt -lpthread -ldl"
140. restoring INCLUDES to ""
141. setting EXTRA_INCLUDES to ""
142. configure: creating ./config.status
143. config.status: creating Makefile
144. config.status: creating include/apr.h
145. config.status: creating build/apr_rules.mk
146. config.status: creating build/pkg/pkginfo
147. config.status: creating apr--config
148. config.status: WARNING: 'apr-config.in' seems to ignore the --datarootdir setting
149. config.status: creating apr.pc
150. config.status: creating test/Makefile
151. config.status: creating test/internal/Makefile
152. config.status: creating include/arch/unix/apr_private.h
153. config.status: executing default commands
154. config.status: include/apr.h is unchanged
155. config.status: include/arch/unix/apr_private.h is unchanged
After that I am trying make and have error at the end:
make[1]: Entering directory `/root/build/apr-1.3.2'
/bin/sh /root/build/apr-1.3.2/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -pthread -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -.....
Apache Down In The Middle Of Recompiling Apache (via Whm)
Nov 12, 2008In the middle of recompiling apache (via whm) after upgrading postgresql to 8.3, apache went down and remains down even after restart. Recompile is still in progress (about 15 minutes in)
tail -f /usr/local/apache/logs/error_log
[Wed Nov 12 15:24:44 2008] [warn] No JkShmFile defined in httpd.conf. Using default /usr/local/apache/logs/jk-runtime-status
[Wed Nov 12 15:24:44 2008] [notice] ModSecurity for Apache/2.5.7 (http://www.modsecurity.org/) configured.
[Wed Nov 12 15:24:46 2008] [warn] No JkShmFile defined in httpd.conf. Using default /usr/local/apache/logs/jk-runtime-status
[Wed Nov 12 15:24:46 2008] [alert] getpwuid: couldn't determine user name from uid 4294967295, you probably need to modify the User directive
[Wed Nov 12 15:24:46 2008] [alert] getpwuid: couldn't determine user name from uid 4294967295, you probably need to modify the User directive
[Wed Nov 12 15:24:46 2008] [alert] getpwuid: couldn't determine user name from uid 4294967295, you probably need to modify the User directive
[Wed Nov 12 15:24:46 2008] [alert] getpwuid: couldn't determine user name from uid 4294967295, you probably need to modify the User directive
[Wed Nov 12 15:24:46 2008] [alert] getpwuid: couldn't determine user name from uid 4294967295, you probably need to modify the User directive
[Wed Nov 12 15:24:46 2008] [notice] Apache/2.2.10 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.10 OpenSSL/0.9.7a mod_auth_passthrough/2.1 mod_bwlimited/1.4 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_jk/1.2.25 PHP/5.2.6 configured -- resuming normal operations
[Wed Nov 12 15:24:46 2008] [alert] Child 22588 returned a Fatal error... Apache is exiting!
httpd configtest
Syntax OK
ps -ef | grep ^httpd (no result)
Cpanel/Centos
Apache 1.3 And PHP4 With Apache 2.2 And PHP5
Jun 1, 2008I have apache 1.3 and PHP 4.4 installed on my CentOS 4.4
Can I install apache 2.2 and PHP 5.x on the same server? I want to test my scripts for compatibility and also to check the performance.
I dont want to break my current setup because it's a production server.
Apache 1 Or Apache 2 , All Else Being Equal
Nov 13, 2008if you were to be presented with a choice to run Apache 1 or Apache 2 given you'd have more or less the same support requests etc, and the same underlying user requirements to implement either one or the other, which one would you choose and why?
I noticed that Hsphere Parallels control panel 3.2 release as may well other control panels, offers such possibility. Personally I've been educated from senior members of previous organizations to appreciate Apache 1 as the defacto version of the web hosting industry (choice here being apache 1 and 2, not IIS or any other web servers)
Could you kindly simply attempt to enlighten me given, indeed support for both will/might remain the same in the future?
Apache :: IIS 7.5 And Apache 2.4.4 Not Working Together
Jun 25, 2013 I am facing while upgrading the current Apache version 2.2.11 to Apache 2.4.4. IIS 7.5 on Windows Web Server 2008 R2 is not redirecting requests to the Apache 2.4.4 which is on Windows Server 2003 R2. I checked the access and error logs of Apache 2.4.4 and there is no entry. The existing 2.2.11 is working completely fine with IIS 7.5. IIS is working as a load balancer in my environment, takes the https requests and forwards that to Apache, then it goes to the App servers. Here, self signed certificate is used between the Load balancer and the Web server.
I have followed exact same configuration as it was used in Apache 2.2.11 but installed it with a different port (444), later changed it to 443 before running Apache 2.4.4 as a service, turning off the Apache 2.2.11 service. And also, my Apache 2.4.4 is working completely fine when I access it through the Web Server level URL (through the server machine name). But it throws me an error 502 when I hit the Load Balancer level URL. Here is the complete error:
"502 - Web server received an invalid response while acting as a gateway or proxy server. There is a problem with the page you are looking for, and it cannot be displayed. When the Web server (while acting as a gateway or proxy)contacted the upstream content server, it received an invalid response from the content server."
how I can solve the issue? I am stuck with this portion for about 2 weeks now, it's really urgent to get it solved!
My observation that came through lots of trial and error, I believe that this has something to do with Windows registry!! I came to this conclusion as I uninstalled the existing Apache 2.2.11 and installed it back again, it throws me the same error that I am getting for Apache 2.4.4. Then, I matched it with the other web server, found out some differences in the registry created for 2.2.11 and changed in this one accordingly- now 2.2.11 worked fine in this web server.
ASP.NET On Apache
Jul 9, 2007I need to run asp.net on apache does anyone know how i can set this up ....
View 5 Replies View RelatedApache On Just One IP
Jan 4, 2009I currently have a dedicated server running centOS5 and webmin. With help of folks here
I was able to bind additional IP numbers using webmin.
I have a small problem now. The idea of binding the IPs was so that I could create "true port 80" shoutcast connections on the new IP numbers. However, when I try this I am taken to the control panel home page (home page to that server). The config on the shoutcast server is set properly (using proper IP #) as I have been able to listen to a stream using the new ip number's (higher ports), but not the main IP number.
My questions, I hope, are simple.
1. Am I able to use these additional IP numbers for Shoutcast Port 80 (true port 80 - only one per IP #)?
2. If yes, do I have to make Apache use ONLY my main IP number, thereby releasing the others for Port 80 use? If so, how do I do this.
Apache 2.2.14 Vs 1.3.41
Oct 20, 2009I am trying to decide on upgrading our Apache version from 1.3.41 to 2.2.14.
From what I can tell 2.2 is MUCH faster, but I have seen many reports of 2.* version crashing more frequently than 1.3.
Does anyone have some solid information on the reliability of 1.3.41 vs 2.2.14?
Also, any other items I may love/miss from upgrading?
We are running php4 (default) + 5.
Apache 2.2.11 Vs Apache Apache 2.0.63
Jun 22, 2009i am using 2.0.63 version and already having high load issue becoz of apache so should i have to upgrade to new version 2.2.11 ? is new versin liter as compared 2.0.63 please suggest what should i do know i am running a forum on the server.
View 4 Replies View RelatedApache VPS
Feb 22, 2008all i have a vps
i have a problem my apache redirect sites in same directory
my apache2.conf OS debian3.1
Code:
<VirtualHost 62.75.152.217:80>
ServerAdmin info@hideyourtracks.org
DocumentRoot /home/hideyourtracks
ServerName hideyourtracks.us
ServerAlias hideyourtracks.us
TransferLog /var/log/hideyourtracks_access.log
ErrorLog /var/log/hideyourtracks_error.log
<Directory "/home/hideyourtracks">
allow from all
Options +Indexes
</Directory>
</VirtualHost>
<VirtualHost 62.75.152.217:80>
ServerAdmin info@nopremium.org
DocumentRoot /home/nopremium
ServerName nopremium.org
ServerAlias nopremium.org
TransferLog /var/log/nopremium.org_access.log
ErrorLog /var/log/nopremium.org_error.log
<Directory "/home/nopremium">
allow from all
Options +Indexes
</Directory>
</VirtualHost>
Apache 2.0 Or 2.2
May 5, 2008Which version is more suitable for shared hosting with cPanel?
View 7 Replies View RelatedApache 1.3.xx Or 2.xx
Jan 10, 2008configuring servers but have a very big website I want to put a new box I'm building, but am not sure if I should install Apache 1.3.xx or 2.xx. I see a TON of web hosts still use Apache 1.3.xx, but it seems that most books now a days say to install Apache 2.xx.
View 3 Replies View RelatedApache 1.x Vs Apache 2.x Vs Apache 2.2.x
May 21, 2008what is the best, most secure, and fastest Apache version right now?
I have Apache 1.x installed on my server. I don't know why. I like to always use the newest and most up to date version for my site. I know the 1.x series is still being updated, but what's the difference between 1.x and 2.x and 2.2.x?
I think I may want to use 2.2.x but don't want to use compatibility etc.
My sites only use 301 redirects, modrewrite, and http hosts [url]to [url]-
if I upgrade to 2.2.x, will my sites break?
Apache/2.0.63 Or 2.2.10?
Nov 29, 2008Just took control of a fresh server which has been setup with Apache/2.0.63 with red hat and cpanel. Is there any reason not to use apache 2.2.10? I have a feeling when i question the version they will say its the most stable version they are happy with. What would be the benefits/negatives for the current version?
View 7 Replies View RelatedApache Via SSH
Jul 17, 2008rebuilding easy apache using SSH?
I'm still stuck with Ioncube problems, got [url]and you'll see what problem im having.